Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-r8qmj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-14T20:51:50.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The first mitogenome of the genus Amphalius (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae) and its phylogenetic implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2024

Ju Pu
Affiliation:
Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory for Zoonosis Control and Prevention, Institute of Pathogens and Vectors, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan, China
Xiaoxia Lin
Affiliation:
Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory for Zoonosis Control and Prevention, Institute of Pathogens and Vectors, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan, China
Wenge Dong*
Affiliation:
Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory for Zoonosis Control and Prevention, Institute of Pathogens and Vectors, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan, China
*
Corresponding author: Wenge Dong; Email: dongwenge2740@sina.com

Abstract

Amphalius spirataenius belongs to Arthropoda, Insecta, Siphonaptera, Ceratophylloidea, Ceratophyllinae, Amphalius. Only 2 species from the subfamily Ceratophyllinae have been sequenced for mitogenomes to date. The genus Amphalius mitogenome research was still blank. The A. spirataenius mitogenome was determined, annotated and analysed for the first time in this study. The 14 825 bp long genome has the typical metazoan of 37 genes with insect ancestral genome arrangement pattern. There was no significant difference in codon usage of 13 protein-coding genes: UUA, UCU, GUU, ACU and GCU were the most frequently used codons. It was found that the reason for codon preference mainly contributed to natural selection base on PR2, ENC-plot and neutrality curve analysis. Evolutionary rate, conserved sites, variable sites and nucleotide diversity analysis indicated that nad6 of A. spirataenius had the fastest evolutionary rate, while cox1 had the slowest evolutionary rate. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed based on 13 protein-coding genes and 2 rRNA genes datasets using Bayesian inference and maximum likelihood method. The phylogenetic tree supported that both Siphonaptera and Mecoptera were monophyletic, and were sister groups to each other. This study filled gap of the genus Amphalius mitogenome sequences and was of great significance for understanding evolution of the order Siphonaptera.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Distribution of the Amphalius spirataenius mitogenome

Figure 1

Figure 1. Organization of the Amphalius spirataenius mitogenome. tRNA genes were shown with the single-letter abbreviations of their corresponding amino acids. Note: The morphological figure of Ochotona thibetana from the volume 7 of The Mammals of The World (Wilson et al., 2017).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Skewness of 13 protein-coding genes of Amphalius spirataenius.

Figure 3

Table 2. Codon usage of protein-coding genes in the Amphalius spirataenius mitogenome

Figure 4

Figure 3. Relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of Amphalius spirataenius. The Y-axis represents the RSCU value, and the X-axis represents the codons corresponding to each amino acid.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Analysis of 13 protein-coding genes of Amphalius spirataenius. (A) PR2; (B) ENC-plot; (C) neutral curve.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree of 40 insect species was constructed using Bayesian methods with Philaenus spumarius as the outgroup and node values as posterior probability values (PP). Amphalius spirataenius was labelled in red.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Phylogenetic tree of 40 insect species was constructed by maximum likelihood method with Philaenus spumarius as an outgroup and node values as bootstrap values (BS). Amphalius spirataenius was labelled in red.

Supplementary material: File

Pu et al. supplementary material 1

Pu et al. supplementary material
Download Pu et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 1.7 MB
Supplementary material: File

Pu et al. supplementary material 2

Pu et al. supplementary material
Download Pu et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 19.8 KB