Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-t6st2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T07:43:27.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two processes are not necessary to understand memory deficits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2020

Adam F. Osth
Affiliation:
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC3010, Australiaadamosth@gmail.comhttps://findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/display/person768357
John C. Dunn
Affiliation:
School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA6009, Australiajohn.dunn@uwa.edu.auhttps://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/persons/john-dunn
Andrew Heathcote
Affiliation:
Discipline of Psychology, The University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, TAS7005, Australiaandrew.heathcote@utas.edu.auhttp://www.tascl.org
Roger Ratcliff
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH43210. ratcliff.22@osu.eduhttp://star.psy.ohio-state.edu

Abstract

Bastin et al. propose a dual-process model to understand memory deficits. However, results from state-trace analysis have suggested a single underlying variable in behavioral and neural data. We advocate the usage of unidimensional models that are supported by data and have been successful in understanding memory deficits and in linking to neural data.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable