Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-h8lrw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-16T00:39:59.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analyses do not support the parasite-stress theory of human sociality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2012

Thomas E. Currie
Affiliation:
Human Evolutionary Ecology Group, Department of Anthropology, University College London, London WC1H 0BW, United Kingdom. t.currie@ucl.ac.uk r.mace@ucl.ac.uk http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucsatec http://www.ucl.ac.uk/anthropology/staff/r_mace http://www.ucl.ac.uk/heeg
Ruth Mace
Affiliation:
Human Evolutionary Ecology Group, Department of Anthropology, University College London, London WC1H 0BW, United Kingdom. t.currie@ucl.ac.uk r.mace@ucl.ac.uk http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucsatec http://www.ucl.ac.uk/anthropology/staff/r_mace http://www.ucl.ac.uk/heeg

Abstract

Re-analysis of the data provided in the target article reveals a lack of evidence for a strong, universal relationship between parasite stress and the variables relating to sociality. Furthermore, even if associations between these variables do exist, the analyses presented here do not provide evidence for Fincher & Thornhill's (F&T's) proposed causal mechanism.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable