Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-rbxfs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T11:50:04.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resistant maltodextrin promotes fasting glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion and production together with glucose tolerance in rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2015

Tohru Hira*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Nutritional Biochemistry, Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Kita-9, Nishi-9, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan
Asuka Ikee
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
Yuka Kishimoto
Affiliation:
Research and Development, Matsutani Chemical Industry Company Limited, Itami, Hyogo, Japan
Sumiko Kanahori
Affiliation:
Research and Development, Matsutani Chemical Industry Company Limited, Itami, Hyogo, Japan
Hiroshi Hara
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Nutritional Biochemistry, Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Kita-9, Nishi-9, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan
*
* Corresponding author: T. Hira, fax +81 11 706 2811, email hira@chem.agr.hokudai.ac.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), which is produced and released from enteroendocrine L cells, plays pivotal roles in postprandial glycaemia. The ingestion of resistant maltodextrin (RMD), a water-soluble non-digestible saccharide, improves the glycaemic response. In the present study, we examined whether the continuous feeding of RMD to rats affected GLP-1 levels and glycaemic control. Male Sprague–Dawley rats (6 weeks of age) were fed an American Institute of Nutrition (AIN)-93G-based diet containing either cellulose (5 %) as a control, RMD (2·5 or 5 %), or fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS, 2·5 or 5 %) for 7 weeks. During the test period, an intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) was performed after 6 weeks. Fasting GLP-1 levels were significantly higher in the 5 % RMD group than in the control group after 6 weeks. The IPGTT results showed that the glycaemic response was lower in the 5 % RMD group than in the control group. Lower caecal pH, higher caecal tissue and content weights were observed in the RMD and FOS groups. Proglucagon mRNA levels were increased in the caecum and colon of both RMD and FOS groups, whereas caecal GLP-1 content was increased in the 5 % RMD group. In addition, a 1 h RMD exposure induced GLP-1 secretion in an enteroendocrine L-cell model, and single oral administration of RMD increased plasma GLP-1 levels in conscious rats. The present study demonstrates that continuous ingestion of RMD increased GLP-1 secretion and production in normal rats, which could be stimulated by its direct and indirect (enhanced gut fermentation) effects on GLP-1-producing cells, and contribute to improving glucose tolerance.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015 
Figure 0

Table 1 Composition of the test diet (g/kg diet)

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Fasting glucose (A), insulin (B), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) (D) levels and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (C) in the tail vein plasma of rats after 6 weeks of feeding the test diet. Blood samples were collected from the tail vein of rats fasted overnight after 6 weeks of feeding the test diet (15 min before intraperitoneal glucose administration). Glucose, insulin and total GLP-1 levels were measured in the plasma. HOMA-IR was calculated using glucose and insulin concentrations. To convert glucose in mg/dl to mmol/l, multiply by 0·0555. Values are means (n 7–8), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was significantly different from that of the control group (P< 0·05; Dunnett's test). RMD, resistant maltodextrin; FOS, fructo-oligosaccharides.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Plasma glucose levels in rats under the intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) after 6 weeks. After 6 weeks of feeding the test diet, an IPGTT was performed in rats fasted overnight. Glucose solution was intraperitoneally injected (1 g/kg) at 0 min, and then blood samples were collected from the tail vein. Glucose levels were measured in the plasma (A). The AUC for changes in glucose levels relative to basal levels (B) was calculated using the trapezoidal rule. To convert glucose in mg/dl to mmol/l, multiply by 0·0555. Values are means (n 7–8), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was significantly different from that of the control group at the same time point (P< 0·05; Tukey–Kramer test). a,bMean values with unlike letters were significantly different between the treatment groups (P< 0·05; Tukey–Kramer test). , Control; , 2·5 % resistant maltodextrin (RMD); , 5 % RMD; , 2·5 % fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS); , 5 % FOS.

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Portal glucose (A), insulin (B), total glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) (C), active GLP-1 (D) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) (E) levels after 7 weeks of feeding the test diet. Blood samples were collected from the portal veins of rats fasted overnight after 7 weeks of feeding the test diet, and the levels of glucose, insulin, GLP-1 (total and active) and total GIP were measured in the plasma. To convert glucose in mg/dl to mmol/l, multiply by 0·0555. Values are means (n 7–8), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,bMean values with unlike letters were significantly different between the treatment groups (P< 0·05; Tukey–Kramer test). RMD, resistant maltodextrin; FOS, fructo-oligosaccharides.

Figure 4

Fig. 4 Intestinal glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) concentrations after 7 weeks of feeding the test diet. Intestinal tissue samples were collected from the jejunum (A), ileum (B), caecum (C) and colon (D) of each rat. After acid–ethanol extraction, GLP-1 and total protein concentrations were measured. GLP-1 concentration was corrected according to the total protein content. GLP-1 content in the whole caecum (E) was calculated on the basis of the tissue weight of the whole caecum (Table 2). Values are means (n 7–8), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,b,cMean values with unlike letters were significantly different between the treatment groups (P< 0·05; Tukey–Kramer test). RMD, resistant maltodextrin; FOS, fructo-oligosaccharides.

Figure 5

Fig. 5 Proglucagon mRNA expression levels in the intestinal mucosa. Intestinal mucosa samples were scraped from the jejunum (A), ileum (B), caecum (C) and colon (D). Total RNA was used for real-time PCR analysis. Proglucagon mRNA expression levels were normalised to those of GAPDH (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase), and data are expressed as relative changes to the control group. Values are means (n 7–8), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,b,cMean values with unlike letters were significantly different between the treatment groups (P< 0·05; Tukey–Kramer test). RMD, resistant maltodextrin; FOS, fructo-oligosaccharides.

Figure 6

Fig. 6 Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion in glucagon-like peptide-1-producing cell line (GLUTag cells). Enteroendocrine GLUTag cells were exposed to various concentrations (1–20 mm) of resistant maltodextrin (RMD) or fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) for 60 min. GLP-1 concentration in the supernatant was measured by ELISA. Values are means (n 8–20), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was significantly different from that of the control (blank) treatment (P< 0·05; Tukey–Kramer test).

Figure 7

Fig. 7 Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion in response to single oral administration of resistant maltodextrin (RMD) in conscious rats. Saline (8 ml/kg, control;) or 2 g/kg of either RMD (), maltodextrin () or ZeinH () were orally administered to the fasted rats. Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein before and after oral administration. Plasma total GLP-1 concentrations were measured by ELISA. Two-way ANOVA P values were < 0·01 for time and treatment, and < 0·068 for the interaction between time and treatment. Values are means (n 6–8), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was significantly different from that of the basal (0 min) values within each treatment group (P< 0·05; Dunnett's test). a,b,cMean values with unlike letters were significantly different between the treatment groups at the same time point (P< 0·05; Tukey–Kramer test).

Figure 8

Table 2 Body weight, food intake, adipose weight, caecal weight and caecal content pH after 7 weeks of feeding the test diet (Mean values with their standard errors, n 7–8)