Book contents
- The New Cambridge History of the English Language
- The New Cambridge History of the English Language
- The New Cambridge History of the English Language
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Maps
- Contributors to Volume I
- General Preface
- Abbreviations
- General Editor’s Introduction
- Introduction to Volume I
- Part I The Context of English
- 1 The Indo-European Framework
- 2 English in Its Germanic Surrounding
- 3 Language Development in the Old English Period
- 4 The Geography of English in England
- 5 Philology and the History of English
- Part II Contact and External Influences
- Part III The Long View by Levels and Areas
- Appendix: Recommended Reading
- Index
- References
2 - English in Its Germanic Surrounding
from Part I - The Context of English
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 October 2025
Book contents
- The New Cambridge History of the English Language
- The New Cambridge History of the English Language
- The New Cambridge History of the English Language
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Maps
- Contributors to Volume I
- General Preface
- Abbreviations
- General Editor’s Introduction
- Introduction to Volume I
- Part I The Context of English
- 1 The Indo-European Framework
- 2 English in Its Germanic Surrounding
- 3 Language Development in the Old English Period
- 4 The Geography of English in England
- 5 Philology and the History of English
- Part II Contact and External Influences
- Part III The Long View by Levels and Areas
- Appendix: Recommended Reading
- Index
- References
Summary
English is a member of the Germanic subgroup of Indo-European, sharing with other Germanic languages a distinctive set of hallmarks, though recent developments have made it in some respects an outlier in this group. In addition, English shares some features with successively smaller subsets of these languages. The observed pattern of similarities and differences arises from a history of shared inheritance, divergence and subsequent interaction which can be reconstructed in detail by systematically comparing the languages, guided by a rigorous methodology. A focus of scholarship for two centuries, this enterprise has taken on renewed vitality in recent decades, informed by new understandings of the role of language contact in shaping linguistic histories. After a brief introduction to the process of comparative reconstruction and the traditional representation of the pedigree of English derived from it, this chapter will introduce the more intricate picture emerging from recent studies.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The New Cambridge History of the English LanguageContext, Contact and Development, pp. 52 - 77Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Antonsen, Elmer. 1975. A Concise Grammar of the Older Runic Inscriptions. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.10.1515/9783111411583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bech, Kristin and Walkden, George. 2014. English is (still) a West Germanic language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39: 65–100.10.1017/S0332586515000219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremmer, Rolf. 1989. Late medieval and early modern opinions on the affinity between English and Frisian: the growth of a commonplace. Folia Linguistica Historica 22: 167–192.10.1515/flih.1989.9.1.167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremmer, Rolf. 2009. An Introduction to Old Frisian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buccini, Anthony. 2010. Between pre-German and pre-English: the origin of Dutch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 22: 310–314.10.1017/S1470542710000073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCamp, David. 1958. The genesis of the Old English dialects: a new hypothesis. Language 34: 232–244.10.2307/410826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drinka, Bridget. 2014. Phylogenetic and areal models of Indo-European relatedness: the role of contact in reconstruction. Journal of Language Contact 6: 379–410.10.1163/19552629-00602009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph and Terje Faarlund, Jan. 2014. English: The Language of the Vikings. Olomouc: Palacký University.Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje and Emonds, Joseph. 2016. English as North Germanic. Language Dynamics and Change 6: 1–17.10.1163/22105832-00601002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Font-Santiago, Cristopher and Salmons, Joseph. 2016. The descent of English: West Germanic, any way you slice it. Language Dynamics and Change 6: 37–41.10.1163/22105832-00601009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooskens, Charlotte. 2020. The North Germanic dialect continuum. In Michael, T. Putnam and Page, Richard B. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 761–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grønvik, Ottar. 1998. Untersuchungen zur älteren nordischen und germanischen Sprachen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2012. Early English and the Celtic hypothesis. In Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 497–507.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1998. How young is Standard Average Indo-European? Language Sciences 20: 271–287.10.1016/S0388-0001(98)00004-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keel, William D. 2020. The West Germanic dialect continuum. In Michael, T. Putnam and Richard, B. Page (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 736–782.10.1017/9781108378291.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kortlandt, Frederik. 1986. The origin of the Old English dialects. In Kastovsky, Dieter and Szwedek, Aleksander (eds.), Linguistics across Historical and Geographical Boundaries, Vol. I. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 437–442.10.1515/9783110856132.437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kortlandt, Frederik. 1999. The origin of the Old English dialects revisited. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 49: 45–51.10.1163/18756719-051-01-90000005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markey, Thomas L. 1976a. Germanic Dialect Grouping and the Position of Ingvaeonic. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, University of Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Migdalski, Krysztof. 2016. Second Position Effects in the Syntax of Slavic and Germanic Languages. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John. 2002. What happened to English? Diachronica 19: 217–272.10.1075/dia.19.2.02whaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, William G. 1954. The stops and spirants of early Germanic. Language 30: 1–42.10.2307/410217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Hans Frede. 1981. Old English and the Continental Germanic Languages: A Survey of Morphological and Phonological Interrelations. Innsbrück: University of Innsbrück.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Hans Frede. 1998. The Continental Backgrounds of English and Its Insular Development until 1154. Odense: Odense University Press.10.1075/nss.19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Hans Frede. 2001. Frisian and the grouping of the older Germanic languages. In Munske, Horst Haider, Århammer, Nils, Volker F. Faltings, Alastair G. H. Walters and Wilts, Ommo (eds.), Handbuch des Friesischen/Handbook of Frisian Studies, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, pp. 512–523.10.1515/9783110946925.512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Donald. 2006. From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ringe, Donald. 2013. What is Old English? Unity and Diversity in West Germanic (ed. Hans Frede Nielsen and Patrick V. Stiles). Special issue of NOWELE 66.1: 127–140.10.1075/nowele.66.2.01rinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Donald and Taylor, Ann. 2014. The Development of Old English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207848.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberge, Paul. 2020. Contact in the history of the Germanic languages. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Handbook of Language Contact. Second edition. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell, p. 323–344.10.1002/9781119485094.ch16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 2014. Language Contact and the Origins of the Germanic Languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Seebold, Elmar. 1995. Wer waren die Friesen – sprachlich gesehen? [Who were the Frisians – from a language point of view?]. In Faltings, Volkert F., Walter, Alastair G. H. and Williams, Ommo (eds.), Friesische Studien II. Odense: Odense University Press, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Seebold, Elmar. 2013. Die Aufgliederung der germanischen Sprachen. NOWELE 66: 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siebs, Theodor. 1901. Geschichte der friesischen Sprache. Pauls Grundriss der germanischen Philologie. Second edition. Vol. I. Strasbourg: K. J. Trübner, pp. 1152–1464.Google Scholar
Stenbrenden, Gjertrud Flermoen. 2016. Why English is not dead: a rejoinder to Emonds and Faarlund. Folia Linguistica Historica 37: 239–279.10.1515/flih-2016-0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, Patrick. 1995. Remarks on the ‘Anglo-Frisian’ thesis. In Faltings, Volkert F., Walter, Alastair G. H. and Williams, Ommo (eds.), Friesische Studien II. Odense: Odense University Press, pp. 177–220.10.1075/nss.12.11stiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, Patrick. 2013. The Pan-West Germanic isoglosses and the sub-relationships of West Germanic to the other branches. NOWELE 66: 5–38.10.1075/nowele.66.1.02stiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. and Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520912793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 2001. Language Contact: An Introduction. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
van Coetsem, Frans. 1988. Loan Phonology and the Two Transfer Types in Language Contact. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110884869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Coetsem, Frans. 2000. A General and Unified Theory of the Transmission Process in Language Contact. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 2010. Contact and prehistory: the Indo-European Northwest. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 380–406.10.1002/9781444318159.ch19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this chapter
conforms to version 2.0 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic
(A)
level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.