Book contents
- The Cultural Politics of Digital User Experience Writing
- The Cultural Politics of Digital User Experience Writing
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- I Mapping the Profession: The Language Work of UX Writers
- II Establishing Status
- III Producing Little Texts
- Conclusion
- Appendices
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 July 2025
Book contents
- The Cultural Politics of Digital User Experience Writing
- The Cultural Politics of Digital User Experience Writing
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- I Mapping the Profession: The Language Work of UX Writers
- II Establishing Status
- III Producing Little Texts
- Conclusion
- Appendices
- References
- Index
- References
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cultural Politics of Digital User Experience Writing , pp. 186 - 206Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, T. L. (2010). Profession: A useful concept for sociological analysis? Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 47(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.2010.01222.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, T. L. (2018). Theorizing professions. In Regulating professions: The emergence of professional self-regulation in four Canadian provinces (pp. 15–36). University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams-Thies, B. (2012). Fluid bodies or bodily fluids: Bodily reconfigurations in cybersex. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 1(2), 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.1.2.03adaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, A. (1999). Register. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9(1/2), 216–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, K. (2013). Skilling the self: The communicability of immigrants as flexible labour. In Duchêne, A., Moyer, M., & Roberts, C. (Eds.), Language, migration and social inequalities (pp. 55–81). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783091010-004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In Lenin and philosophy and other essays (pp. 127–186). Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, B., & Borges-Rey, E. (2019). Encoding the UX: User interface as a site of encounter between data journalists and their constructed audiences. Digital Journalism, 7(9), 1253–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1607520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Languaging when contexts collapse: Audience design in social networking. Discourse, Context & Media, 4–5, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2014.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrivé, M. (2020). Visibilizing invisibility, an introduction. InMedia, 8(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4000/inmedia.2683Google Scholar
Ash, J., Anderson, B., Gordon, R., & Langley, P. (2017). Unit, vibration, tone: A post-phenomenological method for researching digital interfaces. Cultural Geographies 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474017726556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, S., & Carter, R. (2011). Creativity in speech. In Gee, J. P. & Handford, M. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 315–325). Routledge.Google Scholar
Ayaß, R. (2014). Using media as involvement shields. Journal of Pragmatics, 72, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (M. Holquist & C. Emerson, Eds.; V. W. McGee, Trans.). University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, K. M. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, J. N., & Bielby, W. T. (1986). The proliferation of job titles in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(4), 561–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, J. M., Bergstrøm, R., & Foss-Madsen, R. (2021). Are you sure, you want a cookie? – The effects of choice architecture on users’ decisions about sharing private online data. Computers in Human Behavior, 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2), 145–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Polity.Google Scholar
Bermejo Fernandez, C., Chatzopoulos, D., Papadopoulos, D., & Hui, P. (2021). This website uses nudging: MTurk workers’ behaviour on cookie consent notices. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3476087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettivia, R. S. (2016). Seeing the unseen: The politics and privileges of invisibility and opacity in the digital archive. In Rodríguez Ortega, N., Díez-Platas, F., & Kuivakari, S. (Eds.), Airing the past: Inquiries into digital memories (pp. 1–11). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9781848884953_002Google Scholar
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088307313177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (2012). Creative exploitation of socio-pragmatic space in professional discourse. In Jones, R. H. (Ed.), Discourse and creativity (pp. 75–91). Pearson.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (2016). Creativity and interdiscursive performance in professional communication. In Jones, R. H. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 158–169). Routledge.Google Scholar
Bivens, R. (2017). The gender binary will not be deprogrammed: Ten years of coding gender on Facebook. New Media & Society, 19(6), 880–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815621527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, D. (2017). Political economy in applied linguistics research. Language Teaching, 50(1), 32–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, D. (2018). What on earth is ‘language commodification’? In Schmenk, B., Breidbach, S., & Küster, L. (Eds.), Sloganization in language education discourse (pp. 121–141). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788921879-008Google Scholar
Block, D. (2021). Coda: Issues arising around conceptual and empirical work on the commodification of language. In Petrovic, J. E. & Yazan, B. (Eds.), The commodification of language: Conceptual concerns and empirical manifestations (pp. 200–211). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2013). Writing as a sociolinguistic object. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 17(4), 440–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J., & Jie, D. (2010). Ethnographic fieldwork: A beginner’s guide. Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J., & Rampton, B. (2011). Language and superdiversity. Diversities, 13(2), 1–21.Google Scholar
Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms (2nd ed). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolander, B., & Locher, M. A. (2020). Beyond the online offline distinction: Entry points to digital discourse. Discourse, Context & Media, 35, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolchini, D. (2015). User experience and usability. In Cantoni, L. & Danowski, J. A. (Eds.), Communication and technology (pp. 233–248). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110271355-014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollini, L. (2017). Beautiful interfaces: From user experience to user interface design. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S89–S101. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. A. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Borning, A., Friedman, B., & Logler, N. (2020). The ‘invisible’ materiality of information technology. Communications of the ACM, 63(6), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/3360647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information, 16(6), 645–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In Richardson, J. E. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (Thompson, J. B., Ed.; G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1989). Towards a reflexive sociology: A workshop with Pierre Bourdieu. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 26–63.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boutet, J. (2012). Language workers: Emblematic figures of late capitalism. In Duchêne, A. & Heller, M. (Eds.), Language in late capitalism: Pride and profit (pp. 207–229). Routledge.Google Scholar
Boutet, J., & Heller, M. (2007). Enjeux sociaux de la sociolinguistique: Pour une sociolinguistique critique. Langage et société, 121–122(3–4), 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, M. S. (2014). (New) participatory framework on YouTube? Commenter interaction in US political speeches. Journal of Pragmatics, 72, 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. In Burgess, J., Marwick, A., & Poell, T. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social media (pp. 233–253). Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2016). Embodied sociolinguistics. In Coupland, N. (Ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates (pp. 173–197). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, B. (2006). Language biographies: Approaches to multilingualism in education and linguistic research. In Busch, B., Jardina, A., & Tjoutuku, A. (Eds.), Language biographies for multilingual learning (pp. 5–18). PRAESA Occasional Papers.Google Scholar
Busch, B. (2012). The linguistic repertoire revisited. Applied Linguistics, 33(5), 503–523. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In Knorr Cetina, K. & Cicourel, A. V. (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro and macro sociologies (pp. 277–303). Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (2000a). Good to talk? Living and working in a communication culture. Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D. (2000b). Styling the worker: Gender and the commodification of language in the globalized service economy. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(3), 323–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D. (2012). Verbal hygiene. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candlin, C. N., & Sarangi, S. (2003). Introduction: Trading between reflexivity and relevance: New challenges for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 24(3), 271–285.Google Scholar
Candlin, S. (2003). Issues arising when the professional workplace is the site of applied linguistic research. Applied Linguistics, 24(3), 386–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmi, E. (2021). A feminist Critique to digital consent. Seminar.Net, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.4291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnegie, T. A. M. (2009). Interface as exordium: The rhetoric of interactivity. Computers and Composition, 26(3), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2009.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2004). Talking, creating: Interactional language, creativity, and context. Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 62–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.1.62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catenaccio, P., Cotter, C., De Smedt, M., Garzone, G., Jacobs, G., Macgilchrist, F., Lams, L., Perrin, D., Richardson, J. E., van Hout, T., & van Praet, E. (2011). Towards a linguistics of news production. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(7), 1843–1852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazden, C. B. (1970). Children’s questions: Their forms, functions and roles in education. Young Children, 25(4), 202–220.Google Scholar
Cekaite, A., & Mondada, L. (Eds.). (2020). Touch in social interaction: Touch, language and body. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chik, A. (2015). Recreational language learning and digital practices: Positioning and repositioning. In Jones, R. H., Chik, A., & Hafner, C. A. (Eds.), Discourse and digital practices: Doing discourse analysis in the digital age (pp. 112–129). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. (2016). Content strategy: An integrative literature review. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 59(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2537080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornips, L., & van den Hengel, L. (2021). Place-making by cows in an intensive dairy farm: A sociolinguistic approach to nonhuman animal agency. In Bovenkerk, B. & Keulartz, J. (Eds.), Animals in our midst: The challenges of co-existing with animals in the anthropocene (pp. 177–201). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63523-7_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. (2001). Dialect stylization in radio talk. Language in Society, 30(3), 345–375. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404501003013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, F. (2015). What is ‘post-digital’? In Berry, D. M. & Dieter, M. (Eds.), Postdigital aesthetics (pp. 12–26). Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Criado Perez, C. (2019). Invisible women: Exposing data bias in a world designed for men. Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Cuskley, C., Simner, J., & Kirby, S. (2017). Phonological and orthographic influences in the bouba–kiki effect. Psychological Research, 81(1), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0709-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Percio, A., Flubacher, M., & Duchêne, A. (2017). Language and political economy. In García, O., Flores, N., & Spotti, M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and society (pp. 55–75). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dieter, M. (2015). Dark patterns: Interface design, augmentation and crisis. In Berry, D. M. & Dieter, M. (Eds.), Postdigital aesthetics: Art, computation and design (pp. 163–178). Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dieter, M., & Tkacz, N. (2020). The patterning of finance/security: A designerly walkthrough of challenger banking apps. Computational Culture, 7. http://computationalculture.net/the-patterning-of-finance-security/Google Scholar
Djonov, E., & van Leeuwen, T. (2013). Between the grid and composition: Layout in PowerPoint’s design and use. Semiotica, 2013(197), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2013-0078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djonov, E., & van Leeuwen, T. (2017). The power of semiotic software: A critical multimodal perspective. In Flowerdew, J. & Richardson, J. E. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 566–581). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorschel, R. (2022). Reconsidering digital labour: Bringing tech workers into the debate. New Technology, Work and Employment, 37(2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draucker, F. (2015). Participation structures in Twitter interaction. In Dynel, M. & Chovanec, J. (Eds.), Participation in public and social media interactions (pp. 49–66). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Droz-dit-Busset, O. (forthcoming). Disrupting the economies of language work? Social media influencers as ‘new generation’ copywriters. Routledge.Google Scholar
Duchêne, A. (2011). Neoliberalism, social inequalities, and multilingualism: The exploitation of linguistic resources and speakers. Langage et société, 136(2), 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchêne, A. (2020). Unequal language work(ers) in the business of words. In Thurlow, C. (Ed.), The business of words: Wordsmiths, linguists, and other language workers (pp. 23–35). Routledge.Google Scholar
Duchêne, A., & Heller, M. (Eds.). (2012). Language in late capitalism: Pride and profit. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Due, B. L., & Licoppe, C. (2020). Video-mediated interaction (VMI): Introduction to a special issue on the multimodal accomplishment of VMI institutional activities. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v3i3.123836Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (1996). Vowels and nail polish: The emergence of linguistic style in the preadolescent heterosexual marketplace. In Warner, N., Ahlers, J., Bilmes, L., Oliver, M., Wertheim, S., & Chen, M. (Eds.), Gender and belief systems: Proceedings of the fourth Berkeley women and language conference (pp. 183–190). Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
Ehrensberger-Dow, M., Heeb, A. H., Jud, P., & Angelone, E. (2017). Insights from translation process research in the workplace. In Perrin, D. & Kleinberger, U. (Eds.), Doing applied linguistics: Enabling transdisciplinary communication (pp. 116–123). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110496604-014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, S. (2019). ‘Well, I saw the picture’: Semiotic ideologies and the unsettling of normative conceptions of female sexuality in the Steubenville rape trial. Gender and Language, 13(2), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.35019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenlauer, V. (2014). Facebook as a third author – (Semi-)automated participation framework in Social Network Sites. Journal of Pragmatics, 72, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1999). Global capitalism and critical awareness of language. Language Awareness, 8(2), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658419908667119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishkin, K. P., Moran, T. P., & Harrison, B. L. (1999). Embodied user interfaces: Towards invisible user interfaces. In Chatty, S. & Dewan, P. (Eds.), Engineering for human-computer interaction (pp. 1–18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35349-4_1Google Scholar
Florida, R. (2012). The rise of the creative class – revisited: 10th anniversary edition. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Flubacher, M.-C., Coray, R., & Duchêne, A. (2016). Language, integration, and investment: The regulation of diversity in the context of unemployment. Multilingua, 35(6), 675–696. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2015-0075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foord, J. (2009). Strategies for creative industries: An international review. Creative Industries Journal, 1(2), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.1386/cij.1.2.91_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1972). The archeology of knowledge: And the discourse on language (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). Random House.Google Scholar
Fournier, V. (1999). The appeal to ‘professionalism’ as a disciplinary mechanism. The Sociological Review, 47(2), 280–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frame, A., & Brachotte, G. (2015). Le tweet stratégique: Use of Twitter as a PR tool by French politicians. Public Relations Review, 41(2), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freidson, E. (1983). The theory of professions: State of the art. In Dingwall, R. & Lewis, P. (Eds.), The sociology of the professions (pp. 19–37). Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friz, A., & Gehl, R. W. (2016). Pinning the feminine user: Gender scripts in Pinterest’s sign-up interface. Media, Culture & Society, 38(5), 686–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715620925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2006). Postscript: Computer-mediated communication in sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(4), 548–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00292.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A., & Spilioti, T. (Eds.). (2016). The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication. Routledge.Google Scholar
Gershon, I. (2010). Media ideologies: An introduction. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 20(2), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2010.01070.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, M. H., & Alim, H. S. (2010). “Whatever (neck roll, eye roll, teeth suck)”: The situated coproduction of social categories and identities through stancetaking and transmodal stylization. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 20(1), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2010.01056.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gormley, K. (2020). Neoliberalism and the discursive construction of ‘creativity’. Critical Studies in Education, 61(3), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2018.1459762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M., Berg, J. M., & Cable, D. M. (2014). Job titles as identity badges: How self-reflective titles can reduce emotional exhaustion. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1201–1225. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, C. M., Kou, Y., Battles, B., Hoggatt, J., & Toombs, A. L. (2018). The dark (patterns) side of UX design. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, M. L., & Suri, S. (2019). Ghost work: How to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Gunnarsson, B.-L., Linell, P., & Nordberg, B. (Eds.). (1997). The construction of professional discourse. Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Hafner, C. A. (2015). Co-constructing identity in virtual worlds for children. In Jones, R. H., Chik, A., & Hafner, C. A. (Eds.), Discourse and digital practices: Doing discourse analysis in the digital age (pp. 97–111). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Håkanson, L. (2007). Creating knowledge: The power and logic of articulation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(1), 51–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtl033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, C., Sarangi, S., & Slembrouck, S. (1999). The legitimation of the client and the profession: Identities and roles in social work discourse. In Sarangi, S. & Roberts, C. (Eds.), Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings (pp. 293–322). Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, K., Borba, R., & Hiramoto, M. (2020). Language and gender. In Stanlaw, J. (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of linguistic anthropology (pp. 1–22). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786093.iela0143Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. University Park Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Appendix 2: A note on the grammar of little texts. In An introduction to functional grammar (pp. 372–377). Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hanks, W. F. (2005). Pierre Bourdieu and the practices of language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, D., & Goodeve, T. (1998). How like a leaf: An interview with Thyrza Nichols Goodeve. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315022888Google Scholar
Hart-Davidson, W., Spinuzzi, C., & Zachry, M. (2006). Visualizing writing activity as knowledge work: Challenges & opportunities. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Design of Communication – SIGDOC’06, 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/1166324.1166341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassenzahl, M. (2008). User experience (UX): Towards an experiential perspective on product quality. Proceedings of the 20th Conference on l’Interaction Homme-Machine – IHM’08, 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/1512714.1512717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausendorf, H. (2009). Kleine Texte – über Randerscheinungen von Textualität. Germanistik in Der Schweiz, 6, 5–19.Google Scholar
Heller, M. (2003). Globalization, the new economy, and the commodification of language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(4), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2003.00238.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, M. (2010a). Language as resource in the globalized new economy. In Coupland, N. (Ed.), The handbook of language and globalization (pp. 349–365). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heller, M. (2010b). The commodification of language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, M., & Duchêne, A. (2016). Treating langauge as an economic resource: Discourse, data and debate. In Coupland, N. (Ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates (pp. 139–156). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, M., Pujolar, J., & Duchêne, A. (2014). Linguistic commodification in tourism. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(4), 539–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbrechter, S., Callus, I., de Bruin-Molé, M., Grech, M., Müller, C. J., & Rossini, M. (2020). Critical posthumanism: An overview. In Herbrechter, S., Callus, I., Rossini, M., Grech, M., de Bruin-Molé, M., & John Müller, C. (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of critical posthumanism (pp. 1–24). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herring, S., Stein, D., & Virtanen, T. (Eds.). (2013). Pragmatics of computer-mediated communication. De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, T., & Perrin, D. (2014). Beyond single modes and media: Writing as an ongoing multimodal text production. In Jakobs, E.-M. & Perrin, D. (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (pp. 231–253). De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, J. (2020). The concept of affordances in digital media. In Friese, H., Nolden, M., Rebane, G., & Schreiter, M. (Eds.), Handbuch Soziale Praktiken und Digitale Alltagswelten (pp. 47–54). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08357-1_67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hounshell, J., & Todd, E. (2016). The invisible interface: Traditional design principles in modern electronic design. 20th International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV), 375–379. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2016.32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovens, D. (2022). Breakdowns and assemblages: Including machine-actants in sociolinguistic ethnographies of blue-collar work environments. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 27(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irani, L. C., & Silberman, M. S. (2013). Turkopticon: Interrupting worker invisibility in amazon mechanical turk. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 611–620. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, J. T. (1989). When talk isn’t cheap: Language and political economy. American Ethnologist, 16(2), 248–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, J. T., & Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, P. V. (Ed.), Regimes of language (pp. 35–83). School of American Research.Google Scholar
Ivanova, M., Bronowicka, J., Kocher, E., & Degner, A. (2018). Foodora and Deliveroo: The app as a boss? Control and autonomy in app-based management – the case of food delivery riders. Working Paper Forschungsförderung, 107, 1–51.Google Scholar
Jacobs, G. (2020). Unwriteable discourse? Co-crafting the language of science news. In Thurlow, C. (Ed.), The business of words: Wordsmiths, linguists, and other language workers (pp. 53–66). Routledge.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. (2020). Framing elite knowledge in shifting linguistic economies: The case of minority language translation. In Thurlow, C. (Ed.), The business of words: Wordsmiths, linguists, and other language workers (pp. 141–162). Routledge.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, T. A. (Ed.), Style in Language (pp. 350–377). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jandrić, P., & Knox, J. (2021). The postdigital turn: Philosophy, education, research. Policy Futures in Education, 20(7), 780–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103211062713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Hayes, S. (2018). Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jandrić, P., MacKenzie, A., & Knox, J. (2022). Postdigital research: Genealogies, challenges, and future perspectives. Postdigital Science and Education 6(1), n.p.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00306-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, A. (2017). Epilogue: The moiré effect and the art of assemblage. Social Semiotics, 27(4), 532–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1334405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, J. (2013). IT and experiences: User experience, experience design and user-experience design. In Sundbo, J. & Sørensen, F. (Eds.), Handbook on the experience economy (pp. 179–208). Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Joerges, B. (1999). Do politics have artefacts? Social Studies of Science, 29(3), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631299029003004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2004). The problem of context in computer mediated communication. In LeVine, P. & Scollon, R. (Eds.), Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis (pp. 20–33). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2009). Dancing, skating and sex: Action and text in the digital age. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 6(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v6i3.283Google Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2010). Creativity and discourse. World Englishes, 29(4), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2010.01675.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2011). C me Sk8: Discourse, technology, and “bodies without organs”. In Thurlow, C. & Mroczek, K. (Eds.), Digital discourse: Language in the new media (pp. 321–339). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2012). Introduction: Discourse and creativity. In Jones, R. H. (Ed.), Discourse and creativity (pp. 1–13). Pearson.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2015). Discourse, cybernetics, and the entextualisation of the self. In Jones, R. H., Chik, A., & Hafner, C. A. (Eds.), Discourse and digital practices: Doing discourse analysis in the digital age (pp. 28–47). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2016). Creativity and discourse analysis. In Jones, R. H. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 61–77). Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2020a). Accounting for surveillance. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 24(1), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2020b). The rise of the pragmatic web: Implications for rethinking meaning and interaction. In Tagg, C. & Evans, M. (Eds.), Message and medium: English language practices across old and new media (pp. 17–37). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110670837-003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2020c). Towards an embodied visual semiotics: Negotiating the right to look. In Thurlow, C., Dürscheid, C., & Diémoz, F. (Eds.), Visualizing digital discourse: Interactional, institutional and ideological perspectives (pp. 19–42). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501510113-002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2021). The text is reading you: Teaching language in the age of the algorithm. Linguistics and Education, 62, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2022a). Is my mobile phone listening to me? Conspiratorial thinking, digital literacies, and everyday encounters with surveillance. In Demata, M., Zorzi, V., & Zottola, A. (Eds.), Conspiracy theory discourses (pp. 49–70). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2022b). Synthetic embodiment and metapragmatic entanglements: Mediated discourse beyond binaries. Sociolinguistics Symposium 24, Ghent, Belgium.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H., Bhatia, V. K., Bremner, S., & Peirson-Smith, A. (2012). Creative collaboration in the public relations industry. In Jones, R. H. (Ed.), Discourse and creativity (pp. 93–107). Pearson.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H., Chik, A., & Hafner, C. A. (Eds.). (2015). Discourse and digital practices: Doing discourse analysis in the digital age. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalin, N. M. (2016). We’re all creatives now: Democratized creativity and education. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 13(2), 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlander, D. (2017). Roads to regimentation: Place, authenticity and the metapragmatics of naming. Language & Communication, 53, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, W. (2003). Semiotics and the social analysis of material things. Language & Communication, 23(3), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00010-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, W. (2018). On semiotic ideology. Signs and Society, 6(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1086/695387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, E. (2005). Homo prostheticus: Problematizing the notions of activity and computermediated interaction. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 527–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, E., & Mirus, G. (2003). American Sign Language in virtual space: Interactions between deaf users of computer-mediated video communication and the impact of technology on language practices. Language in Society, 32(5), 693–714. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404503325047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, E., & Sunakawa, C. (2010). Participation cues: Coordinating activity and collaboration in complex online gaming worlds. Language in Society, 39(3), 331–356. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly-Holmes, H. (2014). Linguistic fetish: The sociolinguistics of visual multilingualism. In Machin, D. (Ed.), Visual communication (pp. 135–151). De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly-Holmes, H. (2020). The linguistic business of marketing. In Thurlow, C. (Ed.), The business of words: Wordsmiths, linguists, and other language workers (pp. 36–50). Routledge.Google Scholar
Kendrick, M. (2005). Invisibility, race, and the interface. Rhetoric Review, 24(4), 395–399.Google Scholar
Kirschenbaum, M. G. (2012). Mechanisms: New media and the forensic imagination. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Knoblauch, H. (2005). Focused ethnography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.20Google Scholar
Knox, J. (2019). What does the ‘postdigital’ mean for education? Three critical perspectives on the digital, with implications for educational research and practice. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(2), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438–019-00045-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolko, B. E., Nakamura, L., & Rodman, G. B. (Eds.). (2000). Race in cyberspace. Routledge.Google Scholar
Koller, V. (2017). Language awareness and language workers. Language Awareness, 27(1–2), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2017.1406491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskinen, K. (2000). Beyond ambivalence: Postmodernity and the ethics of translation [PhD thesis]. University of Tampere.Google Scholar
Kou, Y., & Gray, C. M. (2018). Towards professionalization in an online community of emerging occupation: Discourses among UX practitioners. Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork, 322–334. https://doi.org/10.1145/3148330.3148352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraft, K. (2020). Trajectory of a language broker: Between privilege and precarity. International Journal of Multilingualism, 17(1), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2020.1682256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2009). The multilingual subject: What foreign language learners say about their experience and why it matters. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2021). Language as symbolic power. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108869386Google Scholar
Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203992692Google Scholar
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970034Google Scholar
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Arnold.Google Scholar
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd edition). Routledge. (Original work published 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krug, S. (2014). Don’t make me think, revisited: A common sense approach to Web usability (3rd edition). New Riders. (Original work published 2000)Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, M. (2011). Ethnography and critical discourse analysis: Towards a problem-oriented research dialogue. Critical Discourse Studies, 8(4), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2011.601630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvåle, G. (2018). Expressing identity in Microsoft Word: A critical discussion of the stylistic normativity of templates and software. In Johannessen, C. M. & van Leeuwen, T. (Eds.), The materiality of writing: A trace-making perspective (pp. 157–174). Routledge.Google Scholar
Lamb, G. (2020). Towards a green applied linguistics: Human–sea turtle semiotic assemblages in Hawai‘i. Applied Linguistics, 41(6), 922–946. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, G., & Higgins, C. (2020). Posthumanism and its implications for discourse studies. In De Fina, A. & Georgakopoulou, A. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of discourse studies (1st edition, pp. 350–370). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landqvist, M. (2019). Semiotic spaces in antidiscriminatory political discourse: Naming practices as indexes. Language in Society, 48(5), 721–743. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404519000459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1984). The powers of association. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00115.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1990). Technology is society made durable. The Sociological Review, 38(1), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03350.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazar, M. (2007). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, E.-J., & Shin, S. Y. (2014). When the medium is the message: How transportability moderates the effects of politicians’ Twitter communication. Communication Research, 41(8), 1088–1110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lialina, O. (2019). Once again, the doorknob: Affordance, forgiveness, and ambiguity in human-computer interaction and human-robot interaction. Media Theory, 3(1), 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Licoppe, C., & Morel, J. (2012). Video-in-interaction: “Talking heads” and the multimodal organization of mobile and skype video calls. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(4), 399–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.724996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, A. J. (2011). An introduction to conversation analysis (2nd ed.). Continuum.Google Scholar
Liep, J. (Ed.). (2001). Introduction. In Locating cultural creativity (pp. 1–13). Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt18fs9q6Google Scholar
Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T. (2013). The sociolinguistics of writing. Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T., & Maybin, J. (2017). Introduction: The dynamics of textual trajectories in professional and workplace practice. Text & Talk, 37(4), 409–414. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2017-0017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, S. (1999). New media, new audiences? New Media & Society, 1(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444899001001010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lønsmann, D., & Kraft, K. (2017). Language in blue-collar workplaces. In B. Vine (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language in the workplace (pp. 138–149). Routledge.Google Scholar
Lorimer, H. (2005). Cultural geography: The busyness of being ‘more-than-representational’. Progress in Human Geography, 29(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph531prCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, E., & Birrell, E. (2022). Prospective consent: The effect of framing on cookie consent decisions. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macgilchrist, F. (2017). Textbook production: The entangled practices of developing educational media for schools (Eckert. Dossiers 15). Georg Eckert Institute for International Textbook Research. http://repository.gei.de/bitstream/handle/11428/267/ED15_Macgilchrist_Production.pdfGoogle Scholar
Macgilchrist, F. (2020). Beyond the academic ‘but’: The pleasures and politics of collaborative language work in the publishing industry. In Thurlow, C. (Ed.), The business of words: Wordsmiths, linguists, and other language workers (pp. 163–178). Routledge.Google Scholar
Macgilchrist, F., Ahlrichs, J., Mielke, P., & Richtera, R. (2017). Memory practices and colonial discourse: On text trajectories and lines of flight. Critical Discourse Studies, 14(4), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1325382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macgilchrist, F., & van Hout, T. (2011). Ethnographic discourse analysis and social science. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-12.1.1600Google Scholar
Machuletz, D., & Böhme, R. (2020). Multiple purposes, multiple problems: A user study of consent dialogs after GDPR. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2020(2), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2020-0037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, C. D. (2017). Multimodality, synaesthesia and intersemiotic translation. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 55, 7–9. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v0i55.25899Google Scholar
Mapes, G. (2021). Elite authenticity: Remaking distinction in food discourse. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mapes, G. (2023). The life of a political speech(writer): Metadiscursive text trajectories in high-end language work. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 33(3), 231–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marwick, A. E. (2013). Status update: Celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social media age. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. (2019). Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Erster Band. Felix Meiner Verlag. (Original work published 1867)Google Scholar
Maryns, K., & Blommaert, J. (2002). Pretextuality and pretextual gaps: On de/refining linguistic inequality. Pragmatics, 12(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.12.1.02marGoogle Scholar
Massanari, A. L. (2007). In context: Information architects, politics, and interdisciplinarity [PhD thesis]. University of Washington.Google Scholar
Massanari, A. L. (2010). Designing for imaginary friends: Information architecture, personas and the politics of user-centered design. New Media & Society, 12(3), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809346722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathier, M. (2024). Postdigital disconnects: The discursive formation of technology in education. Routledge.Google Scholar
Maybin, J., & Swann, J. (2007). Everyday creativity in language: Textuality, contextuality, and critique. Applied Linguistics, 28(4), 497–517. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCorkle, B. (2017). Resisting the “natural”: Rhetorical delivery and the natural user interface. In Miller, C. R. & Kelly, A. R. (Eds.), Emerging genres in new media environments (pp. 99–115). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40295-6_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGill, K. (2013). Political economy and language: A review of some recent literature. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 23(2), 84–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Y., Schäwel, J., & Krämer, N. C. (2020). The shorter the better? Effects of privacy policy length on online privacy decision-making. Media and Communication, 8(2), 291–301. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, G. (2015). Apps, adults and young children: Researching digital literacy practices in context. In Jones, R. H., Chik, A., & Hafner, C. A. (Eds.), Discourse and digital practices: Doing discourse analysis in the digital age (pp. 143–157). Routledge.Google Scholar
Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1999). Authority in language: Investigating standard English (3rd edition). Routledge.Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2011). Understanding as an embodied, situated and sequential achievement in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 542–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteiro, M. (2019). Ruined by design: How designers destroyed the world, and what we can do to fix it. Mule Design.Google Scholar
Monteiro, S. (2017). The fabric of interface: Mobile media, design, and gender. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morson, G. S. (2006). Addressivity. In Brown, K. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (2nd edition, pp. 55–58). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00389-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moschini, I., & Sindoni, M. G. (2021). Language as the tip of the iceberg? Shedding a critical light on ‘hidden’ discourse in digital platforms. Discourse, Context & Media, 42, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosco, V. (1996). The political economy of communication: Rethinking and renewal. Sage.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. M. (2012). Transmodality and temporality in design interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(14), 1966–1981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, G. (1992). Textbooks and the sociology of scientific knowledge. English for Specific Purposes, 11(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(92)90003-SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, L. (2008). Cyberrace. PMLA, 123(5), 1673–1682. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2008.123.5.1673Google Scholar
Nash, K. (2001). The ‘cultural turn’ in social theory: Towards a theory of cultural politics. Sociology, 35(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0038038501000050Google Scholar
Norman, D. A. (1990). Why interfaces don’t work. In Laurel, B. (Ed.), The art of human computer interface design (pp. 209–219). Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Norman, D. A. (1998). The invisible computer: Why good products can fail, the personal computer is so complex, and information appliances are the solution. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Norman, D. A. (2002). The design of everyday things. Basic Books. (Original work published 1988)Google Scholar
Norman, D. A., & Nielsen, J. (2021). The definition of user experience (UX). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/definition-user-experience/Google Scholar
Norrick, N. R. (2016). Language play in conversation. In Bell, N. (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on language play (pp. 11–46). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501503993-002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, S. (2012). The creation of a community artist in everyday life: Long-duration process and creative actions. In Jones, R. H. (Ed.), Discourse and creativity (pp. 143–163). Pearson.Google Scholar
Norris, S., & Jones, R. H. (Eds.). (2005). Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyström, S. (2009). The dynamics of professional identity formation: Graduates’ transitions from higher education to working life. Vocations and Learning, 2(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-008-9014-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odell, L., & Goswami, D. (1982). Writing in a non-academic setting. Research in the Teaching of English, 16(3), 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, K. (2022). Posthumanism and corpus linguistics. In O’Keeffe, A. & McCarthy, M. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 675–692). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opel, D. S., & Hart-Davidson, W. (2019). The primary care clinic as writing space. Written Communication, 36(3), 348–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319839968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Shaugnessy, J., & O’Shaughnessy, N. (2003). Persuasion in advertising. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203299982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, T. (2014). Skeuomorphism or flat design: Future directions in mobile device User Interface (UI) design education. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2014.062350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkin, F. (1979). Marxism and class theory: A bourgeois critique. Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Patterson, D., & Costain, S. (2015). The effectiveness of transient user interface components. User Interfaces, 162, 3–10.Google Scholar
Peck, A., & Stroud, C. (2015). Skinscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1–2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.08pecCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2018b). Posthumanist applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw016Google Scholar
Pennycook, A., & Otsuji, E. (2015). Making scents of the landscape. Linguistic Landscape, 1(3), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.3.01penCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepperell, R., & Punt, M. (2000). The postdigital membrane: Imagination, technology and desire. Intellect.Google Scholar
Perrin, D., & Kleinberger, U. (Eds.). (2017). Doing applied linguistics: Enabling transdisciplinary communication. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110496604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrick, E. R. (2020). A historiography of human–computer interaction. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 42(4), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAHC.2020.3009080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrovic, J. E., & Yazan, B. (2021a). Language as instrument, resource, and maybe capital, but not commodity: A Marxian clarification. In Petrovic, J. E. & Yazan, B. (Eds.), The commodification of language: Conceptual concerns and empirical manifestations (pp. 24–40). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrovic, J. E., & Yazan, B. (Eds.). (2021b). The commodification of language: Conceptual concerns and empirical manifestations. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietikäinen, S. (2021). Powered by assemblage: Language for multiplicity. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2021(267–268), 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-0074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piller, I. (2001). Identity constructions in multilingual advertising. Language in Society, 30(2), 153–186. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404501002019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pink, S., & Morgan, J. (2013). Short-term ethnography: Intense routes to knowing. Symbolic Interaction, 36(3), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porcello, T. (2004). Speaking of sound: Language and the professionalization of sound-recording engineers. Social Studies of Science, 34(5), 733–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312704047328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portmann, L. (2022). Crafting an audience: UX writing, user stylization, and the symbolic violence of little texts. Discourse, Context & Media, 48, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postill, J. (2016). Remote ethnography: Studying culture from afar. In L. Hjorth, H. Horst, A. Galloway, & G. Bell (Eds.), The Routledge companion to digital ethnography (pp. 61–69). Routledge.Google Scholar
Poulsen, S. V., Kvåle, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2018). Special issue: Social media as semiotic technology. Social Semiotics, 28(5), 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1509815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, D. R. (1996). Whaddayaknow?: The modes of folk linguistic awareness. Language Awareness, 5(1), 40–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.1996.9959890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Procházka, O. (2019). Making sense of Facebook’s content moderation: A posthumanist perspective on communicative competence and internet memes. Signs and Society, 7(3), 362–397. https://doi.org/10.1086/704763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pucheu, D. (2016). Effacer l’interface: Une trajectoire du design l’interaction homme-machine. Interfaces Numériques, 5(2), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.25965/interfaces-numeriques.3044Google Scholar
Puzey, G., & Kostanski, L. (Eds.). (2016). Names and naming: People, places, perceptions and power. Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia—A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(12), 3–34.Google Scholar
Redish, J. (1995). Adding value as a professional technical communicator. Technical Communication, 42(1), 26–39.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. T. (2019). Behind the screen: Content moderation in the shadows of social media. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Roderick, I. (2016). Critical discourse studies and technology: A multimodal approach to analysing technoculture. Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Ross, A. (1990). Hacking away at the counterculture. Postmodern Culture, 1(1). http://pmc.iath.virginia.edu/text-only/issue.990/ross-1.990 and http://pmc.iath.virginia.edu/text-only/issue.990/ross-2.990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In Button, G. & Lee, J. R. E. (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 54–69). Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, S. (2005). The conditions and consequences of professional discourse studies. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(3), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v2i3.371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarlett, A., & Zeilinger, M. (2019). Rethinking affordance. Media Theory, 3(1), 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of uh huh and other things that come between sentences. In Tannen, D. (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71–93). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B., Woolard, K. A., & Kroskrity, P. V. (Eds.). (1998). Language ideologies: Practice and theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schindler, K., & Wolfe, J. (2014). Beyond single authors: Organizational text production as collaborative writing. In Jakobs, E.-M. & Perrin, D. (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (pp. 159–173). De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schön, D. A. (1993). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. B. K. (2004). Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging Internet. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebba, M. (2007). Spelling and society: The culture and politics of orthography around the world. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selfe, C. L., & Selfe, R. J. (1994). The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones. College Composition and Communication, 45(4), 480–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shankar, S., & Cavanaugh, J. R. (2012). Language and materiality in global capitalism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41(1), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1979). Language structure and linguistic ideologies. In Clyne, P., Hanks, W. F., & Hofbauer, C. (Eds.), The elements (pp. 193–248). Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23(3–4), 193–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, W., & O’Regan, J. P. (2018). Fetishism and the language commodity: A materialist critique. Language Sciences, 70, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.05.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, A. K., Upadhyaya, N., Seth, A., Hu, X., Sastry, N., & Mondal, M. (2022). What cookie consent notices do users prefer: A study in the wild. Proceedings of the 2022 European Symposium on Usable Security, 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3549015.3555675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjöström, J., & Goldkuhl, G. (2004). The semiotics of user interfaces: A socio-pragmatic perspective. In Liu, K. (Ed.), Virtual, distributed and flexible organisations: Studies in organisational semiotics (pp. 217–236). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2162-3_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slack, J. D., & Wise, J. M. (2014). Culture and technology: A primer (2nd edition). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Slattery, S. (2007). Undistributing work through writing: How technical writers manage texts in complex information environments. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(3), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572250701291046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzmüller, J. (2013). Graphische Variation als soziale Praxis: Eine soziolinguistische Theorie zu skripturaler ‘Sichtbarkeit’. De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzmüller, J. (2015). Graphic variation and graphic ideologies: A metapragmatic approach. Social Semiotics, 25(2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1010323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanfill, M. (2015). The interface as discourse: The production of norms through web design. New Media & Society, 17(7), 1059–1074. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814520873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Star, S. L., & Strauss, A. (1999). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiger, T. L. (1993). Construction skill and skill construction. Work, Employment and Society, 7(4), 535–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stilwell, F. (2019). From economics to political economy: Contradictions, challenge, and change. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 78(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stöckl, H. (2014). Typography. In Norris, S. & Maier, C. D. (Eds.), Interactions, images and texts: A reader in multimodality (pp. 283–295). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511175.281Google Scholar
Susser, D. (2019). Invisible influence: Artificial intelligence and the ethics of adaptive choice architectures. Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swann, J., & Deumert, A. (2018). Sociolinguistics and language creativity. Language Sciences, 65, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swarts, J. (2010). Recycled writing: Assembling actor networks from reusable content. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24(2), 127–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651909353307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweeney, M. E. (2016). The intersectional interface. In Noble, S. U. & Tynes, B. M. (Eds.), The intersectional internet: Race, sex, class, and culture online (pp. 215–228). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Taffel, S. (2016). Perspectives on the postdigital: Beyond rhetorics of progress and novelty. Convergence, 22(3), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514567827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagg, C., & Lyons, A. (2022). Mobile messaging and resourcefulness: A post-digital ethnography. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, P. K. W. (2021). Names as linguistic capital. In Petrovic, J. E. & Yazan, B. (Eds.), The commodification of language (pp. 164–180). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, C. (2006). From statistical panic to moral panic: The metadiscursive construction and popular exaggeration of new media language in the print media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), 667–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00031.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, C. (2012). Determined creativity: Language play in new media. In Jones, R. H. (Ed.), Discourse and creativity (pp. 169–210). Pearson.Google Scholar
Thurlow, C. (2015). Multimodality, materiality and everyday textualities: The sensuous stuff of status. In Rippl, G. (Ed.), Handbook of intermediality: Literature – image – sound – music (pp. 619–636). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110311075-035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, C. (2016). Queering critical discourse studies or/and performing ‘post-class’ ideologies. Critical Discourse Studies, 13(5), 485–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1122646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, C. (2017). “Forget about the words”? Tracking the language, media and semiotic ideologies of digital discourse: The case of sexting. Discourse, Context & Media, 20, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, C. (2018). Critical discourse studies in/of applied contexts: Missed opportunities, fraught possibilities. In Flowerdew, J. & Richardson, J. E. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 328–341). Routledge.Google Scholar
Thurlow, C. (2019). Semiotic creativities in and with space: Binaries and boundaries, beware! International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(1), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2018.1500264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, C. (2020a). Expanding our sociolinguistic horizons? Geographical thinking and the articulatory potential of commodity chain analysis. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 24(3), 350–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, C. (Ed.). (2020b). The business of words: Wordsmiths, linguists, and other language workers. Routledge.Google Scholar
Thurlow, C. (2020c). The (grubby) business of words: What ‘George Clooney’ tells us. In Thurlow, C. (Ed.), The business of words: Wordsmiths, linguists, and other language workers (pp. 1–19). Routledge.Google Scholar
Thurlow, C. (2020d). Touching taste: The classist intersections of materiality, textuality and tactility. Multimodal Communication, 9(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2020-0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, C. (2022). Spracharbeit im Filmgeschäft: Von der Bedeutung “kleiner Texte”. In Brommer, S., Roth, K. S., & Spitzmüller, J. (Eds.), Brückenschläge: Linguistik an den Schnittstellen. Festschrift für Christa Dürscheid (pp. 155–175). Narr.Google Scholar
Thurlow, C., & Britain, D. (2020). Voice work: Learning about and from dialect coaches. In Thurlow, C. (Ed.), The business of words: Wordsmiths, linguists, and other language workers (pp. 67–85). Routledge.Google Scholar
Thurlow, C., & Jaworski, A. (2006). The alchemy of the upwardly mobile: Symbolic capital and the stylization of elites in frequent-flyer programmes. Discourse & Society, 17(1), 99–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506058066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, C., & Jaworski, A. (2013). Visible-invisible: The social semiotics of labour in luxury tourism. In Birtchnell, T. & Caletrío, J. (Eds.), Elite Mobilities (pp. 176–193). Routledge.Google Scholar
Thurlow, C., & Jaworski, A. (2017a). Introducing elite discourse: The rhetorics of status, privilege, and power. Social Semiotics, 27(3), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1301789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, C., & Jaworski, A. (2017b). Word-things and thing-words: The transmodal production of privilege and status. In Cavanaugh, J. R. & Shankar, S. (Eds.), Language and materiality: Ethnographic and theoretical explorations (pp. 185–203). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, C., & Mroczek, K. (Eds.). (2011). Digital discourse: Language in the new media. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, E. (1993). Interpretative nodes in discourse: Actual and actually. In Baker, M., Francis, G., & Tognini-Bonelli, E. (Eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Toolan, M. (2012). Poems: Wonderfully repetitive. In Jones, R. H. (Ed.), Discourse and creativity (pp. 17–34). Pearson.Google Scholar
Turner, P. (2017). A psychology of user experience. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70653-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urciuoli, B. (2008). Skills and selves in the new workplace. American Ethnologist, 35(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2008.00031.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urciuoli, B. (2016). Discussion: Imagining the languaged worker’s language. Multilingua, 35(4), 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2015-0016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urciuoli, B., & LaDousa, C. (2013). Language management/labor. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42(1), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utz, C., Degeling, M., Fahl, S., Schaub, F., & Holz, T. (2019). (Un)informed consent: Studying GDPR consent notices in the field. Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 973–990. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319535.3354212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Style. In Introducing social semiotics (pp. 139–159). Routledge.Google Scholar
Varis, P. (2021). Digital ethnography in the study of language, gender, and sexuality. In J. Angouri, & J. Baxter (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language, gender, and sexuality (pp. 164–177). Routledge.Google Scholar
Venuti, L. (1995). The translator’s invisibility: A history of translation. Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Vidali, D. (2010). Millennial encounters with mainstream television news: Excess, void, and points of engagement. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 20(2), 372–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2010.01075.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The instrumental method in psychology. In Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 134–143). M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Wachter-Boettcher, S. (2017). Technically wrong: Sexist apps, biased algorithms, and other threats of toxic tech. WW Norton.Google Scholar
Walker, J. (2009). Defining the object of study. In Clark, H. & Brody, D. (Eds.), Design studies: A reader (pp. 42–48). Berg.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1978). Classes, status groups and parties. In Runciman, W. G. (Ed.) & E. Matthews (Trans.), Weber: Selections in translation (pp. 43–56). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidman, A. (2010). Sound and the city: Mimicry and media in South India. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 20(2), 294–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2010.01071.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiser, M. (1994). Creating the invisible interface. 7th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, New York. https://doi.org/10.1145/192426.192428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilf, E. Y. (2014). Semiotic dimensions of creativity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 43(1), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilf, E. Y. (2019). Creativity on demand: The dilemmas of innovation in an accelerated age. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226607023.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolard, K. A., & Schieffelin, B. B. (1994). Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23(1), 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.000415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woydack, J. (2017). Call center agents and the experience of stigma. Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies, Paper 215, 2–19.Google Scholar
Woydack, J., & Rampton, B. (2016). Text trajectories in a multilingual call centre: The linguistic ethnography of a calling script. Language in Society, 45(5), 709–732. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404516000610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wysocki, A. F., & Jasken, J. I. (2004). What should be an unforgettable face… Computers and Composition, 21(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2003.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, S., & Ramachandran, P. G. (2019). The current status of accessibility in mobile apps. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 12(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3300176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this chapter is known to have missing or limited accessibility features.
We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is
not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions,
please contact
accessibility@cambridge.org.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.