Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-grvzd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-16T12:31:49.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2025

David L. Sloss
David L. Sloss
Affiliation:
Santa Clara University School of Law
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
People v. The Court
The Next Revolution in Constitutional Law
 , pp. 245 - 258
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Primary Sources

Ackerman, Bruce, We the People, Volume I: Foundations (1991).Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce, We the People, Volume 2: Transformations (1998).Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (2014).Google Scholar
Adams, Katherine et al., Report of the Commission, in Social Media, Freedom of Speech, and the Future of our Democracy (Bollinger, Lee C. & Stone, Geoffrey R., eds. 2022).Google Scholar
Agiesta, Jennifer and Edwards-Levy, Ariel, CNN Poll: Percentage of Republicans Who Think Biden’s 2020 Win was Illegitimate Ticks Back Up Near 70% (Aug. 3, 2023), www.cnn.com/2023/08/03/politics/cnn-poll-republicans-think-2020-election-illegitimate/index.html.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry and Schauer, Frederick, On Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation, 110 Harv. L. Rev. 1359 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Larry and Schauer, Frederick, Defending Judicial Supremacy: A Reply, 17 Const’l Commentary 455 (2000).Google Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed, The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction (1998).Google Scholar
American Law Institute, Restatement (Second) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (1965).Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, Truth and Politics, The New Yorker, Feb. 17, 1967.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Nathan, Foley, Edward, and Ganz, Scott C., Beyond the Spoiler Effect: Can Ranked-Choice Voting Solve the Problem of Political Polarization 2024 Univ. Ill. L. Rev. 1655 (2024).Google Scholar
Atkinson, Nathan and Ganz, Scott C., Robust Electoral Competition: Rethinking Electoral Systems to Encourage Representative Outcomes, 84 Md. L. Rev. 102 (2024).Google Scholar
Attanasio, John, Politics and Capital: Auctioning the American Dream (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, Michael and McLaughlin, Danielle, The Federalist Society: How Conservatives Took the Law Back from Liberals (2013).Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M., Living Originalism (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkin, Jack M. and Siegel, Reva D., Principles, Practices and Social Movements, 154 U. Penn. L. Rev. 927 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkin, Jack M., Constitutional Hardball and Constitutional Crises, 26 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 579 (2008).Google Scholar
Barnett, Randy E., Interpretation and Construction, 34 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol’y 65 (2011).Google Scholar
Barnett, Randy E., Our Republican Constitution: Securing the Liberty and Sovereignty of We the People (2016).Google Scholar
Barrett, John Q., Supreme Court Law Clerks’ Recollections of Brown v. Board of Education, 78 St. John’s L. Rev. 515 (2004).Google Scholar
Baxter, Maurice G., Daniel Webster and the Supreme Court (1966).Google Scholar
Beck, Colin J. et al., Constitutions in World Society: A New Measure of Human Rights, in Constitution-Making and Transnational Legal Order (Ginsburg, Tom, Halliday, Terence C. & Shaffer, Gregory eds., 2019).Google Scholar
Belkin, Aaron, Court Expansion and the Restoration of Democracy: The Case for Constitutional Hardball, 2019 Pepp. L. Rev. 19 (2019).Google Scholar
Benkler, Yochai, Faris, Robert, and Roberts, Hal, Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, David E., Rehabilitating Lochner: Defending Individual Rights Against Progressive Reform (2012).Google Scholar
Bhagwat, Ashutosh, Our Democratic First Amendment (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwat, Ashutosh, The New Gatekeepers?: Social Media and the Search for Truth, 3 J. Free Speech L. 41 (2023).Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M., The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (2nd ed. 1986) (first published in 1962).Google Scholar
Bradley, Curtis A., Self-Execution and Treaty Duality, 2008 Supreme Ct. Rev. 131 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Curtis A. and Goldsmith, Jack L., Customary International Law as Federal Law: A Critique of the Modern Position, 110 Harv. L. Rev. 815 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan Center for Justice, Who Controlled Redistricting in Every State? (Oct. 5, 2022), available at www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/who-controlled-redistricting-every-state.Google Scholar
Brief for Petitioners, Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 (1954) (No. 8), available at 1952 WL 47257.Google Scholar
Brownell, Kathryn Cramer, 24/7 Politics: Cable Television and the Fragmenting of America from Watergate to Fox News (2023).Google Scholar
Brownstein, Ronald, The Second Civil War: How Extreme Partisanship Has Paralyzed Washington and Polarized America (2007).Google Scholar
Caro, Robert A., The Years of Lyndon Johnson: Master of the Senate (2002).Google Scholar
Center for Countering Digital Hate, Musk Misleading Election Claims Viewed 1.2 BN Times on X With no Fact Checks (Aug. 8, 2024), https://counterhate.com/research/musk-misleading-election-claims-viewed-1-2bn-times-on-x-with-no-fact-checks/.Google Scholar
Charles, Guy-Uriel, Judging the Law of Politics, 103 Mich. L. Rev. 1099 (2005).Google Scholar
Charles, Jacob D., Will Bruen Imperil California Gun Laws? 45 Los Angeles Lawyer 16 (2023).Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin, Federal Jurisdiction (6th ed. 2012).Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin, Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies (5th ed. 2015).Google Scholar
Cillizza, Chris, The Least Productive Congress Ever (July 17, 2023), www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2013/07/17/the-least-productive-congress-ever/.Google Scholar
Coles, Harry L., Jr., Applicability of the Public Land System to Louisiana, 43 Miss. Valley Hist. Rev. 39 (1956).Google Scholar
Common Cause, Charge Report: Community Redistricting Report Card (Oct. 13, 2023), available at www.commoncause.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CommunityRedistrictingReportCard_Digital_REV3.pdf.Google Scholar
Congressional Research Service, Table of Laws Held Unconstitutional in Whole or in Part by the Supreme Court, available at https://constitution.congress.gov/resources/unconstitutional-laws/.Google Scholar
Cook Political Report, 2024 CPR House Race Ratings (Feb. 29, 2024), www.cookpolitical.com/ratings/house-race-ratings.Google Scholar
Cook Political Report, 2024 CPR House Race Ratings (June 14, 2024), www.cookpolitical.com/ratings/house-race-ratings.Google Scholar
Copeland, Joseph, Favorable Views of Supreme Court Remain Near Historic Low (Aug. 8, 2024), www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/08/08/favorable-views-of-supreme-court-remain-near-historic-low/.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, et al., V-Dem Codebook, v12 (Mar. 2022), available at www.v-dem.net/static/website/img/refs/codebookv12.pdf.Google Scholar
Cox, Archibald, Foreword: Constitutional Adjudication and the Promotion of Human Rights, 80 Harv. L. Rev. 91 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, Homer and McFarland, Carl, Federal Justice: Chapters in the History of Justice and the Federal Executive (1937).Google Scholar
Currinder, Marian, Beckel, Michael, and Ratliff, Amisa, Why We Left Congress: How the Legislative Branch Is Broken and What We Can Do about It (Dec. 6, 2018), available at www.rstreet.org/research/why-we-left-congress-how-the-legislative-branch-is-broken-and-what-we-can-do-about-it-2/.Google Scholar
Cushman, Barry, Rethinking the New Deal Court: The Structure of a Constitutional Revolution (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czopek, Madison, Trump Trial Judge Didn’t Overrule All Defense Objections and Sustain All Prosecution Objections (Politifact, May 31, 2024), www.politifact.com/factchecks/2024/may/31/jesse-watters/trump-trial-judge-didnt-overrule-all-defense-objec/.Google Scholar
Dean, John W., The Rehnquist Choice: The Untold Story of the Nixon Appointment that Redefined the Supreme Court (2001).Google Scholar
Dibble, Ernest F., Joseph Mills White: Anti-Jacksonian Floridian (2003).Google Scholar
DiResta, Renee, Free Speech Is Not the Same as Free Reach, Wired, Aug. 30, 2018, www.wired.com/story/free-speech-is-not-the-same-as-free-reach/.Google Scholar
Dixon, Rosalind, Responsive Judicial Review, Democracy and Dysfunction in the Modern Age (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorf, Michael C., Equal Protection Incorporation, 88 Va. L. Rev. 951 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driver, Justin, The Strange Career of Antisubordination, 91 U. Chicago L. Rev. 651 (2024).Google Scholar
Dudziak, Mary L., Cold War Civil Rights: Race and the Image of American Democracy (2000).Google Scholar
Economist, The, Democracy Index 2016: Revenge of the “Deplorables” (2017).Google Scholar
Eilperin, Juliet and DeBonis, Mike, President Obama Nominates Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court, Wash. Post, Mar. 16, 2016.Google Scholar
Elkins, Zachary et al., Getting to Rights: Treaty Ratification, Constitutional Convergence, and Human Rights Practice, 54 Harv. Int’l L.J. 61 (2013).Google Scholar
Ely, John Hart, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (1980).Google Scholar
Fairman, Charles, Does the Fourteenth Amendment Incorporate the Bill of Rights?, The Original Understanding, 2 Stan. L. Rev. 5 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairman, Charles, Editorial Comment: Finis to Fujii, 46 Am. J. Int’l L. 682 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallon, Richard H., Jr. et al., Hart & Wechsler’s The Federal Courts and the Federal System (7th ed. 2015).Google Scholar
The Federalist Papers (Isaac Kramnick, ed. 1987).Google Scholar
Feldman, Noah R. and Sullivan, Kathleen, Constitutional Law (20th ed. 2019).Google Scholar
Feldman, Noah, Takeover: How a Conservative Student Club Captured the Supreme Court (audiobook).Google Scholar
Finkelman, Paul, John Bingham and the Background to the Fourteenth Amendment, 36 Akron L. Rev. 671 (2003).Google Scholar
Fishkin, Joseph and Pozen, David E., Asymmetric Constitutional Hardball, 118 Colum. L. Rev. 915 (2018).Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Laura S., Beyond Marbury: Jurisdictional Self-Dealing in Seminole Tribe, 52 Vand. L. Rev. 407 (1999).Google Scholar
Foley, Edward B., Constitutional Preservation and the Judicial Review of Partisan Gerrymanders, 52 Georgia L. Rev. 1105 (2018).Google Scholar
Foley, Edward B., Maximum Convergence Voting: Madisonian Constitutional Theory and Electoral System Design, 76 Fla. L. Rev. 1751 (2024).Google Scholar
Frantz, Laurent B., Congressional Power to Enforce the Fourteenth Amendment against Private Acts, 73 Yale L. J. 1353 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedenthal, Jack H., Mary Kay Kane & Arthur R. Miller, Civil Procedure (5th ed. 2015).Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry, The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part One: The Road to Judicial Supremacy, 73 N.YU. L. Rev. 333 (1998).Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry, The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Two: Reconstruction’s Political Court, 91 Geo. L. J. 1 (2002) [2002a].Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry, The Birth of an Academic Obsession: The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Five, 112 Yale L. J. 153 (2002) [2002b].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Barry, The Will of the People: How Public Opinion Has Influenced the Supreme Court and Shaped the Meaning of the Constitution (2009).Google Scholar
Gardbaum, Stephen, The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom and Huq, Aziz Z., How to Save a Constitutional Democracy (2018).Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann, A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (2001).Google Scholar
Goebel, Julius Jr., Antecedents and Beginnings to 1801 (1971) (The Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court, Vol. I).Google Scholar
Golove, David M. and Hulsebosch, Daniel J., A Civilized Nation: The Early American Constitution, The Law of Nations, and the Pursuit of International Recognition, 85 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 932 (2010).Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A., Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform After the Civil War (2023).Google Scholar
Green, Christopher R., Equal Citizenship, Civil Rights, and the Constitution: The Original Sense of the Privileges and Immunities Clause (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Jamal, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession with Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021).Google Scholar
Gunther, Gerald, Foreword: In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Changing Court: A Model for a Newer Equal Protection, 86 Harv. L. Rev. 1 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Daniel W., The Limits of Sovereignty: Property Confiscation in the Union and the Confederacy During the Civil War (2007).Google Scholar
Hasen, Richard L., Election Meltdown: Dirty Tricks, Distrust, and the Threat to American Democracy (2020).Google Scholar
Hasen, Richard L., The Stagnation, Retrogression, and Potential Pro-Voter Transformation of U.S. Election Law, 134 Yale L. J. 1673 (2025).Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis, U.S. Ratification of Human Rights Conventions: The Ghost of Senator Bricker, 89 Am. J. Int’l L. 341 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Historians’ Amicus Brief in Trump v. United States, available at www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/historians-amicus-brief-trump-v-united-states.Google Scholar
Hodder-Williams, Richard, The Politics of the U.S. Supreme Court (1980).Google Scholar
Hollis, Duncan B., Treaties in the Supreme Court, 1861–1900, in Sloss, Ramsey & Dodge (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Philip N., Lie Machines: How to Save Democracy from Troll Armies, Deceitful Robots, Junk News Operations, and Political Operatives (2020).Google Scholar
Hulsebosch, Daniel J., An Empire of Law: Chancellor Kent and the Revolution in Books in the Early Republic, 60 Alabama L. Rev. 377 (2009).Google Scholar
Huq, Aziz Z., The Collapse of Constitutional Remedies (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issacharoff, Samuel and Pildes, Richard H., Politics as Markets: Partisan Lockups of the Democratic Process, 50 Stan. L. Rev. 643 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issacharoff, Samuel et al., The Law of Democracy: Legal Structure of the Political Process (5th ed. 2016).Google Scholar
Jackson, Vicki C., Federalism and the Uses and Limits of Law: Printz and Principle, 111 Harv. L. Rev. 2180 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jankowicz, Nina, The Coming Flood of Disinformation: How Washington Gave Up on the Fight Against Falsehoods (Foreign Affairs, Feb. 7, 2024).Google Scholar
Jeffries, John C., Jr., In Praise of the Eleventh Amendment and Section 1983, 84 Va. L. Rev. 47 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Kevin, New Models for Keeping Partisans Out of Election Administration (Jan. 31, 2022), available at www.cartercenter.org/resources/pdfs/news/peace_publications/democracy/new-models-keeping-partisans-out-election-admin-013122.pdf.Google Scholar
Johnson, Benjamin B., The Origins of Supreme Court Question Selection, 122 Colum. L. Rev. 793 (2022).Google Scholar
Jones, Jeffrey M., Independent Party ID Tied for High, Democratic ID at New Low (Jan. 12, 2024), available at https://news.gallup.com/poll/548459/independent-party-tied-high-democratic-new-low.aspx#:~:text=U.S.%20adults’%20political%20party%20identification,Republicans%20and%2027%25%20as%20Democrats.Google Scholar
Just Security Podcast, Presidential Immunity after Trump v. United States (July 3, 2024), available at www.justsecurity.org/97447/podcast-trump-v-united-states/.Google Scholar
Kamisar, Ben, Almost a Third of Americans Still Believe the 2020 Election Result Was Fraudulent (June 20, 2023), www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/meetthepressblog/almost-third-americans-still-believe-2020-election-result-was-fraudule-rcna90145.Google Scholar
Kang, Michael S., Gerrymandering and the Constitutional Norm against Government Partisanship, 116 Mich. L. Rev. 351 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlan, Pamela S., John Hart Ely and the Problem of Gerrymandering: The Lion in Winter, 114 Yale L. J. 1329 (2005).Google Scholar
Karlan, Pamela S., Foreword: Democracy and Disdain, 126 Harv. L. Rev. 1 (2012).Google Scholar
KFF, Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions: Interactive Map (May 8, 2024), www.kff.org/affordable-care-act/issue-brief/status-of-state-medicaid-expansion-decisions-interactive-map/.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Natalie Hevener, Human Rights Treaties and the Senate: A History of Opposition (1990).Google Scholar
Keena, Alex et al., Gerrymandering the States: Partisanship, Race, and the Transformation of American Federalism (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, James, Commentaries on American Law (11th ed. 1867) (George Comstock ed.).Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J., From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinfeld, Rachel, Polarization, Democracy, and Political Violence in the United States: What the Research Says (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Sept. 2023).Google Scholar
Koza, John R. et al., Every Vote Equal: A State-Based Plan for Electing the President by National Popular Vote (5th ed. 2024).Google Scholar
Kramer, Larry D., The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruse, Kevin M. and Zelizer, Julian, How Policy Decisions Spawned Today’s Hyperpolarized Media, Wash. Post, Jan. 17, 2019.Google Scholar
LaFave, Wayne R. et al., Criminal Procedure (5th ed. 2009).Google Scholar
Landau, David and Dixon, Rosalind, Abusive Judicial Review: Courts against Democracy, 53 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1313 (2020).Google Scholar
Lash, Kurt T., The Fourteenth Amendment and the Privileges and Immunities of American Citizenship (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Thomas H. and Sloss, David L., International Law as an Interpretive Tool in the Supreme Court: 1861–1900, in Sloss, Ramsey & Dodge (2011).Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian, The Epistemology of the Internet and the Regulation of Speech in America, 20 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol. 903 (2022).Google Scholar
Lemley, Mark A., The Imperial Supreme Court, 136 Harv. L. Rev. F. 97 (2022).Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford, Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where the Constitution Goes Wrong (and How We the People Can Correct It) (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Ziblatt, Daniel, How Democracies Die (2018).Google Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey B., et al., Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database (2024), https://voteview.com/.Google Scholar
Li, Michael and Miller, Peter, How Gerrymandering Tilts the 2024 Race for the House (Sept. 24, 2024), www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/how-gerrymandering-tilts-2024-race-house.Google Scholar
Lockwoood, Bert B., Jr., The United Nations Charter and United States Civil Rights Litigation: 1946–1955, 69 Iowa L. Rev. 901 (1984).Google Scholar
Los Angeles Daily Journal, Charter of United Nations Held to Invalidate California Alien Land Act, April 25, 1950 (reprinted in 96 Cong. Rec. 5993, 6000).Google Scholar
Los Angeles Times, Ruling Holds Alien Land Law Invalid, April 25, 1950 (A1).Google Scholar
Madison, James, The Report of 1800 (Jan. 7, 1800), available at https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01–17–02-0202.Google Scholar
McConnell, Michael W., Institutions and Interpretation: A Critique of City of Boerne v. Flores, 111 Harv. L. Rev. 153 (1997).Google Scholar
McDonald, Jessica, Vance Wrong on Child Tax Credit, Harris’ Remarks about Climate Change and Having Kids (Aug. 2, 2024), www.factcheck.org/2024/08/vance-wrong-on-child-tax-credit-harris-remarks-about-climate-change-and-having-kids/.Google Scholar
McGann, Anthony J. et al., Gerrymandering in America: The House of Representatives, the Supreme Court, and the Future of Popular Sovereignty (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinnis, John O., An Opinionated History of the Federalist Society, 7 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol’y 403 (2009) [2009a].Google Scholar
McGinnis, John O., Medellin and the Future of International Delegation, 118 Yale L. J. 1712 (2009) [2009b].Google Scholar
McKay, Robert B., Political Thickets and Crazy Quilts: Reapportionment and Equal Protection, 61 Mich. L. Rev. 645 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meese, Edwin III, The Law of the Constitution, 61 Tulane L. Rev. 979 (1987).Google Scholar
Meiklejohn, Alexander, Free Speech and Its Relation to Self-Government (1948).Google Scholar
Metzger, Miriam J., Hartsell, Ethan H., and Flanagin, Andrew J., Cognitive Dissonance or Credibility? A Comparison of Two Theoretical Explanations for Selective Exposure to Partisan News, 47(1) Communications Research (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Erin L. Amplified Speech, 43 Cardozo L. Rev. 1 (2021).Google Scholar
Minow, Martha, Saving the News: Why the Constitution Calls for Government Action to Preserve Freedom of Speech (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, Henry P., Foreword: Constitutional Common Law, 89 Harv. L. Rev. 1 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Richard, The Forging of the Union (1984).Google Scholar
Morris, Kevin and Grange, Coryn, Growing Racial Disparities in Voter Turnout, 2008–2022, (Brennan Center for Justice, Mar. 2024), available at www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/growing-racial-disparities-voter-turnout-2008-2022.Google Scholar
Netanel, Neil, Applying Militant Democracy to Defend against Social Media Harms, 45 Cardozo L. Rev. 489 (2023).Google Scholar
Norden, Lawrence, Panditharatne, Mekela, and Harris, David, Multiple Threats Converge to Heighten Disinformation Risks to This Year’s US Elections (Just Security, Feb. 16, 2024).Google Scholar
Norton, Helen, Distrust, Negative First Amendment Theory, and the Regulation of Lies, 4 J. Free Speech L. 595 (2023).Google Scholar
Nunziato, Dawn Carla, The Marketplace of Ideas Online, 94 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1519 (2019).Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Norah, Are Members of Congress Becoming Telemarketers?, CBS NEWS (Apr. 24, 2016), www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-are-members-of-congress-becoming-telemarketers/.Google Scholar
Olson, Theodore B., Tex Lazar Memorial Lecture, 9 Tex. Rev. L. & Pol. 1 (2004).Google Scholar
Orth, Taylor and Bialik, Carl, YouGov, Trust in Media 2024: Which news sources Americans trust—and which they think lean left or right (May 30, 2024), https://today.yougov.com/politics/articles/49552-trust-in-media-2024-which-news-outlets-americans-trust.Google Scholar
Pearlstein, Deborah, Democracy Harms and the First Amendment, 4 J. Free Speech L. 617 (2023).Google Scholar
Pechota, Vratislav, The Development of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, in The international Bill of Rights: The Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Henkin, Louis, ed. 1981).Google Scholar
Perry, Michael J., A Global Political Morality: Human Rights, Democracy, and Constitutionalism (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persily, Nathaniel, The Promise and Pitfalls of the New Voting Rights Act, 117 Yale L. J. 174 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center, Public Trust in Government: 1958–2023, available at www.pewresearch.org/politics/2023/09/19/public-trust-in-government-1958-2023/.Google Scholar
Pildes, Richard H., The Supreme Court, 2003 Term—Foreword: The Constitutionalization of Democratic Politics, 118 Harv. L. Rev. 29 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pildes, Richard H., Why the Center Does Not Hold: The Causes of Hyperpolarized Democracy in America, 99 Cal. L. Rev. 273 (2011).Google Scholar
Pildes, Richard H., Political Reforms to Combat Extremism, in Our Nation at Risk, Election Integrity as a National Security Issue 163–88 (Zelizer, Julian E. and Greenberg, Karen J. eds., 2024).Google Scholar
Post, Robert C. and Siegel, Reva B., Legislative Constitutionalism and Section Five Power: Policentric Interpretation of the Family and Medical Leave Act, 112 Yale L. J. 1943 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, Edward A., Brandeis and the Progressive Constitution (2000).Google Scholar
Rakove, Jack, Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution (1996).Google Scholar
Ramsey, Michael D., Customary International Law in the Supreme Court, 1901–1945, in Sloss, Ramsey, Dodge (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repucci, Sarah and Slipowitz, Amy, Freedom House, Freedom in the World 2021: Democracy Under Siege (2021).Google Scholar
Resnik, Judith, Categorical Federalism: Jurisdiction, Gender, and the Globe, 111 Yale L. J. 619 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roper Center, Public Opinion on the Voting Rights Act (Aug. 6, 2015), https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/blog/public-opinion-voting-rights-act.Google Scholar
Rosen, Jeffrey, Packing the Courts, New York Times, May 10, 2013.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, Frances McCall and Shapiro, Ian, Responsible Parties: Saving Democracy from Itself (2018).Google Scholar
Rothstein, Richard, The Color of Law (2017).Google Scholar
Rutenberg, Jim and Myers, Steven Lee, Trump Allies are Winning War Over Disinformation, New York Times, Mar. 17, 2024.Google Scholar
Salyer, Lucy E., Laws Harsh as Tigers: Chinese Immigrants and the Shaping of Modern Immigration Law (1995).Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin, Keynote Address: Foreign Legal Authority in the Federal Courts, 98 Am. Soc’y Int’l L. Proc. 305 (2004).Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick, Free Speech: A Philosophical Enquiry (1982).Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick, Ashwander Revisited, 1995 Sup. Ct. Rev. 71 (1995).Google Scholar
Segall, Eric J., Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanor, Amanda, The New Lochner, 2016 Wis. L. Rev. 133 (2016).Google Scholar
Shugerman, Jed Handelsman, The People’s Courts: Pursuing Judicial Independence in America (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Reva B., Text in Contest: Gender and the Constitution from a Social Movement Perspective, 150 U. Pa. L. Rev. 297 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Reva B., Constitutional Culture, Social Movement Conflict and Constitutional Change: The Case of the de Facto ERA, 94 Cal. L. Rev. 1323 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloss, David L., The Domestication of International Human Rights: Non-Self-Executing Declarations and Human Rights Treaties, 24 Yale J. Int’l L. 129 (1999).Google Scholar
Sloss, David L., Ex parte Young and Federal Remedies for Human Rights Treaty Violations, 75 Wash. L. Rev. 1103 (2000).Google Scholar
Sloss, David L., Using International Law to Enhance Democracy, 47 Va. J. Int’l L. 1 (2006).Google Scholar
Sloss, David L., Ramsey, Michael D. and Dodge, William S. (eds.), International Law in the U.S. Supreme Court: Continuity and Change (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloss, David L., Executing Foster v. Neilson: The Two-Step Approach to Analyzing Self-Executing Treaties, 53 Harv. Int’l L.J. 135 (2012).Google Scholar
Sloss, David L., Polymorphous Public Law Litigation: The Forgotten History of Nineteenth Century Public Law Litigation, 71 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1757 (2014).Google Scholar
Sloss, David L., Bond v. United States: Choosing the Lesser of Two Evils, 90 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1583 (2015).Google Scholar
Sloss, David L., The Death of Treaty Supremacy: An Invisible Constitutional Change (2016) [2016a].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloss, David L., How International Human Rights Transformed the U.S. Constitution, 38 Human Rights Quarterly 426 (2016) [2016b].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloss, David L. and Sandholtz, Wayne, Universal Human Rights and Constitutional Change, 27 Wm. & Mary Bill of Rights J. 1183 (2019).Google Scholar
Sloss, David L., Stop Electronic Amplification of Lies, 66 St. Louis Univ. L.J. 129 (2021) [2021a].Google Scholar
Sloss, David L., Enhance Fact-Checking to Protect Democracy (Dec. 6, 2021), [2021b] www.acslaw.org/expertforum/enhance-fact-checking-to-protect-democracy/.Google Scholar
Sloss, David L., Tyrants on Twitter: Protecting Democracies from Information Warfare (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloss, David L., Guns, Abortion and Courts, 64 Santa Clara L. Rev. 83 (2024).Google Scholar
Solender, Andrew, Capitol Hill Stunner: 2023 Led to Fewest Laws in Decades (Dec. 18, 2023), www.axios.com/2023/12/19/118-congress-bills-least-unproductive-chart.Google Scholar
Solum, Lawrence B., Originalism and Constitutional Construction, 82 Fordham L. Rev. 453 (2013).Google Scholar
Solum, Lawrence B., Outcome Reasons and Process Reasons in Normative Constitutional Theory, 172 U. Pa. L. Rev. 913 (2024).Google Scholar
Southworth, Ann, Big Money Unleashed: The Campaign to Deregulate Election Spending (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaeth, Harold J., Epstein, Lee, et al., 2023 Supreme Court Database, Version 2023 Release 1, http://supremecourtdatabase.org.Google Scholar
Steigrad, Alexandra, Fox News Earns its Highest July Ratings Ever to Blow Away Cable Rivals CNN, MSNBC, New York Post, July 31, 2024, https://nypost.com/2024/07/31/media/fox-news-has-its-highest-july-ratings-ever-to-beat-cnn-msnbc/.Google Scholar
Stephanopoulos, Nicholas O., The Anti-Carolene Court, 2019 Sup. Ct. Rev. 111 (2019).Google Scholar
Strauss, David A., The Irrelevance of Constitutional Amendments, 114 Harv. L. Rev. 1457 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, David A., The Living Constitution (2010).Google Scholar
Sullivan, Kathleen M., The Supreme Court 1991 Term, Foreword: The Justices of Rules and Standards, 106 Harv. L. Rev. 22 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., Democracy and the Problem of Free Speech (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaine, Edward T., Taking Care of Treaties, 108 Colum. L. Rev. 331 (2008).Google Scholar
Swisher, Carl B., History of the Supreme Court of the United States: The Taney Period: 1836–1864 (1974).Google Scholar
Tananbaum, Duane, The Bricker Amendment Controversy: A Test of Eisenhower’s Political Leadership (1988).Google Scholar
Thayer, James B., The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law, 7 Harv. L. Rev. 17 (1893).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres-Spelliscy, Ciara, The Political Branding of the Big Lie, 2022 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1711, 1733 (2022).Google Scholar
Trump v. Anderson, No. 23–719, Brief of Constitutional Law Professor Mark A. Graber as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondent, 2024 WL 513704.Google Scholar
Tsesis, Alexander, Self-Government and the Declaration of Independence, 97 Cornell L. Rev. 693 (2012).Google Scholar
Tsesis, Alexander, Free Speech in the Balance (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (1999).Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, Alternative Forms of Judicial Review, 101 Mich. L. Rev. 2781 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, Constitutional Hardball, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 523 (2004).Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, Weak Courts, Strong Rights (2008).Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, The Story of City of Boerne v. Flores, Federalism, Rights, and Judicial Supremacy, in Constitutional Law Stories (Michael C. Dorf, 2nd ed. 2009).Google Scholar
V-Dem Institute, Democracy Report 2022: Autocratization Changing Nature?, available at https://v-dem.net/publications/democracy-reports/.Google Scholar
Van Alstine, Michael P., Treaties in the Supreme Court, 1901–1945, in Sloss, Ramsey, Dodge (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vazquez, Carlos Manuel, What Is Eleventh Amendment Immunity?, 106 Yale L. J. 1683 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, The Core of the Case against Judicial Review, 115 Yale L. J. 1346 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washington Post Editorial Board, Put Ranked-Choice Voting at the Top of Your List (Oct. 3, 2024).Google Scholar
Wechsler, Herbert, The Political Safeguards of Federalism, the Role of the States in the Composition and Selection of the National Government, 54 Colum. L. Rev. 543 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, G. Edward, The Transformation of the Constitutional Regime of Foreign Relations, 85 Va. L. Rev. 1 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, Keith E., Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review (1999).Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E., Originalism: A Critical Introduction, 82 Fordham L. Rev. 375 (2013).Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E., Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, Keith E., The Judicial Review of Congress Database, 1789–2022 (July 2022), available at https://scholar.princeton.edu/kewhitt/judicial-review-congress-database.Google Scholar
Witt, John Fabian, Weaponized from the Beginning, 4 J. Free Speech L. 715 (2023).Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow, Congressional Government (1885).Google Scholar
World Inequality Database, https://wid.world/data/.Google Scholar
Wright, Benjamin, The Growth of American Constitutional Law (1942).Google Scholar
Yoo, John C., Globalism and the Constitution: Treaties, Non-Self-Execution, and the Original Understanding, 99 Colum. L. Rev. 1955 (1999).Google Scholar
Zong, Lauren et al., International Regulation of Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Sexual Anatomy, 25 Geo. J. Gender & L. 627 (2024).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Act of May 6, 1882, 22 Stat. 58.Google Scholar
Act of July 5, 1884, 23 Stat. 115.Google Scholar
Act of March 3, 1891, 26 Stat. 1084.Google Scholar
Act of August 18, 1894, 28 Stat. 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
An Act for Ascertaining and Adjusting the Titles and Claims to Land, Within the Territory of Orleans, and the District of Louisiana, 1805, ch. 26, Sec. 5, 2 Stat. 324.Google Scholar
An Act Confirming the Titles to Lots in the Town of Mobile, and in the Former Province of West Florida, Which Claims Have Been Favorably Reported on by the Commissioners Appointed by the United States, 1822, ch. 122, 3 Stat. 699.Google Scholar
An Act for Ascertaining Claims and Titles to Land Within the Territory of Florida, 1822, ch. 129, 3 Stat. 709.Google Scholar
Communications Act of 1934, Pub. L. No. 73-416, 48 Stat. 1064 (June 19, 1934).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crime Control Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-647, 104 Stat. 4789 (1990).Google Scholar
Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, Pub. L. No. 94-142, 89 Stat. 773 (Nov. 29, 1975).Google Scholar
Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, Pub. L. No. 106-229, 114 Stat. 464 (2000).Google Scholar
Fair Labor Standards Act, Pub. L. No. 75-718, 52 Stat. 1060 (June 25, 1938).Google Scholar
Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, and Coretta Scott King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006, Pub. L. No. 109-246, 120 Stat. 577 (July 27, 2006).Google Scholar
Federal Election Campaign Act Amendments of 1974, Pub. L. No. 93-443, 88 Stat. 1263 (Oct. 15, 1974).Google Scholar
Housing Act of 1937, Pub. L. No. 75-412, 50 Stat. 888 (Sept. 1, 1937).Google Scholar
Judiciary Act of 1925, Pub. L. No. 68-415, 43 Stat. 936 (1925).Google Scholar
National Labor Relations Act, Pub. L. No. 74-198, 49 Stat. 449 (July 5, 1935).Google Scholar
Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, Pub. L. No. 103-141, 107 Stat. 1488 (1993).Google Scholar
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-274, 114 Stat. 803 (2000).Google Scholar
Scott Act, Oct. 1, 1888, 25 Stat. 504.Google Scholar
Social Security Act, Pub. L. No. 74-721, 49 Stat. 620 (Aug. 14, 1935).Google Scholar
Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, Pub L. No. 92-318, 86 Stat. 235, 373 (June 23, 1972).Google Scholar
Voting Rights Act of 1965, Pub. L. No. 89-110, 79 Stat. 437 (1965).Google Scholar
Alaska Division of Elections, Nonpartisan Top Four Primary Election, www.elections.alaska.gov/election-information/#RankedChoiceGoogle Scholar
Alaska Division of Elections, RCV Detailed Report, available at www.elections.alaska.gov/results/22GENR/US%20SEN.pdfGoogle Scholar
Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae, Brown v. Bd. of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) (Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5), available at 1952 WL 82045.Google Scholar
California Supreme Court Archives, 2nd Civ. No. 17309, L.A. 21149, Fujii v. California [Fujii Case File].Google Scholar
Chinese Immigration: Hearing Before the House Select Comm. On Immigration and Naturalization, 51st Cong. (1890).Google Scholar
Executive Order, E.O. 14023, 86 Fed. Reg. 19569 (Apr. 9, 2021).Google Scholar
Final Report: Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, Dec. 22, 2022 (117th Cong., Second Sess., H. Rep. 117-663) [“Jan. 6 Report”].Google Scholar
1 Foreign Relations of the United States, 1952–1954 (William Z. Slany et al. eds., 1983).Google Scholar
Freedom to Vote Act, H.R. 11 (118th Cong., 1st Sess., July 18, 2023), www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/11Google Scholar
Inquiry into Section 73.1910 of the Commission’s Rules and Regulations Concerning Alternatives to the General Fairness Doctrine Obligations of Broadcast Licensees in Gen. Docket No. 84-282, 102 FCC 2d 143 (1985) [1985 Fairness Report].Google Scholar
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Hearing Before the S. Comm. on Foreign Relations (102nd Cong., 1992).Google Scholar
International Human Rights Treaties: Hearings Before the S. Comm. on Foreign Relations (96th Cong., 1979).Google Scholar
John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2023, H.R. 14 (118th Cong., 1st Sess.), available at www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/14/textGoogle Scholar
Judicial Modernization and Transparency Act, S.5229, www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/5229Google Scholar
Message from the President of the United States Transmitting Four Treaties Pertaining to Human Rights, S. Exec. Docs. C, D, E and F, 95-2 (1978).Google Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures, Initiative and Referendum States, www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/initiative-and-referendum-states (last visited Sept. 14, 2024).Google Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures, School Safety: Guns in Schools (updated June 20, 2023) www.ncsl.org/education/school-safety-guns-in-schoolsGoogle Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures, State Primary Election Types, available at www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/state-primary-election-typesGoogle Scholar
National Endowment for Democracy, About the National Endowment for Democracy, www.ned.org/about/ (last visited Aug. 3, 2024).Google Scholar
Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, Final Report (Dec. 2021).Google Scholar
Proposition 209, Prohibition against Discrimination or Preferential Treatment by State and Other Public Entities (Nov. 1996), at https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/1996/prop209_11_1996.htmlGoogle Scholar
Senate Comm. on Foreign Relations, Report on Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, S. Exec. Rep. No. 101-30 (1990).Google Scholar
Senate Comm. on Foreign Relations, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, S. Exec. Rep. No. 102-23 (1992).Google Scholar
Supreme Court Biennial Appointments and Term Limits Act of 2023, S.3096, www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/3096.Google Scholar
Treaties and Executive Agreements: Hearings Before a Subcomm. of the Senate Judiciary Comm. on S.J. Res. 1 and S.J. Res. 43 (83rd Cong., 1953).Google Scholar
Treaty for the Cession of Louisiana, U.S.-Fr., Apr. 30, 1803, 8 Stat. 200.Google Scholar
Treaty of Amity, Settlement and Limits, U.S.-Spain, Feb. 22, 1819, 8 Stat. 252.Google Scholar
Burlingame Treaty, U.S.-China, July 28, 1868, 16 Stat. 739.Google Scholar
Treaty Concerning Immigration, U.S.-China, Nov. 17, 1880, 22 Stat. 826.Google Scholar
Convention on Immigration, U.S.-China, Mar. 17, 1894, 28 Stat. 1210.Google Scholar
Charter of the United Nations, Oct. 24, 1945, 1 UNTS 16.Google Scholar
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, G.A. Res. 217 (III)(A) (Dec. 10, 1948).Google Scholar
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, opened for signature Dec. 21, 1965, 660 U.N.T.S. 195 (entered into force Jan. 4, 1969).Google Scholar
International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, opened for signature Dec. 16, 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 3 (entered into force Jan. 3, 1976).Google Scholar
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, opened for signature Dec. 16, 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 171 (entered into force Mar. 23, 1976).Google Scholar
American Convention on Human Rights, Nov. 22, 1969, O.A.S.T.S. No. 36 (entered into force July 18, 1978).Google Scholar
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, opened for signature Dec. 18, 1979, 1249 U.N.T.S. 13 (entered into force Sept. 3, 1981).Google Scholar
Convention Against Torture, opened for signature Dec. 10, 1984, 1465 U.N.T.S. 85 (entered into force June 26, 1987).Google Scholar
Convention on the Rights of the Child, opened for signature Nov. 20, 1989, 1577 U.N.T.S. 3 (entered into force Sept. 2, 1990).Google Scholar
Toonen v. Australia, Comm’n No. 488/1992, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/50/D/488/1992 (Nov. 5, 1992).Google Scholar
International Fact-Checking Network, IFCN Code of Principles, at www.ifcncodeofprinciples.poynter.org/Google Scholar
Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights, Status of Ratification: Interactive Dashboard, available at https://indicators.ohchr.org/ (last visited Aug. 13, 2024).Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The HTML of this chapter is known to have missing or limited accessibility features. We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions, please contact accessibility@cambridge.org.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • David L. Sloss, Santa Clara University School of Law
  • Book: People v. The Court
  • Online publication: 07 August 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009651226.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • David L. Sloss, Santa Clara University School of Law
  • Book: People v. The Court
  • Online publication: 07 August 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009651226.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • David L. Sloss, Santa Clara University School of Law
  • Book: People v. The Court
  • Online publication: 07 August 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009651226.013
Available formats
×