Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-t6st2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-15T19:44:21.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Accusations of Heresy between East and West

from Part II - Case Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2025

Richard Flower
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Get access

Summary

This chapter examines the reciprocal accusations of heresy between the Byzantine East and Latin West: such accusations were only sporadically made during the first millennium but increased exponentially from the twelfth century onwards on the Byzantine side and, to a lesser extent, from the thirteenth century on the Latin side (where they were generally subsumed under the accusation of schism or ‘disobedience’). The notions of ‘heretic’ and ‘schismatic’, which ought to be distinct and precisely defined according to canon law, increasingly overlapped within the polemical discourse and were collectively applied to the opposite population, in a process of construction of religious otherness.

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Select Bibliography

Anastos, M. 2001. ‘Constantinople and Rome: A survey of the relations between the Byzantine and the Roman Churches’, in Anastos, M., Aspects of the Mind of Byzantium, ed. Vryonis, S. and Goodhue, N., Aldershot, no. VIII, 1–119.Google Scholar
Bayer, A. 2002. Spaltung der Christenheit. Das sogenannte Morgenländische Schisma von 1054, Cologne.Google Scholar
Blanchet, M.-H. 2014. ‘“Schismatiques” et “hérétiques”: Les qualifications appliquées aux Latins à Byzance’, Mélanges de l’École française de Rome. Italie et Méditerranée modernes et contemporaines 126.2: 239–50, http://mefrim.revues.org/1870.Google Scholar
Bucossi, A. and Calia, A. (eds.) 2020. Contra Latinos et Adversus Graecos: The Separation between Rome and Constantinople from the Ninth to the Fifteenth Century, Leuven.Google Scholar
Chrissis, N. G. 2019Broken brotherhood: Schism and crusades in Greek-Latin relations’, in Giantsi, N. and Flogaitis, S. (eds.) The Presence and Contribution of the (Eastern) Roman Empire in the Formation of Europe, Athens, 115–50.Google Scholar
Gemeinhardt, P. 2002. Die Filioque-Kontroverse zwischen Ost- und Westkirche im Frühmittelalter, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolbaba, T. 2001. ‘Byzantine perceptions of Latin religious “errors”: Themes and changes from 850 to 1350’, in Laiou, A. E. and Mottahedeh, R. P. (eds.) The Crusades from the Perspective of Byzantium and the Muslim World, Washington, DC, 117–43.Google Scholar
Kolbaba, T. 2008. Inventing Latin Heretics: Byzantines and the Filioque in the Ninth Century, Kalamazoo, MI.Google Scholar
Morini, E. 2013. ‘L’Union vue par les “antiunionistes”. L’orthodoxie ecclésiologique et l’incohérence de l’orthodoxie de Lyon à Florence’, in Blanchet, M.-H. and Gabriel, F. (eds.) Réduire le schisme? Ecclésiologies et politiques de l’Union entre Orient et Occident (XIIIe–XVIIIe siècles), Paris, 1339.Google Scholar
Neocleous, S. 2019. Heretics, Schismatics, or Catholics? Latin Attitudes to the Greeks in the Long Twelfth Century, Toronto.10.1515/9781771104012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedl, A. 2020b. Kirchenbild und Kircheneinheit. Der dominikanische ‘Tractatus contra Graecos’ (1252) in seinem theologischen und historischen Kontext, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabel, C. 2011. ‘The quarrel over unleavened bread in Western theology, 1234–1439’, in Hinterberger, M. and Schabel, C. (eds.) Greeks, Latins, and Intellectual History 1204–1500, Leuven, 85127.Google Scholar
Schabel, C. 2015. ‘Pope, council and the Filioque in Western theology, 1274–1439’, Medieval Encounters: Jewish, Christian and Muslim Culture in Confluence and Dialogue 21: 190213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siecienski, A. E. 2010. The Filioque: History of a Doctrinal Controversy, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalen, B. E. 2007. ‘Rethinking the Schism of 1054: Authority, heresy and the Latin rite’, Traditio 62: 124.10.1017/S0362152900000519CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×