Lewis-Williams, D. The Mind in the Cave. Thames and Hudson, London, 2002.Google Scholar

Kandel, ER. The Age of Insight. Random House, New York, 2012.Google Scholar

Kandel, ER. Reductionism in Art and Brain Science: Bridging the Two Cultures. Columbia University Press, New York, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynne, A. Isbell. The Fruit, the Tree and the Serpent. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2009.Google Scholar

Wilson, EO. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. Vantage Books, New York, 1999.Google Scholar

Renfrew, C, Frith, C, Malafouris, L. The Sapient Mind: Archeology Meets Neuroscience. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harlow, JM. Recovery from the passage of an iron bar through the head. Publications of the Massachusetts Medical Society 1868; 2: 327–347.Google Scholar

Broca, P. Nouvelle observation d'aphémie produite par une lésion de la moitié postérieure des deuxième et troisième circonvolution frontales gauches. Bulletin de la Société Anatomique 1861; 36: 398–407.Google Scholar

Penfield, W. Mechanisms of voluntary movement. Brain 1954; 77: 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Luria, AR. Higher Cortical Functions in Man. Basic Books, New York, 1972.Google Scholar

Lhermitte, F, Pillon, B, Seradura, M. Human autonomy and the frontal lobes. Part 1: imitation and utilization behavior – a neuropsychological study of 75 patients. Ann Neurol 1986; 19: 326–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lhermitte, F. Human autonomy and the frontal lobes. Part II: patient behavior in complex and social situations: the “environmental dependency syndrome.” Ann Neurol 1986; 19: 335–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Folstein, MF, Robins, LN, Helzer, JE. The Mini-Mental State Examination. Arch Ger Psychiatry 1983; 40: 812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nasreddine, ZS, Phillips, MA, Bedirian, V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 695–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mesulam, M-M. Large scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language and memory. Ann Neurol 1990; 28: 597–613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grace, J, Malloy, PF. Frontal Systems Behavior Scale. PAR, Lutz, FL, 2002.Google Scholar

Bar-On, R. The Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i): Technical Manual. Multi-Health Systems, Toronto, 1997.Google Scholar

Roth, RM, Isquith, PK, Gioia, GA. BRIEF-A: Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function – Adult Version. PAR, Lutz, FL, 2005.Google Scholar

Kramer, JH, Reed, BR, Mungas, D, Weiner, MW, Chui, HC. Executive dysfunction in subcortical ischemic vascular disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72: 217–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tullberg, M, Fletcher, E, DeCarli, C, et al. White matter lesions impair frontal lobe function regardless of their location. Neurology 2004; 63(2): 246–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wolfe, N, Linn, R, Babikian, VL, Knoefel, JE, Albert, ML. Frontal systems impairment following multiple lacunar infarcts. Arch Neurol 1990; 47: 129–132.Google Scholar

Del Zoppo, GJ, Saver, JL, Jauch, EC, Adams, HP. Expansion of the time window for treatment of acute ischemic stroke with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator: a science advisory from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2009; 40: 2945–2948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Saver, JL. Comments, opinions and reviews: time is brain – quantified. Stroke. 2006; 37: 263–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffmann, M, Schmitt, F, Bromley, E. Comprehensive cognitive neurological assessment in stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 2009; 119(3): 162–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hoffmann, M, Sacco, RS, Mohr, JP, Tatemichi, TK. Higher cortical function deficits among acute stroke patients: the Stroke Data Bank experience. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 1997; 6: 114–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffmann, M. Higher cortical function deficits after stroke: an analysis of 1000 patients from a dedicated cognitive stroke registry. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2001; 15: 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffmann, M, Schmitt, F. Metacognition in stroke: bedside assessment and relation to location, size and stroke severity. Cogn Behav Neurol 2006; 19(2): 85–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hoffmann, M, Watts, A. Cognitive dysfunction in isolated brainstem stroke: a neuropsychological and SPECT study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 1998; 7: 24–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hoffmann, M, Benes Cases, L. Etiology of frontal network syndromes in isolated subtentorial stroke. Behav Neurol 2008; 20: 101–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rizzolatti, G, Fabbri-Destro, M, Cattaneo, L. Mirror neurons and their clinical relevance. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2009; 5: 24–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hoffmann, M, Bill, PLA. The environmental dependency syndrome, imitation behaviour and utilisation behaviour as presenting symptoms of bilateral frontal lobe infarction due to Moyamoya disease. S Afr Med J 1992; 81: 271–273.Google Scholar

Rizzolatti, G, Fadiga, L, Fogassi, L, Gallese, V. Resonance behaviors and mirror neurons. Arch Ital Biol 1999; 137: 85–100.Google ScholarPubMed

Ramachandran, VS. The Tell-Tale Brain. W.W. Norton, New York, 2011.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, M. The panoply of field dependent behavior in 1436 stroke patients: the Mirror Neuron System uncoupled and the consequences of loss of personal autonomy. Neurocase 2014; 20(5): 556–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Subiaul, F. Mosaic cognitive evolution: the case of imitation learning. In Broadfield, D, Yuan, M, Schick, K, Toth, N. (eds.), The Human Brain Evolving. Stone Age Institute Press, Gosport, IN, 2010.Google Scholar

Wynn, T, Coolidge, FL. The implications of the working memory model for the evolution of modern cognition. Int J Evol Biol 2011. doi: 10.4061/2011/741357.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, B, Chen, R. The impact of stroke on emotional intelligence. BMC Neurology 2010; 10: 103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Koechlin, E, Hyafil, A. Anterior prefrontal function and the limits of human decision making. Science 2007; 318: 594–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burgess, PW, Durmontheil, I, Gilbert, SJ. The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function. Trends Cogn Sci 2007; 11(7): 290–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hoffmann, M, Bar-On, R. Isolated frontopolar cortex lesion: a case study. Cogn Behav Neurol 2012; 25: 50–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Josephs, KA, Hodges, JR, Snowden, JS, et al. Neuropathological background of phenotypical variability in frontotemporal dementia. Acta Neuropathol 2011; 122: 137–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Courville, CB. Pathology of the Nervous System: Part 4. Pacific, Mountain View, CA, 1937.Google Scholar

Dubois, B, Slachevsky, A, Litvan, I, Pillon, B. The FAB: a frontal assessment battery at the beside. Neurology 2000; 55: 1621–1626.Google Scholar

Crossley, NA, Mechelli, A, Scott, J, et al. The hubs of the human connectome are generally implicated in the anatomy of brain disorders. Brain 2014; 137: 2382–2395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rascovsky, K, Hodges, JR, Knopman, D, Miller, BL, et al. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 2011; 134: 2456–2477.Google Scholar

Boutoleau-Bretonniere, C, Evrard, C, Benoit-Hardouin, J, et al. DAPHNE: a new tool for the assessment of the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis 2015; 5: 503–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milan, G, Lamenza, F, Iavarone, A, et al. Frontal behavioral inventory in the differential diagnosis of dementia. Acta Neurol Scand 2008; 117: 260–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Giza, CC, Hovda, DA. The neuro-metabolic cascade of concussion. J Athl Train 2001; 36: 228–235.Google Scholar

Byrnes, KR, Wilson, CM, Brabazon, F, et al. FDG-PET imaging in mild traumatic brain injury: a critical review. Front Neuroenerg 2014. doi: 10.3389/fnene.2013.00013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fagerholm, ED, Hellyear, PJ, Scott, G, Leech, R, Sharp, DJ. Disconnection of network hubs and cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injury. Brain 2015; 138: 1696–1709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wang, H-K, Lee, Y-C, Huang, C-Y, et al. Traumatic brain injury causes frontotemporal dementia and TDP-43 proteolysis. Neuroscience 2015; 300: 94–103.Google Scholar

Lindelov, JK, Overgaard, R, Overgaard, M. Improving working memory performance in brain-injured patients using hypnotic suggestion. Brain 2017; 140: 1100–1106.Google Scholar

Kitagishi, Y, Matsuda, S. Diets involved in PPAR and PI3K/AKT/PTEN pathway may contribute to neuroprotection in atraumatic brain injury. Alzheimers Res Ther 2013; 5: 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study of the safety and effectiveness of the PoNS™ device for cranial nerve noninvasive neuromodulation (“CN-NINM”) training in subjects with a chronic balance deficit due to mTBI. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02429167.Google Scholar

Leonard, G, Lapierre, Y, Chen, J-K, Wardini, JC, Ptito, A. Noninvasive tongue stimulation combined with intensive cognitive and physical rehabilitation induces neuroplastic changes in patients with multiple sclerosis: a multimodal neuroimaging study. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2017. doi: 10.1177/2055217317690561.Google ScholarPubMed

Sili, U, Kaya, A, Mert, A; HSV Encephalitis Study Group. Herpes simplex virus encephalitis: clinical manifestations, diagnosis and outcome in 106 adult patients. J Clin Virol 2014; 60(2): 112–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grydeland, H, Walhovd, KB, Westlye, LT, et al. Amnesia following herpes simplex encephalitis: diffusion-tensor imaging uncovers reduced integrity of normal-appearing white matter. Radiology 2010; 257(3): 774–781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hand, E. New scrutiny for a slowing Atlantic conveyor. Science 2016; 352: 751–752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dansgaard, W, Johnson, SJ, Clausen, HB, et al. Evidence for general instability of past climate from a 250-kyr ice-core record. Nature 1993; 364(6434): 218–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinrich, H. Origin and consequences of cyclic ice rafting in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean during the past 130,000 years. Quat Res 1988; 29: 142–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar