Opinion Formation and Polarisation in the News Feed Era

doi:10.1017/9781108779104.035

32 - Opinion Formation and Polarisation in the News Feed Era

Effects from Digital, Social, and Mobile Media

from Part III - Contemporary Challenges to Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2022

Johanna Dunaway and

Jaime Settle

Edited by

Danny Osborne and

Chris G. Sibley

Show author details

Danny Osborne: Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Chris G. Sibley: Affiliation:
University of Auckland

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Today’s information environment is drastically different from the heyday of print and broadcast, but these changes exceed the scope of researchers’ agendas. More is known now than when these technologies were in their infancy, yet efforts to understand the implications of changing communication technology for media effects have produced mixed findings, limiting progress towards cohesive and generalisable theoretical explanations. A literature review suggests one reason for this is that media effects scholarship has often neglected insights from political psychology and information processing, contributing to a lack of theoretical coherence across these bodies of work. Though research thoroughly examines directional motivations dictating media choice and exposure, it does not equally consider other cognitive biases driving choice, exposure, and processing, which can offset effects from the structural aspects of digital media. Given ample evidence that communication technology influences information processing, any viable, contemporary explanation of media effects must reconcile with these literatures.

Keywords

Digital media Information processing Media effects Opinion formation Polarisation

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology , pp. 508 - 525

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108779104.035 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2008). Is polarization a myth?. The Journal of Politics, 70(2), 542–555.Google Scholar

Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005, August). The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: Divided they blog. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, 36–43.Google Scholar

Arceneaux, K. (2012). Cognitive biases and the strength of political arguments. American Journal of Political Science, 56(2), 271–285.Google Scholar

Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, M. (2013). Changing minds or changing channels?: Partisan news in an age of choice. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, P. M. (2015). How does media choice affect hostile media perceptions? Evidence from participant preference experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(1), 12–25.Google Scholar

Arceneaux, K., Johnson, M., & Cryderman, J. (2013). Communication, persuasion, and the conditioning value of selective exposure: Like minds may unite and divide but they mostly tune out. Political Communication, 30(2), 213–231.Google Scholar

Arceneaux, K., & Vander Wielen, R. J. (2013). The effects of need for cognition and need for affect on partisan evaluations. Political Psychology, 34(1), 23–42.Google Scholar

Atkeson, L. R., & Maestas, C. D. (2012). Catastrophic politics: How extraordinary events redefine perceptions of government. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., et al. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9216–9221.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132.Google Scholar

Baum, M. (2003). Soft news goes to war: Public opinion and American foreign policy in the new media age. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bode, L. (2016). Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 24–48.Google Scholar

Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2015). In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 619–638.Google Scholar

Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., & Cook, F. L. (2014). The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior, 36(2), 235–262.Google Scholar

Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2020). Cross-country trends in affective polarization [No. w26669]. National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brader, T. (2006). Campaigning for hearts and minds: How emotional appeals in political ads work. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics: Ideology and discontent. In Apter, D. E. (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar

De Benedictis-Kessner, J., Baum, M. A., Berinsky, A. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2019). Persuading the enemy: Estimating the persuasive effects of partisan media with the preference-incorporating choice and assignment design. American Political Science Review, 113(4), 902–916.Google Scholar

Detenber, B., & Reeves, B. (1996). A bio-informational theory of emotion: Motion and image size effects on viewers. Journal of Communication, 46(3), 66–84.CrossRef Google Scholar

Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Druckman, J. N. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame?. Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041–1066.Google Scholar

Druckman, J. N., Peterson, E., & Slothuus, R. (2013). How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 57–79.Google Scholar

Dunaway, J., & Searles, K. (2021). News and democratic citizens in the mobile era. Oxford University Press [Manuscript submitted].Google Scholar

Dunaway, J., Searles, K., Sui, M., & Paul, N. (2018). News attention in a mobile era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(2), 107–124.Google Scholar

Dunaway, J., & Soroka, S. (2021). Smartphone-size screens constrain cognitive access to video news stories. Information, Communication & Society, 24(1), 69–84.Google Scholar

Feezell, J. T. (2018). Agenda setting through social media: The importance of incidental news exposure and social filtering in the digital era. Political Research Quarterly, 71(2), 482–494.Google Scholar

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. A., & Pope, J. C. (2008). Polarization in the American public: Misconceptions and misreadings. Journal of Politics, 70(2), 556–560.Google Scholar

Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320.Google Scholar

Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011). Ideological segregation online and offline. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1799–1839.Google Scholar

Goel, S., Hofman, J. M., Lahaie, S., Pennock, D. M., & Watts, D. J. (2010). Predicting consumer behavior with Web search. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(41), 17486–17490.Google Scholar

Grabe, M. E., Lombard, M., Reich, R. D., Capanella Bracken, C., & Ditton, T. B. (2000). The role of screen size in viewer experiences of media content. Visual Communication Quarterly, 6(2), 4–9.Google Scholar

Hetherington, M. J. (2001). Resurgent mass partisanship: The role of elite polarization. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 619–631.Google Scholar

Hindman, M. (2018). The internet trap: How the digital economy builds monopolies and undermines democracy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aarøe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17.Google Scholar

Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Iyengar, S. (2017). A typology of media effects. In Kenski, K. & Jamieson, K. H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication (pp. 59–68).Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Iyengar, S., & Krupenkin, M. (2018). The strengthening of partisan affect. Political Psychology, 39(1), 201–218.CrossRef Google Scholar

Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431.CrossRef Google Scholar

Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707.Google Scholar

Jamieson, K. H. (2017). Creating the hybrid field of political communication: A five-decade long evolution of the concepts of effects. In Kenski, K. & Jamieson, K. H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication (pp. 15–45). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jurkowitz, M., & Mitchell, A. (2020). An oasis of bipartisanship: Republicans and Democrats distrust social media sites for political and election news. https://www.journalism.org/2020/01/29/an-oasis-of-bipartisanship-republicans-and-democrats-distrust-social-media-sites-for-political-and-election-news/Google Scholar

Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communication. Transaction.Google Scholar

Kim, Y. M., Hsu, J., Neiman, D., et al. (2018). The stealth media? Groups and targets behind divisive issue campaigns on Facebook. Political Communication, 35(4), 515–541.Google Scholar

Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498.Google Scholar

Ladd, J. M., & Podkul, A. R. (2020). Sowing distrust of the news media as an electoral strategy. In Grofman, B., Suhay, L., & Trechsel, A. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of electoral persuasion (pp. 427–454). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46–70.Google Scholar

Lang, A., Potter, D., & Grabe, M. E. (2003). Making news memorable: Applying theory to the production of local television news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(1), 113–123.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How voters decide: Information processing in election campaigns. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Layman, G. C., & Carsey, T. M. (2002). Party polarization and ‘conflict extension’ in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 786–802.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B. R., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people’s choice. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Lelkes, Y., Sood, G., & Iyengar, S. (2017). The hostile audience: The effect of access to broadband internet on partisan affect. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 5–20.Google Scholar

Levendusky, M. (2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became Democrats and conservatives became Republicans. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Levendusky, M. S. (2013a). Why do partisan media polarize viewers?. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 611–623.Google Scholar

Levendusky, M. S. (2013b). How partisan media polarize America. The University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2013). The rationalizing voter. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lombard, M., Ditton, T. B., Grabe, M. E., & Reich, R. D. (1997). The role of screen size in viewer responses to television fare. Communication Reports, 10(1), 95–106.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mason, L. (2016). A cross-cutting calm: How social sorting drives affective polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 351–377.Google Scholar

Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mason, L., & Wronski, J. (2018). One tribe to bind them all: How our social group attachments strengthen partisanship. Political Psychology, 39(2), 257–277.CrossRef Google Scholar

Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063.Google Scholar

Molyneux, L. (2017). Mobile news consumption. Digital Journalism, 6(5), 634–650.Google Scholar

Munger, K., Gopal, I., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2021). Accessibility and generalizability: Are social media effects moderated by age or digital literacy?. Research & Politics, 8(2).Google Scholar

Nelson, J. L., & Webster, J. G. (2017). The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience. Social Media+ Society, 3(3).Google Scholar

Nir, L. (2011). Motivated reasoning and public opinion perception. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(3), 504–532.Google Scholar

Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. Penguin.Google Scholar

Pennycook, G., Cannon, T. D., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(12), 1865–1880.Google Scholar

Peterson, E., Goel, S., & Iyengar, S. (2018). Echo chambers and partisan polarization: Evidence from the 2016 presidential campaign [Unpublished manuscript]. https://5harad.com/papers/selective-exposure.pdf Google Scholar

Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 101–127.CrossRef Google Scholar

Redlawsk, D. P. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. The Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1021–1044.Google Scholar

Reeves, B., Lang, A., Kim, E. Y., & Tatar, D. (1999). The effects of screen size and message content on attention and arousal. Media Psychology, 1(1), 49–67.Google Scholar

Settle, J. E. (2018). Frenemies: How social media polarizes America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Settle, J. E. (2020). Moving beyond sentiment analysis: Social media and emotions in political communication. In Welles, B. F. & González-Bailón, S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of networked communication (pp. 350–377). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shin, J., Jian, L., Driscoll, K., & Bar, F. (2017). Political rumoring on Twitter during the 2012 US presidential election: Rumor diffusion and correction. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1214–1235.Google Scholar

Soroka, S. N. (2014). Negativity in democratic politics: Causes and consequences. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stroud, N. J. (2017). Selective exposure theories. In Kenski, K. & Jamieson, K. H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication (pp. 531–548). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Taber, C. (2003). Information processing and public opinion. In Sears, D. O., Huddy, L., & Jervis, R. (Eds.), Handbook of political psychology (pp. 433–476). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Weaver, K., Garcia, S. M., Schwarz, N., & Miller, D. T. (2007). Inferring the popularity of an opinion from its familiarity: A repetitive voice can sound like a chorus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 821–833.Google Scholar

Weeks, B. E. (2015). Emotions, partisanship, and misperceptions: How anger and anxiety moderate the effect of partisan bias on susceptibility to political misinformation. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 699–719.Google Scholar

Weeks, B. E., Lane, D. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S., & Kwak, N. (2017). Incidental exposure, selective exposure, and political information sharing: Integrating online exposure patterns and expression on social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 363–379.Google Scholar

Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zaller, J., & Feldman, S. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 579–616.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.