Book contents
- A Textbook of Clinical Embryology
- A Textbook of Clinical Embryology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Frontispiece
- Chapter Co-authors
- Acknowledgments
- Section 1 Physiology of Reproduction
- Section 2 Assisted Reproductive Procedures
- Section 3 Genetics and Preimplantation Genetic Testing
- Section 4 IVF Laboratory
- Index
- References
Section 1 - Physiology of Reproduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2021
Edited by
Book contents
- A Textbook of Clinical Embryology
- A Textbook of Clinical Embryology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Frontispiece
- Chapter Co-authors
- Acknowledgments
- Section 1 Physiology of Reproduction
- Section 2 Assisted Reproductive Procedures
- Section 3 Genetics and Preimplantation Genetic Testing
- Section 4 IVF Laboratory
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A Textbook of Clinical Embryology , pp. 1 - 70Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
References
Eddy, EM, Clark, JM, Gong, D, Fenderson, BA. Origin and migration of primordial germ cells in mammals. Gamete Res. 1981; 4:333–362.Google Scholar
Konishi, I, Fujii, S, Okamura, H, Parmley, T, Mori, T. Development of interstitial cells and ovigerous cords in the human fetal ovary: an ultrastructural study. J. Anat. 1986; 148:121–135.Google ScholarPubMed
Francavilla, S, Cordeschi, G, Properzi, G, et al. Ultrastructure of fetal human gonad before sexual differentiation and during early testicular and ovarian development. J. Submicrosc. Cytol. Pathol. 1990; 22:389–400.Google Scholar
Ulloa-Montoya, F, Kidder, BL, Pauwelyn, KA, et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis of embryonic and adult stem cells with extended and limited differentiation capacity. Genome Biol. 2007; 8:R163.Google Scholar
Eguizabal, C, Shovlin, TC, Durcova-Hills, G, Surani, A, McLaren, A. Generation of primordial germ cells from pluripotent stem cells. Differentiation 2009; 78:116–123.Google Scholar
Baker, TG. A quantitative and cytological study of germ cells in human ovaries. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol Sci. 1963; 158:417–433.Google ScholarPubMed
Li, Y, Zheng, M, Lau, YF. The sex-determining factors SRY and SOX9 regulate similar target genes and promote testis cord formation during testicular differentiation. Cell Rep. 2014; 8:723–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hannema, SE, Hughes, IA. Regulation of Wolffian duct development. Horm. Res. 2007; 67:142–151.Google ScholarPubMed
References
Frisch, RE, Revelle, R. Height and weight at menarche and hypothesis of menarche. Arch. Dis. Child. 1971; 46:695–701.Google Scholar
Grumbach, MM, Richards, GE, Conte, FA, Kaplan, SL. Clinical disorders of adrenal function and puberty: an assessment of the role of the adrenal cortex in normal and abnormal puberty in man and evidence for an ACTH-like pituitary adrenal androgen stimulating hormone. In: Serio, M, ed., The Endocrine Function of the Human Adrenal Cortex. New York: Academic Press. 1978; 583–612.Google Scholar
Grumbach, MM, Roth, JC, Kaplan, SL, Kelch, RP. Hypothalamic-pituitary regulation of puberty in man: evidence and concepts derived from clinical research. In: Grumbach, MM, Grave, GD, Mayer, FE, eds., Control of the Onset of Puberty. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 1974; 115–166.Google Scholar
Worthman, CM. The epidemiology of human development. In: Worthman, CM, Panter-Brick, C, eds., Hormones, Health and Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1999; 47–104.Google Scholar
Parker, CR Jr. Dehydroepiandrosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate production in the human adrenal during development and aging. Steroids 1999; 64:640–647.Google Scholar
Orentreich, N, Brind, JL, Vogelman, JH, Andres, R, Baldwin, H. Long-term longitudinal measures of plasma dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate in normal men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1992; 75:1002–1014.Google Scholar
Baulieu, EE. Neurosteroids: a novel function of the brain. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1998; 23:963–987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Majewska, MD. Neuronal actions of dehydroepiandrosterone. Possible role in brain development, aging, memory and affect. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1995; 774:111–120.Google Scholar
Labrie, F, Belanger, A, Simard, J, Luu-The Van, , Labrie, C. DHEA and peripheral androgen and estrogen formation: intracinology. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1995; 774:16–28.Google Scholar
Argquitt, AB, Stoecker, BJ, Hermann, JS, Winterfeldt, EA. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, cholesterol, hemoglobin, and anthropometric measures related to growth in male adolescents. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1991; 91:575–579.Google Scholar
Dorn, LD, Hitt, SF, Rotenstein, D. Biopsychological and cognitive differences in children with premature vs. on-time adrenarche. Arch. Pediat. Adolesc. Med. 1999; 153:137–146.Google Scholar
Nass, R, Baker, S, Sadler, AE, Sidtis, JJ. The effects of precocious adrenarche on cognition and hemispheric specialization. Brain Cogn. 1990; 14:59–69.Google Scholar
Gottsch, ML, Cunningham, MJ, Smith, JT, et al. A role for kisspeptins in the regulation of gonadotropin secretion in the mouse. Endocrinology 2004; 145:4073–4077.Google Scholar
Cariboni, A, Pimpinelli, F, Colamarino, S, et al. The product of X-linked Kallmann’s syndrome gene (KAL1) affects the migratory activity of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-producing neurons. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2004; 13:2781–2791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferris, HA, Shupnik, MA. Mechanisms for pulsatile regulation of the gonadotropin subunit genes by GNRH1. Biol. Reprod. 2006; 74:993–998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, F, Austin, DA, Mellon, PL, Olefsky, JM, Webster, NJ. GnRH activates ERK1/2 leading to the induction of c-fos and LHbeta protein expression in LbetaT2 cells. Mol. Endocrinol. 2002; 16:419–434.Google Scholar
Scherf, KS, Behrman, M, Dahl, RE. Facing changes and changing faces in adolescence: a new model for investigating adolescent-specific interactions between pubertal, brain and behavioral development. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012; 2:199–299.Google Scholar
Bouchard, P, Wolf, JP, Hajri, S. Inhibition of ovulation: comparison between the mechanism of action of steroids and GnRH analogues. Hum. Reprod. 1988; 3:503–506.Google Scholar
Bethea, CL, Centeno, ML, Cameron, JL. Neurobiology of stress-induced reproductive dysfunction in female macaques. Mol. Neurobiol. 2008; 38:199–230.Google Scholar
Booth, RA Jr, Weltman, JY, Yankov, VI, et al. Mode of pulsatile follicle-stimulating hormone secretion in gonadal hormone-sufficient and -deficient women – a clinical research center study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1996; 81:3208–3214.Google Scholar
References
Nicholson, HD, Hardy, MP. Luteinizing hormone differentially regulates the secretion of testicular oxytocin and testosterone by purified adult rat Leydig cells in vitro. Endocrinology 1992; 130:671–677.Google ScholarPubMed
Carreau, S, Bilinska, B, Levallet, J. Male germ cells. A new source of estrogens in mammalian testis. Ann. Endocrinol. 1998; 59:79–92.Google Scholar
Waeber, C, Reymond, O, Reymond, M, Lemarchand-Beraud, T. Effects of hyper- and hypoprolactinemia on gonadotropin secretion, rat testicular luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin receptors and testosterone production by isolated Leydig cells. Biol. Reprod. 1983; 28:167–177.Google Scholar
Neaves, WB, Johnson, L, Petty, CS. Age-related change in numbers of other interstitial cells in testes of adult men: evidence bearing on the fate of Leydig cells lost with advanced age. Biol. Reprod. 1985; 33:259–269.Google Scholar
Gray, A, Berlin, JA, McKinley, JB, Longcope, C. An examination of research design effects on the association of testosterone and male ageing: results of a meta analysis. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1991; 44:671–684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, CY, Mruk, DD. The blood-testis barrier and its implications for male contraception. Pharmacol. Rev. 2012; 64:16–64.Google Scholar
Ragheb, AM, Sabanegh, Jr ES. Smoking and male fertility: a contemporary review. Arch. Med. Sci. 2009; 5:S13–S19.Google Scholar
Lee, NPY, Cheng, CY. Nitric oxide/nitric oxide synthase, spermatogenesis, and tight junction dynamics. Biol. Reprod. 2004; 70:267–276.Google Scholar
Johnson, L, Zane, RS, Petty, CS, Neaves, WB. Quantification of the human Sertoli cell population: Its distribution, relation to germ cell numbers, and age related decline. Biol. Reprod. 1984; 31:785–795.Google Scholar
Girsh, E, Katz, N, Genkin, L, et al. Male age influences oocyte-donor program results. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2008; 25:137–143.Google Scholar
Masliukaite, I, Hagen, JM, Jahnukainen, K, et al. Establishing reference values for age related spermatogonial quantity in prepubertal human testes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil. Steril. 2016; 106:1652–1657.Google Scholar
Paniagua, R, Nistal, M. Morphological and histometric study of human spermatogonia from birth to the onset of puberty. J. Anat. 1984; 139:535–552.Google Scholar
Sharpe, RM, McKinnell, C, Kivlin, C, Fisher, JS. Proliferation and functional maturation of Sertoli cells, and their relevance to disorders of testis function in adulthood. Reproduction 2003; 125:769–784.Google Scholar
Hecht, NB. Molecular mechanisms of male germ cell differentiation. Bioassays 1998; 20:555–561.Google Scholar
Hecht, NB. The making of a spermatozoon: a molecular perspective. Dev. Genet. 1995; 16:95–103.Google Scholar
Gill-Sharma, MK, Choudhuri, JD, Souza, S. Sperm chromatin protamination: an endocrine perspective. Protein Pept. Lett. 2011; 18:786–801.Google Scholar
Carrell, DT, Emery, BR, Hammoud, S. Altered protamine expression and diminished spermatogenesis: what is the link? Hum. Reprod. Update 2007; 13:313–327.Google Scholar
Jager, S. Sperm nuclear stability and male infertility. Arch. Androl. 1990; 25:253–259.Google Scholar
Carrell, DT, Emery, BR, Hammoud, S. The aetiology of sperm protamine abnormalities and their potential impact on the sperm epigenome. Int. J. Androl. 2008; 31:537–545.Google Scholar
Brumlow, WB, Adams, CS. Immunocytochemical detection of prolactin or prolactin-like immunoreactivity in epididymis of mature male mouse. Histochemistry 1990; 93:299–304.Google Scholar
Dacheux, JL, Dacheux, F. New insights into epididymal function in relation to sperm maturation. Reproduction 2014; 147:R27–R42.Google Scholar
Turner, RM. Moving to the beat: a review of mammalian sperm motility regulation. Reprod. Fert. Dev. 2006; 18:25–38.Google Scholar
Lotti, F, Corona, G, Maseroli, E, et al. Clinical implications of measuring prolactin levels in males of infertile couples. Andrology 2013; 1:764–771.Google Scholar
Rastrelli, G, Corona, G, Maggi, M. The role of prolactin in andrology: what is new? Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2015; 16:233–248.Google Scholar
Zukerman, Z, Weiss, DB, Orvieto, R. Does preejaculatory penile secretion originating from Cowper’s gland contain sperm? J. Assist. Reprod. Gen. 2003; 20:157–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Björndahl, L, Kvist, U. Sequence of ejaculation affects the spermatozoon as a carrier and its message. RBM Online 2003; 7:440–448.Google Scholar
Lilja, H, Lundwall, A. Molecular cloning of epididymal and seminal vesicular transcripts encoding a semenogelin-related protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992; 89:4559–4563.Google Scholar
Zaneveld, LG, Tauber, PF. Contribution of prostatic fluid components to the ejaculate. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 1981; 75A:265–277.Google Scholar
Tomar, AK, Sooch, BS, Singh, S, Yadav, S. Differential proteomics of human seminal plasma: a potential target for searching male infertility marker proteins. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 2012; 6:147–151.Google Scholar
Peter, A, Lilja, H, Lundwall, A, Malm, J. Semenogelin I and semenogelin II, the major gel-forming proteins in human semen, are substrates for transglutaminase. Eur. J. Biochem. 1998; 252:216–221.Google Scholar
Suzuki, K, Kise, H, Nishioka, J, Hayashi, T. The interaction among protein C inhibitor, prostate-specific antigen, and the semenogelin system. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2007; 33:46–52.Google Scholar
Sobrero, AJ, Macleod, J. The immediate postcoital test. Fertil. Steril. 1962; 13:184–189.Google Scholar
Perloff, WH, Steinberger, E. In-vitro penetration of cervical mucus by spermatozoa. Fertil. Steril. 1963; 14:231–236.Google Scholar
Publicover, S, Harper, CV, Barratt, C. [Ca2+]i signaling in sperm—making the most of what you’ve got. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007; 9:235–242.Google Scholar
Rode, B, Dirami, T, Bakouh, N, et al. The testis anion transporter TAT1 (SLC26A8) physically and functionally interacts with the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator channel: a potential role during sperm capacitation. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2012; 21:1287–1298.Google Scholar
Krausz, C, Bonaccorsi, L, Luconi, M, et al. Intracellular calcium increase and acrosome reaction in response to progesterone in human spermatozoa are correlated with in-vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod. 1995; 10:120–124.Google Scholar
Ankri, R, Friedman, H, Savion, N, et al. Visible light induces nitric oxide (NO) formation in sperm and endothelial cells. Lasers Surg. Med. 2010; 42:348–352.Google Scholar
Suarez, SS. Control of hyperactivation in sperm. Hum. Reprod. Update 2008; 14:647–657.Google Scholar
Nomikos, M, Kashir, J, Swann, K, Lai, FA. Sperm PLCζ: from structure to Ca2+ oscillations, egg activation and therapeutic potential. FEBS Lett. 2013; 587:3609–3616.Google Scholar
Escoffier, J, Yassine, S, Lee, HC, et al. Subcellular localization of phospholipase Cζ in human sperm and its absence in DPY19L2-deficient sperm are consistent with its role in oocyte activation. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2015; 21:157–168.Google Scholar
Heytens, E, Parrington, J, Coward, K, et al. Reduced amounts and abnormal forms of phospholipase C zeta (PLCzeta) in spermatozoa from infertile men. Hum. Reprod. 2009; 24:2417–2428.Google Scholar
Kashir, J, Konstantinidis, M, Jones, C, et al. A maternally inherited autosomal point mutation in human phospholipase C zeta (PLCzeta) leads to male infertility. Hum. Reprod. 2012; 27:222–231.Google Scholar
Küĉükkömürcü, S, Delogne-Desnoeck, J, Robyn, C. Prolactin and fructose in human seminal fluid. Int. J. Fertil. 1980; 25:117–121.Google Scholar
Meikle, AW, Stephenson, RA, Lewis, CM, Wiebke, GA, Middleton, RG. Age, genetic, and nongenetic factors influencing variation in serum sex steroids and zonal volumes of the prostate and benign prostatic hyperplasia in twins. Prostate 1997; 33:105–111.Google Scholar
Chianese, R, Cobellis, G, Chioccarelli, T, et al. Kisspeptins, estrogens and male fertility. Curr. Med. Chem. 2016; 23:4070–4091.Google Scholar
Eskenazi, B, Wyrobek, AJ, Sloter, E, et al. The association of age and semen quality in healthy men. Hum. Reprod. 2003; 18:447–454.Google Scholar
Slama, R, Bouyer, J, Windham, G, et al. Influence of paternal age on the risk of spontaneous abortion. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2005; 161:816–823.Google Scholar
Sartorius, GA, Nieschlag, E. Paternal age and reproduction. Hum. Reprod. Update 2010; 16:65–79.Google Scholar
Singh, NP, Muller, CH, Berger, RE. Effects of age on DNA double-strand breaks and apoptosis in human sperm. Fertil. Steril. 2003; 80:1420–1430.Google Scholar
Robinson, L, Gallos, ID, Conner, SJ, et al. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. 2012; 27:2908–2917.Google Scholar
Ford, WCL, North, K, Taylor, H, et al. Increasing paternal age is associated with delayed conception in a large population of fertile couples: evidence for declining fecundity in older men. The ALSPAC Study Team (Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood). Hum. Reprod. 2000; 15:1703–1708.Google Scholar
Hassan, MA, Killick, SR. Effect of male age on fertility: evidence for the decline in male fertility with increasing age. Fertil. Steril. 2003; 79:1520–1527.Google Scholar
Yang, Q, Wen, SW, Leader, A, et al. Paternal age and birth defects: how strong is the association? Hum. Reprod. 2007; 22:696–701.Google Scholar
Orioli, IM, Castilla, EE, Scarano, G, Mastroiacovo, P. Effect of paternal age in achondroplasia, thanatophoric dysplasia, and osteogenesis imperfecta. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1995; 59:209–217.Google Scholar
Lauritsen, MB, Pedersen, CB, Mortensen, PB. Effects of familial risk factors and place of birth on the risk of autism: a nationwide register-based study. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry 2005; 46:963–971.Google Scholar
Lawson, G, Fletcher, R. Delayed fatherhood. J. Fam. Plann. Reprod. Health Care 2014; 40:283–288.Google Scholar
Gray, A, Berlin, JA, McKinlay, JB, Longcope, C. An examination of research design effects on the association of testosterone and male aging: results of a meta-analysis. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1991; 44:671–684.Google Scholar
Nieschlag, E. The endocrine function of the human testis in regard to sexuality. Ciba Found. Symp. 1978; 14:183–208.Google Scholar
Diver, MJ, Imtiaz, KE, Ahmad, AM, Vora, JP, Fraser, WD. Diurnal rhythms of serum total, free and bioavailable testosterone and of SHBG in middle-aged men compared with those in young men. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 2003; 58:710–717.Google Scholar
Davidson, JM, Chen, JJ, Crapo, L, et al. Hormonal changes and sexual function in aging men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1983; 57:71–77.Google Scholar
Johnson, JM, Nachtigall, LB, Stern, TA. The effect of testosterone levels on mood in men: a review. Psychosomatics 2013; 54:509–514.Google Scholar
Hawton, KE. Sexual problems associated with physical illness. In: Weatherall, DJ, Ledingham, JG, Warrell, DA, eds., Oxford Textbook of Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1997; 4243–4247.Google Scholar
Lašaitė, L, Čeponis, J, Preikša, RT, Žilaitienė, B. Effects of two-year testosterone replacement therapy on cognition, emotions and quality of life in young and middle-aged hypogonadal men. Andrologia 2017; 49(3):10.1111/and.12633.Google Scholar
Janowsky, JS, Oviatt, SK, Orwoll, ES. Testosterone influences spatial cognition in older men. Behav. Neurosci. 1994; 108:325–332.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, JS. Androgens and bone metabolism. In: Nieschlag, E, Behre, HM, eds., Testosterone: Action, Deficiency, Substitution. Berlin: Springer Verlag. 1998; 187–207.Google Scholar
Bhasin, S, Storer, TW, Berman, N, et al. Testosterone replacement increases fat-free mass and muscle size in hypogonadal men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1997; 82:407–413.Google Scholar
Haider, A, Yassin, A, Haider, KS, et al. Men with testosterone deficiency and a history of cardiovascular diseases benefit from long-term testosterone therapy: observational, real-life data from a registry study. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2016; 14:251–261.Google Scholar
References
Gottsch, ML, Cunningham, MJ, Smith, JT, et al. A role for kisspeptins in the regulation of gonadotropin secretion in the mouse. Endocrinology 2004; 145:4073–4077.Google Scholar
Moreno, I, Codoñer, FM, Vilella, F, et al. Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 215:684–703.Google Scholar
Ravel, J, Gajer, P, Abdo, Z, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011; 108(Suppl. 1):4680–4687.Google Scholar
Gougeon, A. Regulation of ovarian follicular development in primates: facts and hypotheses. Endocr. Rev. 1996; 17:121–155.Google Scholar
Ng, EH, Yeung, WS, Fong, DY, Ho, PC. Effects of age on hormonal and ultrasound markers of ovarian reserve in Chinese women with proven fertility. Hum. Reprod. 2003; 18:2169–2174.Google Scholar
Dierich, A, Sairam, MR, Monaco, L, et al. Impairing follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) signaling in vivo: targeted disruption of the FSH receptor leads to aberrant gametogenesis and hormonal imbalance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998; 95:13612–13617.Google Scholar
Jayaprakasan, K, Hilwah, N, Kendall, NR, et al. Does 3D ultrasound offer any advantage in the pretreatment assessment of ovarian reserve and prediction of outcome after assisted reproduction treatment? Hum. Reprod. 2007; 22:1932–1941.Google Scholar
Kumar, TR, Wang, Y, Lu, N, Matzuk, MM. Follicle stimulating hormone is required for ovarian follicle maturation but not for male fertility. Nat. Genet. 1997; 15:201–204.Google Scholar
Matthews, CH, Borgato, S, Beck-Peccoz, P, et al. Primary amenorrhoea and infertility due to a mutation in the beta-subunit of follicle-stimulating hormone. Nat. Genet. 1993; 5:83–86.Google Scholar
Eppig, J. Oocyte control of ovarian follicular development and function in mammals. Reproduction 2001; 122:829–838.Google Scholar
Kidder, GM, Mhawi, AA. Gap junctions and ovarian folliculogenesis. Reproduction 2002; 123:613–620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eppig, JJ, Wigglesworth, K, Pendola, FL. The mammalian oocyte orchestrates the rate of ovarian follicular development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002; 99:2890–2894.Google Scholar
Vitt, UA, Hayashi, M, Klein, C, Hsueh, AJW. Growth differentiation factor-9 stimulates proliferation but suppresses the follicle stimulating hormone-induced differentiation of cultured granulosa cells from small antral and preovulatory rat follicles. Biol. Reprod. 2000; 62:370–377.Google Scholar
Parrott, JA, Skinner, MK. Kit-ligand/stem cell factor induces primordial follicle development and initiates folliculogenesis. Endocrinology 1999; 140:4262–4271.Google Scholar
Nilsson, E, Parrott, JA, Skinner, MK. Basic fibroblast growth factor induces primordial follicle development and initiates folliculogenesis. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2001; 25:123–130.Google Scholar
Dissen, GA, Garcia-Rudaz, C, Ojeda, SR. Role of neurotrophic factors in early ovarian development. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2009; 27:24–31.Google Scholar
Nilsson, E, Dole, G, Skinner, MK. Neurotrophin NT3 promotes ovarian primordial to primary follicle transition. Reproduction 2009; 138:697–707.Google Scholar
Abir, R, Fisch, B, Jin, S, et al. Presence of NGF and its receptors in ovaries from human fetuses and adults. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2005; 11:229–236.Google Scholar
El-Fouly, MA, Cook, B, Nekola, M, Nalbandov, AV. Role of the ovum in follicular luteinization. Endocrinology 1970; 87:286–293.Google Scholar
Nekola, MV, Nalbandov, AV. Morphological changes of rat follicular cells as influenced by oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 1971; 4:154–160.Google Scholar
Weenen, C, Laven, JSE, von Bergh, ARM, et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone expression pattern in the human ovary: potential implications for initial and cyclic follicle recruitment. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2004; 10:77–83.Google Scholar
Jeppesen, JV, Anderson, RA, Kelsey, TW, et al. Which follicles make the most anti-Müllerian hormone in humans? Evidence for an abrupt decline in AMH production at the time of follicle selection. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2013; 19:519–527.Google Scholar
Amsterdam, A, Koch, Y, Lieberman, ME, Lindner, HR. Distribution of binding sites for human chorionic gonadotropin in the preovulatory follicle of the rat. J. Cell. Biol. 1975; 67:894–900.Google Scholar
Lawrence, TS, Dekel, N, Beers, WH. Binding of human chorionic gonadotropin by rat cumuli oophori and granulosa cells: a comparative study. Endocrinology 1980; 106:1114–1118.Google Scholar
Chen, L, Russell, PT, Larsen, WJ. Functional significance of cumulus expansion in the mouse: roles for the preovulatory synthesis of hyaluronic acid within the cumulus mass. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 1993; 34:87–93.Google Scholar
Peng, XR, Hsueh, AJ, LaPolt, PS, Bjersing, L, Ny, T. Localization of luteinizing hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in ovarian cell types during follicle development and ovulation. Endocrinology 1991; 129:3200–3207.Google Scholar
Gougeon, A. Rate of follicular growth in the human ovary. In: Rolland, R, Van Hall, EV, Hillier, SG, McNatty, KP, Schoemaker, JS, eds., Follicular Maturation and Ovulation. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica. 1982; 155–163.Google Scholar
McNatty, KP, Hillier, SG, van den Boogaard, AMJ, et al. Follicular development during the luteal phase of the human menstrual cycle. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1983; 56:1022–1031.Google Scholar
Pache, TD, Wladimiroff, JW, de Jong, FH, Hop, WC, Fauser, BCJM. Growth patterns of non dominant ovarian follicles during the normal menstrual cycle. Fertil. Steril. 1990; 54:638–642.Google Scholar
Gougeon, A, Lefèvre, B. Evolution of the diameters of the largest healthy and atretic follicles during the human menstrual cycle. J. Reprod. Fert. 1983; 69:497–502.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, M, Nakano, R, Ooshima, A. Immunocytochemical localization of pituitary gonadotrophins and gonadal steroids confirms the ‘two-cell, two-gonadotrophin’ hypothesis of steroidogenesis in the human ovary. J. Endocrinol. 1990; 126:483–488.Google Scholar
Soules, MR, Steiner, RA, Clifton, DK, et al. Progesterone modulation of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in normal women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1984; 58:378–383.Google Scholar
Crowley, WF, McArthur, JW. Simulations of the normal menstrual cycle in Kallmann’s syndrome by pulsatile administration of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH). J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1980; 51:173–175.Google Scholar
Solovyeva, EV, Hayashi, M, Margi, K, et al. Growth differentiation factor-9 stimulates rat theca-interstitial cell androgen biosynthesis. Biol. Reprod. 2000; 63:1214–1218.Google Scholar
Dunlop, CE, Anderson, RA. The regulation and assessment of follicular growth. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. Suppl. 2014; 244:13–17.Google Scholar
Donez, J, Squifflet, J, Jadoul, P, et al. Pregnancy and live birth after autotransplantation of frozen-thawed ovarian tissue in a patient with metastatic disease undergoing chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Fertil. Steril. 1987; 2011:e1-e4.Google Scholar
Choi, J. Smitz, J. Luteinizing hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin: origins of difference. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2014; 383:203–213.Google Scholar
Casarini, L, Lispi, M, Longobardi, S, et al. LH and hCG action on the same receptor results in quantitatively and qualitatively different intracellular signaling. PLoS One 2012; 7, e46682.Google Scholar
Wide, L, Bakos, O. More basic forms of both human follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone in serum at midcycle compared with the follicular or luteal phase. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1993; 76:885–889.Google Scholar
McNatty, KP. Ovarian follicular development from the onset of luteal regression in humans and sheep. In: Rolland, R, Van Hall, EV, Hillier, SG, McNatty, KP, Schoemaker, JS, eds., Follicular Maturation and Ovulation. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica. 1982; 1–18.Google Scholar
Liu, L, Kong, N, Xia, G, Zhang, M. Molecular control of oocyte meiotic arrest and resumption. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2013; 25:463–471.Google Scholar
Reddy, P, Adhikari, D, Zheng, W, et al. PDK1 signaling in oocytes controls reproductive aging and lifespan by manipulating the survival of primordial follicles. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009; 18:2813–2824.Google Scholar
Meduri, G, Charnaux, N, Driancourt, MA, et al. Follicle-stimulating hormone receptors in oocytes? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002; 87:2266–2276.Google Scholar
Patsoula, E, Loutradis, D, Drakakis, P, et al. Messenger RNA expression for the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor and luteinizing hormone receptor in human oocytes and pre-implantation-stage embryos. Fertil. Steril. 2003; 79:1187–1193.Google Scholar
Otsuka, F, Shimasaki, S. A negative feedback system between oocyte bone morphogenetic protein 15 and granulosa cell kit ligand: its role in regulating granulosa cell mitosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002; 99:8060–8065.Google Scholar
Lefievre, L, Conner, SJ, Salpekar, A, et al. Four zona pellucida glycoproteins are expressed in the human. Hum. Reprod. 2004; 19:1580–1586.Google Scholar
Motta, PM, Makabe, S, Naguro, T, Correr, S. Oocyte follicle cells association during development of human ovarian follicle. A study by high resolution scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Arch. Histol. Cytol. 1994; 57:369–394.Google Scholar
Bergh, C, Olsson, JH, Selleskog, U, Hillensjo, T. Steroid production in cultured thecal cell obtained from human ovarian follicles. Hum. Reprod. 1993; 8:519–524.Google Scholar
Gilling-Smith, C, Franks, S. Ovarian function in assisted reproduction. In: Leung, PC, Adashi, EY, eds., The Ovary, 2nd ed. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press. 2004; 473–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gougeon, A. Steroid 3β-ol-dehydrogenase activity in the largest healthy and atretic follicles in the human ovary during the menstrual cycle. Ann. Biol. Anim. Biochim. Biophys. 1977; 17:1087–1094.Google Scholar
Curtis, EM. Normal ovarian histology in infancy and childhood. Obstet. Gynecol. 1962; 19:444–454.Google Scholar
Dekel, N, David, MP, Yedwab, GA, Kraicer, PF. Follicular development during late pregnancy. Int. J. Fertil. 1977; 22:24–29.Google Scholar
Bloom, W, Fawcett, DW. A Textbook of Histology, 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders. 1975.Google Scholar
Amsterdam, A, Rotmensch, S. Structure-function relationships during granulosa cell differentiation. Endocr. Rev. 1987; 8:309–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillier, SG, Yong, EL, Illingworth, PJ, et al. Effect of recombinant inhibin on androgen synthesis in cultured human thecal cells. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 1991; 75:R1–R6.Google Scholar
Roberts, VJ, Barth, S, El-Roeiy, A, Yen, SSC. Expression of inhibin/activin subunits and follistatin messenger ribonucleic acids and proteins in ovarian follicles and the corpus luteum during the human menstrual cycle. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1993; 77:1402–1410.Google Scholar
Sasano, H, Okamoto, M, Mason, JI, et al. Immunolocalization of aromatase, 17ɑ-hydroxylase and side-chain cleavage cytochrome P-450 in the human ovary. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1989; 85:163–169.Google Scholar
Hernandez, ER, Hurwitz, A, Vera, A, et al. Expression of the genes encoding the insulin-like growth factors and their receptors in the human ovary. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1992; 74:419–425.Google Scholar
Salas, C, Julio-Pieper, M, Valladares, M, et al. Nerve growth factor-dependent activation of trkA receptors in the human ovary results in synthesis of follicle-stimulating hormone receptors and estrogen secretion. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2006; 91:2396–2403.Google Scholar
Shima, K, Kitayama, S, Nakano, R. Gonadotropin binding sites in human ovarian follicles and corpora lutea during the menstrual cycle. Obstet. Gynecol. 1987; 69:800–806.Google Scholar
McNatty, KP, Makris, A, DeGrazia, C, Osathanondh, R, Rayan, KJ. The production of progesterone, androgens, and estrogens by granulosa cells, thecal tissue, and stromal tissue from human ovaries in vitro. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1979; 49:687–699.Google Scholar
McNatty, KP, Smith, DM, Makris, A, Osathanondh, R, Ryan, KJ. The microenvironment of the human antral follicle: interrelationship among the steroid levels in antral fluid, the population of granulosa cells and the status of the oocyte in vivo and in vitro. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1979; 49:851–860.Google Scholar
Hillier, SG. Intrafollicular paracrine function of ovarian androgen. J. Steroid. Biochem. 1987; 27:351–357.Google Scholar
Zeleznik, AJ, Schuler, HM, Reichert, LE. Gonadotropin-binding sites in the rhesus monkey ovary: role of the vasculature in the selective distribution of human chorionic gonadotropin to the preovulatory follicle. Endocrinology 1981; 109:356–362.Google Scholar
Wulff, C, Wiegand, SJ, Saunders, PT, Scobie, GA, Fraser, HM. Angiogenesis during follicular development in the primate and its inhibition by treatment with truncated Flt-1-Fc (vascular endothelial growth factor Trap[A40]). Endocrinology 2001; 142:3244–3254.Google Scholar
Pauerstein, CJ, Eddy, CA, Croxatto, HD, et al. Temporal relationships of estrogen, progesterone, and luteinizing hormone levels to ovulation in women and infra-human primates. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1978; 130:876–886.Google Scholar
Park, SJ, Goldsmith, LT, Skurnick, JH, Wojtczuk, A, Weiss, G. Characteristics of the urinary luteinizing hormone surge in young ovulatory women. Fertil. Steril. 2007; 88:684–690.Google Scholar
Direito, A, Bailly, S, Mariani, A, Ecochard, R. Relationships between the luteinizing hormone surge and other characteristics of the menstrual cycle in normally ovulating women. Fertil. Steril. 2012; 99:279–285.Google Scholar
Alliende, ME. Luteinizing hormone surge in normally ovulating women. Fertil. Steril. 2013; 99:e14–e15.Google Scholar
Yussman, MA, Taymor, MI, Miyata, J, Pheteplace, C. Serum levels of follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and plasma progestins correlated with human ovulation. Fertil. Steril. 1970; 21:119–125.Google Scholar
Kerin, J. Ovulation detection in the human. Clin. Reprod. Fertil. 1982; 1:27–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Richards, JS, Russell, DL, Ochsner, S, Espey, LL. Ovulation: new dimensions and new regulators of the inflammatory-like response. Ann. Rev. Physiol. 2002; 64:69–92.Google Scholar
Okamura, H, Okazaki, T, Nakajima, A. Effects of electrical stimulation on human ovarian contractility. Obstet. Gynecol. 1975; 45:557–561.Google Scholar
Okamura, H, Takenaka, A, Yajima, Y, Nishimura, T. Ovulatory changes in the wall at the apex of the human Graafian follicle. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1980; 58:153–155.Google Scholar
Duffy, DM. Novel contraceptive targets to inhibit ovulation: the prostaglandin E2 pathway. Hum. Reprod. Update 2015; 21:652–670.Google Scholar
Priddy, AR, Killick, SR, Elstein, M, et al. Ovarian follicular fluid eicosanoid concentrations during the pre-ovulatory period in humans. Prostaglandins 1989; 38:197–202.Google Scholar
Duffy, DM, Stouffer, RL. The ovulatory gonadotrophin surge stimulates cyclooxygenase expression and prostaglandin production by the monkey follicle. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2001; 7:731–739.Google Scholar
Tjugum, J, Norström, A, Dennefors, B, Lundin, S. Oxytocin in human follicular fluid and its possible role in the ovulatory process as studied in vitro. Hum. Reprod. 1986; 1:283286.Google Scholar
Meidan, R, Altstein, M, Girsh, E. Biosynthesis and release of oxytocin by granulosa cells derived from preovulatory bovine follicles: effects of forskolin and insulin-like growth factor-I. Biol. Reprod. 1992; 46:715–720.Google Scholar
Horka, P, Malickova, K, Jarosova, R, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases in serum and the follicular fluid of women treated by in vitro fertilization. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2012; 29:1207–1212.Google Scholar
Hernandez-Gonzalez, I, Gonzalez-Robayna, I, Shimada, M, et al. Gene expression profiles of cumulus cell oocyte complexes during ovulation reveal cumulus cells express neuronal and immune-related genes: does this expand their role in the ovulation process? Mol. Endocrinol. 2006; 20:1300–1321.Google Scholar
Edson, MA, Nagaraja, AK, Matzuk, MM. The mammalian ovary from genesis to revelation. Endocr. Rev. 2009; 30:624–712.Google Scholar
Gershon, E, Plaks, V, Dekel, N. Gap junctions in the ovary: expression, localization and function. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2008; 282:18–25.Google Scholar
Freimann, S, Ben-Ami, I, Dantes, A, Ron-El, R, Amsterdam, A. EGF-like factor epiregulin and amphiregulin expression is regulated by gonadotropins/cAMP in human ovarian follicular cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004; 324:829–834.Google Scholar
Park, JY, Su, YQ, Ariga, M, et al. EGF-like growth factors as mediators of LH action in the ovulatory follicle. Science 2004; 303:682–684.Google Scholar
Hizaki, H, Segi, E, Sugimoto, Y, et al. Abortive expansion of the cumulus and impaired fertility in mice lacking the prostaglandin E receptor subtype EP(2). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999; 96:10501–10506.Google Scholar
Gueripel, X, Brun, V, Gougeon, A. Oocyte bone morphogenetic protein 15, but not growth differentiation factor 9, is increased during gonadotropin-induced follicular development in the immature mouse and is associated with cumulus oophorus expansion. Biol. Reprod. 2006; 75:836–843.Google Scholar
Elvin, JA, Yan, C, Matzuk, MM. Oocyte-expressed TGF-beta superfamily members in female fertility. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2000; 159:1–5.Google Scholar
Maruo, T, Katayama, K, Barnea, ER, Mochizuki, M. A role for thyroid hormone in the induction of ovulation and corpus luteum function. Horm. Res. 1992; 37 (Suppl. 1):12–18.Google Scholar
Chaffkin, LM, Luciano, AA, Peluso, JJ. Progesterone as an autocrine/paracrine regulator of human granulosa cell proliferation. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1992; 75:1404–1408.Google Scholar
Sasano, H, Mori, T, Sasano, N, Nagura, H, Mason, JI. Immunolocalization of 3beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in human ovary. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1990; 89:743–751.Google Scholar
Brezinka, C. 3D ultrasound imaging of the human corpus luteum. Reprod. Biol. 2014; 14:110–114.Google Scholar
Jokubkiene, L, Sladkevičius, P, Rovas, L, Valentin, L. Assessment of changes in volume and vascularity of the ovaries during the normal menstrual cycle using three dimentional power Doppler ultrasound. Hum. Reprod. 2006; 21:2661–2668.Google Scholar
Stouffer, RL, Bishop, CV, Bogan, RL, Xu, F, Hennebold, JD. Endocrine and local control of the primate corpus luteum. Reprod. Biol. 2013; 13:259–271.Google Scholar
Nishimori, K, Dunkel, L, Hsueh, A, Yamoto, M, Nakano, R. Expression of luteinizing hormone and chorionic gonadotropin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid in human corpora lutea during menstrual cycle and pregnancy. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1995; 80:1444–1448.Google Scholar
Crisp, TM, Dessouky, DA, Denys, FR. The fine structure of the human corpus luteum of early pregnancy and during the progestational phase of menstrual cycle. Am. J. Anat. 1970; 127:37–69.Google Scholar
Meidan, R, Girsh, E, Blum, O, Aberdam, E. In vitro differentiation of bovine theca and granulosa cells into small and large luteal-like cells: morphological and functional characteristics. Biol. Reprod. 1990; 43:913–921.Google Scholar
Sanders, SL, Stouffer, RL. Localization of steroidogenic enzymes in macaque luteal tissue during the menstrual cycle and simulated early pregnancy: immunohistochemical evidence supporting the two-cell model for estrogen production in the primate corpus luteum. Biol. Reprod. 1997; 56:1077–1087.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L, Redmer, D. Growth and development of the corpus luteum. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 1999; 54:181–191.Google Scholar
Robinson, RS, Woad, KJ, Hammond, AJ, et al. Angiogenesis and vascular function in the ovary. Reproduction 2009; 138:869–881.Google Scholar
Ferrara, N, Chen, H, Davis-Smyth, T, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor is essential for corpus luteum angiogenesis. Nat. Med. 1998; 4:336–340.Google Scholar
Wulff, C, Dickson, SE, Duncan, WC, Fraser, HM. Angiogenesis in the human corpus luteum: simulated early pregnancy by hCG treatment is associated with both angiogenesis and vessel stabilization. Hum. Reprod. 2001; 16:2515–2524.Google Scholar
Forsythe, JA, Jiang, BH, Iyer, NV, et al. Activation of vascular endothelial growth factor gene transcription by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996; 16:4604–4613.Google Scholar
Fraser, HM, Duncan, WC. Regulation and manipulation of angiogenesis in the ovary and endometrium. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2009; 21:277–392.Google Scholar
Spencer, TE, Bazer, FW. Conceptus signals for establishment and maintenance of pregnancy. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2004; 2:49.Google Scholar
Horton, EW, Poyser, NL. Uterine luteolytic hormone: a physiological role of prostaglandin F2α. Physiol. Rev. 1976; 56:595–651.Google Scholar
Miyamoto, A, Shirasuna, K, Shimizu, T, Bollwein, H, Schams, D. Regulation of corpus luteum development and maintenance: specific roles of angiogenesis and action of prostaglandin F2α. Soc. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 2010; 67:289–304.Google Scholar
Best, CL, Pudney, J, Welch, WR, Burger, N, Hill, JA. Localization and characterization of white blood cell populations within the human ovary throughout the menstrual cycle and menopause. Hum. Reprod. 1996; 11:790–797.Google Scholar
Townson, DH, Liptak, AR. Chemokines in the corpus luteum: implications of leukocyte chemotaxis. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2003; 1:94.Google Scholar
Girsh, E, Milvae, RA, Wang, W, Meidan, R. Effect of endothelin-1 on bovine luteal cell function: role in prostaglandin F2a-induced antisteroidogenic action. Endocrinology 1996; 137:1306–1312.Google Scholar
Wulff, C, Wilson, H, Largue, P, et al. Angiogenesis in the human corpus luteum: localization and changes in angiopoietins, tie-2, and vascular endothelial growth factor messenger ribonucleic acid. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000; 85:4302–4309.Google Scholar
Zalman, Y, Klipper, E, Farberov, S, et al. Regulation of angiogenesis-related prostaglandin F2α-induced genes in the bovine corpus luteum. Biol. Reprod. 2012; 86:92.Google Scholar
Farberov, S, Meidan, R. Thrombospondin-1 affects bovine luteal function via transforming growth factor β1-dependent and independent actions. Biol. Reprod. 2016; 94:25.Google Scholar
Yadav, VK, Lakshmi, G, Medhamurthy, R. Prostaglandin F2α-mediated activation of apoptotic signaling cascades in the corpus luteum during apoptosis: involvement of caspase-activated DNase. J. Biol. Chem. 2005; 280:10357–10367.Google Scholar
Duncan, WC, McNeilly, AS, Fraser, HM, Illingworth, PJ. Luteinizing hormone receptor in the human corpus luteum: lack of down regulation during maternal recognition of pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. 1996; 11:2291–2297.Google Scholar
Jabbour, HN, Kelly, RW, Fraser, HM, Critchley, HO. Endocrine regulation of menstruation. Endocr. Rev. 2006; 27:17–46.Google Scholar
Nagaoka, SI, Hassold, TJ, Hunt, PA. Human aneuploidy: mechanisms and new insights into an age-old problem. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012; 13:493–504.Google Scholar
Huang, L, Tong, X, Luo, L, et al. Mutation analysis of the TUBB8 gene in nine infertile women with oocyte maturation arrest. RBM Online 2017; 35:305–310.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion. Age-related fertility decline. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008; 112:409–411.Google Scholar
Ziebe, S, Devroey, P. Assisted reproductive technologies are an integrated part of national strategies addressing demographic and reproductive challenges. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2008; 14:583–592.Google Scholar
Faddy, MJ, Gosden, RG, Gougeon, A, Richardson, SJ, Nelson, JF. Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles in mid-life: implications for forecasting menopause. Hum. Reprod. 1992; 7:1342–1346.Google Scholar
Rosen, MP, Johnstone, E, McCulloch, CE, et al. A characterization of the relationship of ovarian reserve markers with age. Fertil. Steril. 2012; 97:238–243.Google Scholar
Hansen, KR, Knowlton, NS, Thyer, AC, et al. A new model of reproductive aging: the decline in ovarian non-growing follicle number from birth to menopause. Hum. Reprod. 2008; 23:699–708.Google Scholar
Wang, YA, Dean, J, Badgery-Parker, T, Sullivan, EA. Assisted Reproduction Technology in Australia and New Zealand 2006. Sydney: AIHW National Peritnatal Statistics Unit. 2008.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, O, Paul, RC, Harris, K, Chambers, GM. Assisted Reproductive Technology in Australia and New Zealand 2016. Sydney: National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, the Univeristy of New South Wales Sydney. 2018.Google Scholar
Gilbert, WM, Nesbitt, TS, Danielsen, B. Childbearing beyond age 40: pregnancy outcome in 24,032 cases. Obstet. Gynecol. 1999; 93:9–14.Google Scholar
Meng, L, Jan, SZ, Hamer, G, et al. Preantral follicular atresia occurs mainly through autophagy, while antral follicles degenerate mostly through apoptosis. Biol. Reprod. 2018; 99:853–863.Google Scholar
Baker, TG. A quantitative and cytological study of germ cells in human ovaries. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 1963;158:417–433.Google Scholar
Richardson, SJ, Senikas, V, Nelson, JF. Follicular depletion during the menopausal transition: evidence for accelerated loss and ultimate exhaustion. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1987; 65:1231–1237.Google Scholar
Murray, A, Schoemaker, MJ, Bennett, CE, et al. Population-based estimates of the prevalence of FMR1 expansion mutations in women with early menopause and primary ovarian insufficiency. Genet. Med. 2014; 16:19–24.Google Scholar
Broekmans, FJ, Soules, MR, Fauser, BC. Ovarian aging: mechanisms and clinical consequences. Endocr. Rev. 2009; 30:465–493.Google Scholar
Johnson, NP, Bagrie, EM, Coomarasamy, A, et al. Ovarian reserve tests for predicting fertility outcomes for assisted reproductive technology: the International Systematic Collaboration of Ovarian Reserve Evaluation protocol for a systematic review of ovarian reserve test accuracy. BJOG 2006; 113:1472–1480.Google Scholar
te Velde, ER, Pearson, PL. The variability of female reproductive ageing. Hum. Reprod. Update 2002; 8:141–154.Google Scholar
Klein, NA, Battaglia, DE, Miller, PB, et al. Ovarian follicular development and the follicular fluid hormones and growth factors in normal women of advanced reproductive age. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1996; 81:1946–1951.Google Scholar
Burger, HG, Hale, GE, Dennerstein, L, Robertson, DM. Cycle and hormone changes during perimenopause: the key role of ovarian function. Menopause 2008; 15:603–612.Google Scholar
Klein, NA, Battaglia, DE, Fujimoto, VY, et al. Reproductive aging: accelerated ovarian follicular development associated with a monotropic follicle-stimulating hormone rise in normal older women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1996; 81:1038–1045.Google Scholar
Rossmanith, WG. Gonadotropin secretion during aging in women. Exp. Gerontology 1995; 30:369–381.Google Scholar
de Bruin, JP, Bovenhuis, H, van Noord, PA, et al. The role of genetic factors in age at natural menopause. Hum. Reprod. 2001; 16:2014–2018.Google Scholar
van Asselt, KM, Kok, HS, Pearson, PL, et al. Heritability of menopausal age in mothers and daughters. Fertil. Steril. 2004; 82:1348–1351.Google Scholar
Kalmbach, KH, Antunes, DM, Kohlrausch, F, Keefe, DL. Telomeres and female reproductive aging. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2015; 33:389–395.Google Scholar
Keefe, DL, Marquard, K, Liu, L. The telomere theory of reproductive senescence in women. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006; 18:280–285.Google Scholar
Keefe, DL. Telomeres, reproductive aging, and genomic instability during early development. Reprod. Sci. 2016; 23:1612–1615.Google Scholar
Westhoff, C, Murphy, P, Heller, D. Predictors of ovarian follicle number. Fertil. Steril. 2000; 74:624–628.Google Scholar
Stock, D, Knight, JA, Raboud, J, et al. Rotating night shift work and menopausal age. Hum. Reprod. 2019; 34:539–548.Google Scholar
Pellestor, F, Andreo, B, Arnal, F, Humeau, C, Demaille, J. Maternal aging and chromosomal abnormalities: new data drawn from in vitro unfertilized human oocytes. Hum. Genet. 2003; 112:195–203.Google Scholar
Alberman, E, Creasy, M, Elleott, M, Spicier, C. Maternal factors associated with fetal chromosomal anomalies in spontaneous abortions. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1976; 83:621–627.Google Scholar
Volarcik, K, Sheean, L, Goldfarb, J, et al. The meiotic competence of in-vitro matured human oocytes is influenced by donor age: evidence that folliculogenesis is compromised in the reproductively aged ovary. Hum. Reprod. 1998; 13:154–160.Google Scholar
Yun, Y, Holt, JE, Lane, SI, et al. Reduced ability to recover from spindle disruption and loss of kinetochore spindle assembly checkpoint proteins in oocytes from aged mice. Cell Cycle 2014; 13:1938–1947.Google Scholar
Hassold, T, Hunt, P. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001; 2:280–291.Google Scholar
Chiang, T, Duncan, FE, Schindler, K, Schultz, RM, Lampson, MA. Evidence that weakened centromere cohesion is a leading cause of age-related aneuploidy in oocytes. Curr. Biol. 2010; 20:1522–1528.Google Scholar
Cheng, JM, Liu, YX. Age-related loss of cohesion: causes and effects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017; 18. doi:10.3390/ijms18071578.Google Scholar
Kuliev, A, Verlinsky, Y. Meiotic and mitotic nondisjunction: lessons from preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum. Reprod. Update 2004; 10:401–407.Google Scholar
Nagaoka, SI, Hassold, TJ, Hunt, PA. Human aneuploidy: mechanisms and new insights into an age-old problem. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012; 13:493–504.Google Scholar
May-Panloup, P, Boucret, L, Chao de la Barca, JM, et al. Ovarian ageing: the role of mitochondria in oocytes and follicles. Hum. Reprod. Update 2016; 22:725–743.Google Scholar
Broekmans, FJ, Faddy, MJ, Scheffer, G, te Velde, ER. Antral follicle counts are related to age at natural fertility loss and age at menopause. Menopause 2004; 11:607–614.Google Scholar
Tietze, C. Fertility after discontinuation of intrauterine and oral contraception. Int. J. Fertil. 1968; 13:385–389.Google Scholar
Gunby, J, Bissonnette F, , Librach, C, Cowan, L; IVF Directors Group of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2006 results from the Canadian ART Register. Fertil. Steril. 2010; 93:2189–2201.Google Scholar
Noci, I, Borri, P, Chieffi, O, et al. Aging of the human endometrium: a basic morphological and immunohistochemical study. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1995; 63:181–185.Google Scholar
Wang, YA, Farquhar, C, Sullivan, EA. Donor age is a major determinant of success of oocyte donation/recipient programme. Hum. Reprod. 2012; 27:118-125.Google Scholar
Sherman, BM, West, JH, Korenman, SG. The menopausal transition: analysis of LH, FSH, estradiol, and progesterone concentrations during menstrual cycles of older women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1976; 42:629–636.Google Scholar
Sabatini, L, Zosmer, A, Hennessy, EM, Tozer, A, Al-Shawaf, T. Relevance of basal serum FSH to IVF outcome varies with patient age. RBM Online 2008; 17:10–19.Google Scholar
Broekmans, FJ, de Ziegler, D, Howles, CM, et al. The antral follicle count: practical recommendations for better standardization. Fertil. Steril. 2010; 94:1044–1051.Google Scholar
Broekmans, FJ, Kwee, J, Hendriks, DJ, Mol, BW, Lambalk, CB. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum. Reprod. Update 2006; 12:685–718.Google Scholar
La Marca, A, Volpe, A. Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) in female reproduction: is measurement of circulating AMH a useful tool? Clin. Endocrinol. 2006; 64:603–610.Google Scholar
Li, HWR, Yeung, WSB, Lau, EYL, Ho, PC, Ng, EHY. Evaluating the performance of serum antimullerian hormone concentration in predicting the live birth rate of controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination. Fertil. Steril. 2010; 94:2177–2181.Google Scholar
Hehenkamp, WJ, Looman, CW, Themmen, AP, et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone levels in the spontaneous menstrual cycle do not show substantial fluctuation. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2006; 91:4057–4063.Google Scholar
Sowers, MR, Eyvazzadeh, AD, McConnell, D, et al. Anti-mullerian hormone and inhibin B in the definition of ovarian aging and the menopause transition. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008; 93:3478–3483.Google Scholar
Broekmans, FJ. Testing for ovarian reserve in assisted reproduction programs: the current point of view. Fact Views Vis. Obgin. 2009; 1:79–81.Google Scholar
References
Sobrero, AJ, Macleod, J. The immediate postcoital test. Fertil. Steril. 1962; 13:184–189.Google Scholar
Pacey, AA, Hill, CJ, Scudamore, IW, et al. The interaction in vitro of human spermatozoa with epithelial cells from the human uterine (fallopian) tube. Hum. Reprod. 1995; 10:360–366.Google Scholar
Hunter, RHF, Petersen, HH, Greve, T. Ovarian follicular fluid, progesterone and Ca2+ ion influences on sperm release from the Fallopian tube reservoir. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 1999; 54:283–291.Google Scholar
Sun, F, Bahat, A, Gakamsky, A, et al. Human sperm chemotaxis: both the oocyte and its surrounding cumulus cells secrete sperm attractants. Hum. Reprod. 2005; 20:761–767.Google Scholar
Talbot, P. Sperm penetration through oocyte investments in mammals. Am. J. Anat. 1985; 174:331–346.Google Scholar
Drobnis, EZ, Katz, DF. Videomicroscopy of mammalian fertilization. In: Wassarman, PM, ed., Elements of Mammalian Fertilization. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 1991; 269–300.Google Scholar
Nomikos, M, Kashir, J, Swann, K, Lai, FA. Sperm PLCζ: from structure to Ca2+ oscillations, egg activation and therapeutic potential. FEBS Lett. 2013; 587:3609–3616.Google Scholar
Sutovski, P, Moreno, RD, Ramalho-Santos, J, et al. Ubiquitin tag for sperm mitochondria. Nature 1999; 402:371–372.Google Scholar
Navot, D, Scott, RT, Droesch, K, et al. The window of embryo transfer and the efficiency of human conception in vitro. Fertil. Steril. 1991; 55:114–118.Google Scholar
Duc-Goiran, P, Mignot, TM, Bourgeois, C, Ferré, F. Embryo-maternal interactions at the implantation site: a delicate equilibrium. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1999; 83:85–100.Google Scholar
Lessey, BA. The role of the endometrium during embryo implantation. Hum. Reprod. 2000; 15:39–50.Google Scholar
Edwards, RG. Implantation, interception and contraception. Hum. Reprod. 1994; 9:985–995.Google Scholar
Franasiak, JM, Forman, EJ, Hong, KH, et al. The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15 169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertil. Steril. 2014; 101:656–663.Google Scholar
Adams, SM, Gayer, N, Hosie, MJ, Murphy, CR. Human uterodomes (pinopods) do not display pinocytotic function. Hum. Reprod. 2002; 17:1980–1986.Google Scholar
Nikas, G, Drakakis, P, Loutradis, D, et al. Uterine pinopodes as markers of “nidation window” in cycling women receiving exogenous oestradiol and progesterone. Hum. Reprod. 1995; 10:1208–1213.Google Scholar
Licht, P, von Volff, M, Berkholz, A, Wildt, L. Evidence for cycle-dependent expression of full-length human chorionic gonadotropin/luteinizing hormone receptor mRNA in human endometrium and decidua. Fertil. Steril. 2003; 79:718–723.Google Scholar
Nikas, G, Aghajanova, L. Endometrial pinopodes: some more understanding on human implantation? RBM Online 2002; 4:18–23.Google Scholar
Macklon, NS, Brosens, JJ. The human endometrium as a sensor of embryo quality. Biol. Reprod. 2014; 91:98.Google Scholar
Wilcox, AJ, Baird, DD, Weinberg, CR. Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999; 340:1796–1799.Google Scholar
Bentin-Ley, U. Relevance of endometrial pinopodes for human blastocyst implantation. Hum. Reprod. 2000; 15:67–73.Google Scholar
Aplin, JD, Ruane, PT. Embryo-epithelium interactions during implantation at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2017; 130:15–22.Google Scholar
Feng, Y, Ma, X, Deng, L, et al. Role of selectins and their ligands in human implantation stage. Glycobiology 2017; 27:385–391.Google Scholar
Genbacev, OD, Prakobphol, A, Foulk, RI, et al. Trophoblast L-selectin-mediated adhesion at the maternal-fetal interface. Science 2003; 299:405–408.Google Scholar
Soygur, B, Moore, H. Expression of syncytin 1 (HERV-W), in the preimplantation human blastocyst, embryonic stem cells and trophoblast cells derived in vitro. Hum. Reprod. 2016; 31:1455–1461.Google Scholar
Mori, M, Bogdan, A, Balassa, T, Csabai, T, Szekeres-Bartho, J. The decidua—the maternal bed embracing the embryo—maintains the pregnancy. Semin. Immunopathol. 2016; 38:635–649.Google Scholar
Liu, S, Diao, L, Huang, C, et al. The role of decidual immune cells on human pregnancy. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2017; 124:44–53.Google Scholar
Han, SW, Lei, ZM, Rao, CV. Treatment of human endometrial stroma cells with chorionic gonadotropin promotes their morphological and functional differentiation into decidua. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 1999; 147:7–16.Google Scholar
Yang, M, Lei, ZM, Rao, CV. The central role of human chorionic gonadotropin in the formation of human placental syncytium. Endocrinology 2003; 144:1108–1120.Google Scholar
Casper, RF. Basic understanding of gonadotropin-releasing hormone-agonist triggering. Fertil. Steril. 2015; 103:867–869.Google Scholar
Fournier, T, Guibourdenche, J, Evain-Brion, D. Review: hCGs: different sources of production, different glycoforms and functions. Placenta 2015; 36:S60–S65.Google Scholar
Sivalingam, VN, Duncan, WC, Kirk, E, Shephard, LA, Horne, AW. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. J. Fam. Plann. Reprod. Health Care 2011; 37:231–240.Google Scholar
Illingworth, PJ, Reddi, K, Smith, K, Baird, DT. Pharmacological “rescue” of the corpus luteum results in increased inhibin production. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf). 1990; 33:323–332.Google Scholar
Duffy, DM, Stouffer, RL. Gonadotropin versus steroid regulation of the corpus luteum of the rhesus monkey during simulated early pregnancy. Biol. Reprod. 1997; 57:1451–1460.Google Scholar
Yoshimi, T, Strott, CA, Marshall, JR, Lipsett, MB. Corpus luteum function in early pregnancy. J. Clin. Endocrinol. 1969; 29:225–230.Google Scholar
Nakajima, ST, Nason, FG, Badger, GJ, Gibson, M. Progesterone production in early pregnancy. Fertil. Steril. 1991; 55:516–521.Google Scholar
Gagliardi, CL, Goldsmith, LT, Saketos, M, Weiss, G, Schmidt, CL. Human chorionic gonadotropin stimulation of relaxin secretion by luteinized human granulosa cells. Fertil. Steril. 1992; 58:314–320.Google Scholar
Conrad, KP. Maternal vasodilation in pregnancy: the emerging role of relaxin. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2011; 301:R267–R275.Google Scholar
Craciunas, L, Gallos, I, Chu, J, et al. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update 2019; 25:202–223, doi:10.1093/humupd/dmy044.Google Scholar
Balasch, J, Fábregues, F, Creus, M, Vanrell, JA. The usefulness of endometrial biopsy for luteal phase evaluation in infertility. Hum. Reprod. 1992; 7:973–977.Google Scholar
Pantos, K, Nikas, G, Makrakis, E, et al. Clinical value of endometrial pinopodes detection in artificial donation cycles. RBM Online 2004; 9:86–90.Google Scholar
Jin, XY, Zhao, LJ, Luo, DH, et al. Pinopode score around the time of implantation is predictive of successful implantation following frozen embryo transfer in hormone replacement cycles. Hum. Reprod. 2017; 32:2394–2403.Google Scholar
Díaz-Gimeno, P, Horcajadas, JA, Martínez-Conejero, JA, et al. A genomic diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature. Fertil. Steril. 2011; 95:50–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hashimoto, T, Koizumi, M, Doshida, M, et al. Efficacy of the endometrial receptivity array for repeated implantation failure in Japan: a retrospective, two-centers study. Reprod. Med. Biol. 2017; 16:290–296.Google Scholar
Tan, J, Kan, A, Hitkari, J, et al. The role of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) in patients who have failed euploid embryo transfers. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2018; 35:683–692.Google Scholar
Wang, J, Xia, F, Zhou, Y, et al. Association between endometrial/subendometrial vasculature and embryo transfer outcome: a metaanalysis and subgroup analysis. J. Ultrasound Med. 2018; 37:149–163.Google Scholar
Simón, C, Martin, JC, Pellicer, A. Paracrine regulators of implantation. Baillieres Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2000; 14:815–826.Google Scholar
Aghajanova, L, Stavrèus-Evers, A, Nikas, Y, Hovatta, O, Landgren, BM. Coexpression of pinopodes and leukemia inhibitory factor, as well as its receptor, in human endometrium. Fertil. Steril. 2003; 79:808–814.Google Scholar
Lindhard, A, Bentin-Ley, U, Ravn, V, et al. Biochemical evaluation of endometrial function at the time of implantation. Fertil. Steril. 2002; 78:221–233.Google Scholar
Stavrèus-Evers, A, Aghajanova, L, Brismar, H, et al. Co-existence of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor and pinopodes in human endometrium at the time of implantation. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2002; 8:765–769.Google Scholar
Daiter, E, Pampfer, S, Yeung, YG, et al. Expression of colony stimulating factor-1 in the human uterus and placenta. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1992; 74:850–858.Google Scholar
Licht, P, Russu, V, Lehmeyer, S, et al. Intrauterine microdialysis reveals cycle-dependent regulation of endometrial insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 secretion by human chorionic gonadotrophin. Fertil. Steril. 2002; 78:252–258.Google Scholar
Slayden, OD, Rubin, JS, Lacey, DL, Brenner, RM. Effects of keratinocyte growth factor in the endometrium of rhesus macaques during the luteal-follicular transition. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000; 85:275–285.Google Scholar
Tei, C, Maruyama, T, Kuji, N, et al. Reduced expression of alphavbeta3 integrin in the endometrium of unexplained infertility patients with recurrent IVF-ET failures: improvement by danazol treatment. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2003; 20:13–20.Google Scholar
Bischof, P. Endocrine, paracrine and autocrine regulation of trophoblastic metalloproteinases. Early Pregnancy 2001; 5:30–31.Google Scholar
Xu, P, Wang, YL, Zhu, SJ, et al. Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2, -9, and -14, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase-1, and matrix proteins in human placenta during the first trimester. Biol. Reprod. 2000; 62:988–994.Google Scholar
Nguyen, HPT, Simpson, RJ, Salamonsen, LA, Greening, DW. Extracellular vesicles in the intrauterine environment: challenges and potential functions. Biol. Reprod. 2016; 95:109.Google Scholar
Gross, N, Kropp, J, Khatib, H. MicroRNA signaling in embryo development. Biology (Basel) 2017; 6:34.Google Scholar
Chegini, N, Tang, XM, Dou, Q. The expression, activity and regulation of granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor in human endometrial epithelial and stromal cells. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 1999; 5:459–466.Google Scholar
Paiva, P, Hannan, NJ, Hincks, C, et al. Human chorionic gonadotrophin regulates FGF2 and other cytokines produced by human endometrial epithelial cells, providing a mechanism for enhancing endometrial receptivity. Hum. Reprod. 2011; 26:1153–1162.Google Scholar
Sjöblom, C, Roberts, CT, Wikland, M, Robertson, SA. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor alleviates adverse consequences of embryo culture on fetal growth trajectory and placental morphogenesis. Endocrinology 2005; 146:2142–2153.Google Scholar
Robertson, SA, Roberts, CT, Farr, KL, Dunn, AR, Seamark, RF. Fertility impairment in granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-deficient mice. Biol. Reprod. 1999; 60:251–261.Google Scholar
Perez-Garcia, V, Fineberg, E, Wilson, R, et al. Placentation defects are highly prevalent in embryonic lethal mouse mutants. Nature 2018; 555:463–468.Google Scholar
Hemberger, M, Hanna, CW, Dean, W. Mechanisms of early placental development in mouse and humans. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2019; 21:27–43. doi:10.1038/s41576-019–0169-4.Google Scholar
Noyes, RW, Hertig, AT, Rock, J. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Fertil. Steril. 1950; 1:3–25.Google Scholar
Pijnenborg, R, Vercruysse, L, Hanssens, M. The uterine spiral arteries in human pregnancy: facts and controversies. Placenta 2006; 27:939–958.Google Scholar
Malassine, A, Frendo, J-L, Evain-Brion, D. A comparison of placental development and endocrine functions between the human and mouse model. Hum. Reprod. Update 2003; 9:531–539.Google Scholar
Jarvela, IY, Ruokonen, A, Tekay, A. Effect of rising hCG levels on the human corpus luteum during early pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. 2008; 23:2775–2781.Google Scholar
Gamliel, M, Goldman-Wohl, D, Isaacson, B, et al. Trained memory of human uterine NK cells enhances their function in subsequent pregnancies. Immunity 2018; 48:951–962.Google Scholar
Hanna, J, Goldman-Wohl, D, Hamani, Y, et al. Decidual NK cells regulate key developmental processes at the human fetal-maternal interface. Nat. Med. 2006; 12:1065–1074.Google Scholar
Kalkunte, SS, Mselle, TF, Norris, WE, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor C facilitates immune tolerance and endovascular activity of human uterine NK cells at the maternal-fetal interface. J. Immunol. 2009; 182:4085–4092.Google Scholar
Klentzeris, LD, Bulmer, JN, Warren, MA, et al. Lymphoid tissue in the endometrium of women with unexplained infertility: morphometric and immunohistochemical aspects. Hum. Reprod. 1994; 9:646–652.Google Scholar
Hunt, JS, Miller, L, Platt, JS. Hormonal regulation of uterine macrophages. Dev. Immunol. 1998; 6:105–110.Google Scholar
Bulmer, JN, Williams, PJ, Lash, GE. Immune cells in the placental bed. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2010; 54:281–294.Google Scholar
Abrahams, VM, Kim, YM, Straszewski, SL, Romero, R, Mor, G. Macrophages and apoptotic cell clearance during pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2004; 51:275–282.Google Scholar
Jiang, TT, Chaturvedi, V, Ertelt, JM, et al. Regulatory T cells: new keys for further unlocking the enigma of fetal tolerance and pregnancy complications. J. Immunol. 2014; 192:4949–4956.Google Scholar
Fisher, SJ. Why is placentation abnormal in preeclampsia? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 213:S115–S122.Google Scholar
Hunt, JS, Petroff, MG, McIntire, RH, Ober, C. HLA-G and immune tolerance in pregnancy. FASEB J. 2005; 19:681–693.Google Scholar
Helige, C, Ahammer, H, Hammer, A, et al. Trophoblastic invasion in vitro and in vivo: similarities and differences. Hum. Reprod. 2008; 23:2282–2291.Google Scholar
Maltepe, E, Fisher, SJ. Placenta: the forgotten organ. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2015; 31:523–552.Google Scholar
Chetty, M, Duncan, WC. Investigation and management of recurrent miscarriage. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Med. 2015; 25:31–36.Google Scholar
Lucas, ES, Dyer, NP, Murakami, K, et al. Loss of endometrial plasticity in recurrent pregnancy loss. Stem Cells 2016; 34:346–356.Google Scholar
Sotiriadis, A, Makrigiannakis, A, Stefos, T, Paraskevaidis, E, Kalantaridou, SN. Fibrinolytic defects and recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 109:1146–1155.Google Scholar