Aldea, Smaranda Andreea (2016). “Phenomenology as Critique: Teleological-Historical Reflection and Husserl’s Transcendental Eidetics.” Husserl Studies 32, 21–46.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry (1983). Kant’s Transcendental Idealism. An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Alston, William (1993). “Epistemic Desiderata.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53, 527–551.Google Scholar

Awodey, Steve and Reck, Erich (2002). “Completeness and Categoricity. Part I: Nineteenth-Century Axiomatics to Twentieth-Century Metalogic.” History and Philosophy of Logic 23, 1–30.Google Scholar

Bachelard, Suzanne (1968[1957]). A Study of Husserl’s Formal and Transcendental Logic. Translated by Lester Embree. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. Original publication: La Logique de Husserl: Étude sur Logique Formelle et Logique Transcendentale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Beaney, Michael (1997). The Frege Reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Becker, Oskar 1973 [1927]). Mathematische Existenz, Untersuchungen zur Logik und Ontologie mathematischer Phänomene. 2., unveränderte Auflage. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. Original publication: “Mathematische Existenz, Untersuchungen zur Logik und Ontologie mathematischer Phänomene.” Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 8, 441–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benacerraf, Paul (1983 [1965]). “What Numbers Could Not Be.” Philosophical Review 74, 47–73. Reprinted in Paul Benacerraf and Putnam Hilary (eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics, Selected Readings. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 272–294.Google Scholar

Berghofer, Philipp (2018). “Why Husserl is a Moderate Foundationalist.” Husserl Studies 34, 1–23.Google Scholar

Berghofer, Philipp (2020). “Intuitionism in the Philosophy of Mathematics: Introducing a Phenomenological Account.” Philosophia Mathematica 28, 204–235.Google Scholar

Berghofer, Philipp and Wiltsche, Harald (2020). “Introduction to Phenomenological Approaches to Physics,” in Wiltsche, Harald and Berghofer, Philipp (eds.), Phenomenological Approaches to Physics. Cham: Springer, 1–47.Google Scholar

Beyer, Christian (1996). Von Bolzano zu Husserl. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Beyer, Christian (2012). “Husserl on Understanding Persons,” in Fricke, Christel und Føllesdal, Dagfinn (eds.), Intersubjectivity and Objectivity in Adam Smith and Edmund Husserl. Frankfurt am Main: Ontos, 93–116.Google Scholar

Boolos, George (1983 [1971]). “The Iterative Conception of Set,” Journal of Philosophy 68, 215–232. Reprinted in Paul Benacerraf and Putnam Hilary (eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics, Selected Readings. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 486–502.Google Scholar

Burgess, John and Rosen, Gideon (1997). A Subject with No Object. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cantor, Georg (1996a [1883]). Grundlagen einer allgemeinen Mannigfaltigkeitslehre. Ein mathematisch-philosophischer Versuch in der Lehre des Unendlichen. Leipzig: Teubner. English translation: “Foundations of a General Theory of Manifolds: A Mathematico-philosophical Investigation into the Theory of the Infinite,” in William Ewald (ed.), From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics. Vol. II. Translated by William Ewald. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 878–916.Google Scholar

Cantor, Georg (1996b). “A Letter to Hilbert, August 3, 1899,” in Ewald, William (ed.), From Kant to Hilbert, a Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics. Vol. II. Translated by William Ewald. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 931–935.Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf (1937 [1934]). Logische Syntax der Sprache. Vienna: Springer.English augmented translation:The Logical Syntax of Language. Translated by Countess von Zeppelin Amethe Smeaton, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.Google Scholar

Carr, David (1970). “Translator’s Introduction,” in Husserl, Edmund, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, xv–xliii.Google Scholar

Carr, David (1999). The Paradox of Subjectivity: The Self in the Transcendental Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cavaillès, Jean (1970). “On Logic and the Theory of Science,” in Kockelmans, Joseph J. and Kisiel, Theodore J. (eds.), Phenomenology and the Natural Sciences. Translated by Theodore J. Kisiel. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 353–409.Google Scholar

Centrone, Stefania (2010). Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics in the Early Husserl. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Centrone, Stefania (ed.) (2017). Essays on Husserl’s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics. Synthese Library 384. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Centrone, Stefania and da Silva, Jairo (2017). “Husserl and Leibniz: Notes on the Mathesis Universalis,” in Centrone, Stefania (ed.), Essays on Husserl’s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics. Synthese Library 384. Dordrecht: Springer, 1–23.Google Scholar

Cobb-Stevens, Richard (1990). Husserl and Analytic Philosophy. Phenomenologica 116. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Cobb-Stevens, Richard (2002). “Husserlian Hermeneutics: Mathematics and Theoria,” in Babich, Babette E. (ed.), Hermeneutic Philosophy of Science, Van Gogh’s Eyes, and God. Essays in Honor of Patrick A. Heelan. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 225. Dordrecht: Springer, 153–162.Google Scholar

Corry, Leo (1997). “David Hilbert and the Axiomatization of Physics (1894–1905).” Archive of History of Exact Sciences 51, 83–198.Google Scholar

Corry, Leo (2004). David Hilbert and the Axiomatization of Physics (1898–1918): From Grundlagen der Geometrie to Grundlagen der Physik. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Crowell, Steven (2001). Husserl, Heidegger and the Space of Meaning.Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, Steven (2013). Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dalen, Dirk van (1984). “Four Letters from Edmund Husserl to Hermann Weyl.” Husserl Studies 1, 1–12.Google Scholar

da Silva, Jairo José (2000). “Husserl’s Two Notions of Completeness, Husserl and Hilbert on Completeness and Imaginary Elements in Mathematics.” Synthese 125, 417–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

da Silva, Jairo José (2016). “Husserl and Hilbert on Completeness, Still.” Synthese 193, 1925–1947.Google Scholar

da Silva, Jairo José (2017a). Mathematics and Its Applications. A Transcendental-Idealist Perspective. Synthese Library 385. Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

da Silva, Jairo José (2017b). “Husserl and Weyl,” in Centrone, Stefania (ed.), Essays on Husserl’s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics. Synthese Library 384. Dordrecht: Springer, 317–352.Google Scholar

Dawson, John W. Jr. (1984). “The Reception of Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems.” Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984, Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers. Philosophy of Science Association, 253–271.Google Scholar

De Caro, Mario and Macarthur, David (eds.) (2010). Naturalism and Normativity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Dedekind, Richard (1996 [1888]). Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen? Brauschweig: Vieweg. English translation: “Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen? ” in William B. Ewald (ed.), From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics. Vol. II. Translated by W. W. Beman and William Ewald. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 790–833.Google Scholar

Dodd, James (2004). Crisis and Reflection, an Essay on Husserl’s Crisis of the European Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Douglas, Heather (2013). “The Value of Cognitive Values.” Philosophy of Science 80, 796–806.Google Scholar

Dreben, Burton and Kanamori, Akihiro (1997). “Hilbert and Set Theory.” Synthese 110, 77–125.Google Scholar

Drummond, John J. (1984). “The Perceptual Roots of Geometric Idealizations.” The Review of Metaphysics 37, 785–810.Google Scholar

Drummond, John J. (2017). “The Doctrine of the Noema and the Theory of Reason,” in Staiti, Andrea (ed.), Commentary on Husserl’s Ideas I. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 257–272.Google Scholar

Dybjer, Peter and Palmgren, Erik (2020). “Intuitionistic Type Theory.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/type-theory-intuitionistic/.Google Scholar

Ebbinghaus, Heinz-Dieter and Peckhaus, Volker (2007). Ernst Zermelo, an Approach to His Life and Work.Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Eley, Lothar (1970). “Einleitung des Herausgebers,” in Edmund Husserl Philosophie der Arithmetik, mit ergänzenden Texten (1890–1901). Husserliana Band XII. Edited by Lothar Eley. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, XIII–XXVIX.Google Scholar

Feferman, Solomon (2005). “Predicativity,” in Shapiro, Stewart (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic. New York: Oxford University Press, 590–624.Google Scholar

Feferman, Solomon (2008). “Lieber Herr Bernays!, Lieber Herr Gödel! Gödel on Finitism, Constructivity and Hilbert’s Program.” Dialectica 62, 179–203.Google Scholar

Ferreirós, José (2007). Labyrinth of Thought: A History of Set Theory and its Role in Modern Mathematics. Second Edition. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag.Google Scholar

Field, Hartry (2009). “Pluralism in Logic.” The Review of Symbolic Logic 2, 342–359.Google Scholar

Føllesdal, Dagfinn (1988). “Husserl on Evidence and Justification,” in Sokolowski, Robert (ed.), Edmund Husserl and the Phenomenological Tradition, Essays in Phenomenology. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 107–129.Google Scholar

Føllesdal, Dagfinn (1994). “Husserl and Frege: A Contribution to Elucidating the Origins of Phenomenological Philosophy.” Translation of his 1958 Norwegian Master’s Thesis, translated by Claire Hill, in Haaparanta, Leila (ed.), Mind, Meaning and Mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 3–47.Google Scholar

Føllesdal, Dagfinn (1999a). “Hermeneutics and Natural Science,” in Fehér, Márta, Kiss, Olga, and Ropolyi, László (eds.), Hermeneutics and Science. Proceedings of the First Conference of the International Society for Hermeneutics and Science. Dordrecht: Springer, 293–298.Google Scholar

Føllesdal, Dagfinn (1999b). “Gödel and Husserl,” in Petitot, Jean, Varela, Francisco, Pachoud, Bernard, and Roy, Jean-Michel (eds.), Naturalizing Phenomenology, Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 385–400.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, Abraham Adolf (1928). Einleitung in die Mengenlehre. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob (1972 [1894]). “Rezension von E. Husserl: Philosophie der Arithmetik.” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik 103, 313–332. English translation: “Review of Dr. E. Husserl’s Philosophy of Arithmetic.” Translated by E. W. Kluge. Mind, New Series 81, 321–337.Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob (1997 [1893]). “Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, Volume I. Selections,” translated by Michael Beaney, in Beaney, Michael (ed.), The Frege Reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 258–289.Google Scholar

Gabriel, Gottfried (2013). “Frege and the German Background to Analytic Philosophy,” in Beaney, Michael (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of The History of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 279–297.Google Scholar

Gibson, W. R. Boyce (1971). “From Husserl to Heidegger: Excerpts from a 1928 Diary by W. R. Boyce Gibson.” Edited by Herbert Spiegelberg. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 2, 58–81.Google Scholar

Gödel, Kurt (1990). “Remarks before the Princeton bicentennial conference on problems in mathematics (1946)” inCollected Works, Volume II, Publications 1938–1974. Edited by Feferman, Solomon, Dawson, John W Jr., Kleene, Stephen C., Moore, Gregory H., Solovay, Robert M., and Heijenoort, Jean van. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 150–153.Google Scholar

Gödel, Kurt (2003). Collected Works, Volume IV, Correspondence A–G. Edited by Feferman, Solomon and Dawson, John W. Jr. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Grassl, Wolfgang (1982). “Friedrich Waismann on the Foundations of Mathematics,” in Friedrich Waismann, Lectures on the Philosophy of Mathematics. Edited and with an introduction by Grassl, Wolfgang. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 3–26.Google Scholar

Gutzmer, A. (1902). Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. Leipzig: Druck und Verlag von B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar

Haaparanta, Leila (1995). “Perspectives into Analytical Philosophy. Review Essay.” Synthese 105, 123–139.Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian (2010). “Husserl on the Origins of Geometry,” in Hyder, David and Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (eds.), Science and the Life-World. Essays on Husserl’s Crisis of European Sciences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 64–99.Google Scholar

Hankel, Hermann (1867). Theorie Der Complexen Zahlensysteme, Insbesondere der Gemeinen imaginären Zahlen und der Hamilton’schen Quaternionen nebst Ihrer Geometrischen Darstellung. Leipzig: Leopold Voss.Google Scholar

Hardy, Lee (2013). Nature’s Suit: Husserl’s Phenomenological Philosophy of the Physical Sciences. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar

Hartimo, Mirja (2007). “Towards Completeness: Husserl on Theories of Manifolds 1890–1901.” Synthese 156, 281–310.Google Scholar

Hartimo, Mirja (2008). “From Geometry to Phenomenology.” Synthese 162, 225–233.Google Scholar

Hartimo, Mirja (2010). “The Development of Mathematics and the Birth of Phenomenology,” in Hartimo, Mirja (ed.), Phenomenology and Mathematics. Phaenomenologica 195. Dordrecht: Springer, 107–120.Google Scholar

Hartimo, Mirja (2012). “Husserl’s Pluralistic Phenomenology of Mathematics.” Philosophia Mathematica 20, 86–110.Google Scholar

Hartimo, Mirja (2017a). “Husserl and Hilbert,” in Centrone, Stefania (ed.), Essays on Husserl’s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics, Synthese Library. Dordrecht: Springer, 245–263.Google Scholar

Hartimo, Mirja (2017b). “Husserl and Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems.” The Review of Symbolic Logic 10, 638–650.Google Scholar

Hartimo, Mirja (2018a). “Husserl on Completeness, Definitely.” Synthese 195, 1509–1527.Google Scholar

Hartimo, Mirja (2018b). “Radical Besinnung in Formale und transzendentale Logik (1929).” Husserl Studies 34, 247–266.Google Scholar

Hartimo, Mirja (2018c). “Husserl’s Scientific Context 1917–1938, a Look into Husserl’s Private Library.” The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 16, 317–336.Google Scholar

Hartimo, Mirja (2019a). “Constitution and Construction,” in Weiss, Christina (ed.), Constructive Semantics – Meaning in Between Phenomenology and Constructivism. Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science Series. Cham: Springer, 123–133.Google Scholar

Hartimo, Mirja (2019b). “On the Origins of Scientific Objectivity,” in Kjosavik, Frode, Beyer, Christian, and Fricke, Christel (eds.), Husserl’s Phenomenology of Intersubjectivity: Historical Interpretations and Contemporary Applications. New York: Routledge, 302–321.Google Scholar

Hartimo, Mirja (2019c). “Husserl on Kant and the Critical View of Logic.” Inquiry. DOI: 10.1080/0020174X.2019.1651089.Google Scholar

Hartimo, Mirja (2019d). “On Husserl’s Combination View: Structuralism, Constructivism, and What Not.” After Husserl: Phenomenological Foundations of Mathematics. Special Issue of META: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy, Vol. XI, 526–546.Google Scholar

Hartimo, Mirja (2020a). “Husserl on ‘Besinnung’ and Formal Ontology,” in Kjosavik, Frode and Serck-Hanssen, Camilla (eds.), Metametaphysics and the Sciences: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. New York: Routledge, 200–215.Google Scholar

Hartimo, Mirja (2020b). “Husserl’s Phenomenology of Scientific Practice,” in Wiltsche, Harald and Berghofer, Philipp (eds.), Phenomenological Approaches to Physics. Cham: Springer, 63–77.Google Scholar

Hartimo, Mirja (2020c). “Transcendentalizing Mathematical Naturalism.” Journal of Transcendental Philosophy 1(3), 289–306.Google Scholar

Hartimo, Mirja (2021a). “Formal and Transcendental Logic—Husserl’s most mature reflection on mathematics and logic,” in Jacobs, Hanne (ed.), The Husserlian Mind, The Routledge Philosophical Mind Series. Routledge. Forthcoming.Google Scholar

Hartimo, Mirja (2021b). “The Chimera of Logicism: Husserl’s Criticism of Frege,” in Boccuni, F. and Sereni, A. (eds.), Origins and Varieties of Logicism. A Foundational Journey in the Philosophy of Mathematics. Studies in the Philosophy of Mathematics and Physics series. Routledge. Forthcoming.Google Scholar

Hartimo, Mirja, Kjosavik, Frode, and Linnebo, Øystein (Forthcoming). “Introduction to Special Issue on ‘Critical Views of Logic’.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy. DOI: 10.1080/0020174X.2019.1651077.Google Scholar

Hartimo, Mirja and Okada, Mitsuhiro (2016). “Syntactic Reduction in Husserl’s Early Phenomenology of Arithmetic.” Synthese 193, 937–969.Google Scholar

Hauser, Kai (2006). “Gödel’s Program Revisited Part I: The Turn to Phenomenology.” The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 12, 529–590.Google Scholar

Heffernan, George (1983). Bedeutung und Evidenz bei Edmund Husserl. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann.Google Scholar

Heffernan, George (1989). Isagoge in die phänomenologische Apophantik. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Heffernan, George (2009a). “On Husserl’s Remark that ‘[s]elbst eine sich als apodiktisch ausgebende Evidenz kann sich als Täuschung enthüllen … ’ (XVII 164:32–33): Does the Phenomenological Method Yield Any Epistemic Infallibility?” Husserl Studies 25, 15–43.Google Scholar

Heffernan, George (2009b). “An Addendum to the Exchange with Walter Hopp on Phenomenology and Fallibility.” Husserl Studies 25, 51–55.Google Scholar

Heffernan, George (2017). “The Concept of Krisis in Husserl’s The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology.” Husserl Studies 33, 229–257.Google Scholar

Heffernan, George (unpublished manuscript). “Universale Besinnung–Selbstbesinnung–Weltbesinnung: Husserl’s Method for the Treatment of Ethical, Existential, and Metaphysical Questions as Grenzprobleme of Phenomenology,” 2nd Research Summer School in Genetic Phenomenology: Grenzprobleme der Phänomenologie, International Network for Genetic Phenomenology and the Human Sciences / Graduate School of Social Research, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland, September 2, 2019 (invited keynote lecture).Google Scholar

Heinämaa, Sara (2018). “Embodiment and Bodily Becoming,” in Zahavi, Dan (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Phenomenology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 533–557.Google Scholar

Heinämaa, Sara (2020). “Values of Love: Two of Forms of Infinity Characteristic of Human Persons.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. DOI: 10.1007/s11097-019–09653–2.Google Scholar

Held, Klaus (2003 [1985]). “Einleitung,” in Edmund Husserl: Die Phänomenologische Methode, Ausgewählte Texte. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam. English translation: “Husserl’s Phenomenological Method,” in Donn Welton (ed.), The New Husserl, A Critical Reader. Translated by Lanei Rodemeyer. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 3–31.Google Scholar

Hilbert, David (1964 [1926]). “Über das Unendliche.” Mathematische Annalen 95, 161–190. English translation: “On the Infinite,” in Paul Benacerraf and Hilary Putnam (eds.), Philosophy of mathematics, Selected readings, Second edition. Translated by E. Putnam and G. J. Massey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 183–201.Google Scholar

Hilbert, David (1996a [1900a]). “Über den Zahlbegriff.” Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker Vereinigung 8, 180–194. English translation: “On the Concept of Number,” in William Ewald (ed.), From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics. Vol. II. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1092–1095.Google Scholar

Hilbert, David (1996b [1900b]). “Mathematische Probleme. Vortrag, gehalten auf dem internationalen Mathematiker-Kongress zu Paris.” Nachrichten der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, 1900, 253–297. “From Mathematical Problems,” in William Ewald (ed.), From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics. Vol. II. Translated by Mary Winston Newson, lightly revised by William Ewald. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1096–1105.Google Scholar

Hilbert, David (1996c [1918]). “Axiomatische Denken.” Mathematische Annalen 78, 405–415. English translation: “Axiomatic Thought,” in William Ewald (ed.), From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics. Vol. II. Translated by William Ewald. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1107–1115.Google Scholar

Hilbert, David (1996d [1922]). “Neubegründung der Mathematik. Erste Mitteilung.” Abhandlungen aus dem mathematischen Seminar der Hamburgischen Universität 1, 157–177. English translation: “The New Grounding of Mathematics,” in William Ewald (ed.), From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics. Vol. II. Translated by William Ewald. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1117–1134.Google Scholar

Hilbert, David and Wilhelm, Ackermann (1928). Grundzüge der theoretischen Logik. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Hill, Claire Ortiz (1994). “Frege’s Attack on Husserl and Cantor.” The Monist 77, 345–357.Google Scholar

Hill, Claire Ortiz (1995). “Husserl and Hilbert on Completeness,” in Hintikka, Jaakko (ed.), From Dedekind to Gödel, Synthese library (Vol. 251). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 143–163.Google Scholar

Hill, Claire Ortiz (2002). “Tackling Three of Frege’s Problems: Edmund Husserl on Sets and Manifolds.” Axiomathes 13, 79–104.Google Scholar

Hill, Claire Ortiz and Rosado Haddock, Guillermo (2000). Husserl or Frege? Meaning, Objectivity, and Mathematics. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar

Hill, Claire Ortiz and da Silva, Jairo José (2013). The Road Not Taken, On Husserl’s Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics. Texts in Philosophy 21. Norcross, GA: College Publications.Google Scholar

Hintikka, Jaakko (2003 [1996]). The Principles of Mathematics Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hjortland, Ole Thomassen (2019). “What Counts as Evidence for a Logical Theory?” Australasian Journal of Logic 16, 250–282.Google Scholar

Hopp, Walter (2009). “Reply to Heffernan.” Husserl Studies 25, 45–49.Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund (1981 [1911]). “Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft.” Logos 1, 289–341. English translation: “Philosophy as Rigorous Science,” in Peter McCormick and Frederick A. Elliston (eds.), Husserl, Shorter Works. Translated by Quentin Lauer. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press and The Harvester Press.Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund (1993). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Pähenomenologie. Ergänzungsband. Texte aus dem Nachlass 1934-1937. Husserliana XXIX. Edited by Reinhold N. Smid. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Ierna, Carlo and Lohmar, Dieter (2016). “Husserl’s Manuscript A I 35,” in Rosado Haddock, Guillermo E. (ed.), Husserl and Analytic Philosophy. Berlin: De Gruyter, 289–319.Google Scholar

Jansen, Julia (2015). “Transcendental Philosophy and the Problem of Necessity in a Contingent World.” Metodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy Special Issue 1, 47–80.Google Scholar

Kanamori, Akihiro (2004). “Zermelo and Set Theory.” The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 10, 487–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, Immanuel (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel (1977). Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics. Translated by Paul Carus, revised by James Ellington. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Felix (1978 [1930]). Das Unendliche in der Mathematik und seine Ausschaltung. Leipzig: Fr. Deutcke. English translation: The Infinite in Mathematics, Logico-mathematical Writings. Edited by Brian McGuinness, translated by Paul Foulkes. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Klev, Ansten (2017). “Husserl’s Logical Grammar.” History and Philosophy of Logic 39, 232–269. DOI: 10.1080/01445340.2017.1399782Google Scholar

Kragh, Helge (2015). “Mathematics and Physics: The Idea of a Pre-established Harmony.” Science and Education 24, 515–527.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. (1977). “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice,” in The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 320–339.Google Scholar

Linnebo, Øystein (2008). “Structuralism and the Notion of Dependence.” Philosophical Quarterly 58, 59–79.Google Scholar

Linnebo, Øystein (2012). “Higher-Order Logic,” in Pettigrew, Richard and Horsten, Leon (eds.), The Continuum Companion to Philosophical Logic. London: Bloomsbury, 105–127.Google Scholar

Linnebo, Øystein (2013). “The Potential Hierarchy of Sets.” The Review of Symbolic Logic 6, 205–228.Google Scholar

Linnebo, Øystein (2017). Philosophy of Mathematics. Princeton Foundations of Contemporary Philosophy. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Lohmar, Dieter (2000). Edmund Husserls “Formale und transzendentale Logik.” Darmstad: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Lohmar, Dieter (2003). “Husserl’s Type and Kant’s Schemata: Systematic Reasons for Their Correlation or Identity,” in Welton, Donn (ed.), The New Husserl, a Critical Reader. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 93–124.Google Scholar

Longino, Helen E. (1995). “Gender, Politics, and the Theoretical Virtues.” Synthese 104, 383–397.Google Scholar

Longino, Helen E. (2004). “How Values Can Be Good for Science,” in Wolters, Gereon and Machamer, Peter K. (eds.), Science, Values and Objectivity. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 127–142.Google Scholar

Lotze, Hermann (1928 [1884]). Logik, Drei Bücher vom Denken, vom Untersuchen und vom Erkennen. Second Edition. Leipzig: Felix Meiner. English translation: Lotze’s System of Philosophy: Logic – of Thought, of Investigation, and of Knowledge, translated by Bernard Bosanquet. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Löwenheim, Leopold (1967 [1915]). “On Possibilities in the Calculus of Relatives,” in Heijenoort, Jean van (ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic 1879–1931. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 228–251.Google Scholar

Luft, Sebastian (1998). “Husserl’s Phenomenological Discovery of the Natural Attitude.” Continental Philosophy Review 31, 153–170.Google Scholar

Luft, Sebastian (2011). Subjectivity and Lifeworld in Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Luft, Sebastian (2019). “Introduction to the Translation,” in Husserl, Edmund First Philosophy, Lectures 1923/24 and Related Texts From the Manuscripts (1920–1925). Translated by Sebastian Luft and Thane Naberhaus. Dordrecht: Springer, xiii–lxxxv.Google Scholar

Maddy, Penelope (1997). Naturalism in Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Maddy, Penelope (2007). Second Philosophy: A Naturalistic Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maddy, Penelope (2011). Defending the Axioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mahnke, Dietrich (1977 [1923]). “Von Hilbert zu Husserl: Erste Einführung in die Phänomenologie, besonders der formalen Mathematik.” Unterrichtsblätter 24, 34–37. English translation: “From Hilbert to Husserl: First Introduction to Phenomenology, Especially that of Formal Mathematics.” Translated by David L. Boyer. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 8, 75–84.Google Scholar

Maier, Verena (2016). “Der Logische Aufbau als Plagiat. Oder: Einführung in Husserls System der Konstitution,” in Rosado Haddock, Guillermo (ed.), Husserl and Analytic Philosophy. Berlin: De Gruyter, 175–260.Google Scholar

Majer, Ulrich (1997). “Husserl and Hilbert on Completeness: A Neglected Chapter in Early Twentieth-Century Foundations of Mathematics.” Synthese 110, 37–56.Google Scholar

Mancosu, Paolo (1998). From Brouwer to Hilbert. The Debate on the Foundations of Mathematics in the 1920s. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mancosu, Paolo (1999). “Between Vienna and Berlin: The Immediate Reception of Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems.” History and Philosophy of Logic 20, 33–45.Google Scholar

Mancosu, Paolo (with T. Ryckman) (2002). “Mathematics and Phenomenology. The Correspondence between Oskar Becker and Hermann Weyl.” Philosophia Mathematica 10, 130–202, in Mancosu, Paolo (2010). The Adventure of Reason. Interplay between Philosophy of Mathematics and Mathematical Logic, 1900–1940. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 277–307.Google Scholar

Mancosu, Paolo (2005). “Das Abenteuer der Vernunft: Oskar Becker and Dietrich Mahnke on the Phenomenological Foundation of the Exact Sciences,” in Peckhaus, Volker (ed.), Die Philosophie und die Mathematik: Oskar Becker in der mathematischen Grundlagendiskussion. Wilhelm Fink Verlag: München (Neuzeit & Gegenwart: Philosophie in Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft), 229–243, in Mancosu, Paolo (2010). The Adventure of Reason. Interplay between Philosophy of Mathematics and Mathematical Logic, 1900–1940. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 346–356.Google Scholar

Mancosu, Paolo (ed.) (2008). The Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mancosu, Paolo (2010). The Adventure of Reason. Interplay between Philosophy of Mathematics and Mathematical Logic 1900–1940. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Martin-Löf, Per (1987). “Truth of a Proposition, Evidence of a Judgement, Validity of a Proof.” Synthese 73, 417–420.Google Scholar

Meyer, Adolf (1929). “Das Wesen der antiken Naturwissenschaft mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Aristotelismus in der modernen Biologie.” Sudhoffs Archiv für Geschichte der Medizin 22, 1–23.Google Scholar

Miller, Philip J. (1982). Numbers in Presence and Absence: A Study of Husserl’s Philosophy of Mathematics. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

Mohanty, Jitendra (1984). “Husserl, Frege and the Overcoming of Psychology,” in Cho, Kah Kyung (ed.), Philosophy and Science in Phenomenological Perspective. Phaenomenologica 95. Dordrecht: Springer, 143–152.Google Scholar

Moore, Gregory H. (1980). “Beyond First-Order Logic: The Historical Interplay between Mathematical Logic and Axiomatic Set Theory.” History and Philosophy of Logic 1, 95–137.Google Scholar

Moore, Gregory H. (1988). “The Emergence of First-Order Logic,” in Aspray, William and Kitcher, Philip (eds.), History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 95–135.Google Scholar

Moore, Gregory H. (2013 [1982]). Zermelo’s Axiom of Choice. Its Origins, Development, and Influence. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications. Unabridged republication of the work originally published as Volume 8 in the series “Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences.” New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Moran, Dermot (2000). “Husserl and the Crisis of the European Sciences,” in Stone, M. W. F. and Wolff, J. (eds.), The Proper Ambition of Science. London: Routledge, 122–150.Google Scholar

Moran, Dermot (2011). “Even the Papuan is a Man and Not a Beast: Husserl on Universalism and the Relativity of Cultures.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 49, 463–494.Google Scholar

Moran, Dermot (2012a). Husserl’s Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Moran, Dermot (2012b). “Edmund Husserl,” in Luft, Sebastian and Overgaard, Søren (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Phenomenology. London: Routledge, 28–39.Google Scholar

Moran, Dermot (2018). “What Is the Phenomenological Approach?” Phenomenology and Mind 15, 72–90.Google Scholar

Nagel, Ernst (1978). “Introduction,” in Kaufmann, Felix (1978), The Infinite in Mathematics, Logico-mathematical Writings. Edited by Brian McGuinness, translated by Paul Foulkes. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, ix–xv.Google Scholar

Nenon, Thomas (2010). “Husserl’s Theory of the Mental,” in Nenon, Thomas and Embree, Lester (eds.), Issues in Husserl’s Ideas II. Contributions to Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Springer, 223–235.Google Scholar

Okada, Mitsuhiro (2013). “Husserl and Hilbert on Completeness and Husserl’s Term Rewrite-based Theory of Multiplicity,” in Raamsdonk, Femke van (ed.), Proceedings of 24th International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA’13). The Netherlands: Eindhoven, 4–19.Google Scholar

Parsons, Charles (1983 [1977]). “What is the Iterative Conception of Set?,” in Benacerraf, Paul and Hilary, Putnam (eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 503–529. Reprinted from Robert E. Butts and Jaakko Hintikka (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science 1975, Part I: Logic, Foundations of Mathematics, and Computability Theory. D. Reidel, 335–367.Google Scholar

Parsons, Charles (2003). Charles Parsons’ Seminar on the History of Structuralism. Compiled and edited by Douglas Marshall. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Parsons, Charles (2004). “Structuralism and Metaphysics.” The Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214), 56–77.Google Scholar

Parsons, Charles (2008). Mathematical Thought and Its Objects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Parsons, Charles (2012). From Kant to Husserl. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Parsons, Charles (2015). “Infinity and a Critical View of Logic.” Inquiry 58, 1–19.Google Scholar

Peckhaus, Volker (1990). Hilbertprogramm und Kritische Philosophie, Das Göttinger Modell interdisziplinärer Zusammenarbeit zwischen Mathematik und Philosophie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Peckhaus, Volker (1994). “Benno Kerry Beiträge zu seiner Biographie.” History and Philosophy of Logic 15, 1–8.Google Scholar

Peckhaus, Volker (1996). “On the Origins of the Word ‘Logicism’.” Philosophical Glossary by Roger Bishop Jones: www.rbjones.com/rbjpub/////philos/glossary/logicism.htm. Retrieved on November 18, 2020.Google Scholar

Peckhaus, Volker and Kahle, Reinhard (2002). “Hilbert’s Paradox.” Historia Mathematica 29, 157–175.Google Scholar

Peucker, Henning (2002). Von der Psychologie zur Phänomenologie, Husserls Weg in die Phänomenologie der Logischen Untersuchungen. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar

Poincaré, Jules Henri (1996 [1906]). “Les mathématiques et la logique.” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 14, 294–317. English translation: “Mathematics and Logic: III,” in William Ewald (ed.), George Bruce Halsted and William Ewald (transl.), From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics. Vol. II. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1052–1071.Google Scholar

Pyenson, Lewis (1982). “Relativity in Late Wilhelmian Germany: The Appeal to a Preestablished Harmony between Mathematics and Physics.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 27, 137–155.Google Scholar

Reck, Erich (2017). “Dedekind’s Contributions to the Foundations of Mathematics,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/dedekind-foundations/.Google Scholar

Rosado Haddock, Guillermo (2006). “Husserl’s Philosophy of Mathematics: Its Origin and Relevance.” Husserl Studies 22, 193–222.Google Scholar

Rosado Haddock, Guillermo (2010). “Platonism, Phenomenology, and Interderivability,” in Hartimo, Mirja (ed.), Phenomenology and Mathematics. Phaenomenologica 195. Dordrecht: Springer, 23–46.Google Scholar

Rosado Haddock, Guillermo (2013). Against the Current: Selected Philosophical Papers. Frankfurt am Main: Ontos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rota, Gian-Carlo (1997a). “The Phenomenology of Mathematical Proof.” Synthese 111, 183–196.Google Scholar

Rota, Gian-Carlo (1997b). “The Phenomenology of Mathematical Beauty.” Synthese 111, 171–182.Google Scholar

Schmit, Roger (1981). Husserls Philosophie der Mathematik. Platonistische und konstruktivistische Momente in Husserls Mathematikbegriff. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann.Google Scholar

Schuhmann, Karl (1977). Husserl-Chronik, Denk- und Lebensweg Edmund Husserls. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Serck-Hanssen, Camilla and Smit, Houston (2021). “The Schematism,” in Baiasu, Sorin (ed.), The Kantian Mind. Routledge. Forthcoming.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Stewart (1985). “Second-Order Languages and Mathematical Practice.” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 714–742.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Stewart (1991). Foundations without Foundationalism. A Case for Second-Order Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Stewart (1997). Philosophy of Mathematics, Structure and Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Stewart (1999). “Do Not Claim Too Much: Second-Order Logic and First-Order Logic.” Philosophia Mathematica 7, 42–64.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Stewart (2006). “Structure and Identity,” in MacBride, Fraser (ed.), Identity and Modality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 109–145.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Stewart (2012a). “Life on the Ship of Neurath: Mathematics in the Philosophy of Mathematics,” in Trobok, Majda, Miščević, Nenad, and Žarnić, Berislav (eds.), Between Logic and Reality. Cham: Springer, 11–27.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Stewart (2012b). “Higher-Order Logic or Set Theory: A False Dilemma.” Philosophia Mathematica 20, 305–323.Google Scholar

Sher, Gila (2016). Epistemic Friction: An Essay on Knowledge, Truth, and Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sieg, Wilfried (1999). “Hilbert’s Programs: 1917–1922.” Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5, 1–44.Google Scholar

Skolem, Thoralf (1967 [1920]). “Logisch-kombinatorische Untersuchungen über die Erfürbarkeit und Beweisbarkeit mathematischen Sätze nebst einem Theoreme über dichte Mengen, §1.”Videnskapsselskapets Skrifter. Mat. Naturv. Klasse 43, 3–15. English translation: “Logico-Combinatorial Investigations in the Satisfiability of Provability of Mathematical Propositions: A Simplified Proof of a Theorem by Löwenheim and Generalizations of the Theorem,” in Jean van Heijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel. A Source Book in Mathematical Logic 1879–1931. Translated by Stefan Bauer-Mengelberg. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 252–263.Google Scholar

Sokolowski, Robert (1973). “Logic and Mathematics in Husserl’s Formal and Transcendental Logic,” in Carr, David and Casey, Eward (eds.), Explorations in Phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 306–327.Google Scholar

Sokolowski, Robert (1974). Husserlian Meditations, How Words Present Things. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Sokolowski, Robert (2000). Introduction to Phenomenology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Solin, Kim (2013). The Mathematician as Mathematics. Theories of Computation in Light of Wittgenstein’s Thought. Dissertation. Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar

Spranger, Eduard (1921). Lebensformen: Geisteswissenschafliche Psychologie und Ethik der Persönlickeit. Zweite Auflage. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Staiti, Andrea (2014). Husserl’s Transcendental Phenomenology, Nature, Spirit, and Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Staiti, Andrea (2015). “The Melody Unheard: Husserl on the Natural Attitude and Its Discontinuation,” in Staiti, Andrea (ed.), Commentary on Husserl’s Ideas I. Berlin: De Gruyter, 69–94.Google Scholar

Tieszen, Richard (2004). “Husserl’s Logic,” in Gabbay, D. and Woods, J. (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic, Vol. III, Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V., 207–319.Google Scholar

Tieszen, Richard (2005). Phenomenology, Logic, and the Philosophy of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tieszen, Richard (2010). “Mathematical Realism and Transcendental Phenomenological Idealism,” in Hartimo, Mirja (ed.), Phenomenology and Mathematics. Phaenomenologica 195. Dordrecht: Springer, 1–22.Google Scholar

Tieszen, Richard (2011). After Gödel. Platonism and Rationalism in Mathematics and Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Van Atten, Mark (2002). “Why Husserl Should Have Been a Strong Revisionist in Mathematics.” Husserl Studies 18, 1–18.Google Scholar

Van Atten, Mark (2007). Brouwer Meets Husserl: On the Phenomenology of Choice Sequences. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Van Atten, Mark (2010). “Construction and Constitution in Mathematics.” New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 10, 43–90.Google Scholar

Van Atten, Mark (2015). Essays on Gödel’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Van Atten, Mark (2017). “Construction and Constitution in Mathematics,” in Centrone, Stefania (ed.), Essays on Husserl’s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics. Synthese Library 384. Dordrecht: Springer, 265–315.Google Scholar

Van Atten, Mark (2019). “Les multiplicités définies de Husserl et les théorèmes d’incomplétude de Gödel,” in Farges, Julien and Pradelle, Dominique (eds.), Husserl. Phénoménologie et fondements des sciences. Paris: Hermann, 87–104.Google Scholar

Van Atten, Mark and Kennedy, Juliette (2015 [2003]). “On the Philosophical Development of Kurt Gödel,” Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 9, 425–476. Reprinted in Mark van Atten (ed.), Essays on Gödel’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer. Cham: Springer, 95–145.Google Scholar

Von Wright, G. H. (1963) Norm and Action. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Waismann, Friedrich (1966 [1936]). Einführung in das mathematische Denken: die Begriffsbildung der modernen Mathematik. Vorwort von Karl Menger, Mit einem. Wien: Gerold. English translation: Friedrich Waismann. Introduction to Mathematical Thinking, The Formation of Concepts in Modern Mathematics. Translated by Theodore J. Benac. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Welton, Donn (2000). The Other Husserl. The Horizons of Transcendental Phenomenology. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Weyl, Hermann (1998 [1925]). “Die heutige Erkenntnislage in der Mathematik.” Symposion, Philosophische Zeitschrift für Forschung und Aussprache 1 (1), 1–32. English translation: “The Current Epistemological Situation in Mathematics.” Translated by Benito Müller, in Paolo Mancosu (ed.), From Brouwer to Hilbert. The Debate on the Foundations of Mathematics in the 1920s. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 123–142.Google Scholar

Weyl, Hermann (1926). Philosophie der Mathematik und Naturwissenschaft. München: Oldenburg.Google Scholar

Weyl, Hermann (1968 [1955]). “Erkenntnis und Besinnung,” (Vortrag, gehalten an der Universität Lausanne im Mai 1954). Studia Philosophia (Jahrbuch der Schwiezerischen Philosophischen Gesellschaft), 15, 153–171. Reprinted in Hermann Weyl, Gesammelte Abhandlungen, Band IV. Berlin: Springer, 631–649.Google Scholar

Weyl, Hermann (1987 [1918]). Das Kontinuum: Kritische Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Analysis. Leipzig: Veit. English translation:The Continuum, A Critical Examination of the Foundation of Analysis. Translated by Stephen Pollard and Thomas Bole. Kirksville, MO: The Thomas Jefferson University Press.Google Scholar

Weyl, Hermann (2009 [1949]). Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science. Translated by Olaf Helmer. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Wigner, E. P. (1960). “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences. Richard Courant Lecture in Mathematical Sciences Delivered at New York University, May 11, 1959.” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 13, 1–14.Google Scholar

Willard, Dallas (1984). Logic and the Objectivity of Knowledge: A Study of Husserl’s Early Philosophy. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar

Wiltsche, Harald A. (2012). “What is Wrong with Husserl’s Scientific Anti-Realism?” Inquiry 55, 105–130.Google Scholar

Woodruff Smith, David (2013). Husserl. Second Revised Edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Woodruff Smith, David (2016). “Husserl and Tarski: The Semantic Conception of Intentionality and Truth,” in Rosado Haddock, G. (ed.), Husserl and Analytic Philosophy. Boston: De Gruyter, 143–173.Google Scholar

Zahavi, Dan (2003). Husserl’s Phenomenology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Zahavi, Dan (2017). Husserl’s Legacy, Phenomenology, Metaphysics, and Transcendental Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zermelo, Ernst (1967 [1908]). “Neuer Beweis für die Möglichkeit einer Wohlordung.” Mathematische Annalen 65, 107–128. English translation: “A New Proof of the Possibility of a Well-Ordering,” in Jean van Heijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel, A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931. Translated by Stefan Bauer-Mengelberg. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 183–198.Google Scholar

Zermelo, Ernst (1996 [1930]). “Über Grenzzahlen und Mengenbereiche: Neue Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Mengenlehre.” Fundamenta Mathematicae 16, 29–47. English translation: “On Boundary Numbers and Domains of Sets: New Investigations in the Foundations of Set Theory,” in William Ewald (ed.), From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics. Vol. II. Translated by Michael Hallett. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1219–1233.Google Scholar

Ziehen, Theodor (1920). Lehrbuch der Logik auf positivistischer Grundlage mit Berücksichtigung der der Geschichte der Logik. Bonn: A. Marcus & E. Webers Verlag.Google Scholar