Book contents
- The Cambridge World HistoryVOLUME VI
- The Cambridge World History
- The Cambridge World History
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part One Migrations and Encounters
- Part Two Trade, Exchange, and Production
- Part Three Religion and Religious Change
- Part Four Questions of Method
- 17 On early modern historiography
- 18 Microhistory and world history
- Index
- References
18 - Microhistory and world history
from Part Four - Questions of Method
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2015
Book contents
- The Cambridge World HistoryVOLUME VI
- The Cambridge World History
- The Cambridge World History
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part One Migrations and Encounters
- Part Two Trade, Exchange, and Production
- Part Three Religion and Religious Change
- Part Four Questions of Method
- 17 On early modern historiography
- 18 Microhistory and world history
- Index
- References
Summary
Microhistory, conceived as an analytical approach to history, far from being opposed to world history, may in fact be regarded as an indispensable tool of it. Two related phenomena shape our approach to world history today: the enormous expansion of the human species and the growing fragility of the natural environment. History as a process, Antonio Labriola argued, implies discovery through experimentation, but historical knowledge implies experiment as well. On both sides men act in an artificial environment, produced by themselves, in which experiments can take place. The historian may re-enact the past relying upon a more or less successful thought experiment. In the case of experimental archaeology, this re-enactment may be supplemented by a material reconstruction of some aspects of the past. The relationship between an experiment and its potential implications is always asymmetrical. La Crequinieres tendency to speak, alternatively, on behalf of the colonizers and the colonized can be inscribed in a much larger phenomenon.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge World History , pp. 446 - 473Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Further Reading
Berlin, I., “A Note on Vico's Concept of Knowledge”, in Tagliacozzo, G. G. and White, H. V. (eds.), Giambattista Vico: an International Symposium (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Bloch, M., “Pour une histoire comparée des sociétés éuropéennes”, in Perrin, Ch.-E. (ed.), Mélanges Historiques (Paris: SEVPEN, 1963), vol. i, pp. 16–40.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. “Croce's Philosophy of History”, in Essays in the Philosophy of History (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1965), pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. and van der Dussen, J. (eds.), The Idea of History (Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Connelly, J., “Art Thou the Man: Croce, Gentile, or de Ruggiero?”, in Boucher, D. et al. (eds.), Philosophy, History, and Civilization: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on R.G. Collingwood (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1995), pp. 92–114.Google Scholar
Croce, B. Teoria e storia della storiografia, 2nd revised edn. (Bari: G. Laterza, 1920), D. Ainslie, (trans.), Theory and History of Historiography (London: G. C. Harrap, 1921).Google Scholar
de Vivo, F., “Prospect or Refuge? Microhistory, History on the Large Scale”, Cultural and Social History 7 (2010): 387–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dray, W. H., History as Re-enactment: R. G. Collingwood's Idea of History (Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Funkenstein, A., Theology and the Scientific Imagination from the Middle Ages to the Seventeenth Century (Princeton University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Gentile, G., The Theory of Mind as Pure Act, Carr, W. W. (trans.) (London: Macmillan and Co., 1922).Google Scholar
Ginzburg, C., “Distance and Perspective: Two Metaphors”, in Ginzburg, C., Wooden Eyes: Nine Reflections on Distance (New York: Columbia University Press, 2002), pp. 139–56.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, C., “Ecce: On the Scriptural Roots of Christian Devotional Imagery”, in Ginzburg, C.. Wooden Eyes: Nine Reflections on Distance (New York: Columbia University Press, 2002), pp. 79–93.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, C., “Our Words, and Theirs: A Reflection on the Historian's Craft, Today”, in Fellman, S. and Rahikainen, M. (eds.), Historical Knowledge: In Quest of Theory, Method, and Evidence (Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012), pp. 97–119.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, C., “Provincializing the World: Europeans, Indians, Jews (1704)”, Postcolonial Studies 14 (2011): 135–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, C., “The Letter Kills: On some Implications of 2 Corinthians 3:6”, History and Theory 49 (2010): 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, C., Thread and Traces: True, False, Fictive (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, C. and Poni, C., “The Name and the Game: Unequal Exchange and the Historiographical Marketplace” in Muir, E. and Ruggiero, G. (eds.), Microhistory and the Lost People of Europe (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991), pp. 2–10.Google Scholar
Harris, H. S., “Croce and Gentile in Collingwood's New Leviathan” in Boucher, D. et al. (eds.), Philosophy, History, and Civilization: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on R. G. Collingwood (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1995), pp. 115–29.Google Scholar
Labriola, A., Essays on the Materialistic Conception of History, Kerr, C. H. (trans.) (Chicago: C. H. Kerr and Co., 1904).Google Scholar
Labriola, A., Scritti filosofici e politici, Sbarberi, F. (ed.) (Turin: G. Einaudi, 1973).Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Korsch, K., Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Oekonomie (Berlin: G. Kiepenheuer, 1932).Google Scholar
Momigliano, A., “Ancient History and the Antiquarian” (1950), in Contributo alla storia degli studi classici (Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura, 1979), pp. 67–206.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A., “La storia antica in Inghilterra” (1945) in Sesto contributo alla storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico (Rome: Edizione di storia e letteratura, 1980), vol. ii.Google Scholar
Pipa, A., “Marx's Relationship to Vico: a Philological Approach” in Tagliacozzo, G. (ed.), Vico and Marx: Affinities and Contrasts (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1983), pp. 290–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, L., “To Study the Fragments/whole: Microhistory and the Atlantic World”, Journal of Social History 39 (2006): 615–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanò, A. (ed.), La cultura italiana del ’900 attraverso le riviste (Turin: Einaudi, 1960).Google Scholar
Saari, H., Re-enactment: A Study in R. G. Collingwood's Philosophy of History (Abo: Abo Akademi, 1984).Google Scholar
Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S., Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life (Princeton University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Sorel, G., Étude sur Vico et autres texts, Menasseyre, A.-S. (ed.) (Paris: H. Champion, 2007).Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, S., “Monsieur Picart and the Gentiles of India” in Hunt, L., Jacob, M. and Mijnhardt, W. (eds.), Bernard Picart and the First Global Vision of Religion (Los Angeles, CA: Getty Research Institute, 2010), pp. 197–214.Google Scholar
Trivellato, F., “Is there a Future for Italian Microhistory in the Age of Global History?”, California Italian Studies 2 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Dussen, W. J., History as Science: the Philosophy of R. G. Collingwood (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vico, G., De antiquissima Italorum sapientia, Sanna, M. (ed.) (Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura, 2005).Google Scholar
Vico, G., Princìpi di scienza nuova, Battistini, A. (ed.) (Milan: Oscar Mondadori, 2011).Google Scholar
Vico, G., The Autobiography, 2nd edn. Fisch, M. H. (ed.) (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Vico, G., The First New Science, Pompa, L. (trans.) (Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vico, G., The New Science: Unabridged Translation of the Third Edition (1744) with the Addition of “Practic of New Science”, Bergin, T. Goddard and Fisch, M. H. (trans.) (Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 15
- Cited by