American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM). AIUM Practice Guideline for the Performance of Pelvic Ultrasound Examinations. Available at: http://www.aium.org/resources/guidelines/femalepelvis.pdf. Accessed Dec. 9, 2015.Google Scholar

American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM). AIUM Practice Guidelines for the Performance of Obstetric Ultrasound Examination: Classification of Fetal Sonographic Examinations. Available at: http://www.aium.org/resources/guidelines/obstetric.pdf. Accessed Dec. 9, 2015.Google Scholar

American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM). AIUM Practice Guideline for the Performance of Sonohysteroscopy: Indications/Contraindications. Available at: http://www.aium.org/resources/guidelines/sonohysterography.pdf. Accessed Dec. 9, 2015.Google Scholar

Assad, NA, Hudson, S. Three-dimensional Ultrasound in Gynecology. In: Rizk, BRMB, Puscheck, EE, eds. Ultrasonography in Gynecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015: 1–11.Google Scholar

Grimbizis, GF, Camus, M, Tarlatzis, BC, et al. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update 2001 Mar–Apr;7(2):161–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Diagnosing Submuscosal Fibroics (SIS) beyond Hysterectomy: The Contemporary Management of Uterine Fibroids – An International Conference, Phoenix, Arizona; April 11–13, 2003.Google Scholar

Timor-Tritsch, IE, Goldstein, SR. Early Pregnancy. In: Ultrasound in Gynecology, 2nd edition. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2006: 139.Google Scholar

Levi, CS, Lyons, EA, Lindsay, DJ. Early diagnosis of nonviable pregnancy with endovaginal US. Radiology 1988 May;167(2):383–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levi, CS, Lyons, EA, Zheng, XH, et al. Endovaginal US: demonstration of cardiac activity in embros of less than 5.0 mm in crown-rump length. Radiology 1990 Jul;176(1):71–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, DL, Emerson, DS, Felker, RE, et al. Diagnosis of early embryonic demise by endovaginal sonography. J Ultrasound Med 1990 Nov;9(11):631–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goldstein, SR. Significance of cardiac activity on endovaginal ultrasound in very early embryos. Obstet Gynecol 1991 Oct;80(4):670–2.Google Scholar

Schats, R, Jansen, CA, Qladimiroff, JW. Embryonic heart activity: appearance and development in early human pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990 Nov;97(11):989–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coubilet, PM, Benson, CB, Chow, JS. Long-term prognosis of pregnancies complicated by slow embryonic heart rates in the early first trimester. J Ultrasound Med 1999 Aug;18 (8):537–41.Google Scholar

Coubilet, PM, Benson, CB, Chow, JS. Outcome of pregnancies with rapid embryonic heart rates in the early first trimester. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000 Jul;175(1):67–9.Google Scholar

Vaccaro, H, Amor, F, Leyton, M, Sepulveda, W. Arrhythmia in early pregnancy: a predictor of first-trimester pregnancy loss. Ultrasound Obstet Gyneccol 1998 Oct;12(4):248–51.Google ScholarPubMed

Timor-Tritsch, IE, Goldstein, SR. Early Pregnancy. In: Ultrasound in Gynecology, 2nd edition. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2006: 139–50.Google Scholar

Ackerman, TE, Levi, CS, et al. Interstitial line: sonographic finding in interstitial (corneal) ectopic pregnancy. Radiology 1993 Oct;189(1):83–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lujan, ME, Jarrett, BY, et al. Updated ultrasound criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: reliable thresholds for elevated follicle population and ovarian volume. Hum Reprod 2013 May;28(5):1361–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Exacoustos, C, Romanini, ME, et al. Preoperative sonographic features of borderline ovarian tumors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005 Jan;25(1):50–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Timor-Tritsch, IE, Goldstein, SR. The complexity of a “complex mass” and the simplicity of a “simple cyst.” J Ultrasound Med 2005;24(3):255–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sladkevicius, P, Jokubkiene, L, Valentin, L. Contribution of morphological assessment of the vessel tree by three-dimensional ultrasound to a correct diagnosis of malignancy in ovarian masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007 Nov;30(6):874–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kudla, MJ, Timor-Tritsch, IE, Hope, JM, et al. Spherical tissue sampling in 3-dinensional power Doppler angiography: a new approach for evaluation of ovarian tumors. J Ultrasound Med 2008 Mar;27(3):425–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alcazar, JL, Prka, M. Evaluation of two different methods for vaascular sampling by three-dimensional power Doppler angiography in solid and cystic-solid adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009 Mar;33(3):349–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Age and Sex Composition: 2010 Census Briefs. [Internet]. 2011 [issued 2011 May, cited 2014 August 31]. Available from: www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-03.pdf.Google Scholar

Heisler, CA, Aletti, GD, Weaver, AL, et al. Improving quality of care: development of a risk-adjusted perioperative morbidity model for vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202:137.e1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.059. Epub 2009 Aug 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Erekson, EA, Yip, SO, Martin, DK, et al. Major postoperative complications after benign gynecologic surgery: a clinical prediction model. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2012; 18(5):274–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rock, JA, Thompson, JD. TeLinde’s Operative Gynecology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1997.Google Scholar

Johnson, BE, Porter, J. Preoperative evaluation of the gynecologic patient: considerations for improved outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111(5):1183–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lilic, G, Zivadinovic, R, Petric, A, Lilic, V. Preoperative preparation of patients for gynecologic surgery. Scientific Journal of the Faculty of Medicine in Nis 2011; 28(2):125–33.Google Scholar

Zambouri, A. Preoperative evaluation and preparation for anesthesia and surgery. Hippokratia 2007; 11(1):13–21.Google ScholarPubMed

Mann, WJ. Overview of preoperative evaluation and preparation for gynecologic surgery [Internet]. 2013 [updated 2014 Apr 28, cited 2014 Aug 31]. Available from: www.uptodate.com.Google Scholar

Steege, JF, Siedhoff, MT. Clinical expert series: chronic pelvic pin. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124:616–29.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Pelvic organ prolapse. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 85. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110:717–29.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Management of adnexal masses. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 83. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110:201–14.Google Scholar

Moore, RG, Miller, MC, Disilvestro, P, et al. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm in women with a pelvic mass. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118(2):280–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Management of abnormal uterine bleeding associated with ovulatory dysfunction. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 136. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122:176–85.Google Scholar

Howlader, N, Noone, AM, Krapcho, M, et al., editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2009 (vintage 2009 populations), National Cancer Institute. Bethesda (MD) [Internet]. 2012 [updated 2012 Aug 20, cited 2014 Aug 31]. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2009_pops09.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Power morcellation and occult malignancy in gynecologic surgery: a special report [Internet]. 2014 May [updated 2014 May; cited 2014 Aug 31]. Available from: www.acog.org/~/media/Task%20Force%20and%20Work%20Group%20Reports/MorecellationSpecialReport.pdf.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 144:1156–8.Google Scholar

Nieboer, TE, Johnson, N, Lethaby, A, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8; 3:CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.DC003677.pub4.Google Scholar

ACOG Committee on Ethics. Informed consent. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 439. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barash, PG, Cullen, BF, Stoelting, RK, et al. Clinical Anesthesia, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009.Google Scholar

Dresner, N, Kurzman, AR. Preoperative evaluation and preparation of the gynecologic patient. Glob Libr Women’s Med (ISSN 1756–2228) 2008; doi: 10.3843/GLOWM.10423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bunde, M, Suls, J, Martin, R, Barnett, K. Hystersisters online: social support and social comparison among hysterectomy patients on the internet. Ann Behav Med 2006; 31(3):271–8.Google ScholarPubMed

Kumar, A, Srivastava, U. Role of routine laboratory investigations in preoperative evaluation. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2011; 27(2):174–9.Google ScholarPubMed

Choosing Wisely: an initiative of the ABIM Foundation [Internet]. 2014 [updated 2014, cited 2012 Jul 30]. Available from: www.choosingwisely.org.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Five things physicians and patients should question. Choosing Wisely: an initiative of the ABIM Foundation [Internet]. 2013 [updated 2013 Feb 21, cited 2014 Aug 31]. Available from: www.choosingwisely.org/doctor-patient-lists/american-college-of-obstetricians-and-gynecologists.Google Scholar

American Society of Anesthesiologists: Five things physicians and patients should question. Choosing Wisely: an initiative of the ABIM Foundation [Internet]. 2013 [updated 2013, cited 2014 Aug 31]. Available from: www.choosingwisely.org/doctor-patient-lists/american-society-of-anesthesiologists.Google Scholar

Onuoha, OC, Arkoosh, VA, Fleisher, LA. Choosing Wisely in anesthesiology: the gap between evidence and practice. JAMA Intern Med 2014 Jun 16. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2309. [Epub ahead of print].CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schein, OD, Katz, J, Bass, EB, et al. The value of routine preoperative medical testing before cataract surgery. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:168–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benarroch-Gampel, J, Sheffield, KM, Duncan, CB, et al. Preoperative laboratory testing in patients undergoing elective, low-risk ambulatory surgery. Ann Surg 2012; 256(3):518–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lee, TH, Marcantonio, ER, Mangione, CM, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation 1999; 100: 1043–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fleisher, LA, Beckman, JA, Brown, KA, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (writing committee to revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). Circulation 2007; 116:e418–500.Google Scholar

Karnath, B. Preoperative cardiac risk assessment. Am Fam Physician 2002; 66(10):1889–97.Google ScholarPubMed

Sheffield, KM, McAdams, PS, Benarroch-Gampel, J, et al. Overuse of preoperative cardiac stress testing in medicare patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery. Ann Surg 2013; 257(1):73–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Raymond, R. Anesthetic management of the elderly patient. 53rd ASA Annual Meeting Refresher Course Lectures #321. 2002; p1–7.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 104. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113:1180–9.Google Scholar

Mangram, AJ, Horan, TC, Pearson, ML, et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection [Internet]. 1999 [updated, cited 2014 Aug 31]. Accessible from: www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/gl_surgicalsite.html.Google Scholar

McElligott, KA, Havrilesky, LJ, Myers, ER. Preoperative screening strategies for bacterial vaginosis prior to elective hysterectomy: a cost comparison study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205:500.e1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 84. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110:429–40.Google Scholar

Browning, RM, Trentino, K, Nathan, EA, Hashemi, N, Western Australian Patient Blood Management Program. Preoperative anaemia is common in patients undergoing major gynaecological surgery and is associated with a fivefold increased risk of transfusion. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 52(5):455–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2012.01478.x. Epub 2012 Sept 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baron, DM, Hochrieser, H, Posch, M, et al. Preoperative anaemia is associated with poor clinical outcome in non-cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth 2014; 113(3):416–23. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu098. Epub 2014 May 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schrier, SI, Mentzer, WC. Treatment of the adult with iron deficiency anemia [Internet]. 2014 [updated 2014 Aug 5, cited 2014 Aug 31]. Available from: www.uptodate.com.Google Scholar

Lethaby, A, Vollenhoven, B, Sowter, MC. Pre-operative GnRH analogue therapy before hysterectomy or myomectomy for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; 2:CD000547.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Report of the Presidential Task Force on Patient Safety in the Office Setting. In: Quality and Safety in Women’s Health Care, 2nd edition. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2010: 91–8.Google Scholar

Ambulatory Health Care: 2011 National Patient Safety Goals, effective July 1, 2011. Available at: www.jointcommission.org.Google Scholar

Nezhat, C, Nezhat, F, Nezhat, C. Nezhat’s Operative Gynecologic Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy. London: Cambridge University Press; 2008: 98–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Basinski, CM. A review of clinical data for currently approved hysteroscopic sterilization procedures. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2010; 3:101–10.Google ScholarPubMed

Povedano, B, Arjona, JE, Velasco, E, Monserrat, JA, Lorente, J, Castelo-Branco, C. Complications of hysteroscopic Essure® sterilisation: report on 4306 procedures performed in a single centre. BJOG 2012; 119:795–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Benefits and risks of sterilization. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 133. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121:392–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Essure®. Instructions for use. Available at: www.essuremd.com/App_Themes/BaseTheme/PDFs/Link%20Essure%20IFU.pdf. Accessed Jun 3, 2014.Google Scholar

Noller, KL. Intraepithelial neoplasia of the lower genital tract (cervix, vulva): etiology, screening, diagnostic techniques, management. In: Lentz, GM, Lobo, RA, Gershenson, DM, Katz, VL, editors. Comprehensive Gynecology, 6th edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2012: 653–65.Google Scholar

Gajjar, K, Martin-Hirsch, PP, Bryant, A. Pain relief for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing colposcopy treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17; 10:CD006120.Google ScholarPubMed

Damewood, DD, Keye, WR, Coddington, CC III. Office gynecology and surgical procedures. In: Gibbs, RS, Karlan, BY, Haney, AF, Nygaard, IE, editors. Danforth’s Obstetrics and Gynecology, 10th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008: 514–39.Google Scholar

Fuh, K, Blumenthal, PD. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). In: A Practical Guide to Office Gynecologic Procedures. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013: 80–6.Google Scholar

www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/n/nexplanon/nexplanon_pi.pdf. Accessed Oct 30, 2014.Google Scholar

Heikinheimo, O, Inki, P, Kunz, M, et al. Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study on the effect of misoprostol on ease of consecutive insertion of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Contraception 2010; 81:481–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sääv, I, Aronsson, A, Marions, L, et al. Cervical priming with sublingual misoprostol prior to insertion of an intrauterine device in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2007; 22:2647–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vickery, Z, Madden, T. Difficult intrauterine contraception insertion in a nulligravid patient. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2011 Feb; 117(2 Pt 1):391–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montz, FJ. Management of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and potential complications. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000 Jun; 43(2): 394–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Solomon, D, Davey, D, Kurman, R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 2002; Apr 24; 287(16): 2114–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Waxman, AG, Chelmow, D, Darragh, TM, et al. Revised terminology for cervical histopathology and its implications for management of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 1465–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End results Program. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2009.Google Scholar

Center for Disease Control and Prevention. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2011 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute; 2014. Available at: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/uscs. Accessed 2 Feb 2015.Google Scholar

Cendejas, BR, Smith-McCune, KK, Khan, MJ. Does treatment for cervical and vulvar dysplasia impact women’s sexual health? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 Mar; 212(3): 291–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wright, TC, Schiffman, M. Adding a test for human papillomavirus DNA to cervical cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2003 Feb 6; 348(6): 489–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Muñoz, N, Bosch, FX, de Sanjosé, S, et al. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kjaer, SK, Frederiksen, K, Munk, C, Iftner, T. Long-term absolute risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse following human papillomavirus infection: role of persistence. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010 Oct 6; 102(9): 1478–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kjaer, SK, van den Brule, AJ, Paull, G, et al. Type specific persistence of high risk human papillomavirus (HPV) as indicator of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions in young women: population based prospective follow up study. BMJ 2002; 325: 572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McCredie, MRE, Sharples, KJ, Paul, C, et al. Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2008 May; 9: 425–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lammé, J, Pattaratornkosohn, T, Mercado-Abadie, J, et al. Concurrent anal human papillomavirus and abnormal anal cytology in women with known cervical dysplasia. Obstet Gynecol Aug; 124(2 pt.1): 242–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ACOG Committee on Adolescent Health Care. Committee Opinion No. 588: human papillomavirus vaccination. Obstet Gynecol 2014 Mar; 123: 712–18.Google Scholar

Beller, U, Abu-Rustum, NR. Cervical cancers after human papillomavirus vaccination. Obstet Gynecol 2009 Feb; 113(2 p. 2): 550–2. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318191a54a.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Teixeira, JC, Derchain, SFM, Oliveira, ERZ, et al. Microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix in a young woman vaccinated against human papillomavirus: the screening must be continued. J Lower Genit Tract Dis 2014; 18(2): E50–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sung, HY, Kearney, KA, Miller, M, et al. Papanicolaou smear history and diagnosis of invasive cervical carcinoma among members of a large prepaid health plan. Cancer 2000 May 15; 88(10): 2284–9.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Leyden, WA, Manos, MM, Geiger, AM, et al. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process. J National Can Instit 2005 May; 97(9): 675–83.Google ScholarPubMed

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 109: screening for cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2009 Dec; 109: 1–18.Google Scholar

Committee Opinion No. 534: Guidelines for women’s healthcare. A resource manual. 4th ed. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 421–4.Google Scholar

Huh, WK, Sidri, M, Stoler, M, et al. Relevance of random biopsy at the transformation zone when colposcopy is negative. Obstet Gynecol 2014 Oct; 124(4): 670–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 99: management of abnormal cervical cytology and histology. Obstet Gynecol 2008 Dec; 112(6): 1419–44. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318192497c.Google Scholar

Bosgraaf, RP, Mast, PP, Struik-van der Zanden, PHTH, et al. Overtreatment in a see-and-treat approach to cervical intraepithelial lesions. Obstet Gynecol 2013 Jun; 121(6): 1209–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, S, Leeman, L. Treatment options for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2013 Jun; 40(2): 291–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ciavattini, A, Clemente, N, Delli Carpini, G, et al. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of miscarriage. Fertil Steril 2015 Apr; 103(4): 1043–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Massad, LS, Einstein, MH, Huh, WK, et al. 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. J Lower Genit Tract Dis 2013; 17(5): S1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 140: management of abnormal cervical cancer screening test results and cervical cancer precursors. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 1338–67. (Replaces Practice Bulletin No. 99, Dec 2008.)Google Scholar

Roberts, OA, Owonikoko, KM, Abdus-Salam, AA, Ogun, O. Advanced carcinoma of the cervix in a 17-year-old girl. J Obstet Gynaecol 2013 Oct; 33(7): 747–8. doi: 10.3109;01443615.2013.813911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guo, Y, Song, L, Liu, H. Cervical clear cell adenocarcinoma infected with human papillomavirus type 18 in an adolescent. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2014 Feb; 27 (1): e1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 Jul 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goncalves, CV, Quintana, SM, Marcolin, AC, et al. Microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix in a 14-year-old adolescent: case report and literature review. São Paulo Med J 2009 May; 127(2): 105–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costa, MJ, Tadros, T, Tackett, E, Naib, Z. Vaginocervical cytology in victims of sexual assault. Diagn Cytopathol 1991; 7(4): 337–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coker, AL, Hopenhayn, C, DeSimone, CP, et al. Violence against women raises risk of cervical cancer. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2009 Aug; 18(8): 1179–85. doi:10.1089/jwh.2008.1048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1993 revised classification system HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. MMWR 1992; 41: 1–19.Google Scholar

Massad, LS, Xie, X, D’Souza, G, et al. Incidence of cervical precancers among HIV-seropositive women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 May; 212(5): 606.e1–8. Epub 2014 Dec 10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Denslow, SA, Rositch, AF, Firnhaber, C, et al. Incidence and progression of cervical lesions in women with HIV: a systematic global review. In J STD AIDS 2014 Mar; 25(3): 163–77. doi:10.1177/0956462413491735.Google ScholarPubMed

Lofgren, S, Tadros, T, Herring-Bailey, G, et al. Progression and regression of cervical pap test lesions in an urban AIDS clinic in the combined antiretroviral therapy era: a longitudinal, retrospective study. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2015 Feb; 19: 1–20.Google Scholar

Huchko, MJ, Leslie, H, Maloba, M, et al. Outcomes up to twelve months after treatment with loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among HIV-infected women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2015 Feb; 2: 1–19.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Preparing for clinical emergencies in obstetrics and gynecology. Committee Opinion No. 487. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 1032–4.Google Scholar

Neumar, RW, Otto, CW, Link, MS, et al. Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2010: 122[Suppl 3]: S729–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rosenberg, NM, Urman, RD, Gallagher, S, et al. Effect of an office based surgical safety system on patient outcomes. Eplasty 2012; 12: e59.Google ScholarPubMed

National Center for Health Statistics (US). Health, United States, 2013. Hyattsville (MD). May 2014. Report No: 2014–32.Google Scholar

American Society of Anesthesiologists. Guidelines for office-based anesthesia. Available at: asatest.asahq.org/publicationsAndServices/standards/12.pdf. Accessed October 19, 2014.Google Scholar

Berg, RA, Hemphill, R, Abella, BS, et al. Adult basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2010: 122[Suppl 3]: S685–705.Google ScholarPubMed

Sheppard, LP, Channer, KS. Acute coronary syndromes. CEACCP 2004; 4 (6): 175–80.Google Scholar

American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Women’s Health, 2011: Stats and Facts. Available at: www.acog.org/-/media/NewsRoom/MediaKit.pdf.Google Scholar

Anderson, JL, Adams, CD, Antman, EM, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2011; 123: e426–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Gara, PT, Kushner, FG, Ascheim, DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61(4): e78–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vanden Hoek, TL, Morrison, LJ, Shuster, M, et al. Part 12: cardiac arrest in special situations 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2010: 122(Suppl 3): S829–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Public Health Dimensions of the Epilepsies. Epilepsy across the spectrum: promoting health and understanding. England, MJ, Liverman, CT, Schultz, AM, Strawbridge, LM (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US), 2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brophy, GM, Bell, R, Claassen, J, et al. Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care 2012; 17(1): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sutula, TP, Hagen, J, Pitkӓnen, A. Do epileptic seizures damage the brain? Curr Opin Neurol 2003; 16(2): 189–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Paterson-Brown, S, Howell, C. (Eds.) Managing obstetric emergencies & trauma: the MOET course manual, 3rd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paterson-Brown, S, Bamber, J. Prevention and treatment of haemorrhage. In: Knight, M, Kenyon, S, Brocklehurst, P, et al. (Eds.) on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving lives, improving mothers’ care – lessons learned to inform future maternity care from the UK and Ireland confidential enquiries into maternal deaths and morbidity 2009–12. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, 2014.Google Scholar

Johansson, SO, Bieber, T, Dahl, R, et al. A revised nomenclature for allergy for global use: Report of the nomenclature review committee of the World Allergy Organization. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 113 (5): 832–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ebo, DG, Fisher, MM, Hagendorens, MM, et al. Anaphylaxis during anaesthesia: diagnostic approach. Allergy 2007; 62 (5): 471–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Whittington, T, Fisher, MM. Anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions. Baillière’s Clin Anaesthesiol 1998; 12; 301–23.Google Scholar

McLean-Tooke, AC, Bethune, CA, Fay, AC, et al. Adrenaline in the treatment of anaphylaxis: what is the evidence? BMJ 2003; 327: 1332–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Knight, M, Nair, M, Shah, A, et al. Maternal mortality and morbidity in the UK 2009–12: surveillance and epidemiology. In: Knight, M, Kenyon, S, Brocklehurst, P, et al. (Eds.) on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving lives, improving mothers’ care – lessons learned to inform future maternity care from the UK and Ireland confidential enquiries into maternal deaths and morbidity 2009–12. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit. University of Oxford, 2014.Google Scholar

Mushkat, Y, Luxman, D, Nachum, Z, et al. Gas embolism complicating obstetric and gynecologic procedures. Cases reports and review of the literature. Eur J Obstetrics and Gynecology & Reproductive Medicine 1995; 63: 97–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Checklist for treatment of local anesthetic systemic toxicity. Available at: www.asra.com. Accessed July 31, 2014.Google Scholar

Weinberg, GL. Lipid emulsion infusion: resuscitation for local anesthetic and other drug overdose. Anesthesiology 2012; 117 (1): 180–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Propst, AM, Liberman, RF, Harlow, BL, et al. Complications of hysteroscopic surgery: predicting patients at risk. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2000; 96(4): 517–20.Google ScholarPubMed

Schafer, M, Von Ungern-Sternberg, BS, Wight, E, Schneider, MC. Isotonic fluid absorption during hysteroscopy resulting in severe hyperchloraemic acidosis. Anesthesiol 2005; 103(1): 203–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hahn, RG. Fluid absorption in endoscopic surgery. Br J Anaesth 2006; 96 (1): 8–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ayus, JC, Arieff, AI. Glycine-induced hypo-osmolar hyponatremia. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157 (2): 223–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

AAGL Practice Report: practice guidelines for the management of hysteroscopic distending media. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2013; 20(2): 137–48.Google Scholar