Amanatullah, E. T., & Tinsley, C. H. (2013). Punishing female negotiators for asserting too much ... or not enough: Exploring why advocacy moderates backlash against assertive female negotiators. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(1), 110–122.Google Scholar

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452–471.Google Scholar

Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arnold, K. A., Dupré, K. E., Hershcovis, M. S., & Turner, N. (2011). Interpersonal targets and types of workplace aggression as a function of perpetrator sex. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 23(3), 163–170.Google Scholar

Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, 33(1), 1–4.Google Scholar

Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Hjelt-Bäck, M. (1994). Aggression among university employees. Aggressive Behavior, 20(3), 173–184.Google Scholar

Browne, K. (2005). Snowball sampling: Using social networks to research non-heterosexual women. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice, 8(1), 47–60.Google Scholar

Buchanan, N. T., Settles, I. H., & Woods, K. C. (2008). Comparing sexual harassment subtypes among black and white women by military rank: Double jeopardy, the jezebel, and the cult of true womanhood. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.Google Scholar

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). Labor force statistics from the current population survey.Google Scholar

Buss, A. H. (1961). The psychology of aggression. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar

Catalyst, Inc. (2012). Missing pieces: Women and minorities on Fortune 500 boards. (Research Report). New York: Author. Retrieved from www.catalyst.org/knowledge/missing-pieces-women-and-minorities-fortune-500-boards-2012-alliance-board-diversity, last accessed October 11, 2016.Google Scholar

Clair, J. A., Beatty, J. E., & MacLean, T. L. (2005). Out of sight but not out of mind: Managing invisible identities in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 78–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cortina, L. M. (2008). Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cortina, L. M., Curtin, N., & Stewart, A. J. (2012). Where is social structure in personality research?: A feminist analysis of publication trends. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(3), 259–273.Google Scholar

Cortina, L. M., Kabat-Farr, D., Leskinen, E. A., Huerta, M., & Magley, V. J. (2013). Selective incivility as modern discrimination in organizations evidence and impact. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1579–1605.Google Scholar

Cortina, L. M., Lonsway, K. A., Magley, V. J., Freeman, L. V., Collinsworth, L. L., Hunter, M., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2002). What’s gender got to do with it? Incivility in the federal courts. Law & Social Inquiry, 27(2), 235–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cuddy, A. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631–648.Google Scholar

Devine, P. G., & Monteith, M. J. (1999). Automaticity and control in stereotyping. In Chaiken, S. & Trope, Y. (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 339–360). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54(6), 408–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In Eckes, T. & Trautner, H. M. (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. C., & Glick, P. (2006). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11(2), 77–83.Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: a test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4), 578–589.Google Scholar

Gallus, J. A., Bunk, J. A., Matthews, R. A., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & Magley, V. J. (2014). An eye for an eye? Exploring the relationship between workplace incivility experiences and perpetration. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(2), 143–154.Google Scholar

Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 148–170.Google Scholar

Graham, S. (1992). “Most of the subjects were White and middle class”: Trends in published research on African Americans in selected APA journals, 1970–1989. American Psychologist, 47(5), 629–639.Google Scholar

Harrison, D. A., Kravitz, D. A., Mayer, D. M., Leslie, L. M., & Lev-Arey, D. (2006). Understanding attitudes toward affirmative action programs in employment: summary and meta-analysis of 35 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1013–1036.Google Scholar

Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657–674.Google Scholar

Hershcovis, M. S., Turner, N., Barling, J., Arnold, K. A., Dupré, K. E., Inness, M., LeBlanc, M. M., & Sivanathan, N. (2007). Predicting workplace aggression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 228–238.Google Scholar

Holland, K., & Cortina, L. M. (2013). When sexism and feminism collide: The sexual harassment of feminist working women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(2), 192–208.Google Scholar

Huang, J. L., Liu, M., & Bowling, N. A. (2015). Insufficient effort responding: Examining an insidious confound in survey data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 828–845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jones, M. (2002). Social psychology of prejudice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Kabat-Farr, D., & Cortina, L. M. (2014). Sex-based harassment in employment: New insights into gender and context. Law and Human Behavior, 38(1), 58–72.Google Scholar

Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Konik, J., & Cortina, L. M. (2008). Policing gender at work: Intersections of harassment based on sex and sexuality. Social Justice Research, 21(3), 313–337.Google Scholar

LeBlanc, M. M., & Kelloway, E. K. (2002). Predictors and outcomes of workplace violence and aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 444–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Leskinen, E. A., Rabelo, V. C., & Cortina, L. M. (2015). Gender stereotyping and harassment: A “catch-22” for women in the workplace. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(2), 192–204.Google Scholar

Lin, M. H., Kwan, V. S. Y., Cheung, A., & Fiske, S. T. (2005). Stereotype content model explains prejudice for an envied outgroup: Scale of anti-Asian American stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 34–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Maass, A., Cadinu, M., Guarnieri, G., & Grasselli, A. (2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 853–870.Google Scholar

MacDonald, T. K., & Zanna, M. P. (1998). Cross-dimension ambivalence toward social groups: Can ambivalence affect intentions to hire feminists? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(4), 427–441.Google Scholar

McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91–125). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. (1998). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence concerning specific forms, potential causes, and preferred targets. Journal Of Management, 24(3), 391–419.Google Scholar

Neuman, J. H., (2005). Aggression in the workplace: A social-psychological perspective. In Fox, S., Spector, P. E., Fox, S., & Spector, P. E. (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 13–40). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Operario, D., & Fiske, S. T. (1998). Racism equals power plus prejudice: A social psychological equation for racial oppression. In Eberhardt, J. L., Fiske, S. T., Eberhardt, J. L., & Fiske, S. T. (Eds.), Confronting racism: The problem and the response (pp. 33–53). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar

Ott, J. S. (1989). The organizational culture perspective. Chicago: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar

Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188.Google Scholar

Pearson, C. M., Andersson, L. M., & Porath, C. L. (2000). Assessing and attacking workplace incivility. Organizational Dynamics, 29(2), 123–137.Google Scholar

Pearson, C. M. & Porath, C. L. (2004). On incivility, its impact and directions for future research. In Griffin, R. & O’Leary-Kelly, A. (Eds.), The dark side of organizational behavior (pp. 403–425). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Rabelo, V. C., & Cortina, L. M. (2014). Two sides of the same coin: Gender harassment and heterosexist harassment in LGBQ work lives. Law & Human Behavior, 38, 378–391.Google Scholar

Roth, L. M. (2004). The social psychology of tokenism: Status and homophily processes on Wall Street. Sociological Perspectives, 47(2), 189–214.Google Scholar

Rozin, P. (2001). Social psychology and science: Some lessons from Solomon Asch. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(1), 2–14.Google Scholar

Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165–179.Google Scholar

Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal Of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 515–530.Google Scholar

Shteynberg, G., Leslie, L. M., Knight, A. P., & Mayer, D. M. (2011). But affirmative action hurts us! Race-related beliefs shape perceptions of White disadvantage and policy unfairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 434–443.Google Scholar

Stanton, J. M., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2001). Using Internet/intranet Web pages to collect organizational research data. Organizational Research Methods, 4(3), 200–217.Google Scholar

Stanton, J. M., & Weiss, E. M. (2002). Online panels for social science research: An introduction to the StudyResponse project. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, School of Information Studies, Tech. Rep, 13001.Google Scholar

Thomas, K. M., Johnson-Bailey, J., Phelps, R. E., Tran, N. M., & Johnson, L. (2013). Moving from pet to threat: Narratives of professional Black women. In Comas-Diaz, L. & Green, B. (Eds.), The psychological health of women of color: Intersections, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 275–286). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Waldo, C. R. (1999). Working in a majority context: A structural model of heterosexism as minority stress in the workplace. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46(2), 218–232.Google Scholar

Westwood, R. I., & Leung, A. S. M. (1999). Women in management in Hong Kong and Beijing: between pragmatism and patriarchy. In Fosh, P., Chan, A. W., Chow, W. S., Snape, E., & Westwood, R. (Eds.), Hong Kong management and labor: Change and continuity (pp. 199–219). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Yoder, J. D., & Aniakudo, P. (1996). When pranks become harassment: The case of African American women firefighters. Sex Roles, 35(5–6), 253–270.Google Scholar