Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T06:37:30.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part V - Language and communication development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2017

Edited by
Brian Hopkins ,
Elena Geangu  and
Sally Linkenauger
Brian Hopkins
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Elena Geangu
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Sally Linkenauger
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Child Development , pp. 373 - 412
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further reading

Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E.V. (2011). Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M.T. (2004). Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lust, B.C. (2006). Child language: Acquisition and growth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pine, J.M., Freudenthal, D., Krajewski, G., & Gobet, F. (2013). Do young children have adult-like syntactic categories? Zipf’s law and the case of the determiner. Cognition, 127, 345–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Aguado-Orea, J., & Pine, J.M. (2015). Comparing different models of the development of verb inflection in early child Spanish. PloS ONE, 10, e0119613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E.V.M. (2015). A constructivist account. In MacWhinney, B. & O’Grady, W. (Eds.), Handbook of language emergence (pp. 478–510). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., & Rowland, C.F. (2009). Predicting children’s errors with negative questions: Testing a schema-combination account. Cognitive Linguistics, 20, 225–266.Google Scholar
Ambridge, B., Kidd, E., Rowland, C.F., & Theakston, A.L. (2015). The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 42, 239–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound patterns of English. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Christophe, A., Millotte, S., Bernal, S., & Lidz, J. (2008). Bootstrapping lexical and syntactic acquisition. Language and Speech, 51, 61–75.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J.M., & Gobet, F. (2005). On the resolution of ambiguities in the extraction of syntactic categories through chunking. Cognitive Systems Research, 6, 17–25.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J.M., & Gobet, F. (2010). Explaining quantitative variation in the rate of Optional Infinitive errors across languages: A comparison of MOSAIC and the Variational Learning Model. Journal of Child Language, 37, 643–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gambell, T., & Yang, C.D. (2003). Scope and limits of statistical learning in word segmentation. Proceedings of the 34th Northeastern Linguistic Society Meeting (NELS), Stony Brook University, New York, pp. 29–30.Google Scholar
Hayiou-Thomas, M.E., Bishop, D.V. M., & Plunkett, K. (2004). Simulating SLI: General cognitive processing stressors can produce a specific linguistic profile. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 47, 1347–1362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollich, G.J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R.M., Brand, R.J., Brown, E., Chung, H.L., … & Bloom, L. (2000). Breaking the language barrier: An emergentist coalition model for the origins of word learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, i–135.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, P.W. (1999). How infants begin to extract words from speech. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 323–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. (1987). The bootstrapping problem in language acquisition. In MacWhinney, B. (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 339–441). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rice, M.L., Warren, S.F., & Betz, S.K. (2005). Language symptoms of developmental language disorders: An overview of autism, Down syndrome, fragile X, specific language impairment, and Williams syndrome. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakas, W.G., & Fodor, J.D. (2001). The structural triggers learner. In Bertolo, S. (Ed.), Language acquisition and learnability (pp. 228–300). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Santelmann, L., Berk, S., Austin, J., Somashekar, S., & Lust, B. (2002). Continuity and development in the acquisition of inversion in yes/no questions: Dissociating movement and inflection. Journal of Child Language, 29, 813–842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Lely, H.K.J. (1997). Language and cognitive development in a grammatical SLI boy: Modularity and innateness. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 10, 75–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M.M., & Croft, W. (2007). Phonological development: Toward a “radical” templatic phonology. Linguistics, 45, 683–725.Google Scholar
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106, 23–79.Google Scholar

Further reading

Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2010). Bilingual: Life and reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J.F., Byers-Heinlein, K., & Fennell, C.T. (2009). Bilingual beginnings to learning words. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 3649–3663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Bialystok, E., Luk, G., Peets, K.F., & Yang, S. (2010). Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 525–531.Google Scholar
Bosch, L., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2003). Simultaneous bilingualism and the perception of a language-specific vowel contrast in the first year of life. Language and Speech, 46, 217–243.Google Scholar
Byers-Heinlein, K., Burns, T.C., & Werker, J.F. (2010). The roots of bilingualism in newborns. Psychological Science, 21, 343–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Core, C., Hoff, E., Rumiche, R., & Señor, M. (2013). Total and conceptual vocabulary in Spanish–English bilinguals from 22 to 30 months: Implications for assessment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 1637–1649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Houwer, A. (1990). The acquisition of two languages from birth: A case study. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, Supplementary volume. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission ( 2012). Europeans and their languages. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_386_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Fennell, C.T., Byers-Heinlein, K., & Werker, J.F. (2007). Using speech sounds to guide word learning: The case of bilingual infants. Child Development, 78, 1510–1525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Dale, P.S., Reznick, J.S., Bates, E., Thal, D.J., & Pethick, S.J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, 1–173.Google Scholar
García, O., & Kleifgen, J. (2010). Educating emergent bilinguals: Policies, programs and practices for English language learners. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Green, D.W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67–81.Google Scholar
Kroll, J.F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P.K., Stevens, E., Hayashi, A., Deguchi, T., Kiritani, S., & Iverson, P. (2006). Infants show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months. Developmental Science, 9, F13–F21.Google Scholar
Morales, J., Calvo, A., & Bialystok, E. (2013). Working memory development in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 187–202.Google Scholar
Oller, D.K., Pearson, B.Z., & Cobo-Lewis, A.B. (2007). Profile effects in early bilingual language and literacy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 191–230.Google Scholar
Peal, E., & Lambert, W.E. (1962). The relation of bilingualism to intelligence. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 76, 1–23.Google Scholar
Ryan, C. (2013). Language use in the United States: 2011. American Community Survey Reports. U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from: https://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/acs-22.pdf.Google Scholar
Saer, D.J. (1923). The effect of bilingualism on intelligence. British Journal of Psychology, 14, 25–38.Google Scholar
Smith, M.E. (1931). A study of five bilingual children from the same family. Child Development, 2, 184–187.Google Scholar
Smithson, L., Paradis, J., & Nicoladis, E. (2014). Bilingualism and receptive vocabulary achievement: Could sociocultural context make a difference? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 810–821.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada ( 2012). Linguistic characteristics of Canadians. Language, 2011 Census of Population. Retrieved from: http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/98-314-x/98-314-x2011001-eng.pdf.Google Scholar
Werker, J.F., Fennell, C.T., Corcoran, K.M., & Stager, C.L. (2002). Infants’ ability to learn phonetically similar words: Effects of age and vocabulary size. Infancy, 3, 1–30.Google Scholar
Werker, J.F., Gilber, J.H.V., Humphrey, K., & Tees, R.C. (1981). Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception. Child Development, 52, 349–355.Google Scholar
Werker, J.F., Yeung, H.H., & Yoshida, K. (2012). How do infants become native speech perception experts? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further reading

Cook, V., & Ryan, D. (2016). The Routledge handbook of the English writing system. Abingdon: UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 322–352.Google Scholar
Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2009). Children’s reading and spelling: Beyond the first steps. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References

Berninger, V.W., Garcia, N.P., & Abbott, R.D. (2009). Multiple processes that matter in writing instruction and assessment. In Troia, G.A. (Ed.), Instruction and assessment for struggling writers: Evidence-based practices (pp. 15–50). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P.E. (1983). Categorising sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.Google Scholar
Bullinaria, J.A. (1997). Modeling reading, spelling, and past tense learning with artificial neural networks. Brain and Language, 59, 236–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlisle, J.F. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth and eighth graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehri, L. (2000). Learning to read and learning to spell: Two sides of a coin. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In Patterson, K., Marshall, J., & Coltheart, M. (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330). London, UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gough, P.B., & Tunmer, W.E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.Google Scholar
Hatcher, P.J., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M.J. (2004). Explicit phoneme training combined with phonic reading instruction helps young children at risk of reading failure. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 338–358.Google Scholar
Hayes, H., Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2006). Children use vowels to help them spell consonants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 27–42.Google Scholar
Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (2013). Learning to read: What we know and what we need to understand better. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 1–5.Google Scholar
Kemp, N., & Bryant, P. (2003). Do beez buzz? Rule-based and frequency-based knowledge in learning to spell plural -s. Child Development, 74, 63–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levin, I., & Ehri, L.C. (2009). Young children’s ability to read and spell their own and classmates’ names: The role of letter knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, T., Bryant, P.E., & Bindman, M. (1997). Learning to spell regular and irregular verbs. Reading and Writing, 9, 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakhill, J., & Garnham, A. (1988). Becoming a skilled reader. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Yuill, N. (1998). Individual differences in children’s comprehension skill: Toward an integrated model. In Hulme, C. & Joshi, R.M. (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 344–367). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Ardoin, S.P., & Binder, K.S. (2013). Children’s eye movements in reading: A commentary. School Psychology Review, 42, 223–233.Google Scholar
Share, D.L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., & Yin, L. (2011). Early differentiation between drawing and writing in Chinese children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 786–801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treiman, R., Cassar, M., & Zukowski, A. (1994). What types of linguistic information do children use in spelling? The case of flaps. Child Development, 65, 1318–1337.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., Cohen, J., Mulqueeny, K., Kessler, B., & Schechtman, S. (2007). Young children’s knowledge about printed names. Child Development, 78, 1458–1471.Google Scholar
Wood, C., Kemp, N., & Plester, B. (2014). Text messaging and literacy: The evidence. Oxford, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Further reading

Aske, D., Connolly, L., & Corman, R. (2013). Accessibility or accountability? The rhetoric of No Child Left Behind. Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, 14, 107–118.Google Scholar
Ferguson, M. (2014). 3 hurdles for Common Core adoption. Phi Delta Kappan, 95, 68–69.Google Scholar
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (2006). Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93–99.Google Scholar
Powell, P.J., (2010). Repeating views on grade retention. Childhood Education, 87, 90–93.Google Scholar
Taylor, B.M., Raphael, T.E., & Au, K.H. (2011). Reading and school reform. In Kamil, M., Pearson, P.D., Moje, E.B., & Afflerbach, P.P. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 594–628). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

References

Bloome, D., Averill, J., Hill, H., & Ryu, S. (2014). Ideologies and their consequences in defining literacies: An essay. In Dunston, P.J., Fullerton, S.K., Cole, M.W., Herro, D., Malloy, J.A., Wilder, P.M., & Headley, K.N. (Eds.), 63rd yearbook of the Literacy Research Association (pp. 61–77). Altamonte Springs, FL: Literacy Research Association.Google Scholar
Goodlad, J. (1954). Some effects of promotion and non-promotion upon the social and personal adjustment of children. Journal of Experimental Education, 22, 301–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberman, M. (2007). Who benefits from failing urban schools? An essay. Theory Into Practice, 46, 179–186.Google Scholar
Heath, S.B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jimerson, S.R., & Ferguson, P. (2007). A longitudinal study of grade retention: Academic and behavioral outcomes of retained students through adolescence. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 314–339.Google Scholar
Johnston, P.H. (2010). An instructional frame for RTI. The Reading Teacher, 63, 602–604.Google Scholar
Johnston, P.H., & Allington, R. (1991). Remediation. In Barr, R., Kamil, M., Mosenthal, P.B., & Pearson, P.D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 984–1012). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Klene, V., & Branson, E. (1929). Trial promotion versus failure. Educational Research Bulletin, 8, 6–1.Google Scholar
Leu, D.J., Kinzer, C.K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L.A. (2011). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In Alvermann, D.E., Unrau, N.J., & Ruddell, R.B. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 1150–1181). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Moje, E.B., Stockdill, D., Kim, K., & Kim, H. (2011). The role of text in disciplinary learning. In Kamil, M., Pearson, P.D., Moje, E.B., & Afflerbach, P.P. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 453–486). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ogbu, J.U. (1988). Literacy and schooling in subordinate cultures: The case of Black America. In Kintgen, E.R., Kroll, B.M., & Rose, M. (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy (pp. 227–242). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Reardon, S., & Owens, A. (2014). 60 years after Brown: Trends and consequences of school segregation. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, R. (2011). 21st-century skills: Cultural, linguistic, and motivational perspectives. In Alvermann, D.E., Unrau, N.J., & Ruddell, R.B. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 1241–1267). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Villegas, A.M. (1983). School failure and cultural mismatch: Another view. Urban Review, 20, 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wixson, K.K., Lipson, M.Y., & Johnston, P.H. (2010). Making the most of RTI. In Lipson, M.Y & Wixson, K.K. (Eds.), Successful approaches to RTI: Collaborative practices for improving K-12 Literacy (pp. 1–19). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar

Further reading

Davis, B.L., & Bedore, L.M. (2013). An emergence approach to speech acquisition: Doing and knowing. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P.K., & Damasio, A. (2012). Language. In Kandel, E.R., Schwartz, J.H., Jessell, T.M., Siegelbaum, S., & Hudspeth, J. (Eds.), Principles of neural science (5th ed., pp. 1353–1372). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. (2012). The dynamic lexicon. In Cohn, A., Huffman, M., & Fougeron, C. (Eds), Handbook of laboratory phonology (pp. 173–83). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vihman, M.M. (2014). Phonological development: The first two years (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

References

Dick, F., Krishnan, S., Leech, R., & Curtin, S. (2016). Language development. In Hickok, G. & Small, S.L. (Eds.), Neurobiology of language (pp. 373–388). New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Eimas, P.D., Siquel, and E.R., Jusczyk, P., & Vigorito, J. (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science, 171, 303–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giulivi, S., Whalen, D.H., Goldstein, L.M., Nam, H., & Levitt, A.G. (2011). An articulatory phonology account of preferred consonant–vowel combinations. Language Learning & Development, 7, 202–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guenther, F.H., Ghosh, S.S., & Tourville, J.A. (2006). Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain & Language, 96, 280–301.Google Scholar
Kent, R.K. (2005). Speech development. In Hopkins, B. (Ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of child development (pp. 249–257). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kern, S., Davis, B.L. & Zink, I. (2010). From babbling to first words in four languages: Common trends, cross language and individual differences. In Hombert, J.-M. & d’Errico, F. (Eds.), Becoming eloquent (pp. 205–232). Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kröger, B.J., Kannampuzha, J., & Kaufmann, E. (2014). Associative learning and self-organization as basic principles for simulating speech acquisition, speech production, and speech perception. Nonlinear Biomedical Physics, 2, 1–28.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P.K., & Meltzoff, A.N. (1982). The bimodal perception of speech in infancy. Science, 218, 1138–1141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacNeilage, P.F., & Davis, B.L. (1990). Acquisition of speech production: Frames, then content. In Jeannerod, M. (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII: Motor representation and control (pp. 453–475). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mattock, K., Molnar, M., Polka, L., & Burnham, D. (2008). The developmental course of lexical tone perception in the first year of life. Cognition, 106, 1367–1381.Google Scholar
Νicolaidis, K. (2006). Speech development. In Brown, K. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (pp. 722–736). New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Nittrouer, S., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & McGowan, R.S. (1989). The emergence of phonetic segments: Evidence from the spectral structure of fricative–vowel sequences spoken by children and adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 120–132.Google Scholar
Patterson, M.L., & Werker, J.F. (2003). Two-month-olds match vowel information in the face & voice. Developmental Science, 6, 191–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petitto, L.A., Berens, M.S., Kovelman, I., Dubins, M.H., Jasinska, K., & Shalinsky, M. (2012). The “Perceptual Wedge” hypothesis as the basis for bilingual babies’ phonetic processing advantage: New insights from fNIRS brain imaging. Brain and Language, 121, 130–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polka, L., & Werker, J.F. (1994). Developmental changes in perception of non-native vowel contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 421–435.Google Scholar
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (2004). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Saffran, J., Werker, J.F., & Werner, L. (2006). The infants’ auditory world: Hearing, speech, and the beginnings of language. In Kuhn, D. & Siegler, M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 2: Cognition, perception, and language (pp. 58–108), Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Vihman, M.M., & Croft, W. (2007). Phonological development: Toward a ‘radical’ templatic phonology. Linguistics, 45, 683–725.Google Scholar
Vorperian, H.K., Wang, S., Chung, M.K., Schimek, E.M., Durtschi, R.B., Kent, R.D., Ziegert, A.J., & Gentry, L.R. (2009). Anatomic development of the oral & pharyngeal portions of the vocal tract: An imaging study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 1666–1678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werker, J.F., & Tees, R.C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49–63.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×