Adorno, Theodor W. 1969. “Scientific Experiences of a European Scholar in America.” In The Intellectual Migration: Europe and America, 1930–1960, ed. Fleming, Donald. and Bailyn, Bernard, pp. 338–370. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Akerlof, George A. and Kranton, Rachel E.. 2010. Identity Economics: How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages and Well-Being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, Robert L. 1994. Opening Doors the Life and Work of Joseph Schumpeter, Volume 1: Europe. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Amadae, S. M. 2003. Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. 1968. Men in Dark Times. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Janovich.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 2009. Nichomachean Ethics, ed. Ross, David and Brown, Lesley. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bailes, Christopher. 2012. “Ludwig Wittgenstein and Hermann Broch: The Need for Fiction and Logic in Moral Philosophy”. Washington University Open Scholarship.Google Scholar

Berger, Peter L. 1963. Invitation to Sociology: A Humanistic Perspective. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Berger, Peter L. and Kellner, Hansfried. 1982. Sociology Reinterpreted. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Berman, Sheri. 1997. “Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic.” World Politics 49 (3): 401–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernal, J. D. 1939. The Social Function of Science. London: Routledge & Sons.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Michael A. 2001. A Perilous Progress: Economists and Public Purpose in Twentieth-Century America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birner, Jack. 1999. “The Surprising Place of Cognitive Psychology in the Work of F.A. Hayek.” History of Economic Ideas 7 (1–2): 43–84.Google Scholar

Blaug, Mark. 1962. Economic Theory in Retrospect. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Blaug, Mark. 1992. The Methodology of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boettke, Peter J. 1994. The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boettke, Peter J. 2010. Handbook on Contemporary Austrian Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boettke, Peter J. 2012. Living Economics: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Oakland: The Independent Institute.Google Scholar

Bohm, Franz, Eucken, Walter, and Grossmann-Doerth, Hans. 1936/1989. “The Ordo Manifesto of 1936.” In Germany’s Social Market Economy, ed. Peacock, Alan and Wilgerodt, Hans, 15–26. London: Trade Policy Research Centre.Google Scholar

Boltanski, Lu and Thévenot, Laurent. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boulding, Kenneth E. 1963. “Towards a Pure Theory of Threat Systems.” The American Economic Review 53 (2): 424–434.Google Scholar

Boulding, Kenneth E. 1969. “Economics as a Moral Science.” The American Economic Review 59 (1): 1–12.Google Scholar

Broch, Hermann. 1946a. “Geschichtsgesetz Und Willensfreiheit.” In Massenpsychologie: Schriften Aus Dem Nachlass, 237–312. Zürich: Rhein-Verlag.Google Scholar

Broch, Hermann. 1946b. The Death of Virgil. London: George Routledge & Sons.Google Scholar

Broch, Hermann. 2002. “Hugo von Hofmannstahl and His Time: Art and Its Non-Style at the End of the Nineteenth Century.” In Geist and Zeitgeist: The Spiritual in an Unspiritual Age, ed. Hargraves, John, 141–210. New York: Counterpoint.Google Scholar

Buck, Peter. 1985. “Adjusting to Military Life: The Social Sciences Go to War, 1941–1950.” In Military Enterprise and Technological Change: Perspectives on the American Experience, ed. Smith, Merritt Roe, 203–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Burgin, Angus. 2012. The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets Since the Depression. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von. 1891. The Positive Theory of Capital. London: Macmillan and Company.Google Scholar

Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von. 1914/1924. “Macht Oder Ökonomisch Gesetz.” In Gesammelte Schriften von Eugen von Böhm Bawerk, ed. Weiss, Franz X., 230–300. Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar

Caldwell, Bruce. 1988. “Hayek’s Transformation.” History of Political Economy 20 (4): 513–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caldwell, Bruce. 1997. “Introduction.” In The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek: Volume X. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Caldwell, Bruce. 2004. Hayek’s Challenge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Cassidy, John. 2000. “The Hayek Century.” Hoover’s Digest (3). www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/6405.Google Scholar

Cassidy, John. 2010. “Interview with John Cochrane (After the Blow-up Series).” The New Yorker (January 13). www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2010/01/interview-with-john-cochrane.html.Google Scholar

Clarke, Maurice D. 1888. “Therapeutic Nihilism.” Boston Medical and Surgical Journal 119 (9): 199–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coase, Ronald H. 1934. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica 4 (16): 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coen, Deborah R. 2007. Vienna in the Age of Uncertainty: Science, Liberalism, and Private Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Randall. 1998. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Collins, Randall. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Congdon, Lee. 1991. Exile and Social Thought: Hungarian Intellectuals in Germany and Austria 1919–1934. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowen, Tyler. 2007. Discover Your Inner Economist. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar

Cowen, Tyler. 2013. “One Further Thought on the Reinhart and Rogoff Fracas.” Marginal Revolution. http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2013/04/one-further-thought-on-the-reinhart-and-rogoff-fracas.html.Google Scholar

Crankshaw, Edward. 1938. Vienna: The Image of a Culture in Decline. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Cravens, Hamilton. 2012. “Column Right, March! Nationalism, Scientific Positivism, and the Conservative Turn of the American Social Sciences in the Cold War Era.” In Cold War Social Science: Knowledge Production, Liberal Democracy, and Human Nature, ed. Solovey, Mark and Cravens, Hamilton, 117–35. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Craver, Earlene. 1986. “The Emigration of the Austrian Economists.” History of Political Economy 18 (1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craver, Eearlen and Leijonhufvud, Axel. 1987. “Economics in America: the Continental Influence.” History of Political Economy, 19 (2): 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cushing, James T. 1994. Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dahms, Hans-Joachim. 1995. The Migration of the Vienna Circle. In Vertreibung der Vernunft: The Cultural Exodus from Austria, ed. Stadler, Friedrich and Weibel, Peter, 57–79. Wien: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Davis, John B. 2011. Individuals and Identity in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dekker, Erwin (2014). “The Intellectual Networks of Otto Neurath: Between the Coffeehouse and Academia.” In European Encounters: Intellectual Exchange and the Rethinking of Europe 1914–1945.Google Scholar

Dietl, Joseph. 1845. “Praktische Wahrnehmungen Nach Den Ergebnissen Im Wiedner-Bezirkskrankenhause.” Zeitschrift Der K.u.k. Gesellschaft Der Aerzte Zu Wien 1 (2): 9–26.Google Scholar

Dietl, Joseph. 1849. Der Aderlass in Der Lungentzündung. Klinisch Und Physiologisch Erötert. Wien: Kaulfuss Witwe, Prandel & Comp.Google Scholar

Drucker, Peter F. 1939. The End of Economic Man: A Study of the New Totalitarianism. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar

Dunning, Eric and Mennell, Stephen. 1996. “Preface.” In The Germans: Power Struggles and the Development of Habitus in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, vii–xvi. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Ebenstein, Alan. 2003. Hayek’s Journey: The Mind of Friedrich Hayek. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ebner, Alexander. 2005. “Hayek on Entrepreneurship: Competition, Market Process and Cultural Evolution.” In Entrepreneurship, Money and Coordination, ed. Backhaus, Jürgen G., 131–149. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Ekelund, Robert B. and Hébert, Robert F.. 1983. A History of Economic Theory and Method. Auckland: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Elias, Norbert. 1939/2000. The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Elias, Norbert. 1996. The Germans: Power Struggles and the Development of Habitus in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Engel-Janosi, Friedrich. 1974. … Aber ein Stolzer Bettler: Erinnerungen aus einer Verlorenen Generation. Graz: Styria.Google Scholar

Fleck, Christian. 1996. Emigration of Social Scientists’ Schools from Austria. In Forced Migration and Scientific Change, eds. Ash, Mitchell G. & Söllner, Alfons, 198–223. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foss, Nicolai Juul. 1995. “More on ‘Hayek’s Transformation’.” History of Political Economy 27 (2): 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Francis, Mark and Stacy, Barrie. 1985. “Freud and the Enlightenment.” In The Viennese Enlightenment, ed. Francis, Mark, pp. 88–128. Kent: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Frank, Robert H. 2008. The Economic Naturalist. London: Virgin Books.Google Scholar

Franz, Georg. 1955. Liberalismus: Die Deutschliberale Bewegung in der Habsburgischen Monarchie. München: G.D.W. Callwey.Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. 1930. Civilization and Its Discontents. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar

Fuchs, Albert. 1949. Geistige Strömungen in Österreich 1867–1918. Wien: Globus Verlag.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis. 1989. “The End of History?” National Interest (16): 3–18.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1975. “Philosophy & Social Criticism.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 2: 307.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2004. Truth and Method. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Gray, John. 1984. Hayek on Liberty. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gray, John. 2000. Two Faces of Liberalism. New York: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Grillparzer, Franz. 1962. King Ottocar: His Rise and Fall. Ed. Burkhard, Arthur. Yarmouth Port: The Register Press.Google Scholar

Groenewegen, Peter D. 2001. Physicians and Political Economy: Six Studies of the Work of Doctor-Economists. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gruen, William. 1939. “What Is Logical Empiricism.” Partisan Review 6 (5): 64–77.Google Scholar

Haag, John. 1976. “Othmar Spann and the Quest for a ‘True State’.” Austrian History Yearbook 12: 227–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haberler, Gottfried von. 1983. “Fritz Machlup: In Memoriam.” Cato Journal 3: 11–14.Google Scholar

Hacohen, Malachi H. 2000. Karl Popper, the Formative Years, 1902–1945: Politics and Philosophy in Interwar Vienna. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hahn, Hans, Neurath, Otto, and Carnap, Rudolf. 1929/1979. “Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis.” In Otto Neurath: Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung, Sozialismus Und Logischer Empirismus, ed. Hegelsmann, Rainer, 79–101. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar

Hahn, Robert W. 1989. “Economic Prescriptions for Environmental Problems: How the Patient Followed the Doctor’s Orders.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (2): 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamann, Brigitte (ed ). 1979. Majestät, Ich Warne Sie …: Geheime Und Private Schriften. Wien: Amalthea.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1926/1992. “Friedrich von Wieser (1851–1926).” In The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek: Volume IV, The Fortunes of Liberalism, 108–125. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1933. “The Trend of Economic Thinking.” Economica (40): 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1937. “Economics and Knowledge.” Economica 4 (13): 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1939. Freedom and the Economic System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1944/1992. “Historians and the Future of Europe.” In The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek: Volume IV, The Fortunes of Liberalism, ed. Klein, Peter G., 201–215. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” The American Economic Review 35 (4): 519–530.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1947/1967. “Opening Address to a Conference at Mont Pèlerin.” In Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, 148–159. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1948. “Individualism: True and False.” In Individualism & Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1949. “The Intellectuals and Socialism.” The University of Chicago Law Review 16 (3): 417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1952. The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1956/2007. “Foreword to the 1956 American Paperback Edition.” In The Road to Serfdom: The Definitive Edition, ed. Caldwell, Bruce, 39–52. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1962. “The Moral Element in Enterprise.” The Freeman 8 (July): 44–51.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1962. “The Pretence of Knowledge.” The Swedish Journal of Economics 77 (4): 433–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1979. “Interviews with Hayek.” http://mises.org/books/hayek_oral_history.pdf.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1981. “Foreword.” In Socialism, ed. von Mises, Ludwig, xix–xxiv. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1982. Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 3: The Political Order of a Free People. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1988. The Collected Works of Friedrich August Hayek Vol I, The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism, ed. Bartley, W.W. III. Vol. I. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1994. Hayek on Hayek. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heilbroner, Robert L. 1953. The Worldly Philosophers: The Lives, Times, and Ideas of the Great Economic Thinkers. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Heims, S. J. 1991. “Fritz London and the Community of Quantum Physicists.” In World Views and Scientific Discipline Formation, ed. Woordward, William R.. Vol. 134. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Heizmann, Jürgen. 2003. “A Farewell to Art: Poetic Reflection in Broch’s Der Tod Des Vergil.” In Hermann Broch, Visionary in Exile: The 2001 Yale Symposium, ed. Lützeler, Paul Michael, 187–200. Rochester: Camden House.Google Scholar

Helling, Ingeborg Katharina. 1984. “A. Schutz and F. Kaufmann: Sociology Between Science and Interpretation.” Human Studies 7: 141–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hennecke, Hans Jörg. 2000. Friedrich August von Hayek: Die Tradition Der Freiheit. Düsseldorf: Verlag Wirtschaft und Finanzen.Google Scholar

Hermann, Friedrich Wilhelm. 1832. Staatswirtschaftliche Untersuchungen. München: Anton Weberschen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Heyne, Paul T. 1973. The Economic Way of Thinking. Chicago: Science Research Associates.Google Scholar

Heyt, Friso D. 1999. “Popper’s Vienna. A Contribution to the History of the Ideas of Critical Rationalism.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 12 (4): 525–541.Google Scholar

Hicks, John. 1939. Value and Capital: An Inquiry into Some Fundamental Principles of Economic Theory. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hicks, John. 1984. “The Formation of an Economist.” In The Economics of John Hicks, ed. Helm, Dieter, 281–290. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. 1977. The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism Before Its Triumph. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. 1982. “Rival Interpretations of Market Society: Civilizing, Destructive, or Feeble?” Journal of Economic Literature 20 (4): 1463–1484.Google Scholar

Homans, Jennifer. 2012. “Tony Judt: A Final Victory.” New York Review of Books (March).Google Scholar

Horwitz, Steven. 2005. “Review Essay Friedrich Hayek, Austrian Economist.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 27 (1): 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howson, Susan. 2006. “Hayek’s Journey: The Mind of Friedrich Hayek Review.” History of Political Economy 38 (3): 555–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, Stuart H. 1956. “Is the Intellectual Obsolete?” Commentary 22 (4): 313.Google Scholar

Hughes, Stuart H. 1958. Consciousness and Society: the Reorientation of European Social Thought, 1890–1930. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Huizinga, Johan. 1938. Homo Ludens: Proeve Eener Bepaling Van Het Spel-element Der Cultuur. Haarlem: H.D. Tjeenk Willink & Zoon.Google Scholar

Huizinga, Johan. 1949. Homo Ludens-A Study of the Play - Element in Culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Hülsmann, Jörg Guido. 2007. Mises: The Last Knight of Liberalism. Auburn: Mises Institute.Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel P. 1998. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Hutchison, Terence W. 1964. Positive Economics and Policy Objectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ingrao, Bruno and Israel, Giorgio. 1990. The Invisible Hand. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jabloner, Clemens. 1998. “Kelsen and His Circle: The Viennese Years.” European Journal of International Law 9 (2): 368–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janik, Allan. 1981. “Therapeutic Nihilism: How Not to Write About Otto Weininger.” In Structure and Gestalt, ed. Smith, Barry, 263–292. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janik, Allan. 1985. Essays on Wittgenstein and Weininger. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janik, Allan and Toulmin, Stephen. 1973. Wittgenstein’s Vienna. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Johnston, William M. 1972. The Austrian Mind: An Intellectual and Social History, 1848–1938. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judson, Pieter M. 1996. Exclusive Revolutionaries: Liberal Politics, Social Experience, and National Identity in the Austrian Empire 1848–1914. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judt, Tony. 2010. Ill Fares the Land. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Felix. 1992. Wiener Lieder zu Philosophie und Ökonomie. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keynes, John Maynard. 1924. “Alfred Marshall 1842–1924.” The Economic Journal 34 (135): 311–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keynes, John Maynard. 1930/1963. Essays in Persuasion. London: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Keynes, John Maynard. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar

Kirzner, Israel M. 1987. “The Austrian School of Economics.” In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, ed. Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, Peter. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Klamer, Arjo. 2007. Speaking of Economics: How to Get in the Conversation. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klausinger, Hansjörg. 2005. Die Austroliberalen und die Kampagne in “Neuen Wiener Tagblatt”, 1931–1934. In Wirtschaftspolitische Beiträge in kritischer Zeit (1931–1934), 11–36. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar

Klausinger, Hansjörg. 2006. “In the Wilderness”: Emigration and the Decline of the Austrian School. History of Political Economy, 38(4), 617–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klausinger, Hansjörg. 2013. Academic Anti-Semitism and the Austrian School: Vienna, 1918–1945 (No. 155) (pp. 1–25).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klausinger, Hansjörg. 2014. Hans Mayer, Last Knight of the Austrian School, Vienna Branch. Paper presented at HOPE, Duke University. http://hope.econ.duke.edu/sites/default/files/Klausinger_CHOPE1.pdfGoogle Scholar

Knight, Frank H. 1923. “The Ethics of Competition.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 37 (4): 579–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Konrád, György. 1984. Antipolitics. New York: Harcourt Brace Janovich.Google Scholar

Koppl, Roger, Horwitz, Steve, and Desrochers, Pierre. 2010. What Is so Austrian About Austrian Economics. Bingley: Emerald Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter. 2003. “The Viennese Connection: Alfred Schutz and the Austrian School.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 6 (2): 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lavoie, Don. 1985. Rivalry and Central Planning: The Socialist Calculation Debate Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lavoie, Don. 2011. “The Interpretive Dimension of Economics.” The Review of Austrian Economics 24 (2): 91–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lachmann, Ludwig M. 1982. “The Salvage of Ideas: Problems of the Revival of Austrian Economic Thought.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 138: 629–45.Google Scholar

Lederer, Emil. 1940. State of the Masses: The Threat of the Classless Society. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Leonard, Robert J. 1998. “The History of Science Society, Ethics and the Excluded Middle: Karl Menger and Social Science in Interwar Vienna.” Isis 89 (1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leonard, Robert J. 2010. Von Neumann, Morgenstern, and the Creation of Game Theory: From Chess to Social Science, 1900–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leonard, Robert J. 2011. “The Collapse of Interwar Vienna: Oskar Morgenstern’s Community, 1925–50.” History of Political Economy 43 (1) (February 28): 83–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leser, Norbert. 1981. Das Geistige Leben Wiens in Der Zwischenkriegszeit. Wien: Österreichischer Bundesverlag.Google Scholar

Lesky, Erna. 1976. The Vienna Medical School of the 19th Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Liebersohn, Harry. 1990. Fate and Utopia in German Sociology, 1870–1923. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lipking, Lawrence. 1981. The Life of the Poet: Beginning and Ending of Poetic Careers. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Littlechild, Stephen. 1990. Austrian Economics: Volume 1–3. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Alasdair C. 1984. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Machlup, Fritz. 1932/2005a. “Kontingentverträge?”. In Wirtschaftpublizistische Beiträge in kritischer Zeit (1931–1934) ed. Klausinger, H., 69–72. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar

Machlup, Fritz. 1932/2005b. “Währungspolitische Quacksalbereien”. In Wirtschaftpublizistische Beiträge in kritischer Zeit (1931–1934) ed. Klausinger, H., 72–74. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar

Machlup, Fritz. 1932/2005c. “Industrieförderung?”. In Wirtschaftpublizistische Beiträge in kritischer Zeit (1931–1934) ed. Klausinger, H., 116–117. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar

Machlup, Fritz. 1933/2005b. “Ärzte der Wirtschaft”. In Wirtschaftpublizistische Beiträge in kritischer Zeit (1931–1934) ed. Klausinger, H., 202–206. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar

Machlup, Fritz. 1959. “Statics and Dynamics: Kaleidoscopic Words.” Southern Economic Journal 26 (2): 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Machlup, Fritz. 1962. The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Madison, G Brent. 1990. “How Individualistic Is Methodological Individualism.” Critical Review 4 (1–2): 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magris, Claudio. 1989. Danube. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1941. “Man’s Culture and Man’s Behaviour.” Sigma Xi Quarterly 29 (3–4): 182–196.Google Scholar

Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1947. Freedom and Civilization. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

McCloskey, Deirdre N. 1994. Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCloskey, Deirdre N. 2006. The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCraw, Thomas K. 2007. Prophet of Innovation: Joseph Schumpeter and Creative Destruction. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McGill, V. J. 1936. “An Evaluation of Logical Positivism.” Science & Society 1 (1): 45–80.Google Scholar

McGucken, William. 1978. “On Freedom and Planning in Science: The Society for Freedom in Science, 1940-46.” Minerva 16 (1): 42–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Medema, Steven G. 2009. The Hesitant Hand: Taming Self-Interest in the History of Economic Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menger, Anton. 1886. Das Recht Auf Den Vollen Arbeitsertrag in Geschichtlicher Darstellung. Stuttgart: J.G. Cotta.Google Scholar

Menger, Carl. 1871/1950. Principles of Economics. Glencoe: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Menger, Carl. 1883/2009. Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences. Auburn: Mises Institute.Google Scholar

Menger, Carl. 1891/1935. The Collected Works of Carl Menger Vol. 3: Kleinere Schriften zur Methode und Geschichte der Volkswirtschaftslehre. London: The London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar

Menger, Karl. 1994. Reminiscences of the Vienna Circle and the Mathematical Colloquium, eds. Golland, Louise, McGuiness, Brian, and Sklar, Abe. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menger, Max. 1866. Die Auf Selbsthilfe Gestützten Genossenschaften Im Handwerker-Und Arbeiterstande: Vorträge Gehalten Im Fortbildungs-Verein Für Buchdrucker in Wien. Wien: Fortbildungs-Verein für Buchdrucker in Wien.Google Scholar

Menger, Max. 1873. Die Wahlreform in Österreich. Vienna: Verlag von K. Rosner.Google Scholar

Mennell, Stephen and Goudsblom, Johan. 1997. “Civilizing Processes-Myth or Reality? A Comment on Duerr’s Critique of Elias.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 39 (4): 729–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mirowski, Philip. 2002. Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mirowski, Philip. 2009. “Postface: Defining Neoliberalism.” In The Road from Mont-Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, ed. Mirowski, Philip and Plehwe, Dieter, pp. 417–455. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mirowski, Philip. 2012. A History Best Served Cold. In Uncertain Empire: American History and the Idea of the Cold War, ed. Isaac, Joel and Bell, Duncan, pp. 61–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mirowski, Philip, and Plehwe, Dieter. 2009. The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mises, Ludwig von. 1919/1983. Nation, State and Economy: Contributions to the Politics and History of Our Time. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Mises, Ludwig von. 1922/1951. Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Mises, Ludwig von. 1926/1977. A Critique of Interventionism. New York: Arlington House.Google Scholar

Mises, Ludwig von. 1931. “Die Psychologischen Wurzeln des Widerstandes gegen die Nationaloekonomische Theorie.” Eds. von Mises, Ludwig and Spiethoff, Arthur. Schriften Des Vereins Für Sozialpolitik 183 (1): 275–295.Google Scholar

Mises, Ludwig von. 1932. “Review of ‘Die Letzten Jahrzehnte Einer Groβmacht’ by Rudolph Sieghart.” Economica 38: 477–78.Google Scholar

Mises, Ludwig von. 1942/1978. Ludwig Von Mises, Notes and Recollections. South Holland: Libertarian Press.Google Scholar

Mises, Ludwig von. 1949/2007. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar

Mises, Ludwig von. 1944. Omnipotent Government: The Rise of the Total State and Total War. Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Mises, Ludwig von. 2002. Selected Writings of Ludwig von Mises: Between Two World Wars. Ed. Ebeling, Richard M. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar

Morgenstern, Oskar. 1928. Wirtschaftsprognose: Eine Untersuchung Ihrer Voraussetzungen Und Möglichkeiten. Wien: Julius Fischer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mulder, Henk L. 1968. “Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung - Der Wiener Kreis.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 6 (4): 386–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, Karl H. 1998. “The Ideal Worlds of the Austrian Political Economists.” In Vertreibung Der Vernunft: The Cultural Exodus from Austria, ed. Stadler, Friedrich and Weibel, Peter, 146–159. Wien: Springer.Google Scholar

Musil, Robert. 1930. Der Mann Ohne Eigenschaften. Berlin: Rowohlt.Google Scholar

Neider, Heinrich. 1973. “Memories of Otto Neurath.” In Empiricism and Sociology, ed. Neurath, Marie and Cohen, Robert S., 45–49. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Nelson, Julie A. 2006. Economics for Humans. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neurath, Otto. 1916/2004. “Economics in Kind, Calculation in Kind and Their Relation to War Economics.” In Economic Writings: Selections 1904–1945, ed. Uebel, Thomas E. and Cohen, Robert S., 299–311. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Neurath, Otto. 1917/2004. “The Economic Order of the Future and the Economic Sciences.” In Economic Writings: Selections 1904–1945, ed. Uebel, Thomas E. and Cohen, Robert S., 241–261. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Neurath, Otto. 1919/2004. “War Economy.” In Economic Writings: Selections 1904–1945, ed. Uebel, Thomas E. and Cohen, Robert S., 153–199. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1887/2006. On the Genealogy of Morality. Ed. Ansell-Pearson, Keith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Novick, Peter. 1988. That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

O’Hear, A. (2009). Popperian Individualism Today. In Rethinking Popper eds. Parusnikova, Z. and Cohen, Robert S., 205–214. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oakeshott, Michael. 1962. Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plehwe, Dieter. 2009. “Introduction.” In The Road from Mont-Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, 1–42. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Plener, Ernst von. 1911. Erinnerungen - Bd. 1. Jugend, Paris und London bis 1873. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. 2009. Political Thought and History: Essays on Theory and Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Polanyi, Karl. 1945. Origins of Our Time: The Great Transformation. Ed. Gollancz, Victor. London.Google Scholar

Polanyi, Michael. 1940. The Contempt of Freedom: The Russian Experiment and After. London: Watts & Co.Google Scholar

Polanyi, Michael. 1958. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies, Volume 1: The Spell of Plato. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. 1950/2003. “Preface to the Second Edition.” In The Open Society and Its Enemies. Volume One: The Spell of Plato, xi–xiii. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. (1950/2008). The Open Society after Five Years: Prefaces to the American Edition. In After the Open Society: Selected Social and Political Writings, eds. Shearmur, J. & Turner, P. Norris, 169–181. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. 1963/2008. The Open Society and the Democratic State. In After the Open Society: Selected Social and Political Writings, eds. Shearmur, J. & Turner, P. Norris, 231–248. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. 1976. Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography. Glasgow: William Collins Sons & Co.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. 1994. The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Porter, Theodore M. 2012. “Positioning the Social Sciences in Cold War America.” In Cold War Social Science: Knowledge Production, Liberal Democracy, and Human Nature, ed. Solovey, Mark and Cravens, Hamilton, x – xvi. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, John. 1996. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Reisch, George A. 2005. How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: To the Icy Slopes of Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robbins, Lionel R. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar

Roll, Eric. 1973. A History of Economic Thought. London: Faber.Google Scholar

Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Roth, Alvin E. 2002. “The Economist as Engineer: Game Theory, Experimentation, and Computation as Tools for Design Economics.” Econometrica 70 (4): 1341–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roth, Joseph. 1996. The Radetzky March. New York: Everyman’s Library.Google Scholar

Sandel, Michael J. 2012. What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Schäffle, Albert Eberhard Friedrich. 1861. Die Nationalökonomie oder allgemeine Wirtschaftslehre. Leipzig: Verlag von Otto Spamer.Google Scholar

Schlant, Ernestine. 1971. “Hermann Broch Als Politischer Utopist Zwischen’Geschichtsgesetz Und Willensfreiheit.” Literatur Und Kritik 6: 207–213.Google Scholar

Schorske, Carl E. 1980. Fin-de-siècle Vienna: Politics and Culture. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar

Schorske, Carl E. 1997. “The New Rigorism in the Human Sciences, 1940–1960.” Daedalus 126 (1): 289–309.Google Scholar

Schulak, Eugen M. and Unterköfler, Herbert. 2011. Austrian School of Economics: A History of Its Ideas, Ambassadors, and Institutions. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1912. Theorie Der Wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1919/1950. “The Crisis of the Tax-State.” In International Economic Papers: Translations Prepared for the International Economic Association. Vol. 6. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1919/1951. Imperialism and Social Classes. Ed. Sweezy, Paul M. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1943/1976. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1946/1976. “Preface to the Second Edition” In Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 411–414. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1949. “Science and Ideology.” The American Economic Review 39 (2): 346–359.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sedlacek, Tomas. 2011. Economics of Good and Evil: The Quest for Economic Meaning from Gilgamesh to Wall Street. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shearmur, Jeremy. 1996. Hayek and After: Hayekian Liberalism as a Research Programme. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sieghart, Rudolf. 1932. Die Letzten Jahrzehnte Einer Grossmacht: Menschen, Völker, Probleme Des Habsburger-Reichs. Berlin: Ullstein.Google Scholar

Small, Albion W. 1924. “Some Contributions to the History of Sociology. Section XVII. The Attempt (1860–80) to Reconstruct Economic Theory on a Sociological Basis.” American Journal of Sociology 30 (1): 49–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Adam. 1975. The Wealth of Nations: The Prosperity Classic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Barry. 1990. “On the Austrianness of Austrian Economics.” Critical Review 4 (1–2): 212–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smithies, Arthur. 1951. “Memorial: Joseph Alois Schumpeter, 1883–1950.” In Schumpeter, Social Scientist, ed. Harris, Seymour E, 11–23. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sombart, Werner. 1908. Sozialismus Und Soziale Bewegung. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar

Spiegel, Henry W. 1983. The Growth of Economic Thought. Revised and Expanded Edition. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Spiel, Hilde. 1987. Vienna’s Golden Autumn. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar

Stadler, Friedrich. 1994. “Heinrich Gomperz Und Karl Popper im Kontext des Logischen Empirismus.” In Heinrich Gomperz, Karl Popper und die Österreichische Philosophie. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stadler, Friedrich. 2003. “What Is the Vienna Circle?: Some Methodological and Historiographical Answers.” In The Vienna Circle and Logical Empiricism: Re-evaluation and Future Perspectives, XI–XXIII. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Starr, Paul. 1976. “The Politics of Therapeutic Nihilism.” The Hastings Center Report 6 (5): 24–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Steiner, George. 1967. Language and Silence: Essays 1958–1966. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Sternhell, Zeev, and Talmon, Jacob L.. 1996. The Intellectual Revolt Against Liberal Democracy, 1870–1945: International Conference in Memory of Jacob L. Talmon. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar

Storr, Virgil. 2013. Understanding the Culture of Markets. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Streissler, Erich and Streissler, Monika. 1994. Carl Menger’s Lecture to Crown Prince Rudolf of Austria. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Strigl, Richard. 1932/2005. “Rückkehr zu gesunder Währungspolitik!”. In Wirtschaftspublizistische Beiträge in kritischer Zeit (1931–1934), ed. Klausinger, H., 100–112. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar

Szeps, Berta. 1938. My Life and History. London: Cassell.Google Scholar

Thomas, Richard F. 2004. Virgil and the Augustan Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Timms, Edward. 1986. Karl Kraus, Apocalyptic Satirist: Culture and Catastrophe in Habsburg Vienna. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Timms, Edward. 1993. “Die Wiener Kreise: Schöpferische Interaktionen in Der Wiener Moderne.” In Die Wiener Jahrhundertwende: Einflüsse, Umwelt, Wirkungen, ed. Nautz, Jürgen and Vahrenkamp, Richard, 128–143. Wien: Böhlau Verlag.Google Scholar

Timms, Edward. 2009. “Cultural Parameters Between the Wars: A Reassessment of the Vienna Circles.” In Vienna, Interwar, ed. Deborah Holmes and Lisa Silverman, 21–30. Rochester: Camden House.Google Scholar

Uchitelle, Louis. 1999. “A Challenge to Scientific Economics: An Older School Looks at a Broad, More Intuitive Picture While Modernists See Just the Numbers and Facts.” The New York Times.Google Scholar

Vaughn, Karen I. 1994. Austrian Economics in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wasserman, Janek. 2014. Black Vienna: The Radical Right in the Red City, 1918–1938. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watkins, John. 1997. “Karl Popper: A Memoir.” The American Scholar 66(2): 205–19.Google Scholar

Weber, Alfred. 1998. “Civilization and Culture - A Synthesis.” In Classical Readings in Culture and Civilization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Weigand, Hermann J. 1947. “Broch’s Death of Vergil: Program Notes.” PMLA 62 (2): 525–554.Google Scholar

Weintraub, Roy E. 2002. How Economics Became a Mathematical Science. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

White, Leslie A. 1949. The Science of Culture: A Study of Man and Civilization. New York: Farrar, Straus and Company.Google Scholar

Wiesemann, C. 1991. Josef Dietl Und Der Therapeutische Nihilismus. Zum Historischen Und Politischen Hintergrund Einer Medizinischen These. Frankfurt am Mainz: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Wieser, Friedrich von. 1907a. “Unsere Gesellschaftliche und Politische Entwicklung Seit 1848, Teil I.” Neue Freie Presse, 8th of February.Google Scholar

Wieser, Friedrich von. 1907b. “Unsere Gesellschaftliche und Politische Entwicklung Seit 1848, Teil II.” Neue Freie Presse, 9th of February.Google Scholar

Wieser, Friedrich von. 1907c. “Unsere Gesellschaftliche und Politische Entwicklung Seit 1848, Teil III.” Neue Freie Presse, 12th of February.Google Scholar

Wieser, Friedrich von. 1910. Recht und Macht: Sechs Vorträge. Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Wistrich, Robert S. 1996. “Intellectuals and Mass Politics in Fin-de-siècle Vienna.” In The Intellectual Revolt Against Liberal Democracy 1870–1945, eds. Sternhell, Zeev and Talmon, Jacob L., 70–86. Jerusalem: The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar

Wouters, Cas. 1986. “Formalization and Informalization: Changing Tension Balances in Civilizing Processes.” Theory Culture Society 3 (2): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yagi, Kiichiro. 1991. “Max Menger’s Liberal Position.” The Kyoto University Economic Review 61(1–14): 1–14.Google Scholar

Zuidhof, P.W. 2011. Imagining Markets: The Discursive Politics of Neoliberalism. University of Amsterdam, unpublished dissertation.Google Scholar

Zweig, Stefan. 1943. The World of Yesterday. New York: The Viking Press.Google Scholar