Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 2022
Howard Adelman locates the production of refugees and the discourses and policies that have emerged as a response to the movement or flow of refugees, asylum seekers and stateless people across borders to processes of globalisation, modernity and the political system of nation states:
Refugees are the products of modernity. Their plight became acute when the processes of modernity became globalized, when the political system of nation states first became extended over the whole globe and efforts were made to sort the varied nations of the world into political states. (Adelman, 1999, p 83)
In this chapter I support this argument as many others have done (Castles, 2003; Marfleet, 2006; Sales, 2007), but I also argue for the need to better explain and understand the processes, discourses and policies related to forced migration, the impact of humiliation and human rights (Lindner, 2006; Smith, 2006).
For Marfleet, the key themes or threads of analysis to explore forced migration include: the underpinning theory of globalisation and the ‘implications for patterns of forced migration’ (2006, p 5); the character and role of the liberal state and the role of politicians and state officials; refugee movement to the West; and the need for an interdisciplinary lens (refugee studies) when studying migration. This chapter takes up these threads, in particular the need for an interdisciplinary lens in order to examine the connections between globalisation, forced migration, humiliation and the possibilities for social justice.
Century of the refugee: processes of inclusion and exclusion
Adelman suggests that refugees characterise the 20th century because it was in this century that ‘the total globe was colonized and set on a course of being divided into self governing nation states’ (Adelman, 1999, p 90). And, given the twin forces of modernity and globalisation, the nation state epitomises certain contradictions. ‘On the one hand each nation state consolidated itself around a sentimental communal and sometimes atavistic sense of a homogenous nation. At the same time, the state was the vehicle of universal citizenship and, in idealist liberal belief, the upholder and defender of individual rights’ (Adelman, 1999, p 90).
Reflecting on the history of the movement of people across borders, Adelman argues that the Huguenots, who fled religious persecution in France, were archetypical refugees of modernity.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.