The sociohistory of clicks in Southern Bantu

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511486692.016

15 - The sociohistory of clicks in Southern Bantu

from Part II - Language contact

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009

Robert K. Herbert

Edited by

Rajend Mesthrie

Show author details

Robert K. Herbert: Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, State University of New York
Rajend Mesthrie: Affiliation:
University of Cape Town

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION: CLICKS IN SOUTHERN AFRICA

The click consonants of southern Africa are such pervasive elements within the indigenous Khoesan languages and so striking to the ear that the earliest explorers and missionaries to this area frequently commented on the very distinct acoustic quality of local languages. Such commentary was most often negative:

Among the Hottentot dialects, none is so rough and wild, and differs so much from the rest, as that of the Bosjesmans, so that it is scarcely understood by any of the other tribes. It is, in the first place, much poorer in sounds: many sounds, which may be expressed by our letters … are either totally wanting among them, or occur rarely. Pure vowels are seldom to be heard; but the cluck and the diphthongs are much more frequent. The cluck, in particular, seems the most completely at home among them: scarcely a word occurs without it.

(H. Lichtenstien, cited in Theal 1910: 19–20)

The peoples and languages of southern Africa soon attracted the attention of linguistic and cultural evolutionary theorists, who saw southern African hunters and their languages as representing ‘primitive types’. The view, first expressed by van Ginneken (1911: 346–7), that clicks were the phonetic material from which human language first arose was developed and ardently championed by the Polish linguist Roman Stopa (1935, 1979). Clicks were seen as arising from ‘the condensed expression of the gesticulatory part of speech’ (Stopa 1979: 28).

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Language in South Africa , pp. 297 - 315

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486692.016 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Beach, D. M. 1938. The Phonetics of the Hottentot Language. Cambridge: W. Heffers & Sons

Bourquin, W. 1951. ‘Click words which Xhosa, Zulu and Sotho have in common’. African Studies, 10: 59–81CrossRef Google Scholar

Bryant, A. T. 1929. Olden Times in Zululand and Natal. London: Longmans

Faye, C. U. 1923–5. ‘The influence of “hlonipa” on the Zulu clicks’. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 3: 757–82CrossRef Google Scholar

Finlayson, R. 1982. ‘Hlonipha – the women's language of avoidance among the Xhosa’. South African Journal of African Languages, Supplement: 35–60Google Scholar

Finlayson, R. 1984. ‘The changing nature of isihlonipho sabafazi’. African Studies, 43: 137–46CrossRef

Hagège, C. and A. Haudricourt 1978. La Phonologie panchronique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France

Harinck, G. 1969. ‘Interaction between Xhosa and Khoi: emphasis on the period 1620–1750’. In L. Thompson (ed.), African Societies in Southern Africa. New York: Praeger, pp. 145–69

Herbert, R. K. 1985. ‘Gender systems and semanticity: two case histories from Bantu’. In J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical Semantics/Historical Word-Formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 171–97

Herbert, R. K. 1987. ‘Articulatory modes and typological universals: the puzzle of Bantu ejectives and aspirates’. In L. Shockey and R. Channon (eds.), Festschrift for Ilse Lehiste. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 401–13

Herbert, R. K. 1990a. ‘Hlonipha and the ambiguous woman’. Anthropos, 85: 455–73

Herbert, R. K. 1990b. ‘The relative markedness of click sounds’. Anthropological Linguistics, 32, 1–2: 295–315

Herbert, R. K. 1990c. ‘The sociohistory of clicks in Southern Bantu’. Anthropological Linguistics, 32, 3–4: 120–38

Herbert, R. K. 1995. ‘The sociohistory of clicks in Southern Bantu’. In R. Mesthrie (ed.), Language and Social History: Studies in South African Sociolinguistics. Cape Town: David Philip, pp. 51–67

, J. de N. R. 1899/1900. ‘Een week in Kafferland.’ Ons Tijdschrift (February): 441–8Google Scholar

Jacottet, E. 1896. ‘Moeurs, coutumes et superstitions des Ba-Souto’. Bulletin de la Société Neuchâteloise de Géographie, 9: 107–51Google Scholar

Kunene, D. P. 1958. ‘Notes on hlonepha among the Southern Sotho’. African Studies, 17: 159–82CrossRef Google Scholar

Lanham, L. W. 1964. ‘The proliferation and extension of Bantu phonemic systems influenced by Bushman and Hottentot’. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 382–91

Louw, J. A. 1962. ‘The segmental phonemes of Zulu’. Afrika und Übersee, 46: 43–93Google Scholar

Louw, J. A. 1976. ‘The influence of Khoi on Xhosa morphology’. In W. J. de Klerk and F. A. Ponelis (eds.), Gedenkbundel H. J. J. M. van der Merwe. Pretoria: J. L. van Schaik, pp. 87–95

Louw, J. A. 1977. ‘The linguistic prehistory of the Xhosa’. In W. J. G. Möhlig, F. Rotland and B. Heine (eds.), Zur Sprachgeschichte und Ethnohistorie in Afrika. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer, pp. 127–51

Louw, J. A. 1979. A Preliminary Survey Of Khoi and San Influence in Zulu. Khoesan Linguistic Studies 5, Series ed. A. Traill. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press

Louw, J. A. 1986. ‘Some linguistic influence of Khoi and San in the prehistory of the Nguni’. In R. Vossen and K. Keuthmann (eds.), Contemporary Studies in Khoesan. Hamburg: Helmut Buske, pp. 141–68

Marks, S. 1969. ‘The traditions of the Natal “Nguni”: a second look at the work of A. T. Bryant’. In L. Thompson (ed.), African Societies in Southern Africa. New York: Praeger, pp. 126–44

Meinhof, C. 1932. Introduction to the Phonology of the Bantu Languages. Berlin: Reimer/Vohsen

Mncube, F. S. M. 1949. ‘Hlonipha language as found among the Zulu–Xhosa women’. MA thesis, University of the Witwatersrand

Moravcsik, E. 1978. ‘Language contact’. In J. H. Greenberg et al., (eds.), Universals of Human Language, vol. I: Method and Theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 93–122

Mzamane, G. I. M. 1949. ‘A concise treatise on Phuti with special reference to its relationship with Nguni and Sotho’. Fort Hare Papers, 1, 4: 121–249Google Scholar

Mzamane, G. I. M. 1962. ‘A Comparative Phonetic and Morphological Study of the Dialects of Southern Nguni including the Lexical Influences of the Non-Bantu Languages’. D.Litt. and D.Phil. thesis, University of South Africa

Nurse, G. T., J. S. Weiner and T. Jenkins 1985. The Peoples of Southern Africa and their Affinities. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Ownby, C. P. 1981. ‘Early Nguni history: linguistic suggestions’. South African Journal of African Languages, Supplement: 60–81Google Scholar

Ownby, C. P. 1985. ‘Early Nguni History: The Linguistic Evidence and its Correlation with Archaeology and Oral Tradition’. Ph.D. thesis, University of California (Los Angeles)

Raum, O. F. 1973. The Social Functions of Avoidances and Taboos among the Zulu. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Soga, J. H. 1932. The Ama-Xosa: Life and Customs. Lovedale: Lovedale Press

Stopa, R. 1935. Die Schnalze, ihre Natur, Entwicklung und Ursprung. Kraków: Polska Akademja Umiejȩtności, Prace Komisiji Jȩzykowej, nr. 23

Stopa, R. 1979. Clicks: Their Form, Function and their Transformation, or how our Ancestors were Gesticulating, Clicking and Crying. Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Prace Jȩzykoznawcze, z. 68

Theal, G. M. 1910. The Yellow and Dark-Skinned People of Africa South of the Zambesi. London: Swan Sonnenschein

Tobias, P. V. 1974. ‘The biology of the Southern African Negro’. In W. D. Hammond-Tooke (ed.), The Bantu-speaking People of Southern Africa. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 3–45

Traill, A. T. 1986. ‘Click replacement in Khoe’. In R. Vossen and K. Keuthmann (eds.), Contemporary Studies on Khoesan. Hamburg: Helmut Buske, pp. 301–20

Ginneken, J. 1911. ‘Sprachwissenschaftliche Chronik’. Anthropos, 6: 345–65Google Scholar

van Ginneken, J. 1938. ‘Les clics, les consonnes et les voyelles dans l'histoire de l'humanité’. Proceedings of the Third International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Ghent: University of Ghent, pp. 321–6

van Warmelo, N. J. 1974. ‘The classification of cultural groups’. In W. D. Hammond-Tooke (ed.), The Bantu-speaking People of Southern Africa. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 56–85

Werner, A. 1902. ‘Note on clicks in the Bantu languages’. Journal of the African Society, 2: 416–21Google Scholar

Werner, A. 1905. ‘The custom of “hlonipa” in its influence on language’. African Affairs, 4: 346–56CrossRef

Westphal, E. O. J. 1963. ‘The linguistic prehistory of southern Africa: Bush, Kwadi, Hottentot and Bantu linguistic relationships’. Africa, 33: 237–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilson, M. 1969. ‘Changes in social structure in southern Africa’. In Wilson and Thompson (eds.), pp. 71–85

Wilson, M. L. 1986. ‘Khoisanosis: the question of separate identities for Khoi and San.’ In R. Singer and J. K. Lundy (eds.), Variation, Culture and Evolution in African Populations. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press, pp. 13–25

Wilson, M. L. and L. Thompson 1969 (eds.). The Oxford History of South Africa. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Ziervogel, D. 1959. A Grammar of Northern Transvaal Ndebele. Pretoria: J. L. van Schaik

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.