Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T08:48:17.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Predictability of Lagrangian motion in the upper ocean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2009

Leonid I. Piterbarg
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
Tamay M. Özgökmen
Affiliation:
Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
Annalisa Griffa
Affiliation:
Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA; ISMAR/CNR, La Spezia, Italy
Arthur J. Mariano
Affiliation:
Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
Annalisa Griffa
Affiliation:
University of Miami
A. D. Kirwan, Jr.
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
Arthur J. Mariano
Affiliation:
University of Miami
Tamay Özgökmen
Affiliation:
University of Miami
H. Thomas Rossby
Affiliation:
University of Rhode Island
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The prediction particle trajectories in the ocean is of practical importance for problems such as searching for objects lost at sea, tracking floating mines, designing oceanic observing systems, and studying ecological issues such as the spreading of pollutants and fish larvae (Mariano et al., 2002). In a given year, for example, the US Coast Guard (USCG) performs over 5000 search and rescue missions (Schneider, 1998). Even though the USCG and its predecessor, the Lifesaving Service, have been performing search and rescue operations for over 200 years, it has only been in the last 30 years that Computer Assisted Search Planning has been used by the USCG. The two primary components are determining the drift caused by ocean currents and the movement caused by wind. The results presented in this review are motivated by the drift estimation problem.

A number of authors (e.g., Aref, 1984; Samelson, 1996) have shown that prediction of particle motion is an intrinsically difficult problem because Lagrangian motion often exhibits chaotic behavior, even in regular and simple Eulerian flows. In the ocean, the combined effects of complex time-dependence (Samelson, 1992; Meyers, 1994; Duan and Wiggins, 1996) and three-dimensional structure (Yang and Liu, 1996) are likely to induce chaotic transport. Chaos implies strong dependence on the initial conditions, which are usually not known with great accuracy, so that the task of predicting particle motion is often extremely difficult.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aref, H., 1984. Stirring by chaotic advection. J. Fluid Mech., 143, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, S., Swenson, M. S., Griffa, A., Mariano, A. J., and Owens, K., 1998. Eddy-mean flow decomposition and eddy-diffusivity estimates in the tropical Pacific Ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 30855–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, S., Swenson, M. S., and Griffa, A., 2002. Eddy-mean flow and eddy diffusivity estimates in the tropical Pacific Ocean. 2: Results. J. Geophys. Res., 107, (c10), 3154–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxendale, P. and Harris, T., 1986. Isotropic stochastic flows, Ann. Prob., 14, No. 4, 1155–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berloff, P. and McWilliams, J. C., 2002. Material transport in oceanic gyres. Part II: Hierarchy of stochastic models. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32, 797–830.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berloff, P., McWilliams, J. C., and Bracco, A., 2002. Material transport in oceanic gyres. Part I: Phenomenology. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32, 764–96.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berloff, P. and McWilliams, J. C., 2003. Material transport in oceanic gyres. Part III: Randomized stochastic models. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 33, 1416–45.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgas, M. S. and Sawford, B. L., 1994. Stochastic equations with multifractal random increments for modeling turbulent dispersion. Phys. Fluids, 6, 618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellari, S., Griffa, A., Özgökmen, T. M., and Poulain, P.-M., 2001. Prediction of particle trajectories in the Adriatic Sea using Lagrangian data assimilation. J. Mar. Sys., 29, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman-Roisin, B., 1994. Introduction to Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Duan, J. and Wiggins, S., 1996. Fluid exchange across a meandering jet with quasiperiodic variability. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 26, 1176–88.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falco, P., Griffa, A., Poulain, P.-M., and Zambianchi, E., 2000. Transport properties in the Adriatic Sea deduced from drifter data. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 30, 2055–71.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkovich, G. and Piterbarg, L. I., 2004. The Lyapunov exponent for inertial particles and an explosive ergodic diffusion. Submitted to Comm. Math. Phys.Google Scholar
Flament, P. J., Kennan, S. C., Knox, R. A., Niiler, P. P., and Bernstein, R. L., 1996. The three-dimensional structure of an upper ocean vortex in the tropical Pacific Ocean. Nature, 383, 610–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffa, A., 1996. Applications of stochastic particle models to oceanographic problems. In Stochastic Modelling in Physical Oceanography, ed. Adler, R., Muller, P., and Rozovskii, B.. Cambridge, MA: Birkhauser Boston, 113–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffa, A., Owens, K., Piterbarg, L., and Rozovskii, B., 1995. Estimates of turbulence parameters from Lagrangian data using a stochastic particle model. J. Mar. Res., 53, 212–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffa, A., Piterbarg, L., and Özgökmen, T. M., 2004. Predictability of Lagrangian particles: effects of smoothing of the underlying Eulerian flow. J. Mar. Res., 62/1, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, D. V. and Poulain, P.-M., 1996. Quality control and interpolations of WOCE/TOGA drifter data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Tec., 13, 900–9.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jazwinski, A. H., 1970. Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Liptser, R. S. and Shiryaev, A. N., 2000. Statistics of Random Processes., second edition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Mariano, A. J., Griffa, A., Özgökmen, T. M., and Zambianchi, E., 2002. Lagrangian analysis and predictability of coastal and ocean dynamics 2000. J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 19, 1114–26.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monin, A. S. and Yaglom, A. M., 1975. Statistical Fluid Mechanics: Mechanics of Turbulence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Meyers, S., 1994. Cross-frontal mixing in a meandering jet. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 24, 1641–6.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niiler, P. P., Sybrandy, A. S., Bi, K., Poulain, P.-M., and Bittermam, D. S., 1995. Measurements of the water-following capability of holey-sock and TRISTART drifters. Deep Sea Res., 42, 1951–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özgökmen, T. M., Griffa, A., Piterbarg, L. I., and Mariano, A. J., 2000. On the predictability of the Lagrangian trajectories in the ocean. J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 17/3, 366–83.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özgökmen, T. M., Piterbarg, L. I., Mariano, A. J., and Ryan, E. H., 2001. Predictability of drifter trajectories in the tropical Pacific Ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 31, 2691–720.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paldor, N., Dvorkin, Y., Mariano, A. J., Özgökmen, T. M., and Ryan, E., 2004. A practical hybrid model for predicting the trajectories of near-surface drifters in the Pacific Ocean. J. Ocean. Atmos. Sci., 21, 1246–58.Google Scholar
Pedrizzetti, G. and Novikov, E. A., 1994. On Markov modelling of turbulence, J. Fluid Mech., 280, 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piterbarg, L. I., 2001a. The top Lyapunov exponent for a stochastic flow modeling the upper ocean turbulence. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 62, 777–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piterbarg, L. I., 2001b. Short term prediction of Lagrangian trajectories. J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 18, 1398–410.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piterbarg, L. I. and Özgökmen, T. M., 2002. A simple prediction algorithm for the Lagrangian motion in two-dimensional turbulent flows. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 63, 116–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piterbarg, L. I., 2004a. On predictability of particle clusters in a stochastic flow, to appear in Stochastics and Dynamics.
Piterbarg, L. I., 2005. Relative dispersion in 2D stochastic flows. J. of Turbulence, 6(4), doi:10.1080/14685240500103168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B., 1987. Consistency conditions for random walk models of turbulent dispersion. Phys. Fluids, 30, 2374–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulain, P.-M., 1999. Drifter observations of surface circulation in the Adriatic Sea between December 1994 and March 1996. J. Mar. Sys., 20, 231–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reverdin, G., Frankignoul, C., and Kestenare, E., 1994. Seasonal variability in the surface currents of the Equatorial Pacific. J. Geophys. Res., 99(10), 20323–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A. M., 1998. On the formulation of Lagrangian stochastic models of scalar dispersion within plant canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteor., 86, 333–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodean, H. C., 1996. Stochastic Lagrangian models of turbulent diffusion, Meteorological Monographs, 26, n.48. Boston: AMS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samelson, R. M., 1992. Fluid exchange across a meandering jet. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 22, 431–40.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samelson, R. M., 1996. Chaotic transport by mesoscale motions. In Stochastic Modelling in Physical Oceanography, ed. Adler, R. J., Müller, P., and Rozovoskii, B. L.. Cambridge, MA: Birkhäuser Boston, 423–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawford, B. L., 1993. Recent developments in the Lagrangian stochastic theory of turbulent dispersion. Boundary-Layer Meteor., 62, 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, T., 1998. Lagrangian drifter models as search and rescue tools. M. S. Thesis, Dept. of Meteorology and Physical Oceanography, University of Miami.
Thomson, D. J., 1986. A random walk model of dispersion in turbulent flows and its application to dispersion in a valley. Quat. J. R. Met. Soc., 112, 511–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, D. J., 1987. Criteria for the selection of stochastic models of particle trajectories in turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech., 180, 529–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, D. J., 1990. A stochastic model for the motion of particle pairs in isotropic high-Reynolds-number turbulence, and its application to the problem of concentration variance. J. Fluid Mech., 210, 113–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toner, M., Poje, A. C., Kirwan, A. D., Jones, C. K. R. T., Lipphardt, B. L., and Grosch, C. E., 2001a. Reconstructing basin-scale Eulerian velocity fields from simulated drifter data. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 31, 1361–76.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toner, M., Kirwan, A. D., Kantha, L. H., and Choi, J. K., 2001b. Can general circulation models be assessed and their output enhanced with drifter data?J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 106, 19563–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veneziani, M., Griffa, A, Reynolds, A. M., and Mariano, A. J., 2004. Oceanic turbulence and stochastic models from subsurface Lagrangian data for the North-West Atlantic Ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 34, 1884–1906.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, H. and Liu, Z., 1996. The three-dimensional chaotic transport and the great ocean barrier. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 27, 1258–73.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Q., Parvin, B., and Mariano, A. J., 2001. Detection of vortices and saddle points in SST data. Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 331–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zambianchi, E. and Griffa, A., 1994. Effects of finite scales of turbulence on dispersion estimates. J. Mar. Res., 52, 129–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×