Trait Complexes, Cognitive Investment, and Domain Knowledge

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511615801.003

1 - Trait Complexes, Cognitive Investment, and Domain Knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Philip Ackerman and

Margaret E. Beier

Edited by

Robert J. Sternberg and

Elena L. Grigorenko

Show author details

Philip Ackerman: Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology
Margaret E. Beier: Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology
Robert J. Sternberg: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Elena L. Grigorenko: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The study of expertise has a long and varied history across over one hundred years of modern psychology. Along the way, various approaches and perspectives have been applied to examination of two central questions: “Who becomes an expert?” and “How does one become an expert?” Traditional experimental psychology researchers have focused on describing the processes involved in acquisition of expert performance (for example, Bryan and Harter, 1899), or on specifying the methods one should adopt for successfully acquiring expert performance (for example, James, 1890/1950). In contrast, traditional differential psychology researchers have focused on differentiating individuals from some specified group (for example, novices) who will acquire expertise during the course of training or job tenure from those who will fail to acquire expertise, given the same exposure. Researchers from a third perspective, which is best characterized as an “interactionist” approach, have attempted to build representations that consider both trait differences and childhood and adulthood experiences as spurs to the development of expertise (for example, Snow, 1996).

The focus of our discussion in this chapter is mainly on the differential and interactionist approaches. That is, we seek to understand the development of expertise as an interaction between individual characteristics (abilities, personality, interests, self-concept, and so forth) and the environment, as jointly influencing which persons develop expertise and which persons do not. In addition, we concern ourselves with the direction of investment of cognitive resources, which in turn determines the domains of expertise that are developed.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Psychology of Abilities, Competencies, and Expertise , pp. 1 - 30

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615801.003 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ackerman, P. L. (1988). Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(3), 288–318CrossRef Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. (1994). Intelligence, attention, and learning: Maximal and typical performance. In D. K. Detterman (Ed.), Current Topics in Human Intelligence; Volume 4: Theories of Intelligence, pp. 1–27. Norwood, NJ: Ablex

Ackerman, P. L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 227–257CrossRef Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. (1997). Personality, self-concept, interests, and intelligence: Which construct doesn't fit?Journal of Personality, 65(2), 171–204CrossRef Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. (2000). Domain-specific knowledge as the “dark matter” of adult intelligence: Gf/Gc, personality and interest correlates. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 55B, P69–P84CrossRef Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L., Bowen, K. R., Beier, M. E., & Kanfer, R. (2001). Determinants of individual differences and gender differences in knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 797–825CrossRef Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ackerman, P. L., & Lohman, D. F. (in press). Education and g. To appear in H. Nyborg (Ed.), The Scientific Study of General Intelligence – Tribute to Arthur R. Jensen. Elsevier Science

Ackerman, P. L., & Rolfhus, E. L. (1999). The locus of adult intelligence: Knowledge, abilities, and non-ability traits. Psychology and Aging, 14, 314–330CrossRef Google Scholar

Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (1999). Learner profiles: Valuing individual differences within classroom communities. In P. L. Ackerman, P. C. Kyllonen, and R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Learning and Individual Differences: Process, Trait, and Content Determinants (pp. 413–436). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

Baltes, P. B., & Schaie, K. W. (1976). On the plasticity of intelligence in adulthood and old age: Where Horn and Donaldson fail. American Psychologist, 31, 720–725CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Barrett, G. V., Alexander, R. A., & Doverspike, D. (1992). The implications for personnel selection of apparent declines in predictive validities over time: A critique of Hulin, Henry, and Noon. Personnel Psychology, 45, 601–617CrossRef Google Scholar

Bayley, N. (1949). Consistency and variability in the growth of intelligence from birth to eighteen years. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 75, 165–196Google Scholar

Beier, M. E., & Ackerman, P. L. (2001). Current events knowledge in adults: An investigation of age, intelligence and non-ability determinants. Psychology and Aging, 16, 615–628CrossRef Google Scholar

Beier, M. E., & Ackerman, P. L. (in press). Determinants of health knowledge: An investigation of age, gender, abilities, personality, and interests. To appear in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Brainard, J. (2001, February 19). U. of California's President Proposes Dropping the SAT Requirement. Chronicle of Higher Education, 47

Bryan, W. L., & Harter, N. (1899). Studies on the telegraphic language: The acquisition of a hierarchy of habits. Psychological Review, 6, 345–375Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1982). The measurement of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 29–120). New York: Cambridge University Press

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press

Cattell, R. B. (1943). The measurement of adult intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 40, 153–193CrossRef

Cattell, R. B. (1957). Personality and motivation structure and measurement. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book Company

Cattell, R. B. (1971/1987). Intelligence: Its structure, growth, and action. (Revised and reprinted from Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action, Boston: Houghton-Mifflin). Amsterdam: North Holland

Chronicle of Higher Education Almanac, 2000–2001. Washington, DC: Author

Cole, N. S. (1997). The ETS gender study: How females and males perform in educational settings. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service

Cronbach, L. J. (1949). Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper

Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684CrossRef Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30, 116–127CrossRef Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games (pp. 1–50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49(8), 725–747CrossRef Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102(2), 211–245CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406CrossRef Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273–305CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books

Gleick, J. (1992). Genius: The life and science of Richard Feynman. New York: Pantheon Books

Goff, M., & Ackerman, P. L. (1992). Personality-intelligence relations: Assessing typical intellectual engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 537–552CrossRef Google Scholar

Holland, J. L. (1959). A theory of vocational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6(1), 35–45CrossRef Google Scholar

Holland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices: a theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

Honzik, M. P., MacFarlane, J. W., & Allen, L. (1948). The stability of mental test performance between two and eighteen years. Journal of Experimental Education, 17, 309–324CrossRef Google Scholar

Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized general intelligences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57(5), 253–270CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Horn, J. L., & Donaldson, G. (1976). On the myth of intellectual decline in adulthood. American Psychologist, 31, 701–719CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Horn, J. L., & Donaldson, G. (1977). Faith is not enough: A response to the Baltes-Schaie claim that intelligence does not wane. American Psychologist, 32, 369–373CrossRef Google Scholar

Hulin, C. L., Henry, R. A., & Noon, S. L. (1990). Adding a dimension: Time as a factor in the generalizability of predictive relationships. Psychological Bulletin 107 1–13CrossRef Google Scholar

Hunter, J. E. (1983). A causal analysis of cognitive ability, job knowledge, job performance, and supervisor ratings. In F. Landy, S. Zedeck, & J. Cleveland (Eds.), Performance measurement and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72–98CrossRef Google Scholar

James, W. (1890/1950). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Dover Publications

Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger

Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 74(4), 657–690CrossRef Google Scholar

Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?!Intelligence, 14, 389–433CrossRef Google Scholar

Lin, P. C., & Humphreys, L. G. (1977). Predictions of academic performance in graduate and professional school. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 249–257CrossRef Google Scholar

Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Harkness, A. R., & Silva, P. A. (1993). The natural history of change in intellectual performance: Who changes? How much? Is it meaningful?Journal of Child Psychological Psychiatry, 34(4), 455–506CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Peterson, P. L. (1976). Interactive effects of student anxiety, achievement orientation, and teacher behavior on student achievement and attitude. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA

Porteus, A. W. (1976). Teacher-centered vs. student-centered instruction: Interactions with cognitive and motivational aptitudes. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA

Rolfhus, E. L., & Ackerman, P. L. (1996). Self-report knowledge: At the crossroads of ability, interest, and personality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 174–188CrossRef Google Scholar

Rolfhus, E. L., & Ackerman, P. L. (1999). Assessing individual differences in knowledge: Knowledge structures and traits. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 511–526CrossRef Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1988). Scientific genius: A psychology of science. New York: Cambridge University Press

Snow, R. E. (1963). Effects of learner characteristics in learning from instructional films. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, Lafayette, IN

Snow, R. E. (1976). Research on aptitudes: A progress report. Stanford University Aptitude Research Project, Technical Report No. 1. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University

Snow, R. E. (1989). Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in learning. In P. L. Ackerman, R. J. Sternberg, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Learning and individual differences. Advances in theory and research (pp. 13–59). New York: W. H. Freeman

Snow, R. E. (1996). Aptitude development and education. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 536–560CrossRef Google Scholar

Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293CrossRef Google Scholar

Spearman, C. (1914). The theory of two factors. Psychological Review, Vol. 21(2), 101–115CrossRef Google Scholar

Spearman, C. (1927). The nature of “intelligence” and the principles of cognition. London: Macmillan and Co

Spearman, C. E. (1938). Measurement of intelligence. Scientia, Milano, 64, 75–82Google Scholar

Spearman, C. (1939). “Intelligence” tests. Eugenics Review, 30, 249–254Google Scholar PubMed

Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Costs of expertise. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games (pp. 347–354). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Watson, J. B. (1926). What the nursery has to say about instincts. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Psychologies of 1925 (pp. 1–34). Worchester, MA: Clark University PressCrossRef

Watzman, H. (2000, January 21). Israeli colleges will begin using an alternative to national admissions tests. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46, A53Google Scholar

Willingham, W. W. (1974). Predicting success in graduate education. Science, 183, 273–278CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Willingham, W. W., & Cole, N. S. (1997). Gender and fair assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Wittmann, W. W., and Süß, H.-M. (1999). Investigating the paths between working memory, intelligence, knowledge, and complex problem-solving performances via Brunswik symmetry. In P. L. Ackerman, P. C. Kyllonen, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Process, trait, and content determinants (pp. 77–108). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.