Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Communication technology and psychological well-being: Yin, Yang, and the golden mean of media effects
- 2 Internet and well-being
- 3 Information, innovation, and society
- 4 Work-related technological change and psychological well-being
- 5 From ergonomics to hedonomics: trends in human factors and technology
- 6 “Good teleworking”: under what conditions does teleworking enhance employees' well-being?
- 7 Commuting and well-being
- 8 Technology and medicine
- 9 Mothers of invention? The myth-breaking history and planetary promise of women's key roles in subsistence technology
- 10 Technology and well-being: designing the future
- Index
- References
6 - “Good teleworking”: under what conditions does teleworking enhance employees' well-being?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 December 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Communication technology and psychological well-being: Yin, Yang, and the golden mean of media effects
- 2 Internet and well-being
- 3 Information, innovation, and society
- 4 Work-related technological change and psychological well-being
- 5 From ergonomics to hedonomics: trends in human factors and technology
- 6 “Good teleworking”: under what conditions does teleworking enhance employees' well-being?
- 7 Commuting and well-being
- 8 Technology and medicine
- 9 Mothers of invention? The myth-breaking history and planetary promise of women's key roles in subsistence technology
- 10 Technology and well-being: designing the future
- Index
- References
Summary
Myth: The home is a benign place to work and enables teleworkers to “have it all” – excel at both work and family. Work is portable to home without any downside.
Reality: For many employees, moving the workplace to the home can hurt an employee's home life and create new social dilemmas, especially if employees do not perceive control over the timing, location, and process of work, and believe they are able to create boundaries that allow them to sometimes separate work and family roles.
Given the increasing availability of formal and informal access to teleworking and other flexible work arrangements, in this chapter our goal is to understand the kinds of psychological working conditions under which use of teleworking is more likely to enhance employee well-being. We will show that “good teleworking” or teleworking where use is likely to be related to favorable outcomes for the workers' well-being has several psychological job design characteristics. We draw on survey and interview data from a sample of 316 professional employees in two Fortune 500 firms. Our chapter emphasizes two main features of good teleworking.
First, perceived psychological control over when, where, and how one teleworks matters for well-being. We will show that employees with higher perceived personal control over the location, timing, and process of work experience significantly lower work–family conflict, turnover intentions, and are less likely to want to move to a new career.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Technology and Psychological Well-being , pp. 148 - 173Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
(2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 414–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001). Telework trendlines. Retrieved July 3, 2009, from www.worldatwork.org/waw/adimLink?id=21945.
(1998). The alternative workplace: Changing where and how people work. Harvard Business Review, May–June, 121–136.Google ScholarPubMed
, , and (2000). All in a day's work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25, 472–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2001). The Flexible Workplace: A sourcebook of information and research. Westport, CT: Quorum.Google Scholar
, and (2002). Review of telework research, findings: New directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and (1999). Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: A meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 496–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1997). Loyalty, voice, and intent to exit a union firm: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 51, 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. (2000). National Compensation Survey: Survey of Employee Benefits. Retrieved May 2003, from www.bls.gov.
(2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). If you can use them: Flexibility policies, organizational commitment and perceived performance. Industrial Relations, 42, 145–167.Google Scholar
, and (1989). Investigating supervisor attributions of subordinate performance. Journal of Management, 15, 405–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1987). The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 40, 287–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1998). Work and life: The end of the zero-sum game. Harvard Business Review, Nov.–Dec., 119–129.Google ScholarPubMed
(2001). Flexible work schedules: Which workers get them?American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 1157–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1988). Flexible Work Arrangements: Managing the work–family boundary. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
, and (1995). Who appreciates family-responsive human resource policies: The impact of family-friendly policies on the organizational attachment of parents and non-parents. Personnel Psychology, 48, 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for work–family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 560–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (1998). Influences of the virtual office on aspects of work and work/life balance. Personnel Psychology, 5, 667–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002). Work and home as competing and complementary domains. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the National Academy of Management, Denver, CO.
(1977). Work and Family in the United States: A critical review and agenda for research and policy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
(2001). From telecommuting to timework: Looking back in order to look ahead. Doctoral paper for graduate course credit, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
(2006). Work and family in America: Growing tensions between employment policy and a changing workforce. A thirty year perspective. Commissioned chapter by SHRM Foundation and University of California Center for Organizational Effectiveness for the 30th anniversary of the State of Work in America. In and (Eds.), America at Work: Choices and challenges (pp. 53–72). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1999). Managerial use of flexible work schedules: The power of peers. Human Resource Management Journal, 38, 33–46.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2008). CEO of Me: Creating a life that works in the flexible job age. New Jersey: Pearson/Wharton Press.Google Scholar
, , and (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work–family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1999). Work–family role synthesis: Individual, family and organizational determinants. International Journal of Conflict Resolution, 10, 102–129.Google Scholar
, , , and (1998). Career self-management: A quasi-experimental assessment of a training intervention. Personnel Psychology, 51, 935–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1998). The impact of gender, occupation, and presence of children on telecommuting motivations and constraints. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 1115–1134.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996). Home and Work: Negotiating boundaries through everyday life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). Boundary control: The social ordering of work and family in a high-tech corporation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2), 328–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2005). Work–family relations in transnational perspective: A view from high-tech firms in India and the United States. Social Problems, 52(1), 122–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2002). Beyond Work–Family Balance: Advancing gender equity and workplace performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
, and (2002). Role conflict and flexible work arrangements: The effects on applicant attraction. Personnel Psychology, 55, 111–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2001). The relationship between work–life policies and practices and employee loyalty: A life course perspective. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22, 141–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1997). Relationship of gender, family responsibility and flexible work hours to organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 377–391.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). Exploring the domain of work and family concerns. In (Ed.), Work, Families, and Organizations (pp. 1–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- 25
- Cited by