Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T01:13:53.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2010

Vincent Pouliot
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
International Security in Practice
The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy
, pp. 251 - 274
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Emanuel (1997), “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics,” European Journal of International Relations 3(3): 319–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel (1998), “Seeds of Peaceful Change: The OSCE's Security Community-Building Model,” in Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael, eds., Security Communities, 119–60. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel (2002), “Constructivism and International Relations,” in Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas and Simmons, Beth A., eds., Handbook of International Relations, 95–118. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel (2005), Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundations of International Relations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel (2008), “The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO's Post Cold War Transformation,” European Journal of International Relations 14(2): 195–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael (1998), “A Framework for the Study of Security Communities,” in Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael, eds., Security Communities, 29–65. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Grieve, Patricia (2009), “When Security Community Meets Balance of Power: Overlapping Regional Mechanisms of Security Governance,” Review of International Studies 35(1): 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (n.d.), “The Practice Turn: Introduction and Framework,” mimeo, August 2008.
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca (2008), “The Diplomacy of Opting Out: A Bourdieudian Approach to National Integration Strategies,” Journal of Common Market Studies 46(3): 663–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Roy (2006), “Russian Security Engagement with NATO,” in Roy Allison, Margot Light and Stephen White, Putin's Russia and the Enlarged Europe, 94–129. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ambrosio, Thomas (2005), Challenging America's Global Preeminence: Russia's Quest for Multipolarity. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Antonenko, Oksana (2007), “Russia and the Deadlock over Kosovo,” Survival 49(3): 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arbatov, Alexei and Dvorkin, Vladimir (2006), Beyond Nuclear Deterrence: Transforming the U.S.– Russian Equation. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Ashley, Richard (1987), “The Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Politics,” Alternatives 12(4): 403–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmus, Ronald D. (2002), Opening NATO's Door: How the Alliance Remade Itself for a New Era. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Asmus, Ronald D., Kugler, Richard L. and Larrabee, F. Stephen (1993), “Building a New NATO,” Foreign Affairs 72(4): 28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, James A. III (2002), “Russia in NATO?Washington Quarterly 25(1): 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baranovsky, Vladimir (2000), “Russia: A Part of Europe or Apart from Europe?International Affairs 76(3): 443–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baranovsky, Vladimir (2002), “11 septembre: une vision russe” (11 September: A Russian View”)Politique étrangère 67(1): 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baranovsky, Vladimir (2003), “Russian Views on NATO and the EU,” in Lieven, Anatol and Trenin, Dmitri, eds., Ambivalent Neighbors: The EU, NATO and the Price of Membership, 269–94. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Barnes, Barry (2001), “Practice as Collective Action,” in Schatzki, Theodore R., Cetina, Karin Knorr and Savigny, Eike, eds., The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, 17–28. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael (2002), Eyewitness to a Genocide: The United Nations and Rwanda. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael and Adler, Emanuel (1998), “Studying Security Communities in Theory, Comparison, and History,” in Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael, eds., Security Communities, 413–41. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond (2005), “Power in International Politics,”International Organization 59(1): 39–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael and Finnemore, Martha (2004), Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bartelson, Jens (1995), A Genealogy of Sovereignty. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,BBC (2008), “Rice Criticises ‘Isolated’ Russia,” September 19 (http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7623555.stm, accessed September 19, 2008).
Berridge, G. R., ed. (2004), Diplomatic Classics: Selected Texts from Commynes to Vattel. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bigo, Didier (1996), Polices en réseaux. L'expérience européenne (Networked Police: The European Experience). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
Bigo, Didier (2000), “When Two Become One: Internal and External Securitisations in Europe,” in Kelstrup, Morten and Williams, Michael C., eds., International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration: Power, Security and Community, 171–204. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bjola, Corneliu and Kornprobst, Markus (2007), “Security Communities and the Habitus of Restraint: Germany and the United States on Iraq,” Review of International Studies 33(2): 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Ian (1997), “Albright to Offer Arms Cuts as Russia Digs in on NATO,” Guardian, February 20.Google Scholar
Blacker, Coit D. (1998), “Russia and the West,” in Mandelbaum, Michael, ed., The New Russian Foreign Policy, 167–93. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1980), Questions de sociologie (Questions of Sociology). Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1981), “Men and Machines,” in Knorr-Cetina, Karin and Cicourel, Aaron V., eds., Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies, 304–17. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1986), “The Forms of Capital,” in Richardson, J. G., ed., Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, 241–58. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1987), Choses dites (Things Said). Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1989), “Social Space and Symbolic Power,” Sociological Theory 7(1):14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1990a [1980]), The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1990b), “The Scholastic Point of View,” Cultural Anthropology 5(4):380–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1994), “Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field,” Sociological Theory 12(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (2000 [1972]), Esquisse d'une théorie de la pratique, précédé de trois études d'ethnologie kabyle (Outline of a Theory of Practice, Preceded with Three Studies in Kabylian Ethnology). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (2001a [1982]), Langage et pouvoir symbolique (Language and Symbolic Power). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (2001b), Science de la science et réflexivité (Science of Science and Reflexivity). Paris: Raison d'agir.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (2003 [1997]), Méditations pascaliennes (Pascalian Meditations). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, ed. (1993), La misère du monde (The World's Misery). Paris: Seuil.
Bourdieu, Pierre and Loïc, J. D. Wacquant (1992), “The Purpose of Reflexive Sociology (The Chicago Workshop),” in Bourdieu, Pierre and Loïc, J. D. Wacquant, An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, 60–215. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Braun, Aurel (2008), “Introduction: Thinking about Security and Democracy,” in Braun, Aurel, ed., NATO–Russia Relations in the Twenty-First Century, 1–8. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1995 [1977]), The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 2nd edition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Wæver, Ole and Wilde, Jaap (1998), Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Carr, Edward Hallett (1958 [1939]), The Twenty Years' Crisis 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, 2nd edition. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik (1997), Emergent Actors in World Politics: How States and Nations Develop and Dissolve. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Charodeyev, Gennady (1999), “There's Only One Person Who Could Have Given the Order: The President,” Izvestia, June 15, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 51(24).Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. (1997), Ideas and International Political Change: Soviet/Russian Behavior and the End of the Cold War. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. (2001), “Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change,” International Organization 55(3): 553–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. (2004), “Social Constructivisms in Global and European Politics: A Review Essay,” Review of International Studies 30(2): 229–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. (2005), “International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework,” International Organization 59(4): 801–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. (2008), “Process Tracing,” in Klotz, Audie and Prakash, Deepa, eds., Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide, 114–27. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
,CNN (2003), “Chirac Lashes Out at ‘New Europe,’” February 18 (www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/europe/02/18/sprj.irq.chirac, accessed May 31, 2008).
Colton, Timothy J. (2008), “Post-postcommunist Russia, the International Environment and NATO,” in Braun, Aurel, ed., NATO–Russia Relations in the Twenty-First Century, 25–38. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cooper, Helene (2008), “In Georgia Clash, a Lesson on U.S. Need for Russia,” New York Times, August 9.Google Scholar
,Council of the EU (2003), “A Secure Europe in a Better World,” European Security Strategy, December 12.
Cox, Michael (1992), “Western Intelligence, the Soviet Threat and NSC-68: A Reply to Beatrice Heuser,” Review of International Studies 18(1): 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Neta C. (2002), Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, Mai'a K. Davis (2006), The European Diplomatic Corps: Diplomats and International Cooperation from Westphalia to Maastricht. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Daalder, Ivo and Goldgeier, James (2006), “Global NATO,” Foreign Affairs 85(5): 105–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daalder, Ivo H. and Lindsay, James M. (2005 [2003]), American Unbound: The Bush Revolution in Foreign Policy, 2nd edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
D'Andrade, Roy (1995), The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dannreuther, Roland (1999–2000), “Escaping the Enlargement Trap in NATO–Russian Relations,” Survival 41(4): 145–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Certeau, Michel (1990 [1980]), L'invention du quotidien 1. Arts de faire (The Invention of the Everyday: Ways of Doing). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Nevers, Renée (2007), “NATO's International Security Role in the Terrorist Era,” International Security 31(4): 34–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derian, James (1987), On Diplomacy: A Genealogy of Western Estrangement. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W., Burrell, Sidney A., Kann, Robert A., Lee, Maurice Jr., Lichterman, Martin, Lindgren, Raymond E., Loewenheim, Francis L. and Wagenen, Richard W. (1957), Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant (2002), The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doty, Roxanne Lynn (1996), Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North–South Relations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Duffy, Gavan, Frederking, Brian K. and Tucker, Seth A. (1998), “Language Games: Dialogical Analysis of INF Negotiations,” International Studies Quarterly 42(2): 271–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckstein, Harry (1975), “Case Studies and Theory in Political Science,” in Greenstein, Fred I. and Polsby, Nelson W., eds., Handbook of Political Science, vol. VII, 94–137. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon (1989), Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
English, Robert D. (2000), Russia and the Idea of the West: Gorbachev, Intellectuals, and the End of the Cold War. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Seymour (1994), “Integration of the Cognitive and the Psychodynamic Unconscious,” American Psychologist 49(8): 709–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evangelista, Matthew (1999), Unarmed Forces: The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Evangelista, Matthew (2002), The Chechen Wars: Will Russia Go the Way of the Soviet Union?Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Fierke, Karin M. (1998), Changing Games, Changing Strategies: Critical Investigations in Security. New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Fierke, Karin M. (2004), “World or Worlds? The Analysis of Content and Discourse,” Qualitative Methods 2(1): 36–9.Google Scholar
Fierke, Karin M. (2005), Diplomatic Interventions: Conflict and Change in a Globalizing World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha (2003), The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn (2001), “Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Programme in International Relations and Comparative Politics,” Annual Review of Political Science 4: 391–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, Alan Page, Kitayama, Shinobu, Markus, Hazel Rose and Nisbett, Richard E. (1999), “The Cultural Matrix of Social Psychology,” in Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T. and Lindzey, G., eds., The Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd edition, volume II, 915–81. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Flynn, Gregory and Farrell, Henry (1999), “Piecing Together the Democratic Peace: The CSCE, Norms, and the ‘Construction’ of Security in Post-Cold War Europe,” International Organization 53(3): 505–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1980), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, edited by Colin Gordon. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion (2006), “The Construction of a Global Profession: The Transnationalization of Economics,” American Journal of Sociology 112(1): 145–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritch, Paul (2007), “The NATO–Russia Partnership: More than Meets the Eye,” NATOReview 2.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold (1967), Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1973), The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1987), “‘From the Native's Point of View’: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding,” in Gibbons, Michael. T., ed., Interpreting Politics, 133–47. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. (1993), Bridging the Gap: Theory and Practice in Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew (2005), Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ghebali, Victor-Yves (1996), L'OSCE dans l'Europe post-communiste, 1990–1996. Vers une identité paneuropéenne de sécurité (The OSCE in Post-Communist Europe, 1990–1996: Toward a Paneuropean Security Identity). Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar
Gheciu, Alexandra (2005), NATO in the “New Europe”: The Politics of International Socialization after the Cold War. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert (1981), War and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Barney G. and Strauss, Anselm L. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goldgeier, James M. and McFaul, Michael (2003), Power and Purpose: U.S. Policy Toward Russia after the Cold War. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Gorbachev, Mikhail (1994), “The NATO Ultimatum Was the Worst Possible Way of Handling the Bosnian Crisis,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, February 22, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 46(7).Google Scholar
Gorbachev, Mikhail (1999), “No, No, NATO,” Boston Globe, July 16.Google Scholar
Gornostayev, Dimitri and Katin, Vladimir (1998), “‘We Shouldn't Set a Precedent for NATO,’” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, May 30, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 50(22).Google Scholar
Guk, Sergei (1992), “NATO Could Become Guarantor of Russia's Security,” Izvestia, January 22, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 44(3).Google Scholar
Gusterson, Hugh (1993), “Exploding Anthropology's Canon in the World of the Bomb: Ethnographic Writing on Militarism,” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 22(1): 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusterson, Hugh (2008), “Ethnographic Research,” in Klotz, Audie and Prakash, Deepa, eds., Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide, 93–113. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano (2000), “A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations,” European Journal of International Relations 6(2): 147–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano (2005), “The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33(3): 495–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter M. and Haas, Ernst B. (2002), “Pragmatic Constructivism and the Study of International Institutions,” Millennium 31(3): 573–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1982), “Language, Truth and Reason,” in Hollis, Martin and Lukes, Steven, eds., Rationality and Relativism, 48–66. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1999), The Social Construction of What?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (2002a), Historical Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian (2002b), “Inaugural Lecture: Chair of Philosophy and History of Scientific Concepts at the Collège de France, 16 January 2001,” Economy and Society 31(1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. and Montgomery, Alexander H. (2006), “Power Positions: International Organizations, Social Networks, and Conflicts,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50(1): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. (2003), “Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research,” in Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, eds., Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, 373–404. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Keith and Langhorne, Richard (1995), The Practice of Diplomacy: Its Evolution, Theory and Administration. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hansen, Lene (2006), Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Headley, Jim (2003), “Sarajevo, February 1994: The First Russia–NATO Crisis of the Post-Cold War Era,” Review of International Studies 29(2): 209–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heider, Karl G. (1988), “The Rashomon Effect: When Ethnographers Disagree,” American Anthropologist 90(1): 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuser, Beatrice (1991), “NSC 68 and the Soviet Threat: A New Perspective on Western Threat Perception and Policy Making,” Review of International Studies 17(1): 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, Martin and Smith, Steve (1990), Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted (2002) Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted (n.d.), “The Logic of Habit in International Relations,” mimeo, May 2008.
Huysmans, Jef (2002), “Shape-shifting NATO: Humanitarian Action and the Kosovo Refugee Crisis,” Review of International Studies 28(3): 599–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanov, Sergey B. (2004), “International Security in the Context of the Russia–NATO Relationship,” Munich, February 7 (www.securityconference.de/konferenzen/rede.php?menu_2005=&menu_konferenz, accessed July 27, 2007).
,Izvestia (2004), “Yury Baluyevsky, First Deputy Chief of the Russian General Staff: ‘NATO Expansion Will Strike a Fatal Blow to the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe,” Izvestia, March 3, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 56(9).Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2004), “Hegel's House, or ‘People Are States Too,’” Review of International Studies 30(2): 281–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2006a), Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the Invention of the West. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2006b), “Making Sense of Making Sense: Configurational Analysis and the Double Hermeneutic,” in Yanow, Dvora and Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, eds., Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn, 264–80. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2008), “Foregrounding Ontology: Dualism, Monism, and IR Theory,” Review of International Studies 34(1): 129–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel H. (1999), “Relations before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics,” European Journal of International Relations 5(3): 291–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel H. (2004), “Constructivist Realism or Realist-Constructivism?International Studies Review 6(2): 337–41.Google Scholar
Jackson, Peter (2008), “Pierre Bourdieu, the ‘Cultural Turn’ and the Practice of International History,” Review of International Studies 34(1): 155–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain (2001), “Treating International Institutions as Social Environments,” International Studies Quarterly 45(4): 487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jönsson, Christer and Hall, Martin (2005), Essence of Diplomacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Robert (2003), Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel (2002), “Maps of Bounded Rationality: A Perspective on Intuitive Judgment and Choice” (nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/2002/kahnemann-lecture.pdf, accessed April 15, 2009).
Kassianova, Alla (2001), “Russia: Still Open to the West? Evolution of the State Identity in the Foreign Policy and Security Discourse,” Europe–Asia Studies 53(6): 821–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O. and Krasner, Stephen D. (1998), “International Organization and the Study of World Politics,” International Organization 52(4): 645–85.Google Scholar
Katzner, Donald W. (1999), “Hysteresis and the Modeling of Economic Phenomena,” Review of Political Economy 11(2): 171–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauppi, Niilo (2005), Democracy, Social Resources and Political Power in the European Union. New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn (1998), Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kipp, Jacob W., Thomas, Timothy L., Grau, Lester W.et al. (2000), “Lessons and Conclusions on the Execution of IFOR Operations and Prospects for a Future Combined Security System: The Peace and Stability of Europe after IFOR,” 2nd edition. Fort Leavenworth, KS: US Army Combined Arms Center.
Kissinger, Henry A. (1973), A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh and the Problem of Peace 1812–1822. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry A. (1994), Diplomacy. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Kitchen, Veronica (2009), “Argument and Identity Change in the Atlantic Security Community,” Security Dialogue 40(1): 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondrashov, Stanislav (1996), “The Diplomatic Gospel according to Yevgeny on the Eve of the Second Coronation of Boris,” Izvestia, August 9, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 48(32).Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan (2001), “The Rational Design of International Institutions,” International Organization 55(4): 761–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornprobst, Markus, Pouliot, Vincent, Shah, Nisha and Zaiotti, Ruben, eds. (2008), Metaphors of Globalization: Mirrors, Magicians, and Mutinies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Kozyrev, Andrei V. (1992), “Russia and Human Rights,” Slavic Review 51(2): 287–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozyrev, Andrei V. (1993), “The New Russia and the Atlantic Alliance,” NATO Review 1 (www.nato.int/docu/review/1993/9301-1.htm) accessed August 27, 2007).
Kozyrev, Andrei V. (1994a), “The Lagging Partnership,” Foreign Affairs 73(3): 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozyrev, Andrei V. (1994b), “Russia and the U.S.: Partnership Is Not Premature, It Is Overdue,” Izvestia, March 11, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 46(10).Google Scholar
Kozyrev, Andrei V. (1995), “Partnership or Cold Peace?Foreign Policy 99: 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Mark (2002), “NATO, The Baltic States and Russia: A Framework for Sustainable Enlargement,” International Affairs 78(4): 731–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. (1989), Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. (2000), “Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt's ‘Social Theory of International Politics’ and the Constructivist Challenge,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29(1): 73–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. (2007), “Of False Promises and Good Bets: A Plea for a Pragmatic Approach to Theory Building (The Tartu Lecture),” Journal of International Relations and Development 10(1): 215–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kujat, Harald (2002), “Combating Terrorism: A Key Objective,” Kraznaya Zvezda, reprinted and translated by NATO (www.nato.int/docu/articles/2002/a021225a.htm, accessed January 22, 2004).
Kupchan, Charles A. (1994), “Expand NATO– And Split Europe,” New York Times, November 27.Google Scholar
Kvale, Steinar (1996), InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre (1970), “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,” in Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan, eds., Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, 91–196. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leander, Anna (2001), “Pierre Bourdieu on Economics,” Review of International Political Economy 8(2): 344–53.Google Scholar
Leander, Anna (2008) “Thinking Tools,” in Klotz, Audie and Prakash, Deepa, eds., Qualitative Methods of International Relations: A Pluralist Guide, 11–27. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned (2008), A Cultural Theory of International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legvold, Robert (2007), “Introduction,” in Legvold, Robert, ed., Russian Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century and the Shadow of the Past, 3–34. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévesque, Jacques (1995), 1989 – La fin d'un empire. L'URSS et la liberation de l'Europe de l'Est (1989 – The End of an Empire: USSR and the Liberation of Eastern Europe). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
Levitin, Oleg (2000), “Inside Moscow's Kosovo Muddle,” Survival 42(1): 130–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Clifford J. (2008), “Russia Adopts Blustery Tone Set by Envoy,” New York Times, August 28.Google Scholar
Lo, Bobo (2002), Russian Foreign Policy in the Post-Soviet Era: Reality, Illusion and Mythmaking. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukyanov, Fyodor (2004), “Final Act,” Vremya Novostei, July 9, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 56(27).Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael (1997), “Theorizing Practice,” Human Studies 20(3): 335–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacFarlane, S. Neil (2008), “Russia, NATO Enlargement and the Strengthening of Democracy in the European Space,” in Braun, Aurel, ed., NATO–Russia Relations in the Twenty-First Century, 39–52. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Madsen, Mikael Rask (2007), “From Cold War Instrument to Supreme European Court: The European Court of Human Rights at the Crossroads of International and National Law and Politics,” Law and Social Inquiry 32(1): 137–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P. (1989), Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P. (1998), “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders,” International Organization 52(4): 943–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marti, Eduardo (1996), “Mechanisms of Internalisation and Externalisation of Knowledge in Piaget's and Vygotsky's Theories,” in Tryphon, Anastasia and Vonèche, Jacques, eds., Piaget-Vygotsky: The Social Genesis of Thought, 57–83. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Mattern, Janice Bially (2001), “The Power Politics of Identity,” European Journal of International Relations 7(3): 349–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattern, Janice Bially (2005), Ordering International Politics: Identity, Crisis, and Representational Force. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McDonald, David (2007), “Domestic Conjunctures, the Russian State, and the World Outside, 1700–2006,” in Legvold, Robert, ed., Russian Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century and the Shadow of the Past, 145–203. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
MccGwire, Michael (1998), “NATO Expansion: ‘A Policy Error of Historic Importance,’” Review of International Studies 24(1): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. (2001), The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Mérand, Frédéric (2008), European Defense Policy: Beyond the Nation State. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mérand, Frédéric and Pouliot, Vincent (2008), “Le monde de Pierre Bourdieu: Éléments pour une théorie sociale des Relations internationales” (Pierre Bourdieu's World: Elements for a Social Theory of International Relations), Canadian Journal of Political Science 41(3): 603–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan (1995), “Anarchy and Identity,” International Organization 49(2): 229–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migranyan, Andranik (1994), “Russia's Foreign Policy: Disastrous Results of Three Years,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, December 10, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 46(50).Google Scholar
Migranyan, Andranik (1997), “A Mistake or Not? Boris Yeltsin Will Sign Russia-NATO Treaty in Paris Today,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, May 27, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 49(22).Google Scholar
Milliken, Jennifer (1999), “The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods,” European Journal of International Relations 5(2): 225–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2001), “Speech by President Putin of Russia before the Representatives of the American Public and US Political Figures,” Washington, November 13 (www.ln.mid.ru/bl.nsf/900b2c3ac91734634325698f002d9dcf/0472a5da92607d0543256b050031fe41?OpenDocument, accessed June 3, 2009).
,Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2007a), “The Foreign Policy Sovereignty of Russia – An Absolute Imperative, article by Sergey Lavrov,” January 18 (www.ln.mid.ru/brp_4.nsf/e78a48070f128a7b43256999005bcbb3/4a94acbef393c22, accessed June 3, 2007).
,Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2007b), “Transcript of Remarks and Replies to Media Questions by Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Sergey Lavrov Following Ministerial Meeting of Russia–NATO Council,” Oslo, April 26 (www.nato-russia-council.info/htm/EN/statements26apr07_3.shtml, accessed June 3, 2009).
Mitzen, Jennifer (2006), “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma,” European Journal of International Relations 12(3): 341–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morozov, Viatcheslav (2002), “Resisting Entropy, Discarding Human Rights: Romantic Realism and Securitization of Identity in Russia,” Cooperation and Conflict 37(4): 409–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novosti, Moskovskiye (1996), “Primakov Starts with the CIS,” Moskovskiye Novosti, January 14, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 48(2).Google Scholar
Mukhin, Vladimir (1998), “Warning by Russian Defense Ministry,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 23, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 50(25).Google Scholar
Myers, Steven Lee (2008), “Bush Supports Ukraine's Bid to Join NATO,” New York Times, April 2.Google Scholar
,NATO (1990), “Declaration on a Transformed North Atlantic Alliance Issued by the Heads of State and Government Participating in the Meeting of the North Atlantic Council,” London, July 6 (www.nato.int/docu/basictxt/b900706a.htm, accessed November 6, 2004).
,NATO (1994a), “Declaration of the Heads of State and Government Participating in the Meeting of the North Atlantic Council (‘The Brussels Summit Declaration’),” Brussels, January 11 (www.nato.int/docu/basictxt/b940111a.htm, accessed November 6, 2004).
,NATO (1994b), “Final Communiqué,” press communiqué M-NAC-1(94)46, Istanbul, June 9 (www.nato.int/docu/comm/49-95/c940609b.htm, accessed October 12, 2007).
,NATO (1994c), “Final Communiqué,” communiqué M-NAC-2(94)116, Brussels, December 1 (www.nato.int/docu/comm/49-95/c941201a.htm, accessed October 11, 2007).
,NATO (1995), “Study on NATO Enlargement,” September (www.nato.int/docu/basictxt/enl-9501.htm, accessed March 10, 2006).
,NATO (1997), “Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between NATO and the Russian Federation,” Paris, May 27 (www.nato.int/docu/basictxt/fndact-a.htm, accessed June 11, 2004).
,NATO (2001a), “Press Statement, Meeting in Extraordinary Session of the NATO-Russia Permanent Joint Council at Ambassadorial Level,” Brussels, September 13 (www.nato.int/docu/pr/2001/p010913e.htm, accessed October 18, 2007).
,NATO (2001b), “NATO–Russia: Sit Down and Discuss Where Our Interests Meet,” speech by Lord Robertson, NATO Secretary-General at the Moscow State Institute of Foreign Relations (MGIMO), February 21 (www.nato.int/docu/speech/2001/s010221a.htm, accessed December 2, 2007).
,NATO (2001c), “Press Conference with NATO Secretary-General, Lord Robertson,” Moscow, November 22 (www.nato.int/docu/speech/2001/s011122b.htm, accessed December 1, 2007).
,NATO (2002), “NATO–Russia Relations: A New Quality,” Rome, May 28 (www.nato.int/docu/basictxt/b020528e.htm, accessed June 3, 2009).
,NATO (2004a), “Joint NATO–Russia position on Ukraine,” December 9 (www.nato.int/docu/update/2004/12-december/e1209d.htm, accessed October 21, 2005).
,NATO (2004b), “The Istanbul Declaration: Our Security in a New Era,” Press release 2004(097), June 28 (www.nato.int/docu/pr/2004/p04– 097e.htm, accessed January 24, 2005).
,NATO (2006), “NATO-Russia News 2/06,” NATO Public Diplomacy Division.
,NATO (2007), “NATO-Russia: A Pragmatic Partnership,” NATO Public Diplomacy Division.
,NATO (2008a), “Bucharest Summit Declaration,” Bucharest, April 3 (www.nato.int/docu/pr/2208/p08-049e.html, accessed June 3, 2008).
,NATO (2008b), “Statement at the Meeting of the North Atlantic Council at the Level of Foreign Ministers held at NATO Headquarters, Brussels, on 19 August 2008,” press release (2008) 104 (www.nato.int/docu/pr/2008/p08-104e.html, accessed August 19, 2008).
Neufeld, Mark (1993), “Interpretation and the ‘Science’ of International Relations,” Review of International Studies 19(1): 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Iver B. (1996), “Self and Other in International Relations,” European Journal of International Relations 2(2): 139–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Iver B. (1999), Uses of the Other: “The East” in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver B. (2002), “Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31(3): 627–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Iver B. (2004), “Beware of Organicism: The Narrative Self of the State,” Review of International Studies 30(2): 259–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Iver B. (2005a), “To Be a Diplomat,” International Studies Perspective 6(1): 72–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Iver B. (2005b), “Russia as a Great Power,” in Hedenskog, Jakob, Konnander, Vilhelm, Nygren, Bertil, Oldberg, Ingmar and Pursiainen, Christer, eds., Russia as a Great Power: Dimensions of Security under Putin, 13–28. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver B. (2007), “A Speech That the Entire Ministry May Stand for,” or: Why Diplomats Never Produce Anything New,” International Political Sociology 1(2): 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Iver B. (2008a) “Discourse Analysis,” in Klotz, Audie and Prakash, Deepa, eds., Qualitative Methods of International Relations: A Pluralist Guide, 61–77. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver B. (2008b), “Russia as a Great Power, 1815–2007,” Journal of International Relations and Development 11(2): 128–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,New York Times (1994), “Include Russia, Too,” New York Times, January 9.Google Scholar
,New York Times (1997), “Former Enemies Speak of Peace,” New York Times, May 28.Google Scholar
,New York Times (2001), “Bush's Vision: ‘We Will Not Trade Away the Fate of Free European Peoples,” New York Times, June 16.Google Scholar
Nexon, Daniel H. (2009), The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires and International Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Nezavisimaya Gazeta (1994), “Yeltsin on Partnership in NATO,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, April 7, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 46(14).Google Scholar
Nicolson, Harold (1963 [1939]), Diplomacy, 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, John (2005), Collision Course: NATO, Russia, and Kosovo. Westport, CN: Praeger.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Barry (1999), Honor, Symbols, and War. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas (1998), “Constructivism: A User's Manual,” in Kubalkova, Vendulka, Onuf, Nicholas and Kowert, Paul, eds., International Relations in a Constructed World, 58–98. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Parkhomenko, Sergei (1993), “Russia Gives Poland Leave to Join NATO,” Sevodnya, August 27, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 45(34).Google Scholar
Paul, T. V. (2005), “Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy,” International Security 30(1): 46–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul (2004), Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,PIPA (2002), Worldview 2002: American and European Public Opinion and Foreign Policy, The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, (www.ccfr.org/globalviews2004/sub/pdf/2002_Comparative.pdf, accessed January 24, 2004).
Polanyi, Michael (1983), The Tacit Dimension. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Poleshchuk, Andrei (1993), “Is an Expansion of NATO Justified?” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, November 26, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 45(47).Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, Donald E. (1988), Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Ponsard, Lionel (2007), Russia, NATO and Cooperative Security: Bridging the Gap. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pop, Liliana (2007), “Time and Crisis: Framing Success and Failure in Romania's Post-communist Transformations,” Review of International Studies 33(3): 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent (2003), “La Russie et la communauté atlantique. Vers une culture commune de sécurité” (Russia and the Atlantic Community: Toward a Common Security Culture?), Études internationales 34(1): 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent (2004), “The Essence of Constructivism,” Journal of International Relations and Development 7(3): 319–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent (2006), “The Alive and Well Transatlantic Security Community: A Theoretical Reply to Michael Cox,” European Journal of International Relations and Development 12(1): 119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent (2007), “Pacification Without Collective Identification: Russia and the Transatlantic Security Community in the Post-Cold War Era,” Journal of Peace Research 44(5): 603–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent (2008), “Reflexive Mirror: Everything Takes Place As If Threats Were Going Global,” in Kornprobst, Markus, Pouliot, Vincent, Shah, Nisha and Zaiotti, Ruben, eds., Metaphors of Globalization: Mirrors, Magicians, and Mutinies, 34–49. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent (n.d.), “The Materials of Practice: Nuclear Warheads, Rhetorical Commonplaces and Committee Meetings in NATO-Russia Diplomacy,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 2008.
Pouliot, Vincent and Lachmann, Niels (2004), “Les communautés de sécurité, vecteurs d'ordre régional et international” (Security Communities as Vehicles of Regional and International Order), Revue internationale et stratégique 54: 131–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,President of Russia (2001), “Annual Address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation,” Moscow, April 3 (www.kremlin.ru/eng/text/speeches/2001/04/03/0000_type70029type82912_70660.shtml, accessed June 5, 2007).
,President of Russia (2007), “Speech and the Following Discussion at the Munich Conference on Security Policy,” Munich, February 10 (www.president.kremlin.ru/eng/text/speeches/2007/02/10/0138, accessed April 4, 2007).
,President of Russia (2008), “Speech at the Meeting with Russian Ambassadors and Permanent Representatives to International Organisations,” Moscow, July 15 (http://kremlin.ru/eng/text/speeches/2008/07/15/1121_type82912 type84779_204155.shtml, accessed July 16, 2008).
Price, Richard and Reus-Smit, Christian (1998), “Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism,” European Journal of International Relations 4(3): 259–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primakov, Yevgeny (2004), Russian Crossroads: Toward the New Millennium. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Primakov, Yevgeny (2006), “Russia and the U.S. in Need of Trust and Cooperation,” Russia in Global Affairs, February 8 (eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/14/1005.html, accessed April 5, 2006).
Pushkov, Aleksei (1999), “The Chernomyrdin Syndrome,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 11, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 51(23).Google Scholar
Pushkov, Aleksei (2004), “The Aim Is Not to Divide Ukraine, But to Break It Away from Russia,” Trud, December 1, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 56(48).Google Scholar
Reber, Arthur S. (1993), Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge: An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian (1997), The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul (1977 [1973]), “The Model of the Text: Meaningful Action Considered as a Text,” in Dallmayr, Fred R. and McCarthy, Thomas A., eds., Understanding and Social Inquiry, 316–34. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Ringmar, Erik (1996), Identity, Interest and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden's Intervention in the Thirty Years War. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas (2000), “‘Let's Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics,” International Organization 54(1): 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodin, Ivan (1994), “NATO's Program Is Not Entirely to the Liking of the State Duma,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, March 18, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 46(11).Google Scholar
Rodionov, Igor (1996), “What Sort of Defense Does Russia Need?” Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, November 28, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 48(50).Google Scholar
,Rossiiskaya Gazeta (1996), “Let's Leave Nuclear Ambitions to the History Books,” Rossiiskaya Gazeta, September 26, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 48(39).Google Scholar
,Rossiiskaya Gazeta (1997), “Cooperation Instead of Confrontation,” Rossiiskaya Gazeta, March 18, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 49(11).Google Scholar
,Rossiiskaya Gazeta (1999), “NATO Seeks to Enter 21st Century Wearing the Uniform of World Policeman,” Rossiiskaya Gazeta, March 26, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 51(12).Google Scholar
Vesti, Rossiiskiye (1995), “Abandon Reflexive Resort to Force in Favor of Considered Approach,” Rossiiskiye Vesti, September 8, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 47(36).Google Scholar
Rubin, Herbert J. and Rubin, Irene S. (1995), Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Susan Hoeber (2004), “Toward Convergence,” in Shapiro, Ian, Smith, Rogers M., and Masoud, Tarek E., eds., Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics, 385–88. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. (1998), Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert (1984), The Concept of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Satow, Ernest Mason (1979), Satow's Guide to Diplomatic Practice, 5th edition. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schatz, Edward (2009a), “Ethnographic Immersion and the Study of Politics,” in Schatz, Edward, ed., Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power, 1–22. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatz, Edward (2009b), “What Kind(s) of Ethnography Does Political Science Need,” in Schatz, Edward, ed., Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power, 303–18. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R. (2005), “Practices and Actions: A Wittgensteinian Critique of Bourdieu and Giddens,” in Robbins, Derek, ed., Pierre Bourdieu 2, 167–191. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R., Cetina, Karin Knorr and Savigny, Eike, eds. (2001), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. New York: Routledge.
Schelling, Thomas C. (1980 [1960]), The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank (2001), “The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union,” International Organization 55(1): 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank (2003), The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe: Rules and Rhetoric. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, William E. (1994), “Russia Clarifies Hopes for a Link with NATO,” New York Times, May 26.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. (1998), Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R (1995), The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R (1998), Mind, Language and Society: Philosophy in the Real World. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sending, Ole Jacob (2002), “Constitution, Choice and Change: Problems with the ‘Logic of Appropriateness’ and Its Use in Constructivist Theory,” European Journal of International Relations 8(4): 443–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, Vaughn P. (2000), “Norms Are What States Make of Them: The Political Psychology of Norm Violation,” International Studies Quarterly 44(2): 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, Paul and Wiseman, Geoffrey, eds. (2007), The Diplomatic Corps as an Institution of International Society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shegedin, Aleksandr and Zygar, Mikhail (2006), “Estonia Turns Its Defense Side to Russia,” Kommersant, December 7, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 58(49).Google Scholar
Shevtsov, Leontiy P. (1997), “Russian-NATO Military Cooperation in Bosnia: A Basis for the Future?NATO Review 45(2): 17–21.Google Scholar
Smirnov, Aleksei (2002), “Russia Is Given a Place in a Dying Alliance,” Noviye Izvestia, May 16, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 54(20).Google Scholar
Solovyov, Vladimir and Sidorov, Dmitry (2006), “Sanction Master,” Kommersant, October 4, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 58(40).Google Scholar
Stankevich, Sergei (1992), “Russia Has Already Made an Anti-imperial Choice,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, November 6, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 44(45).Google Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E. and West, Richard F. (2000), “Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(5): 645–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer (2002), “Realism and the Constructivist Challenge: Rejecting, Reconstructing, or Rereading,” International Studies Review 4(1): 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straus, Ira (2003), “NATO: The Only West That Russia Has?Demokratizatsiya 11(2): 229–69.Google Scholar
Sysoyev, Gennady (1998), “Russian Assault Force Lands in Albania,” Kommersant, August 18, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 50(33).Google Scholar
Sysoyev, Gennady (2004), “Minister Gets Job Done at Highest Level,” Kommersant, June 30, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 56(26).Google Scholar
Swidler, Ann (2001), “What Anchors Cultural Practices,” in Schatzki, Theodore R., Cetina, Karin Knorr and Savigny, Eike, eds., The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, 74–92. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Talbott, Strobe (1995), “Why NATO Should Grow,” New York Review of Books, August 10: 27.Google Scholar
Talbott, Strobe (2002), The Russia Hand: A Memoir of Presidential Diplomacy. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1993 [1981]), “To Follow a Rule …” in Calhoun, Craig, LiPuma, Edward and Postone, Moishe, eds., Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, 45–59. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Daniel C. (2001), The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights, and the Demise of Communism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1985), “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime,” in Evans, Peter B., Rueschemeyer, Dietrich and Skocpol, Theda, eds., Bringing the State Back In, 169–91. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen (2001), Return to Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc (2006), The Craft of International History: A Guide to Method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Traynor, Ian (2002), “Russia and Nato Reach Historic Deal,” Guardian, May 15.Google Scholar
Trenin, Dmitri (2000), “Russia's Security Relations with the West after Kosovo and Chechnya,” Notes de l'IFRI 19.
Trenin, Dmitri (2005), “Russia's Security Integration with America and Europe,” in Motyl, Alexander J., Ruble, Blair A. and Shevtsova, Lilia, eds., Russia's Engagement with the West: Transformation and Integration in the Twenty-first Century, 281–94. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George (1990), Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tsygankov, Andrei P. (2001), “The Final Triumph of the Pax Americana? Western Intervention in Yugoslavia and Russia's Debate on the Post-Cold War Order,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 34(2): 133–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsygankov, Andrei P. (2003), “Mastering Space in Eurasia: Russia's Geopolitical Thinking after the Soviet Break-up,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 36(1): 101–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsygankov, Andrei P. (2004), Whose World Order? Russia's Perception of American Ideas after the Cold War. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Tsygankov, Andrei P. (2005), “Vladimir Putin's Vision of Russia as a Normal Great Power,” Post-Soviet Affairs 21(2): 132–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Stephen (1994), The Social Theory of Practices: Tradition, Tacit Knowledge, and Presuppositions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
,UN Security Council (1993), “Resolution 836,” S/RES/836(1993), June 4.
,UN Security Council (1998a), “Resolution 1199 (1998),” S/RES/1199, September 23.
,UN Security Council (1998b), “3937th Meeting, Saturday, 24 October 1998, 4.15 p.m, New York,” S/PV.3937.
,US Department of State (2004), “The NATO–Russia Council: A Vital Partnership in the War on Terror,” remarks by R. Nicholas Burns, Moscow, November 8 (www.state.gov/p/eur/rls/rm/38244.htm, accessed April 2, 2007).
,US Department of State (2006), “Discussion on Russia/G8 issues,” Washington, April 19 (www.state.gov/p/eur/rls/rm/65206.htm, accessed September 26, 2006).
Vaughn, Diane (2008), “Bourdieu and Organizations: The Empirical Challenge,” Theory and Society 37(1): 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villumsen, Trine (2008), “Theory as Practice and Capital: NATO in a Bourdieusian Field of Security in Europe: Toward a Sociological Approach to IR.” PhD dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen.
Wacquant, Loïc J. D. (1992), “Toward a Social Praxeology: The Structure and Logic of Bourdieu's Sociology,” in Bourdieu, Pierre and Wacquant, Loïc J. D., An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, 1–59. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc J. D. (1995), “The Pugilistic Point of View: How Boxers Think and Feel about Their Trade,” Theory and Society 24(4): 489–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wæver, Ole (1998), “Insecurity, Security, and Asecurity in the West European Non-War Community,” in Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael, eds., Security Communities, 69–118. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979), Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Watkins, Susan Cotts and Swidler, Ann (2006), “Hearsay Ethnography: Capturing Collective Life,” CCPR-007–06, University of California, Los Angeles.
Watson, Adam (1991), Diplomacy: The Dialogue Between States. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Welch, David A. (2005), Painful Choices: A Theory of Foreign Policy Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch Larson, Deborah and Shevchenko, Alexei (2003), “Shortcut to Greatness: The New Thinking and the Revolution in Soviet Foreign Policy,” International Organization 57(1): 77–109.Google Scholar
Weldes, Jutta (1999), Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (1998), “On Constitution and Causation in International Relations,” Review of International Studies 24 (special issue): 101–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (1999), Social Theory of International Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (2004), “The State as Person in International Theory,” Review of International Studies 30(2): 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (2006), “Social Theory as Cartesian Science: An Auto-Critique from a Quantum Perspective,” in Guzzini, Stefano and Leander, Anna, eds., Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics, 181–219. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wenger, Etienne (1998), Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Stephen (2006), “Russia and ‘Europe’: The Public Dimension,” in Allison, Roy, Light, Margot and White, Stephen, Putin's Russia and the Enlarged Europe, 130–59. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
White, Stephen, Korosteleva, Julia and Allison, Roy (2006), “NATO: The View from the East,” European Security 15(2): 165–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Stephen, Light, Margot and McAllister, Ian (2005), “Russia and the West: Is There a Values Gap?International Politics 42(3): 314–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael C. (2001), “The Discipline of the Democratic Peace: Kant, Liberalism, and the Social Construction of Security Communities,” European Journal of International Relations 7(4): 525–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael C. (2007), Culture and Security: Symbolic Power and the Politics of International Security. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael C. and Neumann, Iver B. (2000), “From Alliance to Security Community: NATO, Russia, and the Power of Identity,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29(2): 357–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Peter (2005), “NATO-Russia Military Cooperation: From Dialogue to Interoperability?RUSI Journal 150(5): 44–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1958), Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William C. (2009), “Unipolarity, Status Competition, and Great Power War,” World Politics 61(1): 28–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wörner, Manfred (1991), “The Atlantic Alliance in a New Era,” NATO Review 39(1): 3–8.Google Scholar
Yost, David (1998), “The New NATO and Collective Security,” Survival 40(2): 135–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yusin, Maksim (1993), “On Eve of Dec. 12 Elections, NATO Gives Yeltsin Unpleasant Surprise,” Izvestia, December 10, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 45(49).Google Scholar
Yusin, Maksim (2001), “Havel Takes Zyuganov's Path,” Izvestia, November 29, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 53(48).Google Scholar
Zehfuss, Maja (2002), Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerubavel, Eviatar (1997), Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, William (2002), The Russian People and Foreign Policy: Russian Elite and Mass Perspectives, 1993–2000. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Vincent Pouliot, McGill University, Montréal
  • Book: International Security in Practice
  • Online publication: 03 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676185.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Vincent Pouliot, McGill University, Montréal
  • Book: International Security in Practice
  • Online publication: 03 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676185.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Vincent Pouliot, McGill University, Montréal
  • Book: International Security in Practice
  • Online publication: 03 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676185.009
Available formats
×