Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 May 2010
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic , pp. 213 - 240Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005
References
2003. Bilingualism and the Latin Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Bilingualism in Ancient Society. Language Contact and the Written Text. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1985. Metaformations. Soundplay and Wordplay in Ovid and Other Classical Poets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
1999. Gestures and Acclamations in Ancient Rome. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
1990. Trials in the Late Roman Republic 149 B.C. to 50 B.C. Phoenix Supp. Vol. 26. Toronto: University of Toronto PressGoogle Scholar
2002. The Case for the Prosecution in the Ciceronian Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
1982. “Tradition Reshaped: Language and Style in Euripides' Medea 1–19, Ennius' Medea exul 1–9 and Catullus 64.1–30.” Ramus 11: 116–33Google Scholar
1970. “Phormio parasitus: A Study in Dramatic Methods of Characterisation.” G&R 17: 32–57Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 1995. “The Opening of Plautus' Curculio: Comic Business and Mime.” In L. Benz et al. 1995. 185–92
ed. 1996. Menander, vol. 2. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
1991. “Catullo e il folklore.” In Studi di filologia classica in onore di C. Monaco. Palermo. 723–35Google Scholar
Auhagen, U. 2000. “Monolog bei Ennius und Catull.” In E. Stärk and G.; Vogt-Spira, eds. 173–87
Augahen, U. 2001. “Lucilius und die Komödie.” In Manuwald 2001b. 9–23
, ed. 1960. M. Tulli Ciceronis Pro M. Caelio Oratio, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
ed. 1963. P. Vergili Maronisx Aeneidos Liber Quartus. Edited with a Commentary. Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
ed. 1964. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Secundus. With a Commentary. Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
ed. 1971. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Primus. With a Commentary. Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
1972. “Ennius and His Friends.” In Fondation Hardt Entretiens XVII: Ennius. Geneva: Hardt. 149–208Google Scholar
1997. Werk und Wirkung Varros im Spiegel seiner Zeitgenossen von Cicero bis Ovid. Hermes Einzelschriften 73. Stuttgart: SteinerGoogle Scholar
Baier, T. 2001. “Lucilius und die griechischen Wörter.” In Manuwald 2001b. 37–50
2000. “Self-Help and Social Status in Cicero's Pro Quinctio.” Ancient Society 30: 71–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1993. “L'Epos.” In Lo spazio letterario di Roman antica, vol. 1. ., eds. Rome: Salerno. 115–41Google Scholar
1997. The Poet and the Prince. Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2001. “Teaching Augustus through Allusion.” In Speaking Volumes. Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets. London: Duckworth. 79–103. [=MD 31 (1993) 149–84]
Barchiesi, A. 2002. “The Uniqueness of the Carmen Saeculare and Its Tradition.” In Woodman and Feeney 2002. 107–23
1967. The Crimen Maiestatis in the Roman Republic and Augustan Principate. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University PressGoogle Scholar
1999. Spectacle Entertainments of Early Imperial Rome. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
2001. “Homo Fandi Dulcissimus: The Role of Favorinus in the Attic Nights of Aulus Gellius.” AJP 122: 87–106Google Scholar
1971. The Profession of Dramatist in Shakespeare's Time, 1590–1642. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
., eds. 1995. Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels. Script Oralia; 75. Tübingen: Gunter NarrGoogle Scholar
2003. “Equester Ordo Tuus Est: Did Cicero Win His Cases Because of His Support for the Equites?” CQ 53: 222–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. Ludi publici. Untersuchungen zur Entstehung und Entwicklung der öffentlichen Spiele im republikanischen Rom. Historia Einzelschriften 119. Stuttgart: SteinerGoogle Scholar
1985. “La poesia romana arcaica ‘al lavoro’ (con una apologia della medesima).” MD 14: 13–43Google Scholar
1957. Accio ed i Gracchi. Contributo alla storia della plebe e della tragedia romana. Rome: SignorelliGoogle Scholar
Biville, F. 2002. “The Graeco-Romans and Graeco-Latin: A Terminological Framework for Cases of Bilingualism.” In Adams et al. 2002. 77–102
Blänsdorf, J. 1974. “Das Bild de Komödie in der späten Republik.” In Musa Iocosa. and , eds. Hildesheim: Olms. 141–57Google Scholar
Blänsdorf, J. 1978. “Die Organisation des Theaterwesens.” In Das römischen Drama. , ed. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. 112–25Google Scholar
ed. 1990. Theater und Gesellschaft im Imperium Romanum. Mainzer Forschungen zu Drama und Theater, Bd. 4. Tübingen: FranckeGoogle Scholar
1984. Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. R. Nice, tr. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
1990b. In Other Words. Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology. M. Adamson, tr. Cambridge, MA: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
1915. Public Libraries and Literary Culture in Ancient Rome. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Braun, M. 2000. “Moribus vivito antiquis! Bemerkungen zur Moral in Plautus' Trinummus.” In Braun et al. 2000
Braun, M. et al., eds. 2000. Moribus antiquis res stat Romana. Römische Werte und römische Literatur im 3. und 2. Jh. v. Chr. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 134. Leipzig
and , eds. 2003. Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome. Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman. Exeter: University of Exeter PressGoogle Scholar
Brink, C. O. 1963a. “Horace and Varro.” In Fondation Entretiens IX: Varron. , ed. Geneva: Hardt. 173–206Google Scholar
1963b. Horace on Poetry. Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
1982. Horace on Poetry, vol. 3. Epistles Book II. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Briquel, D. 1990. “Die Frage der etruskischen Herkunft des römischen Theaters bei den Schriftstellern Kaiserzeit.” In Blänsdorf 1990. 93–106
Brown, P. G. McC. 2002. “Actors and Actor-managers at Rome in the Time of Plautus and Terence.” In Easterling and Hall 2002. 225–37
1987. Lucretius on Love and Sex: A Commentary on De rerum natura IV, 1030–1287, with Prolegomena, Text and Translation. Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar
Callmer, C. 1944. “Antike Bibliotheken.” Opuscula Archaeologica 3. Skrifter Utgivna av Svenska Institutet i Rom 10. 145–93
1997. “Quaerenti plura legendum: On the Necessity of ‘Reading More’ in Ovid's Exile Poetry.” Ramus 26: 80–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, W. R. 1965. “Plautus and his Audience.” In Roman Drama. and , eds. London: Routledge. 21–50Google Scholar
1979. Sklaven und Freigelassene als Grammatiker und Philologen im antiken Rom. Forschungen zur antiken Sklaverei, 10. Wiesbaden: SteinerGoogle Scholar
1998. “Lucilius senex – vetus historia – Epilog zu XXVI–XXX: drei alte Fragen neu verhandelt.” Philologus 142: 71–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. “Catullus 64 and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius: Allusion and Exemplarity.” PCPS 42: 60–88Google Scholar
1991. The Houses of Roman Italy, 100 B.C.–A.D. 250. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
1979. “A New Virgilian Writing Exercise from Oxyrhynchus.” Scriturra e civilità 3: 55–75Google Scholar
1994b. Latin Literature. A History. Tr. J. B. Solodow. Rev. D. Fowler and G. W. Most. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
Conte, G. B. and A. Barchiesi. 1993. “Imitazione e arte allusiva.” In Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica, vol. 1. 2 ed. ., eds. Rome: Salerno. 81–114Google Scholar
1956. Exclusus Amator. A Study in Latin Love Poetry. American Philological Association Philological Monographs 17. Baltimore: APAGoogle Scholar
1996. Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Cornell, T. J. 1986. “The Value of the Literary Tradition Concerning Archaic Rome.” In Social Struggles in Archaic Rome. , ed. Berkeley: University of California Press. 52–76Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. 1991. “The Tyranny of the Evidence: A Discussion of the Possible Uses of Literacy in Etruria and Latium in the Archaic Age.” In Literacy in the Roman World. , ed. JRA Supplementary Series No. 3. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 7–33Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. 2003. “Coriolanus: Myth, History and Performance.” In Braund and Gill 2003. 73–97
2000. Sulla preistoria della tradizione poetica italica. Accademia Toscana di Scienze e Lettere 184. Florence: OlschkiGoogle Scholar
1911. Retractatio in the Ambrosian and Palatine Recensions of Plautus. Bryn Mawr College Monographs, vol. 10. Bryn Mawr, PAGoogle Scholar
1995. Musa Lapidaria. A Selection of Latin Verse Inscriptions. American Classical Studies 36. Atlanta: Scholars PressGoogle Scholar
1982. Terence, Bembine Phormio: A Palaeological Examination. Chicago: Bolchazy-CarducciGoogle Scholar
1993. Form as Argument in Cicero's Speeches: A Study of Dilemma. Atlanta: Scholars PressGoogle Scholar
and . 1995. The Context of Ancient Drama. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1981. “Stanley Fish and the Righting of the Reader.” In The Pursuit of Signs. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 119–31Google Scholar
1953. European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages, W. R. Trask, tr. New York: PantheonGoogle Scholar
1963. “Zu Varros Literaturforschung, besonders in ‘De poetis.’” In Fondation Hardt Entretiens IX: Varron. Geneva: Hardt. 3–31Google Scholar
1955. “C. Asinius Pollio and the Early History of Public Recitation at Rome.” Hermathena 86: 20–28Google Scholar
Dangel, J. 1990b. “Sénèque et Accius: continuité et rupture.” In Blänsdorf 1990. 107–22
and . 1984. A Modern Archive Reader. Washington, D.C.: National Archives Trust Fund BoardGoogle Scholar
1984. “Il problema della origine della poesia latina nel Brutus di Cicerone.” Ciceroniana 5: 81–90Google Scholar
1998. “La menzione di Lucrezio nell' epistola Ad Quintum Fratrem 2.10.” Ciceroniana 10: 55–68Google Scholar
1998. Scribes and Schools. The Canonization of the Hebrew Scriptures. Louisville, KY: Westminster John KnoxGoogle Scholar
1999a. “‘Since My Part Has Been Well Played’: Conflicting Evaluations of Augustus.” Ramus 28: 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1980. Studi su Accio. Quaderni dell'Istituto di filologia classica “Giorgio Pasquali” dell' Università degli Studi di Firenze, 1. Florence: Editrice universitariaGoogle Scholar
2002. Textgeschichte und Rezeption der plautinischen Komödien im Altertum. Berlin: de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillery, J. 2002. “Quintus Fabius Pictor and Greco-Roman Historiography at Rome.” In Miller et al. 2002. 1–23
1965. Pagan and Christian in an Age of Anxiety. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1932. Plautinische Akzentstudien, vol. 2. Abhandlungen der schlesischen Gesellschaft für vaterländische Cultur 7. Breslau: MarcusGoogle Scholar
Ducos, M. 1990. “La condition des acteurs à Rome. Données juridiques et sociales.” In Blänsdorf 1990. 19–33
DuQuesnay, I. 1984. “Horace and Maecenas: The Propaganda Value of Sermones I.” In Woodman and West 1984. 19–58
, ed. 1996. A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
, 2003. “Evidence and Rhetoric in Cicero's Pro Roscio Amerino: The Case Against Sex. Roscius.” CQ 53: 235–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterling, P. E. 1997. “From Repertoire to Canon.” In The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy. , ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 211–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. 2002. Greek and Roman Actors. Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Eder, W. 1986. “The Political Significance of the Codification of Law in Archaic Societies: An Unconventional Hypothesis.” In Raaflaub 1986. 262–300
2001. Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
1996. Writing Rome. Textual Approaches to the City. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Eigler, U. 2000. “Cicero und die römische Tragödie. Eine Strategie zur Legitimation philosophischer Literatur im philosophischen Spätwerk Ciceros.” In Stärk and Vogt-Spira 2000. 619–36
Eigler, U. et al. 2003. Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius. Darmstadt
2002. “Shakespeare and the Publication of his Plays.” Shakespeare Quarterly 53: 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1972. Comparative Studies in Republican Latin Imagery. Toronto: University of Toronto PressGoogle Scholar
1982. “Quintilian on Performance: Traditional and Personal Elements in Institutio 11.3.” Phoenix 36: 243–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1984. “Roman Experience of Menander in the Late Republic and Early Empire.” TAPA 114: 299–309Google Scholar
1996. Roman Literary Culture from Cicero to Apuleius. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. 2002. “Orator and/et actor.” In Easterling and Hall 2002. 362–76
Fantham, E. 2003. “Pacuvius. Melodrama, Reversals and Recognitions.” In Braund and Gill 2003. 98–118
Feeney, D.C. 1992. “Si licet et fas est: Ovid's Fasti and the Problem of Free Speech under the Principate.” In Powell 1992. 1–25
Feeney, D.C. 2002. “VNA CUM SCRIPTORE MEO: Poetry, Principate and the Traditions of Literary History in the Epistle to Augustus.” In Woodman and Feeney 2002. 172–87
1998. Spectacle and Society in Livy's History. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Fineman, J. 1989. “The History of the Anecdote: Fiction and Fiction.” In H. A. Veeser, ed. The New Historicism. London: Routledge. 49–76
1989. “Change.” In Doing What Comes Naturally. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 141–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, N. 2000. “Symposiasts, Fish-Eaters and Flatterers: Social Mobility and Moral Concerns.” In Harvey and Wilkins 2000. 355–96
Fiske, G. C. 1920. Lucilius and Horace. A Study in the Classical Theory of Imitation. University of Wisconsin Studies in Language and Literature 7. Madison
1995. Catullan Provocations. Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Flaig, E. 1995. “Entscheidung und Konsens. Zu den Feldern der politischen Kommunikation zwischen Aristokratie und Plebs.” In Demokratie in Rom? Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik. Historia Einzelschriften 96. Stuttgart. 77–127
1995. “Fabulae Praetextae in Context: When were plays on contemporary subjects performed in Rome?” CQ 45: 170–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, H. 2000. “Fabula de Bacchanalibus: The Bacchanalian Cult of the Second Century B.C. and Roman Drama.” In Manuwald 2000. 23–35
, ed. The Homeric Hymn to Demeter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
2002. The Origins of Criticism. Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. 1979. “What is an Author?” In Textual Strategies. Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism. , ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 141–60Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. 1995. “Horace and the Aesthetics of Politics.” In Harrison 1995. 248–66
1997. “On the Shoulders of Giants: Intertextuality and Classical Studies.” MD 39: 13–34Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. 1961. “Two Poems of Catullus.” JRS 51: 46–53 = Kleine Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie, II. Storia e Letteratura n. 96. Rome, 1964. 115–29
1993. The Walking Muse. Horace on the Theory of Satire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
2001. Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1973. “Die Bildgeschichte der Flucht des Aeneas.” ANRW 1.4: 615–32 (text), 47–58 (plates)Google Scholar
1996. Augustan Culture. An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, K. 2003. “Greek and Roman Drama and the Aeneid.” In Braund and Gill 2003. 275–94
Garbarino, G. 1973. Roma e la filosofia greca della origini all fine del II secolo a. C. 2 vols. Turin
1990. “The Master's Pieces: On Canon Formation and the African American Tradition.” So. Atlantic Quarterly 89: 89–112Google Scholar
Gigon, O. 1978. “Lukrez und Ennius.” In Fondation Hardt Entretiens XXIV: Lucrèce. Vandoeuvres-Geneva. 167–96
Gildenhard, I. 2003. “The ‘Annalist’ before the Annalists: Ennius and His Annales.” In Eigler et al. 2003. 93–114
Goldberg, S. M. 2000. “Cicero and the Work of Tragedy.” In Manuwald 2000. 49–59
Goldberg, S. M. 2004. “Plautus and his Alternatives: Textual Doublets in Cistellaria.” In Studien zu Plautus' Cistellaria. and , eds. Tübingen: Naar. 385–98Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1990. “The Great Dionysia and Civic Ideology.” In Nothing to Do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in its Social Context. and , eds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 97–129Google Scholar
1999. “Literary History Without Literature: Reading Practices in the Ancient World.” SubStance 88: 57–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goody, J. 1977. “What's in a List?” In The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 74–111
Gotter, U. 2003. “Die Vergangenheit als Kampfplatz der Gegenwart. Catos (konter)revolutionäre Konstruktion des republikanischen Erinnerungsraums.” In U. Eigler et al. 2003. 115–34
Gratwick, A. S. 1982. “Lucilius.” In The Cambridge History of Classical Literature II: Latin Literature. and , eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 162–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993a. [rev. of Zwierlein 1990]. CR 43: 36–40
Griffin, J. 1984. “Augustus and the Poets: ‘Caesar qui cogere posset.’” In Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects. and , eds. Oxford: Clarendon. 189–218Google Scholar
1968. Roman Politics and the Criminal Courts, 149–78 B.C.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1984. The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome. 2 vols. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
1993. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. 1993. The Iliad: A Commentary. Vol. III: Books 9–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. “Cicero to Lucceius (Fam. 5.12) in Its Social Context: Valde Bella?” CP 93: 308–21Google Scholar
Hallo, W. W. 1991. “The Concept of Canonicity in Cuneiform and Biblical Literature: A Comparative Approach.” In The Biblical Canon in Comparative Perspective. Scripture in Context IV. Ancient Near Eastern Texts and Studies, vol. 11. eds. Lewiston, ME: Mellen. 1–19Google Scholar
Hanson, J. A. 1965. “The Glorious Military.” In Roman Drama. and , eds. London: Routledge. 51–85Google Scholar
Hardie, P. 1997. “Virgil and Tragedy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. , ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 312–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. 2000. The Rivals of Aristophanes. Studies in Athenian Old Comedy. London: DuckworthGoogle Scholar
1981. “Historical Allusions in Plautus and the Date of the Amphitruo.” Athenaeum 59: 480–89Google Scholar
1993. (1915) Virgil's Epic Technique. Tr. Hazel and David Harvey and Fred Robertson. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L. 1999. “Sophocles at Rome.” In Sophocles Revisited. Essays Presented to Sir Hugh Lloyd-Jones. , ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 219–59Google Scholar
Hopkins, K. 1991. “Conquest by Book.” In Literacy in the Roman World. Journal of Roman Archaeology, Supplementary Series No. 3. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 133–58
Horsfall, N. 1993a. “Roma.” In Lo Spazio letterario della Grecia antica. , ed. Rome: Salerno. 791–822Google Scholar
ed. 1995. A Companion to the Study of Virgil. Mnemosyne Supplementum 151. Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, M. 1995. “Pindarici fontis qui non expallavit haustus: Horace, Epistles 1.3.” In Harrison 1995. 219–27
1982. “Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory.” In Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. T. Bahti, tr. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 3–45, 191–201Google Scholar
Jenkinson, H. 1984. “Reflections of an Archivist.” In Daniels and Walch 1984. 15–21 [=Contemporary Review 165 (1944) 355–61]
1964. “Ancient Scholarship and Virgil's Use of Republican Latin Poetry I.” CQ 58: 280–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1965. “Ancient Scholarship and Virgil's Use of Republican Latin Poetry II.” CQ 59: 126–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. 1995. “Horace and the Reputation of Plautus in the Late First Century B.C.” In Harrison 1995. 228–47
Jocelyn, H. D. 1999. “Code-Switching in the Comoedia Palliata.” In Rezeption und Identität. Die kulturelle Auseinandersetzung Roms mit Griechenland als europäisches Paradigma. and , eds. Stuttgart: Steiner. 169–95Google Scholar
1981. “The Literary Evidence for the Beginnings of Imperial Pantomime.” BICS 28: 147–61Google Scholar
Jory, E. J. 1996. “The Drama of the Dance: Prolegomena to an Iconography of Imperial Pantomime.” In Slater 1996. 1–27
Kaimio, J. 1979. The Romans and the Greek Language. Societas Scientiarum Fennica. Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 64. Helsinki
1980. “Macrobius and Servius: Verecundia and the Grammarian's Function.” HSCP 84: 219–62Google Scholar
1988. Guardians of Language: The Grammarian and Society in Late Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
2000. Engendering Rome. Women in Latin Epic. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1972. The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Kenney, E. J. 1970. “Doctus Lucretius.” Mnemosyne 4: 366–92. rpt. with bibliographic addenda in C. J. Classen, ed. Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim: Olms, 1986. 237–65
and , eds. 1982. The Cambridge History of Classical Literature II: Latin Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1980. “Catos ‘Origines’ und die Anfänge der römischen Geschichtsschreibung.” Chiron 10: 205–24Google Scholar
1986. The Poetry of Friendship. Horace, Epistles I. Edmonton: University of Alberta PressGoogle Scholar
1967. “The Dates of the Pro Roscio Amerino and Pro Quinctio.” Mnemosyne 20: 61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klose, D. 1966. Die Didaskalien und Prologe des Terenz. Diss. Freiburg i. Br. Bamberg
Kokolakis, M. 1959. Pantomimus and the Treatise peri orcheseos. Athens
2002. “Historical Drama in Ancient Rome: Republican Flourishing and Imperial Decline?” SO 77: 5–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001. Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Ladewig, T. 2001. “Ueber den Kanon des Volcatius Sedigitus.” Reprinted from Schulprogramm Neustrelitz 1842 in and , eds. Theodor Ladewig, Schriften zum römischen Drama republikanischer Zeit. Munich: Saur. 25–67Google Scholar
1971. “Horace's Pater Optimus and Terence's Demea: Autobiographical Fiction and Comedy in Sermo I, 4.” AJP 92: 616–32Google Scholar
1999. “Ciceronian ‘Bi-Marcus’: Correspondence with M. Terentius Varro and L. Papirius Paetus in 46 B.C.E.” TAPA 129: 139–79Google Scholar
Lebek, W. D. 1996. “Moneymaking on the Roman Stage.” In Slater 1996. 29–48
1978. Der Phormio des Terenz und der Epidikazomenos des Apollodor von Karystos. Zetemata 74. Munich: BeckGoogle Scholar
, ed. 1969. A Commentary on Cicero's Oration De haruspicum responso. The Hague: MoutonGoogle Scholar
Leonard, W. L. 1942. “Lucretius: The Man, the Poet, and the Times.” In T. Lucreti Cari. De rerum natura libri sex. and , eds. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. 3–91Google Scholar
1962. Laocoön. An Essay on the Limits of Painting and Poetry. Tr. with an introduction and notes by E. A. McCormick. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, J. 1988. “The Script in the Marketplace.” In Representing the English Renaissance. , ed. Berkeley: University of California Press. 265–78Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. 2002. “Horace, Cicero and Augustus, or the Poet Statesman at Epistles 2.1.256.” In Woodman and Feeney 2002. 158–71
Ludwig, W. 1973. “Von Terenz zu Menander.” In Die römische Komödie: Plautus und Terenz. E. Lefèvre, ed. Darmstadt. 354–408 = Philologus 103 (1959) 1–38 with addenda
Lugli, G. 1959. “Commento topografico all' Elegia I del III libro dei Tristia.” In Atti del Convegno internazionale ovidiano, 2 vols. Rome. 2.397–403
Mackie, N. 1992. “Ovid and the Birth of Maiestas.” In Powell 1992. 83–97
Maguinness, W. S. 1965. “The Language of Lucretius.” In Lucretius. , ed. London: Routledge. 69–93Google Scholar
2001. Fabulae praetextae. Spuren einer literarischen Gattung der Römer. Zetemata 108. Munich: BeckGoogle Scholar
2003. Pacuvius. Summus tragicus poeta. Zum dramatischen Profil seiner Tragödien. Munich: SaurCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masten, J. A. 1994. “Beaumont and/or Fletcher: Collaboration and the Interpretation of Renaissance Drama.” In The Construction of Authorship. and , eds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 361–81Google Scholar
Mattingly, H. B. 1993. “L. Porcius Licinus and the Beginning of Latin Poetry.” In Tria Lustra: Essays and Notes Presented to John Pinsent. Liverpool Classical Papers 3. and , eds. Liverpool. 163–68Google Scholar
1988. Trials of Character: The Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. Slaves, Masters and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
McFadden, G. 1978. “‘Literature’: A Many-Sided Process.” In What is Literature?, ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 49–61Google Scholar
McKeown, J. C. 1984. “Fabula proposito nulla tegenda meo. Ovid's Fasti and Augustan Politics.” In Woodman and West 1984. 169–87
ed. 1987. Ovid: Amores. Text, Prolegomena and Commentary. Vol. 1. Text and Prolegomena. ARCA 20. Liverpool: Francis CairnsGoogle Scholar
1918. Parallelisms and Coincidences in Lucretius and Ennius. University of California Publications in Classical Philology, vol. 3. BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. F. 2002. “Ovid on the Augustan Palatine (Tristia 3.1).” In Miller et al. 2002. 129–39
1957. “Perizonius, Niebuhr and the Character of Early Roman Tradition.” JRS 47: 104–14Google Scholar
1990. The Classical Foundations of Modern Historiography. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
1998. The Theater of Plautus. Playing to the Audience. Austin: University of Texas PressGoogle Scholar
1998. Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
1968. Inscriptiones graecae urbis Romae, fasc. 1. Rome: Istituto italiano per la storia anticaGoogle Scholar
1909. “An Interpretation of Catullus VII.” Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts and Sciences 15: 139–51Google Scholar
1998. “Cicero's First Readers: Epistolary Evidence for the Dissemination of his Works.” CQ 48: 492–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, G. 1998. “The Library of Pergamon as a Classical Model.” In Pergamon. Citadel of the Gods. , ed. Harvard Theological Studies 46. Cambridge, MA. 185–232Google Scholar
Narducci, E. 1993. “Le risonanze del potere.” In Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica, vol. 2, 2nd ed. ., eds. Rome: Salerno. 533–77Google Scholar
2001. Vergils' Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius. Leeds: Francis CairnsGoogle Scholar
1990. Die attische Mittlere Komödie. Ihre Stellung in der antiken Literaturkritik und Literaturgeschichte. Berlin: de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. 2000. “Eupolis and the Periodization of Athenian Comedy.” In Harvey and Wilkins 2000. 233–46
1990. Roman Catullus and the Modification of the Alexandrian Sensibility. Berlin: WeidmannGoogle Scholar
1980. The World of the Citizen in Republican Rome. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Niebuhr, B. G. 1848. Vorträge über römische Geschichte, an der Universität zu Bonn gehalten. , ed. Berlin: ReimerGoogle Scholar
1983. Untimely Meditations. Tr. R. J. Hollingdale. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. 1995. “The Survivors: Old-Style Literary Men in the Triumviral Period.” In Collected Papers on Latin Literature. , ed. Oxford: Clarendon. 390–413Google Scholar
Nugent, S. G. 1990. “Tristia 2: Ovid and Augustus.” In Raaflaub and Toher 1990. 239–57
Oberhelman, S. and D. Armstrong. 1995. “Satire as Poetry and the Impossibility of Metathesis in Horace's Satires.” In Philodemus and Poetry. Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. , ed. New York: Oxford University Press. 233–54Google Scholar
1998. Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orgel, S. 1991. “What Is a Text?” In Staging the Renaissance. and , eds. London: Routledge. 83–87Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, N. 1997. “Caecilius, ‘Canons’ and the Origins of Atticism.” In Roman Eloquence. , ed. London: Routledge. 32–49Google Scholar
1951. “Arte allusiva.” In Stravaganze quarte e supreme. Collezione di varia critica, vol. 5. Venice: Pɪozza. 11–20. (frequently reprinted)Google Scholar
Patterson, L. 1990. “Literary History.” In Critical Terms for Literary Study, 2nd ed. and , eds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 250–62Google Scholar
, ed. 1935. Publi Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
1955. M. Tulli Ciceronis De natura deorum, Liber primus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
1998. Civiltà greca nel Lazio preromano. Accademia Toscana di Scienze e Lettere 165. Florence: OlschkiGoogle Scholar
Petaccia, M. R. 2000. “Der Orestes-Mythos in der lateinischen archaischen Tragödie und im politisch-religiösen Zusammenhang der römischen Republik.” In Manuwald 2000. 87–111
Petersmann, H. 1999. “The Language of Early Roman Satire: Its Function and Characteristics.” In Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry. and , eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 289–310Google Scholar
Pickard-Cambridge, A. W. 1968. The Dramatic Festivals of Athens. 2nd ed. and . Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
1959. Il problema del testo e della composizione del De rerum natura di Lucrezio. Rome: Edizioni dell' AteneoGoogle Scholar
1989. “Réflexions sur l' écrit et l' écriture dans la Rome des premières siècles.” Latomus 48: 285–311Google Scholar
, ed. 1992. Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. London: Bristol Classical PressGoogle Scholar
1999. “Circulating Representations: New Historicism and the Poetics of Culture.” SubStance 88: 90–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1916. Studies in the Diction of the Sermo Amatorius in Roman Comedy. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Pugh, M. J. 1984. “The Allusion of Omniscience: Subject Access and the Reference Archivist.” In Daniels and Walch 1984. 264–77 [=The American Archivist 45 (1982) 33–44]
2000. Horace's Carmen Saeculare. Ritual Magic and the Poet's Art. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
and . 1990. “Dalla rappresentazione alla lettura.” Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica, vol. 3. Rome: Salerno. 139–215Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. 1986. “The Conflict of the Orders in Archaic Rome: A Comprehensive and Comparative Approach.” In Raaflaub 1986. 1–51
Raaflaub, K. A and L. J. Samons II. 1990. “Opposition to Augustus.” In Raaflaub and Toher 1990. 417–54
and , eds. 1990. Between Republic and Empire. Interpretations of Augustus and His Principate. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
1973. Urbanitas. Ancient Sophistication and Refinement. Norman: University of Oklahoma PressGoogle Scholar
Rathje, A. 1990. “The Adoption of the Homeric Banquet in Central Italy in the Orientalizing Period.” In Murray 1990. 279–86
1985. Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
Reichel, M. 2000. “Überlegungen zur Echtheitskritik der plautischen Komödien am Beispiel der Asinaria.” In Stärk and Vogt-Spira 2000. 375–96
and . 1991. Scribes and Scholars. A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Riposati, B., ed. 1939. M. Terenti Varronis De vita populi Romani. Pubblicazioni dell' Università cattolica del S. Cuore, ser. 4. vol. 38. Milan
1902. Roman Private Law in the Times of Cicero and of the Antonines. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
1969. Style and Tradition in Catullus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. The Making of the English Literary Canon from the Middle Ages to the Late Eighteenth Century. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University PressGoogle Scholar
ed. 1989. Horace, Epistles Book II and Epistle to the Pisones (“Ars Poetica”). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
2003. “Beyond Satire: Horace, Popular Invective and the Segregation of Literature.” JRS 93: 35–65Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. 2000. ‘Räume literarischer Kommunikation in der Formierungsphase römischer Literatur.’ In Braun et al. 2000. 31–52
Rüpke, J. 2001. “Kulturtransfer als Rekodierung: Zum literaturgeschichtlichen und sozialen Ort der frühen römischen Epik.” In Von Göttern und Menschen erzählen. Formkonstanzen und Funktionswandel moderner Epik. , ed. Stuttgart: Steiner. 42–64Google Scholar
Sarna, N. M. 1971. “The Order of the Books.” In Studies in Jewish Bibliography, History and Literature in Honor of I. Edward Kiev. , ed. New York: Ktav. 407–13Google Scholar
and . 1927. Geschichte der römischen Literatur. Erster Teil: Die römische Literatur in der Zeit der Republik, 4th ed. Munich: BeckGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, E. A. 1987. “Historische Typologie der Orientierungsfunktionen von Kanon in der griechischen und römischen Literatur.” In Kanon und Zensur. Beiträge zur Archäologie der literarsichen Kommunikation II. and , eds. Munich: Fink. 246–58Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. L. 1975. “Die Anfänge der institutionellen Rhetorik in Rom.” In Monumentum Chiloniense. Festschrift für Erich Burck. , ed. Amsterdam: Hakkert. 183–216Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. L. 1989. “Postquam ludus in artem paulatim verterat. Varro und die Frühgeschichte des römischen Theaters.” In Studien zur vorliterarischen Periode im frühen Rom. , ed. ScriptOralia 12. Tübingen: Narr. 77–133Google Scholar
Scholz, U. W. 2000. “Die sermones des Lucilius.” In Braun 2000. 217–34
1970. Horror ac Divina Voluptas. Études sur la poétique et la poésie de Lucrèce. Amsterdam: HakkertGoogle Scholar
2000. Prolegomena zu einer “Phänomenologie” der römischen Literaturgeschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Quintilian. Hypomnemata 130. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & RuprechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt, J. P. 2001. “Literaturgeschichtesschreibung und immanente Literaturgeschichte. Bausteine literarhistorischen Bewusstseins in Rom.” In L'histoire littéraire immanente dans la poésie latine. , ed. Fondation Hardt Entretiens 47. Geneva: Hardt. 1–26Google Scholar
2006. “The Introduction of Epic in Rome: Cultural Thefts and Social Contests.” Arethusa 39: forthcomingCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selden, D. L. 1992. “Ceveat lector: Catullus and the Rhetoric of Performance.” In Innovations of Antiquity. and , eds. London: Routledge. 461–512Google Scholar
1999. Public Records and Archives in Classical Athens. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina PressGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, P. 1995. “Political Declensions in Latin Grammar and Oratory 55 BCE – CE 39.” In Roman Literature and Ideology. Ramus Essays for J. P. Sullivan. , ed. Bendigo, Aus.: Aureal. 92–109Google Scholar
Slater, N. 2004. “Staging Literacy in Plautus.” In , ed. Oral Performance and Its Context. Mnemosyne Supplementum 128. Leiden: Brill. 163–77Google Scholar
, ed. 1996. Roman Theater and Society. E. Togo Salmon Papers I. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. 2000. Dramatische Wäldchen. Festchrift für Eckard Lefèvre zum 65. Geburtstag. Spudasmata 80. Hildesheim: OlmsGoogle Scholar
Storey, I. C. 1993. “Notus est omnibus Eupolis?” In Tragedy, Comedy and the Polis. ., eds. Bari: Levanite. 373–96Google Scholar
1968. Untersuchungen zur Selbstdarstellung älterer römischer Dichter. Spudasmata 19. Hildesheim: OlmsGoogle Scholar
Suerbaum, W. 2000. “Naevius comicus. Der Komödiendichter Naevius in der neueren Forschung.” In Stärk and Vogt-Spira 2000. 301–20
ed. 2002. Handbuch der lateinischen Literatur der Antik: Erster Band. Die archaische Literatur. Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft, ⅶ.1. Munich: BeckGoogle Scholar
Suleiman, S. R. 1980. “Introduction: Varieties of Audience-Oriented Criticism.” In The Reader in the Text. Essays on Audience and Interpretation. and , eds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 3–45Google Scholar
1973. The Orators in Cicero's Brutus: Prosopography and Chronology. Phoenix Supplement 11. TorontoGoogle Scholar
1963. The Roman Censors: A Study on Social Structure. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae 117. HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
Swain, S. 2002. “Bilingualism in Cicero? The Evidence of Code-Switching.” In Adams et al. 2002. 128–67
1984. Catull. Eine Interpretation. Erster Teil. Die kleine Gedichte (1–60). Impulse der Forschung 46. DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
1937. “The Opportunities for Dramatic Performances in the Time of Plautus and Terence.” TAPA 68: 284–304Google Scholar
1982. “Catullus and the Polemics of Poetic Reference (Poem 64.1–18).” AJP 103: 144–64 (= Thomas 1999: 12–32)Google Scholar
1999. Reading Virgil and His Texts: Studies in Intertextuality. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
2001. Virgil and the Augustan Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. W. 1994. “Reading and Writing the Renaissance Commonplace Book: A Question of Authorship?” In The Construction of Authorship. and , eds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 401–15Google Scholar
1997. Catullus, edited with a textual and interpretative commentary. Phoenix Supplentary vol. 31. Toronto: Univ. Toronto PressGoogle Scholar
1978. “Il Carmen Priami.” In Contributi di filologia e di storia della lingua latina. Rome: Ateneo e Bizzari. 99–114Google Scholar
1973. “Fabius Pictor und die Anfänge der römischen Historiographie.” ANRW 1. 2: 928–69Google Scholar
1993. Representations. Images of the World in Ciceronian Oratory. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
1982. “L. Cincius Alimentus – His Place in Roman Historiography.” Philologus 126: 316–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt-Spira, G. 1998. “Der Vergleich von Dichtung und Malerei. Überlegungen zu einem antiken Topos.” In Multiplicatio et Variatio. Beiträge zur Kunst – Festgabe für Ernst Badstübner zum 65. Geburtstag. , ed. Berlin: LukasGoogle Scholar
Vogt-Spira, G. 2000. “Gellius, die römische Komödie und die Kategorie der Imitatio.” In Stärk and Vogt-Spira 2000. 683–98
Walbank, F. W. 1967. “The Scipionic Legend.” PCPS 13: 54–69 = Selected Papers. Cambridge 1985. 120–37
1936. Remains of Old Latin II: Livius, Naevius, Pacuvius, Accius. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
1967. Remains of Old Latin III: Lucilius, The Twelve Tables. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
1948. “Varro, Livy and Tertullian on the History of Roman Dramatic Art.” Vigiliae Christianae 2: 224–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1972. “Problems Concerning the Satura of Ennius.” Fondation Hardt Entretiens XVII: Ennius. Geneva: Hardt. 97–147Google Scholar
1866. Die Komodien des Plautus: Kritisch nach Inhalt und Form Beleuchtet zur Bestimmung des Echten und Unechten in den einzelnen Dichtungen. Quedlinburg: G. BasseGoogle Scholar
1978. “What is Literature?” In What is Literature?, ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 16–23Google Scholar
1934. Catullus and the Traditions of Ancient Poetry. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
1993. Promised Verse: Poets in the Society of Augustan Rome. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. 1995. “Libertino patre natus: True or False?” In Harrison et al. 1995. 296–313
1992. “Representations of the Book-Roll in Latin Poetry: Ovid, Tr. 1.1.3–14 and Related Texts.” Mnemosyne 45: 178–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. The Athenian Institution of the Khoregia: The Chorus, the City and the Stage. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Winniczuk, L. 1961. “Cicero on Actors and the Stage.” In Atti del I Congresso internazionale di studi ciceroniani, vol. 1. Rome. 213–22
1950. Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome During the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1987a. “Conspicui postes tectaque digna deo: The Public Image of Aristocratic and Imperial Houses in the Late Republic and Early Empire.” In L'Urbs: Espace urbain et histoire. Rome: École française de Rome. 393–413
Wiseman, T. P. 2002. “Ovid and the Stage.” In Ovid's Fasti. Historical Readings at its Bimillennium. , ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 275–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlosok, A. 1976. “Vergils Didotragödie. Ein Beitrag zum Problem des Tragischen in der Aeneis.” In Studien zum antiken Epos. and , eds. Meisenheim: Hain. 228–50Google Scholar
and , eds. 1984. Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
1974. Dancing in Chains: The Stylistic Unity of the Comoedia Palliata. Rome: American AcademyGoogle Scholar
2003. More Regio Vivere: Il Banchetto aristocratico e la casa romana di età arcaica. Quaderni de Eutopia 4. RomeGoogle Scholar
1988. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
1973. “Emendavi ad Tironem: Some Notes on Scholarship in the Second Century A.D.” HSCP 77: 227–43Google Scholar
1983b. “Re-creating the Canon: Augustan Poetry and the Alexandrian Past.” Critical Inquiry 10: 83–105Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2002. “Dreaming About Quirinus: Horace's Satires and the Development of Augustan Poetry.” In Woodman and Feeney 2002. 38–52
Zimmermann, B. 1995. “Pantomimische Elemente in den Komödien des Plautus.” In Benz et al. 1995. 193–204
Zimmermann, B. 2001. “Lucilius und Aristophanes.” In Manuwald 2001b. 188–95
Zorzetti, N. 1990b. “The Carmina Convivalia.” In Murray 1990. 289–307
1977. L' indipendenza di Lucilio. Università degli Studi di Parma. Instituto di lingua e letteratura latina 3. Florence: La Nuova ItaliaGoogle Scholar
2003. Bilingualism and the Latin Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Bilingualism in Ancient Society. Language Contact and the Written Text. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1985. Metaformations. Soundplay and Wordplay in Ovid and Other Classical Poets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
1999. Gestures and Acclamations in Ancient Rome. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
1990. Trials in the Late Roman Republic 149 B.C. to 50 B.C. Phoenix Supp. Vol. 26. Toronto: University of Toronto PressGoogle Scholar
2002. The Case for the Prosecution in the Ciceronian Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
1982. “Tradition Reshaped: Language and Style in Euripides' Medea 1–19, Ennius' Medea exul 1–9 and Catullus 64.1–30.” Ramus 11: 116–33Google Scholar
1970. “Phormio parasitus: A Study in Dramatic Methods of Characterisation.” G&R 17: 32–57Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 1995. “The Opening of Plautus' Curculio: Comic Business and Mime.” In L. Benz et al. 1995. 185–92
ed. 1996. Menander, vol. 2. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
1991. “Catullo e il folklore.” In Studi di filologia classica in onore di C. Monaco. Palermo. 723–35Google Scholar
Auhagen, U. 2000. “Monolog bei Ennius und Catull.” In E. Stärk and G.; Vogt-Spira, eds. 173–87
Augahen, U. 2001. “Lucilius und die Komödie.” In Manuwald 2001b. 9–23
, ed. 1960. M. Tulli Ciceronis Pro M. Caelio Oratio, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
ed. 1963. P. Vergili Maronisx Aeneidos Liber Quartus. Edited with a Commentary. Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
ed. 1964. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Secundus. With a Commentary. Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
ed. 1971. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Primus. With a Commentary. Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
1972. “Ennius and His Friends.” In Fondation Hardt Entretiens XVII: Ennius. Geneva: Hardt. 149–208Google Scholar
1997. Werk und Wirkung Varros im Spiegel seiner Zeitgenossen von Cicero bis Ovid. Hermes Einzelschriften 73. Stuttgart: SteinerGoogle Scholar
Baier, T. 2001. “Lucilius und die griechischen Wörter.” In Manuwald 2001b. 37–50
2000. “Self-Help and Social Status in Cicero's Pro Quinctio.” Ancient Society 30: 71–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1993. “L'Epos.” In Lo spazio letterario di Roman antica, vol. 1. ., eds. Rome: Salerno. 115–41Google Scholar
1997. The Poet and the Prince. Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2001. “Teaching Augustus through Allusion.” In Speaking Volumes. Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets. London: Duckworth. 79–103. [=MD 31 (1993) 149–84]
Barchiesi, A. 2002. “The Uniqueness of the Carmen Saeculare and Its Tradition.” In Woodman and Feeney 2002. 107–23
1967. The Crimen Maiestatis in the Roman Republic and Augustan Principate. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University PressGoogle Scholar
1999. Spectacle Entertainments of Early Imperial Rome. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
2001. “Homo Fandi Dulcissimus: The Role of Favorinus in the Attic Nights of Aulus Gellius.” AJP 122: 87–106Google Scholar
1971. The Profession of Dramatist in Shakespeare's Time, 1590–1642. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
., eds. 1995. Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels. Script Oralia; 75. Tübingen: Gunter NarrGoogle Scholar
2003. “Equester Ordo Tuus Est: Did Cicero Win His Cases Because of His Support for the Equites?” CQ 53: 222–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. Ludi publici. Untersuchungen zur Entstehung und Entwicklung der öffentlichen Spiele im republikanischen Rom. Historia Einzelschriften 119. Stuttgart: SteinerGoogle Scholar
1985. “La poesia romana arcaica ‘al lavoro’ (con una apologia della medesima).” MD 14: 13–43Google Scholar
1957. Accio ed i Gracchi. Contributo alla storia della plebe e della tragedia romana. Rome: SignorelliGoogle Scholar
Biville, F. 2002. “The Graeco-Romans and Graeco-Latin: A Terminological Framework for Cases of Bilingualism.” In Adams et al. 2002. 77–102
Blänsdorf, J. 1974. “Das Bild de Komödie in der späten Republik.” In Musa Iocosa. and , eds. Hildesheim: Olms. 141–57Google Scholar
Blänsdorf, J. 1978. “Die Organisation des Theaterwesens.” In Das römischen Drama. , ed. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. 112–25Google Scholar
ed. 1990. Theater und Gesellschaft im Imperium Romanum. Mainzer Forschungen zu Drama und Theater, Bd. 4. Tübingen: FranckeGoogle Scholar
1984. Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. R. Nice, tr. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
1990b. In Other Words. Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology. M. Adamson, tr. Cambridge, MA: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
1915. Public Libraries and Literary Culture in Ancient Rome. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Braun, M. 2000. “Moribus vivito antiquis! Bemerkungen zur Moral in Plautus' Trinummus.” In Braun et al. 2000
Braun, M. et al., eds. 2000. Moribus antiquis res stat Romana. Römische Werte und römische Literatur im 3. und 2. Jh. v. Chr. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 134. Leipzig
and , eds. 2003. Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome. Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman. Exeter: University of Exeter PressGoogle Scholar
Brink, C. O. 1963a. “Horace and Varro.” In Fondation Entretiens IX: Varron. , ed. Geneva: Hardt. 173–206Google Scholar
1963b. Horace on Poetry. Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
1982. Horace on Poetry, vol. 3. Epistles Book II. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Briquel, D. 1990. “Die Frage der etruskischen Herkunft des römischen Theaters bei den Schriftstellern Kaiserzeit.” In Blänsdorf 1990. 93–106
Brown, P. G. McC. 2002. “Actors and Actor-managers at Rome in the Time of Plautus and Terence.” In Easterling and Hall 2002. 225–37
1987. Lucretius on Love and Sex: A Commentary on De rerum natura IV, 1030–1287, with Prolegomena, Text and Translation. Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar
Callmer, C. 1944. “Antike Bibliotheken.” Opuscula Archaeologica 3. Skrifter Utgivna av Svenska Institutet i Rom 10. 145–93
1997. “Quaerenti plura legendum: On the Necessity of ‘Reading More’ in Ovid's Exile Poetry.” Ramus 26: 80–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, W. R. 1965. “Plautus and his Audience.” In Roman Drama. and , eds. London: Routledge. 21–50Google Scholar
1979. Sklaven und Freigelassene als Grammatiker und Philologen im antiken Rom. Forschungen zur antiken Sklaverei, 10. Wiesbaden: SteinerGoogle Scholar
1998. “Lucilius senex – vetus historia – Epilog zu XXVI–XXX: drei alte Fragen neu verhandelt.” Philologus 142: 71–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. “Catullus 64 and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius: Allusion and Exemplarity.” PCPS 42: 60–88Google Scholar
1991. The Houses of Roman Italy, 100 B.C.–A.D. 250. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
1979. “A New Virgilian Writing Exercise from Oxyrhynchus.” Scriturra e civilità 3: 55–75Google Scholar
1994b. Latin Literature. A History. Tr. J. B. Solodow. Rev. D. Fowler and G. W. Most. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
Conte, G. B. and A. Barchiesi. 1993. “Imitazione e arte allusiva.” In Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica, vol. 1. 2 ed. ., eds. Rome: Salerno. 81–114Google Scholar
1956. Exclusus Amator. A Study in Latin Love Poetry. American Philological Association Philological Monographs 17. Baltimore: APAGoogle Scholar
1996. Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Cornell, T. J. 1986. “The Value of the Literary Tradition Concerning Archaic Rome.” In Social Struggles in Archaic Rome. , ed. Berkeley: University of California Press. 52–76Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. 1991. “The Tyranny of the Evidence: A Discussion of the Possible Uses of Literacy in Etruria and Latium in the Archaic Age.” In Literacy in the Roman World. , ed. JRA Supplementary Series No. 3. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 7–33Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. 2003. “Coriolanus: Myth, History and Performance.” In Braund and Gill 2003. 73–97
2000. Sulla preistoria della tradizione poetica italica. Accademia Toscana di Scienze e Lettere 184. Florence: OlschkiGoogle Scholar
1911. Retractatio in the Ambrosian and Palatine Recensions of Plautus. Bryn Mawr College Monographs, vol. 10. Bryn Mawr, PAGoogle Scholar
1995. Musa Lapidaria. A Selection of Latin Verse Inscriptions. American Classical Studies 36. Atlanta: Scholars PressGoogle Scholar
1982. Terence, Bembine Phormio: A Palaeological Examination. Chicago: Bolchazy-CarducciGoogle Scholar
1993. Form as Argument in Cicero's Speeches: A Study of Dilemma. Atlanta: Scholars PressGoogle Scholar
and . 1995. The Context of Ancient Drama. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1981. “Stanley Fish and the Righting of the Reader.” In The Pursuit of Signs. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 119–31Google Scholar
1953. European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages, W. R. Trask, tr. New York: PantheonGoogle Scholar
1963. “Zu Varros Literaturforschung, besonders in ‘De poetis.’” In Fondation Hardt Entretiens IX: Varron. Geneva: Hardt. 3–31Google Scholar
1955. “C. Asinius Pollio and the Early History of Public Recitation at Rome.” Hermathena 86: 20–28Google Scholar
Dangel, J. 1990b. “Sénèque et Accius: continuité et rupture.” In Blänsdorf 1990. 107–22
and . 1984. A Modern Archive Reader. Washington, D.C.: National Archives Trust Fund BoardGoogle Scholar
1984. “Il problema della origine della poesia latina nel Brutus di Cicerone.” Ciceroniana 5: 81–90Google Scholar
1998. “La menzione di Lucrezio nell' epistola Ad Quintum Fratrem 2.10.” Ciceroniana 10: 55–68Google Scholar
1998. Scribes and Schools. The Canonization of the Hebrew Scriptures. Louisville, KY: Westminster John KnoxGoogle Scholar
1999a. “‘Since My Part Has Been Well Played’: Conflicting Evaluations of Augustus.” Ramus 28: 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1980. Studi su Accio. Quaderni dell'Istituto di filologia classica “Giorgio Pasquali” dell' Università degli Studi di Firenze, 1. Florence: Editrice universitariaGoogle Scholar
2002. Textgeschichte und Rezeption der plautinischen Komödien im Altertum. Berlin: de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillery, J. 2002. “Quintus Fabius Pictor and Greco-Roman Historiography at Rome.” In Miller et al. 2002. 1–23
1965. Pagan and Christian in an Age of Anxiety. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1932. Plautinische Akzentstudien, vol. 2. Abhandlungen der schlesischen Gesellschaft für vaterländische Cultur 7. Breslau: MarcusGoogle Scholar
Ducos, M. 1990. “La condition des acteurs à Rome. Données juridiques et sociales.” In Blänsdorf 1990. 19–33
DuQuesnay, I. 1984. “Horace and Maecenas: The Propaganda Value of Sermones I.” In Woodman and West 1984. 19–58
, ed. 1996. A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
, 2003. “Evidence and Rhetoric in Cicero's Pro Roscio Amerino: The Case Against Sex. Roscius.” CQ 53: 235–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterling, P. E. 1997. “From Repertoire to Canon.” In The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy. , ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 211–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. 2002. Greek and Roman Actors. Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Eder, W. 1986. “The Political Significance of the Codification of Law in Archaic Societies: An Unconventional Hypothesis.” In Raaflaub 1986. 262–300
2001. Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
1996. Writing Rome. Textual Approaches to the City. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Eigler, U. 2000. “Cicero und die römische Tragödie. Eine Strategie zur Legitimation philosophischer Literatur im philosophischen Spätwerk Ciceros.” In Stärk and Vogt-Spira 2000. 619–36
Eigler, U. et al. 2003. Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius. Darmstadt
2002. “Shakespeare and the Publication of his Plays.” Shakespeare Quarterly 53: 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1972. Comparative Studies in Republican Latin Imagery. Toronto: University of Toronto PressGoogle Scholar
1982. “Quintilian on Performance: Traditional and Personal Elements in Institutio 11.3.” Phoenix 36: 243–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1984. “Roman Experience of Menander in the Late Republic and Early Empire.” TAPA 114: 299–309Google Scholar
1996. Roman Literary Culture from Cicero to Apuleius. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. 2002. “Orator and/et actor.” In Easterling and Hall 2002. 362–76
Fantham, E. 2003. “Pacuvius. Melodrama, Reversals and Recognitions.” In Braund and Gill 2003. 98–118
Feeney, D.C. 1992. “Si licet et fas est: Ovid's Fasti and the Problem of Free Speech under the Principate.” In Powell 1992. 1–25
Feeney, D.C. 2002. “VNA CUM SCRIPTORE MEO: Poetry, Principate and the Traditions of Literary History in the Epistle to Augustus.” In Woodman and Feeney 2002. 172–87
1998. Spectacle and Society in Livy's History. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Fineman, J. 1989. “The History of the Anecdote: Fiction and Fiction.” In H. A. Veeser, ed. The New Historicism. London: Routledge. 49–76
1989. “Change.” In Doing What Comes Naturally. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 141–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, N. 2000. “Symposiasts, Fish-Eaters and Flatterers: Social Mobility and Moral Concerns.” In Harvey and Wilkins 2000. 355–96
Fiske, G. C. 1920. Lucilius and Horace. A Study in the Classical Theory of Imitation. University of Wisconsin Studies in Language and Literature 7. Madison
1995. Catullan Provocations. Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Flaig, E. 1995. “Entscheidung und Konsens. Zu den Feldern der politischen Kommunikation zwischen Aristokratie und Plebs.” In Demokratie in Rom? Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der römischen Republik. Historia Einzelschriften 96. Stuttgart. 77–127
1995. “Fabulae Praetextae in Context: When were plays on contemporary subjects performed in Rome?” CQ 45: 170–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, H. 2000. “Fabula de Bacchanalibus: The Bacchanalian Cult of the Second Century B.C. and Roman Drama.” In Manuwald 2000. 23–35
, ed. The Homeric Hymn to Demeter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
2002. The Origins of Criticism. Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. 1979. “What is an Author?” In Textual Strategies. Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism. , ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 141–60Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. 1995. “Horace and the Aesthetics of Politics.” In Harrison 1995. 248–66
1997. “On the Shoulders of Giants: Intertextuality and Classical Studies.” MD 39: 13–34Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. 1961. “Two Poems of Catullus.” JRS 51: 46–53 = Kleine Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie, II. Storia e Letteratura n. 96. Rome, 1964. 115–29
1993. The Walking Muse. Horace on the Theory of Satire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
2001. Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1973. “Die Bildgeschichte der Flucht des Aeneas.” ANRW 1.4: 615–32 (text), 47–58 (plates)Google Scholar
1996. Augustan Culture. An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, K. 2003. “Greek and Roman Drama and the Aeneid.” In Braund and Gill 2003. 275–94
Garbarino, G. 1973. Roma e la filosofia greca della origini all fine del II secolo a. C. 2 vols. Turin
1990. “The Master's Pieces: On Canon Formation and the African American Tradition.” So. Atlantic Quarterly 89: 89–112Google Scholar
Gigon, O. 1978. “Lukrez und Ennius.” In Fondation Hardt Entretiens XXIV: Lucrèce. Vandoeuvres-Geneva. 167–96
Gildenhard, I. 2003. “The ‘Annalist’ before the Annalists: Ennius and His Annales.” In Eigler et al. 2003. 93–114
Goldberg, S. M. 2000. “Cicero and the Work of Tragedy.” In Manuwald 2000. 49–59
Goldberg, S. M. 2004. “Plautus and his Alternatives: Textual Doublets in Cistellaria.” In Studien zu Plautus' Cistellaria. and , eds. Tübingen: Naar. 385–98Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1990. “The Great Dionysia and Civic Ideology.” In Nothing to Do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in its Social Context. and , eds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 97–129Google Scholar
1999. “Literary History Without Literature: Reading Practices in the Ancient World.” SubStance 88: 57–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goody, J. 1977. “What's in a List?” In The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 74–111
Gotter, U. 2003. “Die Vergangenheit als Kampfplatz der Gegenwart. Catos (konter)revolutionäre Konstruktion des republikanischen Erinnerungsraums.” In U. Eigler et al. 2003. 115–34
Gratwick, A. S. 1982. “Lucilius.” In The Cambridge History of Classical Literature II: Latin Literature. and , eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 162–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993a. [rev. of Zwierlein 1990]. CR 43: 36–40
Griffin, J. 1984. “Augustus and the Poets: ‘Caesar qui cogere posset.’” In Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects. and , eds. Oxford: Clarendon. 189–218Google Scholar
1968. Roman Politics and the Criminal Courts, 149–78 B.C.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1984. The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome. 2 vols. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
1993. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. 1993. The Iliad: A Commentary. Vol. III: Books 9–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. “Cicero to Lucceius (Fam. 5.12) in Its Social Context: Valde Bella?” CP 93: 308–21Google Scholar
Hallo, W. W. 1991. “The Concept of Canonicity in Cuneiform and Biblical Literature: A Comparative Approach.” In The Biblical Canon in Comparative Perspective. Scripture in Context IV. Ancient Near Eastern Texts and Studies, vol. 11. eds. Lewiston, ME: Mellen. 1–19Google Scholar
Hanson, J. A. 1965. “The Glorious Military.” In Roman Drama. and , eds. London: Routledge. 51–85Google Scholar
Hardie, P. 1997. “Virgil and Tragedy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. , ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 312–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. 2000. The Rivals of Aristophanes. Studies in Athenian Old Comedy. London: DuckworthGoogle Scholar
1981. “Historical Allusions in Plautus and the Date of the Amphitruo.” Athenaeum 59: 480–89Google Scholar
1993. (1915) Virgil's Epic Technique. Tr. Hazel and David Harvey and Fred Robertson. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L. 1999. “Sophocles at Rome.” In Sophocles Revisited. Essays Presented to Sir Hugh Lloyd-Jones. , ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 219–59Google Scholar
Hopkins, K. 1991. “Conquest by Book.” In Literacy in the Roman World. Journal of Roman Archaeology, Supplementary Series No. 3. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 133–58
Horsfall, N. 1993a. “Roma.” In Lo Spazio letterario della Grecia antica. , ed. Rome: Salerno. 791–822Google Scholar
ed. 1995. A Companion to the Study of Virgil. Mnemosyne Supplementum 151. Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, M. 1995. “Pindarici fontis qui non expallavit haustus: Horace, Epistles 1.3.” In Harrison 1995. 219–27
1982. “Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory.” In Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. T. Bahti, tr. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 3–45, 191–201Google Scholar
Jenkinson, H. 1984. “Reflections of an Archivist.” In Daniels and Walch 1984. 15–21 [=Contemporary Review 165 (1944) 355–61]
1964. “Ancient Scholarship and Virgil's Use of Republican Latin Poetry I.” CQ 58: 280–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1965. “Ancient Scholarship and Virgil's Use of Republican Latin Poetry II.” CQ 59: 126–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. 1995. “Horace and the Reputation of Plautus in the Late First Century B.C.” In Harrison 1995. 228–47
Jocelyn, H. D. 1999. “Code-Switching in the Comoedia Palliata.” In Rezeption und Identität. Die kulturelle Auseinandersetzung Roms mit Griechenland als europäisches Paradigma. and , eds. Stuttgart: Steiner. 169–95Google Scholar
1981. “The Literary Evidence for the Beginnings of Imperial Pantomime.” BICS 28: 147–61Google Scholar
Jory, E. J. 1996. “The Drama of the Dance: Prolegomena to an Iconography of Imperial Pantomime.” In Slater 1996. 1–27
Kaimio, J. 1979. The Romans and the Greek Language. Societas Scientiarum Fennica. Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 64. Helsinki
1980. “Macrobius and Servius: Verecundia and the Grammarian's Function.” HSCP 84: 219–62Google Scholar
1988. Guardians of Language: The Grammarian and Society in Late Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
2000. Engendering Rome. Women in Latin Epic. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1972. The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Kenney, E. J. 1970. “Doctus Lucretius.” Mnemosyne 4: 366–92. rpt. with bibliographic addenda in C. J. Classen, ed. Probleme der Lukrezforschung. Hildesheim: Olms, 1986. 237–65
and , eds. 1982. The Cambridge History of Classical Literature II: Latin Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1980. “Catos ‘Origines’ und die Anfänge der römischen Geschichtsschreibung.” Chiron 10: 205–24Google Scholar
1986. The Poetry of Friendship. Horace, Epistles I. Edmonton: University of Alberta PressGoogle Scholar
1967. “The Dates of the Pro Roscio Amerino and Pro Quinctio.” Mnemosyne 20: 61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klose, D. 1966. Die Didaskalien und Prologe des Terenz. Diss. Freiburg i. Br. Bamberg
Kokolakis, M. 1959. Pantomimus and the Treatise peri orcheseos. Athens
2002. “Historical Drama in Ancient Rome: Republican Flourishing and Imperial Decline?” SO 77: 5–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001. Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Ladewig, T. 2001. “Ueber den Kanon des Volcatius Sedigitus.” Reprinted from Schulprogramm Neustrelitz 1842 in and , eds. Theodor Ladewig, Schriften zum römischen Drama republikanischer Zeit. Munich: Saur. 25–67Google Scholar
1971. “Horace's Pater Optimus and Terence's Demea: Autobiographical Fiction and Comedy in Sermo I, 4.” AJP 92: 616–32Google Scholar
1999. “Ciceronian ‘Bi-Marcus’: Correspondence with M. Terentius Varro and L. Papirius Paetus in 46 B.C.E.” TAPA 129: 139–79Google Scholar
Lebek, W. D. 1996. “Moneymaking on the Roman Stage.” In Slater 1996. 29–48
1978. Der Phormio des Terenz und der Epidikazomenos des Apollodor von Karystos. Zetemata 74. Munich: BeckGoogle Scholar
, ed. 1969. A Commentary on Cicero's Oration De haruspicum responso. The Hague: MoutonGoogle Scholar
Leonard, W. L. 1942. “Lucretius: The Man, the Poet, and the Times.” In T. Lucreti Cari. De rerum natura libri sex. and , eds. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. 3–91Google Scholar
1962. Laocoön. An Essay on the Limits of Painting and Poetry. Tr. with an introduction and notes by E. A. McCormick. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, J. 1988. “The Script in the Marketplace.” In Representing the English Renaissance. , ed. Berkeley: University of California Press. 265–78Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. 2002. “Horace, Cicero and Augustus, or the Poet Statesman at Epistles 2.1.256.” In Woodman and Feeney 2002. 158–71
Ludwig, W. 1973. “Von Terenz zu Menander.” In Die römische Komödie: Plautus und Terenz. E. Lefèvre, ed. Darmstadt. 354–408 = Philologus 103 (1959) 1–38 with addenda
Lugli, G. 1959. “Commento topografico all' Elegia I del III libro dei Tristia.” In Atti del Convegno internazionale ovidiano, 2 vols. Rome. 2.397–403
Mackie, N. 1992. “Ovid and the Birth of Maiestas.” In Powell 1992. 83–97
Maguinness, W. S. 1965. “The Language of Lucretius.” In Lucretius. , ed. London: Routledge. 69–93Google Scholar
2001. Fabulae praetextae. Spuren einer literarischen Gattung der Römer. Zetemata 108. Munich: BeckGoogle Scholar
2003. Pacuvius. Summus tragicus poeta. Zum dramatischen Profil seiner Tragödien. Munich: SaurCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masten, J. A. 1994. “Beaumont and/or Fletcher: Collaboration and the Interpretation of Renaissance Drama.” In The Construction of Authorship. and , eds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 361–81Google Scholar
Mattingly, H. B. 1993. “L. Porcius Licinus and the Beginning of Latin Poetry.” In Tria Lustra: Essays and Notes Presented to John Pinsent. Liverpool Classical Papers 3. and , eds. Liverpool. 163–68Google Scholar
1988. Trials of Character: The Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. Slaves, Masters and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
McFadden, G. 1978. “‘Literature’: A Many-Sided Process.” In What is Literature?, ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 49–61Google Scholar
McKeown, J. C. 1984. “Fabula proposito nulla tegenda meo. Ovid's Fasti and Augustan Politics.” In Woodman and West 1984. 169–87
ed. 1987. Ovid: Amores. Text, Prolegomena and Commentary. Vol. 1. Text and Prolegomena. ARCA 20. Liverpool: Francis CairnsGoogle Scholar
1918. Parallelisms and Coincidences in Lucretius and Ennius. University of California Publications in Classical Philology, vol. 3. BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. F. 2002. “Ovid on the Augustan Palatine (Tristia 3.1).” In Miller et al. 2002. 129–39
1957. “Perizonius, Niebuhr and the Character of Early Roman Tradition.” JRS 47: 104–14Google Scholar
1990. The Classical Foundations of Modern Historiography. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
1998. The Theater of Plautus. Playing to the Audience. Austin: University of Texas PressGoogle Scholar
1998. Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
1968. Inscriptiones graecae urbis Romae, fasc. 1. Rome: Istituto italiano per la storia anticaGoogle Scholar
1909. “An Interpretation of Catullus VII.” Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts and Sciences 15: 139–51Google Scholar
1998. “Cicero's First Readers: Epistolary Evidence for the Dissemination of his Works.” CQ 48: 492–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, G. 1998. “The Library of Pergamon as a Classical Model.” In Pergamon. Citadel of the Gods. , ed. Harvard Theological Studies 46. Cambridge, MA. 185–232Google Scholar
Narducci, E. 1993. “Le risonanze del potere.” In Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica, vol. 2, 2nd ed. ., eds. Rome: Salerno. 533–77Google Scholar
2001. Vergils' Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius. Leeds: Francis CairnsGoogle Scholar
1990. Die attische Mittlere Komödie. Ihre Stellung in der antiken Literaturkritik und Literaturgeschichte. Berlin: de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. 2000. “Eupolis and the Periodization of Athenian Comedy.” In Harvey and Wilkins 2000. 233–46
1990. Roman Catullus and the Modification of the Alexandrian Sensibility. Berlin: WeidmannGoogle Scholar
1980. The World of the Citizen in Republican Rome. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Niebuhr, B. G. 1848. Vorträge über römische Geschichte, an der Universität zu Bonn gehalten. , ed. Berlin: ReimerGoogle Scholar
1983. Untimely Meditations. Tr. R. J. Hollingdale. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. 1995. “The Survivors: Old-Style Literary Men in the Triumviral Period.” In Collected Papers on Latin Literature. , ed. Oxford: Clarendon. 390–413Google Scholar
Nugent, S. G. 1990. “Tristia 2: Ovid and Augustus.” In Raaflaub and Toher 1990. 239–57
Oberhelman, S. and D. Armstrong. 1995. “Satire as Poetry and the Impossibility of Metathesis in Horace's Satires.” In Philodemus and Poetry. Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. , ed. New York: Oxford University Press. 233–54Google Scholar
1998. Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orgel, S. 1991. “What Is a Text?” In Staging the Renaissance. and , eds. London: Routledge. 83–87Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, N. 1997. “Caecilius, ‘Canons’ and the Origins of Atticism.” In Roman Eloquence. , ed. London: Routledge. 32–49Google Scholar
1951. “Arte allusiva.” In Stravaganze quarte e supreme. Collezione di varia critica, vol. 5. Venice: Pɪozza. 11–20. (frequently reprinted)Google Scholar
Patterson, L. 1990. “Literary History.” In Critical Terms for Literary Study, 2nd ed. and , eds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 250–62Google Scholar
, ed. 1935. Publi Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
1955. M. Tulli Ciceronis De natura deorum, Liber primus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
1998. Civiltà greca nel Lazio preromano. Accademia Toscana di Scienze e Lettere 165. Florence: OlschkiGoogle Scholar
Petaccia, M. R. 2000. “Der Orestes-Mythos in der lateinischen archaischen Tragödie und im politisch-religiösen Zusammenhang der römischen Republik.” In Manuwald 2000. 87–111
Petersmann, H. 1999. “The Language of Early Roman Satire: Its Function and Characteristics.” In Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry. and , eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 289–310Google Scholar
Pickard-Cambridge, A. W. 1968. The Dramatic Festivals of Athens. 2nd ed. and . Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
1959. Il problema del testo e della composizione del De rerum natura di Lucrezio. Rome: Edizioni dell' AteneoGoogle Scholar
1989. “Réflexions sur l' écrit et l' écriture dans la Rome des premières siècles.” Latomus 48: 285–311Google Scholar
, ed. 1992. Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. London: Bristol Classical PressGoogle Scholar
1999. “Circulating Representations: New Historicism and the Poetics of Culture.” SubStance 88: 90–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1916. Studies in the Diction of the Sermo Amatorius in Roman Comedy. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Pugh, M. J. 1984. “The Allusion of Omniscience: Subject Access and the Reference Archivist.” In Daniels and Walch 1984. 264–77 [=The American Archivist 45 (1982) 33–44]
2000. Horace's Carmen Saeculare. Ritual Magic and the Poet's Art. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
and . 1990. “Dalla rappresentazione alla lettura.” Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica, vol. 3. Rome: Salerno. 139–215Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. 1986. “The Conflict of the Orders in Archaic Rome: A Comprehensive and Comparative Approach.” In Raaflaub 1986. 1–51
Raaflaub, K. A and L. J. Samons II. 1990. “Opposition to Augustus.” In Raaflaub and Toher 1990. 417–54
and , eds. 1990. Between Republic and Empire. Interpretations of Augustus and His Principate. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
1973. Urbanitas. Ancient Sophistication and Refinement. Norman: University of Oklahoma PressGoogle Scholar
Rathje, A. 1990. “The Adoption of the Homeric Banquet in Central Italy in the Orientalizing Period.” In Murray 1990. 279–86
1985. Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
Reichel, M. 2000. “Überlegungen zur Echtheitskritik der plautischen Komödien am Beispiel der Asinaria.” In Stärk and Vogt-Spira 2000. 375–96
and . 1991. Scribes and Scholars. A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Riposati, B., ed. 1939. M. Terenti Varronis De vita populi Romani. Pubblicazioni dell' Università cattolica del S. Cuore, ser. 4. vol. 38. Milan
1902. Roman Private Law in the Times of Cicero and of the Antonines. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
1969. Style and Tradition in Catullus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. The Making of the English Literary Canon from the Middle Ages to the Late Eighteenth Century. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University PressGoogle Scholar
ed. 1989. Horace, Epistles Book II and Epistle to the Pisones (“Ars Poetica”). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
2003. “Beyond Satire: Horace, Popular Invective and the Segregation of Literature.” JRS 93: 35–65Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. 2000. ‘Räume literarischer Kommunikation in der Formierungsphase römischer Literatur.’ In Braun et al. 2000. 31–52
Rüpke, J. 2001. “Kulturtransfer als Rekodierung: Zum literaturgeschichtlichen und sozialen Ort der frühen römischen Epik.” In Von Göttern und Menschen erzählen. Formkonstanzen und Funktionswandel moderner Epik. , ed. Stuttgart: Steiner. 42–64Google Scholar
Sarna, N. M. 1971. “The Order of the Books.” In Studies in Jewish Bibliography, History and Literature in Honor of I. Edward Kiev. , ed. New York: Ktav. 407–13Google Scholar
and . 1927. Geschichte der römischen Literatur. Erster Teil: Die römische Literatur in der Zeit der Republik, 4th ed. Munich: BeckGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, E. A. 1987. “Historische Typologie der Orientierungsfunktionen von Kanon in der griechischen und römischen Literatur.” In Kanon und Zensur. Beiträge zur Archäologie der literarsichen Kommunikation II. and , eds. Munich: Fink. 246–58Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. L. 1975. “Die Anfänge der institutionellen Rhetorik in Rom.” In Monumentum Chiloniense. Festschrift für Erich Burck. , ed. Amsterdam: Hakkert. 183–216Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. L. 1989. “Postquam ludus in artem paulatim verterat. Varro und die Frühgeschichte des römischen Theaters.” In Studien zur vorliterarischen Periode im frühen Rom. , ed. ScriptOralia 12. Tübingen: Narr. 77–133Google Scholar
Scholz, U. W. 2000. “Die sermones des Lucilius.” In Braun 2000. 217–34
1970. Horror ac Divina Voluptas. Études sur la poétique et la poésie de Lucrèce. Amsterdam: HakkertGoogle Scholar
2000. Prolegomena zu einer “Phänomenologie” der römischen Literaturgeschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Quintilian. Hypomnemata 130. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & RuprechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt, J. P. 2001. “Literaturgeschichtesschreibung und immanente Literaturgeschichte. Bausteine literarhistorischen Bewusstseins in Rom.” In L'histoire littéraire immanente dans la poésie latine. , ed. Fondation Hardt Entretiens 47. Geneva: Hardt. 1–26Google Scholar
2006. “The Introduction of Epic in Rome: Cultural Thefts and Social Contests.” Arethusa 39: forthcomingCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selden, D. L. 1992. “Ceveat lector: Catullus and the Rhetoric of Performance.” In Innovations of Antiquity. and , eds. London: Routledge. 461–512Google Scholar
1999. Public Records and Archives in Classical Athens. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina PressGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, P. 1995. “Political Declensions in Latin Grammar and Oratory 55 BCE – CE 39.” In Roman Literature and Ideology. Ramus Essays for J. P. Sullivan. , ed. Bendigo, Aus.: Aureal. 92–109Google Scholar
Slater, N. 2004. “Staging Literacy in Plautus.” In , ed. Oral Performance and Its Context. Mnemosyne Supplementum 128. Leiden: Brill. 163–77Google Scholar
, ed. 1996. Roman Theater and Society. E. Togo Salmon Papers I. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. 2000. Dramatische Wäldchen. Festchrift für Eckard Lefèvre zum 65. Geburtstag. Spudasmata 80. Hildesheim: OlmsGoogle Scholar
Storey, I. C. 1993. “Notus est omnibus Eupolis?” In Tragedy, Comedy and the Polis. ., eds. Bari: Levanite. 373–96Google Scholar
1968. Untersuchungen zur Selbstdarstellung älterer römischer Dichter. Spudasmata 19. Hildesheim: OlmsGoogle Scholar
Suerbaum, W. 2000. “Naevius comicus. Der Komödiendichter Naevius in der neueren Forschung.” In Stärk and Vogt-Spira 2000. 301–20
ed. 2002. Handbuch der lateinischen Literatur der Antik: Erster Band. Die archaische Literatur. Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft, ⅶ.1. Munich: BeckGoogle Scholar
Suleiman, S. R. 1980. “Introduction: Varieties of Audience-Oriented Criticism.” In The Reader in the Text. Essays on Audience and Interpretation. and , eds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 3–45Google Scholar
1973. The Orators in Cicero's Brutus: Prosopography and Chronology. Phoenix Supplement 11. TorontoGoogle Scholar
1963. The Roman Censors: A Study on Social Structure. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae 117. HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
Swain, S. 2002. “Bilingualism in Cicero? The Evidence of Code-Switching.” In Adams et al. 2002. 128–67
1984. Catull. Eine Interpretation. Erster Teil. Die kleine Gedichte (1–60). Impulse der Forschung 46. DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
1937. “The Opportunities for Dramatic Performances in the Time of Plautus and Terence.” TAPA 68: 284–304Google Scholar
1982. “Catullus and the Polemics of Poetic Reference (Poem 64.1–18).” AJP 103: 144–64 (= Thomas 1999: 12–32)Google Scholar
1999. Reading Virgil and His Texts: Studies in Intertextuality. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
2001. Virgil and the Augustan Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. W. 1994. “Reading and Writing the Renaissance Commonplace Book: A Question of Authorship?” In The Construction of Authorship. and , eds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 401–15Google Scholar
1997. Catullus, edited with a textual and interpretative commentary. Phoenix Supplentary vol. 31. Toronto: Univ. Toronto PressGoogle Scholar
1978. “Il Carmen Priami.” In Contributi di filologia e di storia della lingua latina. Rome: Ateneo e Bizzari. 99–114Google Scholar
1973. “Fabius Pictor und die Anfänge der römischen Historiographie.” ANRW 1. 2: 928–69Google Scholar
1993. Representations. Images of the World in Ciceronian Oratory. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
1982. “L. Cincius Alimentus – His Place in Roman Historiography.” Philologus 126: 316–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt-Spira, G. 1998. “Der Vergleich von Dichtung und Malerei. Überlegungen zu einem antiken Topos.” In Multiplicatio et Variatio. Beiträge zur Kunst – Festgabe für Ernst Badstübner zum 65. Geburtstag. , ed. Berlin: LukasGoogle Scholar
Vogt-Spira, G. 2000. “Gellius, die römische Komödie und die Kategorie der Imitatio.” In Stärk and Vogt-Spira 2000. 683–98
Walbank, F. W. 1967. “The Scipionic Legend.” PCPS 13: 54–69 = Selected Papers. Cambridge 1985. 120–37
1936. Remains of Old Latin II: Livius, Naevius, Pacuvius, Accius. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
1967. Remains of Old Latin III: Lucilius, The Twelve Tables. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
1948. “Varro, Livy and Tertullian on the History of Roman Dramatic Art.” Vigiliae Christianae 2: 224–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1972. “Problems Concerning the Satura of Ennius.” Fondation Hardt Entretiens XVII: Ennius. Geneva: Hardt. 97–147Google Scholar
1866. Die Komodien des Plautus: Kritisch nach Inhalt und Form Beleuchtet zur Bestimmung des Echten und Unechten in den einzelnen Dichtungen. Quedlinburg: G. BasseGoogle Scholar
1978. “What is Literature?” In What is Literature?, ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 16–23Google Scholar
1934. Catullus and the Traditions of Ancient Poetry. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
1993. Promised Verse: Poets in the Society of Augustan Rome. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. 1995. “Libertino patre natus: True or False?” In Harrison et al. 1995. 296–313
1992. “Representations of the Book-Roll in Latin Poetry: Ovid, Tr. 1.1.3–14 and Related Texts.” Mnemosyne 45: 178–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. The Athenian Institution of the Khoregia: The Chorus, the City and the Stage. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Winniczuk, L. 1961. “Cicero on Actors and the Stage.” In Atti del I Congresso internazionale di studi ciceroniani, vol. 1. Rome. 213–22
1950. Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome During the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1987a. “Conspicui postes tectaque digna deo: The Public Image of Aristocratic and Imperial Houses in the Late Republic and Early Empire.” In L'Urbs: Espace urbain et histoire. Rome: École française de Rome. 393–413
Wiseman, T. P. 2002. “Ovid and the Stage.” In Ovid's Fasti. Historical Readings at its Bimillennium. , ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 275–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlosok, A. 1976. “Vergils Didotragödie. Ein Beitrag zum Problem des Tragischen in der Aeneis.” In Studien zum antiken Epos. and , eds. Meisenheim: Hain. 228–50Google Scholar
and , eds. 1984. Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
1974. Dancing in Chains: The Stylistic Unity of the Comoedia Palliata. Rome: American AcademyGoogle Scholar
2003. More Regio Vivere: Il Banchetto aristocratico e la casa romana di età arcaica. Quaderni de Eutopia 4. RomeGoogle Scholar
1988. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
1973. “Emendavi ad Tironem: Some Notes on Scholarship in the Second Century A.D.” HSCP 77: 227–43Google Scholar
1983b. “Re-creating the Canon: Augustan Poetry and the Alexandrian Past.” Critical Inquiry 10: 83–105Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2002. “Dreaming About Quirinus: Horace's Satires and the Development of Augustan Poetry.” In Woodman and Feeney 2002. 38–52
Zimmermann, B. 1995. “Pantomimische Elemente in den Komödien des Plautus.” In Benz et al. 1995. 193–204
Zimmermann, B. 2001. “Lucilius und Aristophanes.” In Manuwald 2001b. 188–95
Zorzetti, N. 1990b. “The Carmina Convivalia.” In Murray 1990. 289–307
1977. L' indipendenza di Lucilio. Università degli Studi di Parma. Instituto di lingua e letteratura latina 3. Florence: La Nuova ItaliaGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.