Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- PART I INTRODUCTION AND PERSPECTIVE
- PART II OVERVIEW OF APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF EXPERTISE – BRIEF HISTORICAL ACCOUNTS OF THEORIES AND METHODS
- PART III METHODS FOR STUDYING THE STRUCTURE OF EXPERTISE
- PART IV METHODS FOR STUDYING THE ACQUISITION AND MAINTENANCE OF EXPERTISE
- 15 Laboratory Studies of Training, Skill Acquisition, and Retention of Performance
- 16 Retrospective Interviews in the Study of Expertise and Expert Performance
- 17 Time Budgets, Diaries, and Analyses of Concurrent Practice Activities
- 18 Historiometric Methods
- PART V DOMAINS OF EXPERTISE
- PART VI GENERALIZABLE MECHANISMS MEDIATING EXPERTISE AND GENERAL ISSUES
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core
16 - Retrospective Interviews in the Study of Expertise and Expert Performance
from PART IV - METHODS FOR STUDYING THE ACQUISITION AND MAINTENANCE OF EXPERTISE
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- PART I INTRODUCTION AND PERSPECTIVE
- PART II OVERVIEW OF APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF EXPERTISE – BRIEF HISTORICAL ACCOUNTS OF THEORIES AND METHODS
- PART III METHODS FOR STUDYING THE STRUCTURE OF EXPERTISE
- PART IV METHODS FOR STUDYING THE ACQUISITION AND MAINTENANCE OF EXPERTISE
- 15 Laboratory Studies of Training, Skill Acquisition, and Retention of Performance
- 16 Retrospective Interviews in the Study of Expertise and Expert Performance
- 17 Time Budgets, Diaries, and Analyses of Concurrent Practice Activities
- 18 Historiometric Methods
- PART V DOMAINS OF EXPERTISE
- PART VI GENERALIZABLE MECHANISMS MEDIATING EXPERTISE AND GENERAL ISSUES
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
“If we want to know how people become extraordinary adults, we can start with some of the latter … and then try to find out how they came to do it” (Gruber, 1982, p. 15). That is the premise for retrospective interviews in the study of expertise and expert performance.
As this Handbook makes quite clear, there is a large body of work that coalesces around what Gruber (1986), again, calls “an interest in … human beings … at their best” (p. 248). Only a very small portion of that work uses the method of retrospective interview. But findings from retrospective interview studies have been important in their own right and of significant use to others studying expert performance in other ways. My task in this chapter is to speak about studies using retrospective interviews, to highlight what we have learned from them, to note their strengths and limitations, and to consider where we might head next both in this tradition and as a result of work from this tradition.
In some respects I am well qualified to tackle this task. I served as research coordinator for the Development of Talent Project (Bloom, 1985), work directed by Benjamin Bloom at the University of Chicago in the 1980s and carried out by a large research team. This series of studies has received widespread attention and to some degree has become emblematic of retrospective studies of expert performance.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance , pp. 287 - 302Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
(Ed.) (1983). Genius and eminence: The social psychology of creativity and exceptional achievement. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Bamberger, J. (1982). Growing up prodigies: The midlife crisis. In (Ed.), New directions for child development: Developmental approaches to giftedness and creativity, no. 17. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
& (1986). Educational relevance of the study of expertise. Interchange, 17(2), 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982, April). The role of gifts and markers in the development of talent. Exceptional Children, 48(6), 510–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985, Fall). Exceptional conditions, not exceptional talent, produce high achievers. The University of Chicago Magazine, 78(1), 18–19, 49.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Robinson, R. E. (1986). Culture, time, and the development of talent. In & (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 264–284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
& (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49(8), 725–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Tesch-Römer, C., & Krampe, R. Th. (1990). The role of practice and motivation in the acquisition of expert-level performance in real life: An empirical evaluation of a theoretical framework. In (Ed.), Encouraging the development of exceptional skills and talents (pp. 109–130). Leicester, UK: The British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
(with ) (1986). Nature's gambit: Child prodigies and the development of human potential. NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Freeman, J. (2000). Teaching for talent: Lessons from the research. In & (Eds.), Developing talent across the life span (pp. 231–248). East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, R. & Chi, M. T. H. (1988). Overview. In , , & (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. ⅹⅴ–ⅹⅹⅶ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, L. T. (2000). Tracking trajectories of talent: Child prodigies growing up. In & (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 89–122). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, H. E. (1982). On the hypothesized relation between giftedness and creativity. In (Ed.), Developmental approaches to giftedness and creativity (pp. 7–29). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Gruber, H. E. (1986). The self-construction of the extraordinary. In & (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 247–263). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1990). Before the gates of excellence: The determinants of creative genius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, M. I. (1988). Introduction: What is it to be an expert? In , , & (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. ⅹⅺⅹ–ⅹⅹⅹⅵ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (1996). Remembering our past: Studies in autobiographical memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& (1997). Distribution of important and word-cued autobiographical memories in 20-, 35-, and 70-year-old adults. Psychology and aging, 12(3), 524–535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salthouse, T. A. (1991). Expertise as the circumvention of human processing limitations. In & (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 286–300). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sloboda, J. (1991). Musical expertise. In & (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 153–171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1987). The nature of change in successful learning. Teachers College Record, 88(4), 519–535.Google Scholar
Sosniak, L. A. (2003). Developing talent: Time, task and context. In & (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed.) (pp. 247–253). New York: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
, & (1959). Genetic studies of genius: The gifted group at mid-life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. K. & Stanovich, K. E. (1996). Expertise in reading. In (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 189–225). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(1977/1996). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- 44
- Cited by