Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- PART ONE CLASSIC DISCUSSIONS
- PART TWO POSITIVIST AND POPPERIAN VIEWS
- PART THREE IDEOLOGY AND NORMATIVE ECONOMICS
- PART FOUR BRANCHES AND SCHOOLS OF ECONOMICS AND THEIR METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS
- 16 Econometrics as Observation: The Lucas Critique and the Nature of Econometric Inference
- 17 Does Macroeconomics Need Microfoundations?
- 18 Economics in the Laboratory
- 19 Neuroeconomics: Using Neuroscience to Make Economic Predictions
- 20 The Market as a Creative Process
- 21 What Is the Essence of Institutional Economics?
- PART FIVE NEW DIRECTIONS IN ECONOMIC METHODOLOGY
- Selected Bibliography of Books on Economic Methodology
- Index
- References
19 - Neuroeconomics: Using Neuroscience to Make Economic Predictions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- PART ONE CLASSIC DISCUSSIONS
- PART TWO POSITIVIST AND POPPERIAN VIEWS
- PART THREE IDEOLOGY AND NORMATIVE ECONOMICS
- PART FOUR BRANCHES AND SCHOOLS OF ECONOMICS AND THEIR METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS
- 16 Econometrics as Observation: The Lucas Critique and the Nature of Econometric Inference
- 17 Does Macroeconomics Need Microfoundations?
- 18 Economics in the Laboratory
- 19 Neuroeconomics: Using Neuroscience to Make Economic Predictions
- 20 The Market as a Creative Process
- 21 What Is the Essence of Institutional Economics?
- PART FIVE NEW DIRECTIONS IN ECONOMIC METHODOLOGY
- Selected Bibliography of Books on Economic Methodology
- Index
- References
Summary
Colin F. Camerer (1959–) was educated at Johns Hopkins and the University of Chicago and since 1994 has been a professor of economics at the California Institute of Technology. Camerer's research lies at the boundaries between cognitive psychology, neurophysiology, and economics. He is deeply involved in experimental economics, and his book, Behavioral Game Theory, is the most comprehensive recent survey of experimentation in economics.
Neuroeconomics seeks to ground economic theory in detailed neural mechanisms which are expressed mathematically and make behavioural predictions. One finding is that simple kinds of economising for life-and-death decisions (food, sex and danger) do occur in the brain as rational theories assume. Another set of findings appears to support the neural basis of constructs posited in behavioural economics, such as a preference for immediacy and nonlinear weighting of small and large probabilities. A third direction shows how understanding neural circuitry permits predictions and causal experiments which show state-dependence of revealed preference – except that states are biological and neural variables.
Neuroeconomics seeks to ground microeconomic theory in details about how the brain works (Zak, 2004; Camerer et al., 2004; Chorvat and McCabe, 2005; Sanfey et al., 2006). Neuroeconomics is a subfield of behavioural economics-behavioural economics which uses empirical evidence of limits on computation, willpower and greed to inspire new theories; see Mullainathan and Thaler, (2000); Camerer, (2005). It is also a subfield of experimental economics because neuroeconomics requires mastery of difficult experimental tools which are new to economists (discussed in further detail in Section 1 below).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Philosophy of EconomicsAn Anthology, pp. 356 - 377Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
References
, , , and (2001). The hyperbolic consumption model: calibration, simulation, and empirical evaluation', Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 15 (3) (Summer), pp. 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005). ‘Midbrain dopamine neurons encode a quantitative reward prediction error signal’, Neuron, vol. 47 (1) (07 July), pp. 129–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2002). ‘Dynamic inconsistency and self-control: a planner-doer interpretation’, Economics Letters, vol. 77 (3) pp. 419–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005). ‘Modeling internal commitment mechanisms and self-control: a neuroeconomics approach to consumption-saving decisions’, Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 52 (2) (August), pp. 460–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernheim, B. D. and Rangel, A. (forthcoming). ‘Behavioral public economics: welfare and policy analysis with fallible decision-makers’, in ( and , ed.), Economic Institutions and Behavioral Economics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
and (2005). ‘Self-referential thinking and equilibrium as states of mind in games: fmri evidence’, Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 52 (2) (August), pp. 424–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005). ‘The brain as a hierarchical organization’, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
, and (2006). ‘Learning and visceral temptation in dynamic savings experiments’, Caltech.Google Scholar
and (2007). ‘The road not taken: Two debates on economics and psychology’, Economic Journal, vol. 117(516), pp. 146–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busino, G. (1964). ‘Note bibliographique sur le cours’, in (, ed.), Epstolario, pp. 1165–72, Rome: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei.Google Scholar
Camerer, C. F. (2007). Behavioral Economics, in (, and , eds.), Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress, Cambridge: Cambridge Univesity Press.Google Scholar
, and (2004). ‘A cognitive hierarchy model of games’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 119 (3) (August), pp. 861–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006). ‘How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin-monkey trading behavior’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 114 pp. 517–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (forthcoming). ‘A learning-based model of repeated games with incomplete information’ Games and Economic Behavior.Google Scholar
and (2005). ‘Neuroeconomics and rationality’, Chicago-Kent Law Review, vol. 80 (3) (August), pp. 1235–55.Google Scholar
(2005). ‘Neuroeconomics, the hedonimeter, and utility: some historical links’, Middlebury College.Google Scholar
and (2005). ‘Employing labor supply theory to measure the reward value of electrical brain stimulation’, Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 52 (2), pp. 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2005). ‘Monkeys pay per view: adaptive valuation of social images by rhesus macaques’, Current Biology, vol. 15 (29 March 2005) pp. 543–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2005). ‘Job search and impatience’, Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 23 (3) (July), pp. 527–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2005). ‘Physiological utility theory and the neuroeconomics of choice’, Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 52 (2) (August), pp. 213–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001). ‘Temptation and self-control’, Econometrica, vol. 69 (6) (November), pp. 1403–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2005). ‘Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making’, Science, vol. 310 (5754) (9 December), pp. 1680–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and (2006). ‘Neural signatures of economic preferences for risk and ambiguity’, Neuron, vol. 49 (5) (2 March 2006), pp. 765–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (1995). Economic Choice Theory: An Experimental Analysis of Animal Behavior, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). ‘A psychological perspective on economics’, American Economic Review, vol. 93 (2) (May), pp. 162–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1979). ‘Prospect theory – analysis of decision under risk’, Econometrica, vol. 47 (2) (March), pp. 263–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2005). ‘Oxytocin increases trust in humans’, Nature, vol. 435 (7042) (2 June), pp. 673–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and (2006). ‘Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex’, Science Express vol. 314 (5800), pp. 829–32. DOI:10.1126/science.1129156.Google ScholarPubMed
(1997). ‘Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 112 (2) (May), pp. 443–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2004). ‘Reinforcement learning and decision making in monkeys during a competitive game’, Cognitive Brain Research, vol. 22 (1) (December), pp. 45–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2004). ‘Animal spirits: affective and deliberative processes in economic behavior’, Carnegie Mellon UniversityGoogle Scholar
, , and (2004). ‘Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards’, Science, vol. 306 (5695) (15, October), pp. 503–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2000). Behavioral Economics: Entry in International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Cambridge MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999). ‘Doing it now or later’, American Economic Review, vol. 89 (1) (March), pp. 103–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006). ‘Neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex encode economic value’, Nature, vol. 441 (7090) (11 May), pp. 223–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1999). ‘Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex’, Nature, vol. 400 (6741) pp. 233–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1998). ‘The probability weighting function’, Econometrica, vol. 66 (3) (May), pp. 497–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1961). ‘Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms: comment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 75 (4) (Winter), pp. 690–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2006). ‘Neuroeconomics: cross-currents in research on decision’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game', Science, vol. 300 (5626) (13 June), pp. 1755–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1988). ‘The behavioral life-cycle hypothesis’, Economic Inquiry, vol. 26 (4) (October), pp. 609–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006). ‘Noise characteristics and prior expectations in human visual speed perception’, Nature Neuroscience vol. 9 (4) (April), pp. 578–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2006). ‘Poverty, politics, and preferences: experimental and survey data from Vietnam’, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
, and (2006). ‘Pinocchio's pupil: using eyetracking and pupil dilation to understand truth-telling and deception in biased transmission games’, Caltech.Google Scholar
, , and (2005). ‘Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects strategic decision-making’, Neurorepor, vol. 16 (16) (7 November), pp. 1849–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). ‘Neuroeconomics’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, vol. 359 (1451) (29 November 2004), pp. 1737–48.Google ScholarPubMed
, and (2005). ‘Oxytocin is associated with human trustworthiness’, Hormones and Behavior vol. 48 (5) (December), pp. 522–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
- 4
- Cited by