“The Prisoner's Dilemma.” In Introduction to Philosophy: Classical and Contemporary Readings, edited by Bratman, Michael E. and Perry, John. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.

“Economic Focus: Never the Twain Shall Meet.” Economist, February 2, 2002.

“Robert Aumann's and Thomas Schelling's Contributions to Game Theory: Analyses of Conflict and Cooperation.” In The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, 2005.

Achen, Christopher H. and Snidal, Duncan. “Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies.” World Politics 41, no. 2 (1989): 143–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, James Thurslow. Epic of America. Boston: Little, Brown, 1931.Google Scholar

Alexander, Larry and Sherwin, Emily. The Rule of Rules: Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law. Durham: Duke University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alt, James E., Levi, Margaret, and Ostrom, Elinor. Competition and Cooperation: Conversations with Nobelists about Economics and Political Science. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1999.Google Scholar

Amadae, S. M.Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Amadae, S. M. “Impartiality, Utility and Induction in Adam Smith's Jurisprudence.” In The Adam Smith Review, edited by Brown, Vivienne, 4, 238–246. London: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar

Amadae, S. M. and Lempert, Daniel. “Long-Term Viability of Tem Reasoning.” Journal of Economic Methodology (2015).

Ariely, Dan and Mazar, Nina. “Dishonesty in Everyday Life and Its Policy Implications.” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 25, no. 1 (2006): 1–21.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth J.Social Choice and Individual Values. New York; London: Wiley; Chapman & Hall, 1951.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth J.Social Choice and Individual Values. ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Attanasio, John. “Aggregate Autonomy, the Difference Principle, and the Calabresian Approach to Products Liability,” in Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law, edited by Owen, David G. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), 229–320.Google Scholar

Avanzadi, Javier. Liberalism against Liberalism: Theoretical Analysis of the Writings of Ludwig Von Mises and Gary Becker. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert M.Conflict of Interest: A Theory of Divergent Goals with Applications to Politics, Markham Political Science Series. Chicago: Markham, 1970.Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert M.The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert M. “The Emergence of Cooperation among Egoists.” In Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation: Prisoner's Dilemma and Newcomb's Problem, edited by Campbell, Richmond and Sowden, Lanning, 320–338. Vancouver: The University of British Columbia Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert and D'Ambrosio, Lisa. “Announcement for Bibliography on the Evolution of Cooperation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 39 (1995): 190.Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert and Keohane, Robert O.. “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.” In Neorealism and Neoliberalism, edited by Baldwin, David A., 85–115. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Bacharach, Michael. “Interactive Team Reasoning: A Contribution to the Theory of Co-Operation.” Research in Economics 53 (1999): 117–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacharach, Michael. Beyond Individual Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Bailyn, Bernard. “The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution.” (1967).

Baldwin, David A., ed. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New Directions in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Baliga, Sandeep and Sjöström, Tomas. “Arms Races and Negotiations.” Review of Economic Studies 71 (2004): 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, Desmond and Richelson, Jeffrey. Strategic Nuclear Targeting. Cornell Studies in Security Affairs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Barker, Al. “Where the Police Go Military.” The New York Times, December 4, 2011, SR6.

Barry, Brian and Hardin, Russell. Rational Man and Irrational Society?: An Introduction and Sourcebook. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1982.Google Scholar

Becker, Gary. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Beer, Francis A. “Games and Metaphors: Review Article.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 30, no. 1 (1986): 171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beitz, Charles R.Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Bell, Duncan. “What Is Liberalism?” Political Theory 42, no. 6 (2014), 682–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellah, Robert et al. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Berkes, Fikret. “Social Systems, Ecological Systems, and Property Rights.” In Rights to Nature, edited by Hanna, Susan, Folke, Carl, and Mäler, Karl-Göran, 87–110. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah, Hardy, Henry, and Harris, Ian. Liberty: Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernard, Jessie. “Some Current Conceptualizations in the Field of Conflict.” The American Journal of Sociology 70, no. 4 (1965): 442–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bernholz, Peter. “Is a Paretian Liberal Really Impossible?” Public Choice 20 (1974): 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binmore, Ken. “Bargaining and Morality.” In Rationality, Justice and the Social Contract: Themes from Morals by Agreement, edited by Gauthier, David and Sugden, Robert, 131–156. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Binmore, Ken. Game Theory and the Social Contract, Vol 1: Playing Fair. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Binmore, Ken. Game Theory and the Social Contract, Vol. 2: Just Playing. London: The MIT Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Binmore, Ken. Natural Justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binmore, Ken. “Why Do People Cooperate?” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 5, no. 1 (2006): 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binmore, Ken. Game Theory: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binmore, Ken. Rational Decisions. The Gorman Lectures in Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Binmore, Ken and Herrero, M. J.. “Security Equilibrium.” The Review of Economic Studies (1988): 33–48.

Bohnenblust, H. F. et al. “Mathematical Theory of Zero-Sum Two-Person Games with a Finite Number or a Continuum of Strategies.” Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation, September 3 1948.

Bourdieu, Pierre. Acts of Resistance: Against the Tyranny of the Market. New York: New Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Bowles, Samuel and Gintis, Herbert. Democracy and Capitalism: Property, Community, and the Contradictions of Modern Social Thought. New York: Basic Books, 1986.Google Scholar

Brams, Steven J.Superpower Games: Applying Game Theory to Superpower Conflict. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brams, Steven J.Biblical Games: Game Theory and the Hebrew Bible. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Brams, Steven J.Game Theory and the Humanities:Bridging Two Worlds (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Brams, Steven J., Davis, Morton D., and Straffin, Philip D.. “The Geometry of the Arms Race.” International Studies Quarterly 23, no. 4 (1979): 567–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brams, Steven J. and Kilgour, D. Marc. Game Theory and National Security. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar

Bratman, Michael E. “Toxin, Temptation, and Stability of Intention.” In Rational Commitment and Social Justice, edited by Coleman, Jules L. and Morris, Christopher W., 59–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Bratman, Michael E. “Intention, Practical Rationality, and Self-Governance.” Ethics (2009): 411–443.

Brennan, Geoffrey and Pettit, Philip. “Hands Invisible and Intangible.” Synthese 94 (1993): 191–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brewer, Marilynn B. and Caporael, Linnda R.. “Reviewing Evolutionary Psychology: Biology Meets Society.” Journal of Social Issues 47, no. 3 (1991): 187–195.Google Scholar

Brewer, Marilynn B. and Caporael, Linnda R.. “The Quest for Human Nature: Social and Scientific Issues in Evolutionary Psychology.” Journal of Social Issues 47, no. 3 (1991): 1–9.Google Scholar

Brewer, Marilynn B. and Caporael, Linnda R.. “An Evolutionary Perspective on Social Identity: Revisiting Groups.” In Evolution and Social Psychology, edited by Schaller, M., Simpson, J. A., and Kendrick, D. T.. New York: Psychology Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Brewer, Marilynn B. and Kramer, Roderick. “Choice Behavior in Social Dilemmas.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50, no. 3 (1986): 543–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brewer, Marilynn B. and Schneider, Sherry. “Social Identity and Social Dilemmas.” In Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances, edited by Abrams, Dominic and Hoggs, Michael A.. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf, 1990.Google Scholar

Brodie, Bernard. “Why Were We So (Strategically) Wrong?” Foreign Policy, no. 5 (1972): 151–161.Google Scholar

Brodie, Bernard. “The Development of Nuclear Strategy.” International Security 2, no. 4 (1978): 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brodie, Bernard and Rand Corporation. Strategy in the Missile Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brody, Richard A. “Some Systemic Effects of the Spread of Nuclear Weapons Technology: A Study through Simulation of a Multi-Nuclear Future.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 7, no. 4 (1963): 663–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, WendyUndoing the Demos: Neoliberalism's Stealth Revolution. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books, 2015.

Brown, Wendy. “American Nightmare: Neoliberalism, Neoconservatism, and De-Democratization.” Political Theory 34, no. 6 (2006): 690–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunner, Karl. Economics & Social Institutions: Insights from the Conferences on Analysis & Ideology: [Selections]. Rochester Studies in Economics and Policy Issues. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 1979.Google Scholar

Brzezinski, Zbigniew. Power and Principle: Memoirs of the National Security Adviser, 1977–1981. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 1983.Google Scholar

Brzezinski, Zbigniew. The Choice: Global Domination or Global Leadership. New York: Basic Books, 2004.Google Scholar

Buchanan, James M.The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Buchanan, James M.The Economics and the Ethics of Constitutional Order. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, James M. and Tullock, Gordon. The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley. “Strategic Studies and Its Critics.” World Politics 20, no. 4 (1986): 593–605.Google Scholar

Burgin, Angus. The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets since the Depression. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burke, Edmund. A Letter to a Member of the National Assembly Revolution and Romanticism, 1789–1834. Oxford; New York: Woodstock Books, 1990.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M. “Evolutionary Psychology: A New Paradigm for Psychological Science.” Psychological Inquiry 6, (1995): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cahn, Anne Hessing. “Team B: The Trillion-Dollar Experiment.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 1993, 22, 24–27.Google Scholar

Callahan, David. The Cheating Culture: Why More Americans Are Doing Wrong to Get Ahead. New York: Mariner Books, 2004.Google Scholar

Camerer, Colin. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. The Roundtable Series in Behavioral Economics. New York; Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation; Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Camerer, Colin. Behavioral Game Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Camerer, C. F. “When Does ‘Economic Man’ Dominate Social Behavior?” Science, 311, (2006): 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Richmond. “Background for the Uninitiated.” In Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation: Prisoner's Dilemma and Newcomb's Problem, edited by Campbell, Richmond and Sowden, Lanning, 1–41. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Campbell, Richmond and Snowden, Lanning. Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation: Prisoner's Dilemma and Newcomb's Problem. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Caporael, Linnda R., Dawes, Robyn M., Orbell, John, and Kragt, Alphons van de. “Selfishness Examined.” Behavioral Sciences 12 (1989): 683–699.Google Scholar

Carter, Jimmy. White House Diary. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2010.Google Scholar

Caspary, William R. “Richardson's Model of Arms Races: Description, Critique, and an Alternative Model.” International Studies Quarterly 11, no. 1 (1967): 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassidy, John. How Markets Fail: The Logic of Economic Calamities. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2009.Google Scholar

Cesarani, David. Becoming Eichmann: Rethinking the Life, Crimes, and Trial of a “Desk Murderer.” Da Capo Press pbk. ed. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Churchill, Winston. Mr. Churchill's Speech in the House of Commons. Stockholm: I. Haeggström, 1944.Google Scholar

Clausewitz, Carl, Maude, F. N., and Rapoport, Anatol. On War. New & revised ed. Pelican Classics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1968.Google Scholar

Coase, Ronald H. “The Problem of Social Cost.” The Journal of Law & Economics 3, 1–44. Chicago: University of Chicago Law School, 1960.Google Scholar

Cohen, Avner and Lee, Steven. Nuclear Weapons and the Future of Humanity: The Fundamental Questions. Philosophy and Society Series. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1986.Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A.Why Not Socialism?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google ScholarPubMed

Cohen-Cole, Jamie. The Open Mind: Cold War Politics and the Sciences of Human Nature. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Coleman, Jules L.Markets, Morals, and the Law. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Coleman, Jules L. and Ferejohn, John. “Democracy and Social Choice.” Ethics 97, no. 1 (1986): 6–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, Jules L., Morris, Christopher W., and Kavka, Gregory S.. Rational Commitment and Social Justice: Essays for Gregory Kavka. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Francis S.The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief. New York: Free Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Conybeare, John A. C. “Public Goods, Prisoners’ Dilemmas and the International Political Economy.” International Studies Quarterly 28, no. 1 (1984): 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, Karen S., Hardin, Russell, and Levi, Margaret. Cooperation without Trust? The Russell Sage Foundation Series on Trust v. 9. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2005.Google Scholar

Cooter, Robert. “Coase Theorem.” The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, vol. 1. London: Palgrave MacMillan, 1987.Google Scholar

Copeland, Dale C. “The Constructivist Challenge to Structural Realism: A Review Essay.” International Security 25, no. 2 (2000): 187–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copeland, Dale. The Origins of Major War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Crowther-Heyck, Hunter. Herbert A. Simon: The Bounds of Reason in Modern America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Cullity, Garrett. “Review: Ethics Done Right: Practical Reasoning as a Foundation for Moral Theory.” Ethics (2009): 581–585.

Cuneo, Terence. “Review: The Nature of Normativity.” Ethics (2009): 397–402.

Curry, Lynne and Winnebago County (WI). Dept. of Social Services. The Deshaney Case: Child Abuse, Family Rights, and the Dilemma of State Intervention. Landmark Law Cases & American Society. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2007.Google Scholar

Dasgupta, Partha. An Inquiry into Well-Being and Destitution. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

David, Anthony. “The Apprentice: From Albert Wohlstetter to Paul Wolfowitz to Lewis Libby, Apocaplyptic Neoconservatism Was Passed Down through Generations – to Become Official U.S. Policy.” The American Prospect 18, no. 6 (2007): 38–41.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald. “The Folly of Trying to Define Truth.” Journal of Philosophy 93 (1996): 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, Donald. “Truth and Meaning,” in Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation(Oxford: Clarendon, 1984), 17–36.Google Scholar

Davis, Lawrence H. “Prisoners, Paradox and Rationality.” In Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation: Prisoner's Dilemma and Newcomb's Problem, edited by Campbell, Richmond and Sowden, Lanning, 45–58. Vancouver: The University of British Columbia Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Davis, Lawrence H. “Is the Symmetry Argument Valid.” In Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation, edited by Campbell, Richmond and Sowden, Lanning, 255–263. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Dawes, Robyn M. and Krueger, Joachim I.. Rationality and Social Responsibility: Essays in Honor of Robyn Mason Dawes. Modern Pioneers in Psychological Science. New York: Psychology Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Dawkins, Richard. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Dawkins, Richard. The Selfish Gene. New ed. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Dawkins, Richard. The God Delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2006.Google Scholar

Dawkins, Richard. The Selfish Gene. anniversary ed. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

deLeon, Peter. “Review: Freeze: The Literature of the Nuclear Weapons Debate.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 27, no. 1 (1983): 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeNardo, James. The Amateur Strategist: Intuitive Deterrence Theories and the Politics of the Nuclear Arms Race. Cambridge Studies in Political Psychology and Public Opinion. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Deutsch, Morton. “Trust and Suspicion.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 2, no. 4 (1958): 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewey, John. Public and Its Problems. Athens, OH: Swallow Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Diesing, Paul. Science & Ideology in the Policy Sciences. New York: Aldine, 1982.Google Scholar

Donniger, Christian. “Is It Always Efficient to Be Nice?” In Paradoxical Effects of Social Behavior, edited by Rapoport, Anatol, Diekmann, Andreas, and Mitter, Peter, 123–134. Heidelberg: Physica Verlag, 1986.Google Scholar

Downs, George W. “The Rational Deterrence Debate.” World Politics 41, no. 2 (1989): 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter N.. “Is the Good News About Compliance Good News About Cooperation?” International Organization 50, no. 3 (1996): 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Siverson, Randolph M.. “Arms Races and Cooperation.” World Politics 38, no. 1 (1985): 118–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doyle, Michael W.Ways of War and Peace. New York: W. W. Norton, 1997.Google Scholar

Doyle, Michael W. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12:3 (1983), 205–235.Google Scholar

Dresher, Melvin. Mathematical Theory of Zero-Sum Two-Person Games with a Finite Number or a Continuum of Strategies. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp., 1949.Google Scholar

Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray, Newman, Peter, and Palgrave, Robert Harry Inglis. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. 4 vols. London; New York; Tokyo: Macmillan; Stockton Press; Maruzen, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eden, Lynn and Miller, Steven E.. Nuclear Arguments: Understanding the Strategic Nuclear Arms and Arms Control Debates. Cornell Studies in Security Affairs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Ehrenberg, John. Civil Society: The Critical History of an Idea. New York: New York University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Elloitt, Sober and Wilson, David Sloan. Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Ellsberg, Daniel. “Theory of the Reluctant Duelist.” The American Economic Review 46, no. 5 (1956): 909–923.Google Scholar

Ellsberg, Daniel. Risk, Ambiguity, and Decision. Studies in Philosophy. New York: Garland, 2001.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard. Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Erickson, Paul. The World the Game Theorists Made. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erickson, Paul et al. How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ernst, Zachary. “Explaining the Social Contract.” British Journal of Philosophical Science 52, (2001): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evensky, Jerry. Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective on Markets, Law, Ethics, and Culture. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fairbanks, Charles H. Jr. “Mad and U.S. Strategy.” In Getting MAD: Nuclear Mutual Assured Destruction, Its Origins and Practice, edited by Sokolski, Henry D., 137–147. Darby, PA: Diane Publishing 2004.Google Scholar

Farrell, Daniel M. “Hobbes as Moralist.” Philosophical Studies 48, (1985): 257–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrell, Daniel M. “A New Paradox of Deterrence.” In Rational Commitment and Social Justice, edited by Coleman, Jules L. and Morris, Christopher W., 22–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Fearon, James D. “Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation.” International Organization 52, no. 2 (1998): 269–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fehr, E. and Fischenbacher, Urs. “The Nature of Human Altruism.” Nature 425, (2003): 785–791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ferguson, Charles H.Predator Nation: Corporate Criminals, Political Corruption, and the Hijacking of America. New York: Crown Business, 2012.Google Scholar

Forst, Brian and Lucianovic, Judith. “Prisoner's Dilemma: Theory and Reality.” Journal of Criminal Justice 5 (1977): 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foster, William C. “Prospects for Arms Control.” Foreign Affairs 47, no. 3 (1969): 413–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish. Translated by Sheridan, Alan. New York: Vintage, 1979.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. by Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991, 87–104.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College De France. New York: Picador, 2010.Google Scholar

Frank, Robert, Gilovich, Thomas, and Regan, Donald. “Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7 (1993): 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freedman, Lawrence. The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Freedman, Lawrence. Deterrence. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Frey, Bruno and Jegen, Reto. “Motivation Crowding Theory.” Journal of Economic Surveys 15, no. 5 (2001): 589–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, James W.Game Theory with Applications to Economics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. Capitalism and Freedom, 20th Anniversary Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Thomas L. “This Column Is Not Sponsored by Anyone.” New York Times, May 13, 2012, SR13-13.

Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man. New York; Toronto: Free Press; Maxwell Macmillan Canada; Maxwell Macmillan International, 1992.Google Scholar

Gaddis, John. The Cold War: A New History. London: Penguin, 2006.Google Scholar

Gafni, Amiram. “Willingness-to-Pay as a Measure of Benefits: Relevant Questions in the Context of Public Decisionmaking about Health Care Programs.” Medical Care 29, no. 12 (1991), 1246–1252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gardenfors, Peter. “Rights, Games and Social Choice.” Nous 15, no. 3 (1981): 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaus, Gerald “The Diversity of Comprehensive Liberalisms.” In Handbook of Political Theory, edited by Gerald, F. and Gaus, Chandran Kukathas. London: Sage, 2004, 100–114.Google Scholar

Gaus, Gerald F.The Order of Public Reason: A Theory of Freedom and Morality in a Diverse and Bounded World. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Gaus, Gerald and Courtland, Shane. “Liberalism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2014. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberalism/, accessed July 1, 2015.

Gauthier, David P.The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Gauthier, David. “Deterrence, Maximization, and Rationality.” Ethics 94, no. 3 (1984), 474–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gauthier, David P.Morals by Agreement. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gauthier, David. “Rethinking the Toxin Puzzle.” In Rational Commitment and Social Justice, edited by Coleman, Jules L. and Morris, Christopher W., 47–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Gelman, Andrew. “Methodology as Ideology: Mathematical Modeling of Trench Warfare.” 2007. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1010642 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1010642.CrossRef

George, Alexander L. and Smoke, Richard. Deterrence in American Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice. New York: Columbia University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

George, Alexander L. and Smoke, Richard. “Deterrence and Foreign Policy.” World Politics 41, no. 2 (1989): 170–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghamari-Tabrizi, Sharon. The Worlds of Herman Kahn: The Intuitive Science of Thermonuclear War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, Margaret. A Theory of Political Obligation: Membership, Commitment, and the Bonds of Society. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, Margaret. Joint Commitment: How We Make the Social World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gintis, Herbert. Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life. Economic Learning and Social Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Gintis, Herbert. “Behavioral Ethics Meets Natural Justice.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 5, no. 1 (2005): 5–32.Google Scholar

Gintis, Herbert. The Bounds of Reason: Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Gintis, Herbert and Bowles, Samuel. “The Evolution of Altruistic Punishment.” In The Origin and Evolution of Cultures, edited by Boyd, Robert and Richerson, Peter. New York: Oxford University Press 2005.Google Scholar

Gintis, Herbert, Bowles, Samuel, Boyd, Robert and Fehr, Ernst. “Explaining Altruistic Behavior in Humans.” Evolution of Human Behavior 24, (2003): 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giocoli, Nicola. “Nash Equilibrium.” History of Political Economy 36, no. 4 (2004): 649–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giocoli, Nicola. “Do Prudent Agents Play Lotteries: Von Neumann's Contributions to the Theory of Rational Behavior.” Journal for the History of Economic Thought 28, no. 1 (2006): 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giroux, Henry A.The Terror of Neoliberalism: Authoritarianism and the Eclipse of Democracy. London: Paradigm Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar

Glaser, Charles L. “Why Do Strategists Disagree about the Requirements of Strategic Nuclear Deterence?” In Nuclear Arguments, edited by Eden, Lynn and Miller, Steven E., 109–171. London: Cornell University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Glaser, Charles L. “The Security Dilemma Revisited.” World Politics 50, no. 1 (1997): 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gödel, Kurt. On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems. New York: Basic Books, 1962.Google Scholar

Gold, Natalie and Sugden, Robert. “Collective Intentions and Team Agency.” The Journal of Philosophy, no. 3 (2007): 109–137.Google Scholar

Goldman, Alan H.Practical Rules: When We Need Them and When We Don't. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, Robert E. “Equal Rationality and Initial Endowments.” In Rationality, Justice and the Social Contract: Themes from Morals by Agreement, edited by Gauthier, David and Sugden, Robert, 116–130. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Craufurd D. W.Economics and National Security: A History of Their Interaction. Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy. Durham; London: Duke University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Gowa, Joanne. “Review: Anarchy, Egoism, and Third Images: The Evolution of Cooperation and International Relations.” International Organization 40, no. 1 (1986): 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gralnick, Alexander. “Deterrence, Realism, and Nuclear Omnicide.” Political Psychology 9, no. 1 (1988): 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, Colin S. “What RAND Hath Wrought.” Foreign Policy, no. 4 (1971): 111–129.Google Scholar

Gray, Colin S. “The Arms Race Is About Politics.” Foreign Policy, no. 9 (1973): 117–129.Google Scholar

Gray, Colin S. “Foreign Policy – There Is No Choice.” Foreign Policy, no. 24 (1976): 114–127.Google Scholar

Gray, Colin S. “Nuclear Strategy: The Case for a Theory of Victory.” International Security 4, no. 1 (1979): 54–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, Colin S.Strategic Studies and Public Policy: The American Experience. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1982.Google Scholar

Gray, Colin S. and Barlow, Jeffrey G.. “Inexcusable Restraint: The Decline of American Military Power in the 1970s.” International Security 10, no. 2 (1985): 27–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, Colin S. and Howard, Michael. “Perspectives on Fighting Nuclear War.” International Security 6, no. 1 (1981): 185–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, Colin S. and Payne, Keith. “Victory Is Possible.” Foreign Policy, no. 39 (1980): 14–27.Google Scholar

Green, Donald and Shapiro, Ian. Pathologies of Rational Choice. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Green, Philip. Deadly Logic: The Theory of Nuclear Deterrence. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Green, T. H.Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation. Kitchener, ONT: Batoche Books, 1999.Google Scholar

Grieco, Joseph M. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism.” In Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, edited by Baldwin, David A., 116–140. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo. The Rights of War and Peace. vols. 1–3, edited by Tuck, Richard. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005.Google Scholar

Guetzkow, Harold and Jensen, Lloyd. “Research Activities on Simulated International Processes.” Background 9, no. 4 (1966): 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action, vols., 1 and 2. Trans. by McCarthy, Thomas. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1984 and 1987.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Haggard, Stephan and Simmons, Beth A.. “Theories of International Regimes.” International Organization 41, no. 3 (1987): 491–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halberstam, David. The Best and the Brightest. New York: Ballantine Books, 1993.Google Scholar

Hamilton, William. “The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 37 (1964): 1–52.Google Scholar

Hampton, Jean. Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Hampton, Jean. The Authority of Reason. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Han, Sam. “American Cultural Theory.” In Routledge Handbook of Social and Cultural Theory, edited by Elliot, Anthony, 239–256. New York: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

Hanna, Susan and Jentoft, Carl. “Human Use of the Natural Environment: An Overview of Social and Economic Dimensions.” In Rights to Nature, edited by Hanna, Susan, Folke, Carl, and Mäler, Karl-Göran, 35–56. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Hardin, Garrett James, Lyons, Richard D., and Edelson, Edward. Tragedy of the Commons Revisited. Sound recording. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1973.Google Scholar

Hardin, Russell. Collective Action. Baltimore: Published for Resources for the Future by the Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Hardin, Russell. Social Science Information and Decision Making. vol. 2 FID Studies in Social Science Information and Documentation. Budapest, Hungary: Published on behalf of FID by the Economic Information Unit, Hungarian Academy of Science, 1984.Google Scholar

Hardin, Russell. “Individual Sanctions, Collective Benefits.” In Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation: Prisoner's Dilemma and Newcomb's Problem, edited by Campbell, Richmond and Sowden, Lanning, 339–354. Vancouver: The University of British Columbia Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Hardin, Russell,(ed). Nuclear Deterrence: Ethics and Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Hardin, Russell. “Risking Armageddon.” In Nuclear Weapons and the Future of Humanity, edited by Cohen, Avner and Lee, Steven, 201–223. Totowa: Rowman & Allanheld, 1986.Google Scholar

Hardin, Russell. “The Utilitarian Logic of Liberalism.” Ethics 97, no. 1 (1986): 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardin, Russell. “Does Might Make Right?” In Authority Revisited, edited by Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John William, 201–217. New York: New York University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Hardin, Russell. Morality within the Limits of Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Hardin, Russell. “Contractarianism: Wistful Thinking.” Constitutional Political Economy 1, no. 2 (1990), 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardin, Russell. Liberalism, Constitutionalism, and Democracy. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardin, Russell. Trust and Trustworthiness. The Russell Sage Foundation Series on Trust v. 4. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2002.Google Scholar

Hardin, Russell. “The Free Rider Problem.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford, 2003. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/free-rider/.Google Scholar

Hartz, Louis. The Liberal Tradition in America; an Interpretation of American Political Thought since the Revolution. New York: Harcourt, 1955.Google Scholar

Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Hausman, Daniel M. and McPherson, Michael S.. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy. ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A.. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A.. The Constitution of Liberty: The Definitive Edition. The Collected Works of F. A Hayek, edited by Hamowy, Ronald. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heap, Shaun Hargreaves and Varoufakis, Yanis. Game Theory: A Critical Text. ed. London; New York: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

Heath, Joseph. Communicative Action and Rational Choice. Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Heath, Joseph. Following the Rules: Practical Reasoning and Deontic Constraints. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Heinrich, Joseph et al. “Economic Man in Cross-Cultural Perspective.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2005): 795–855.Google Scholar

Heinrich, Joseph et al. “Costly Punishment across Human Perspective.” Science 312, (2006): 1767–1770.Google Scholar

Held, Virginia. “Rationality and Social Value in Game-Theoretical Analyses.” Ethics 76, no. 3 (1966): 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herf, Jeffrey. Reactionary Modernism: Technology, Culture, and Politics in Weimar and the Third Reich. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Herken, Gregg. Counsels of War. New York: Knopf; distributed by Random House, 1985.Google Scholar

Hess, Charlotte and Ostrom, Elinor. Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Hessing Cahn, Anne. “Team B: The Trillion-Dollar Experiment.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 49, no. 3 (1993): 22, 24–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilgers, Mathieu. “The Three Anthropological Approaches to Neoliberalism.” International Social Science Journal 61, no. 202 (2010): 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilgers, Mathieu. “The Historicity of the Neoliberal State.” Social Anthropology 20, no. 1 (2012): 80–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, edited by Tuck, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, [1651] 1996.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas and Tuck, Richard. Leviathan. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Hollis, Martin. The Cunning of Reason. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Hollis, Martin. “The Agriculture of the Mind.” In Rationality, Justice and the Social Contract: Themes from Morals by Agreement, edited by Gauthier, David and Sugden, Robert, 40–52. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Hollis, Martin. Trust within Reason. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hollis, Martin and Smith, Steve. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Hont, Istvan and Ignatiev, Michael, eds. Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hont, Istvan and Ignatiev, Michael. “Needs and Justice in the Wealth of Nations.” In Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of the Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment, edited by Hont, Istvan and Ignatiev, Michael, 1–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horkheimer, Max and Adorno, Theodor W.. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Trans by Cumming, John. New York: Herder and Herder, 1972.Google Scholar

Hubin, Donald C. “The Groundless Normativity of Instrumental Rationality.” The Journal of Philosophy 98, no. 9 (2001): 445–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. Pelican Classics. Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1969.Google Scholar

Ikenberry, John G.Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Innocenti, Alessandro. “Linking Strategic Interaction and Bargaining Theory: The Harsanyi-Schelling Debate on the Axiom of Symmetry.” History of Political Economy 40, no. 1 (2008): 111–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jasanoff, Sheila. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. International Library of Sociology. London; New York: Routledge, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jervis, Robert. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Jervis, Robert. “Cooperation under the Security Dilemma.” World Politics 30, no. 2 (1978): 167–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jervis, Robert. “Review: Deterrence Theory Revisited.” World Politics 31, no. 2 (1979): 298–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jervis, Robert. The Illogic of American Nuclear Strategy. Cornell Studies in Security Affairs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Jervis, Robert. “Realism, Game Theory, and Cooperation.” World Politics 40, no. 3 (1988): 317–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jervis, Robert. “Rational Deterrence: Theory and Evidence.” World Politics 41, no. 2 (1989): 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jervis, Robert. The Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution: Statecraft and the Prospect of Armageddon. Cornell Studies in Security Affairs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Jervis, Robert. “Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate.” International Security 24, no. 1 (1999): 42–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jervis, Robert. “Was the Cold War a Security Dilemma?” Journal of Cold War Studies 3, no. 1 (2001): 36–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jervis, Robert. “Mutual Assured Destruction.” Foreign Policy, no. 133 (2002): 40–42.Google Scholar

Kahan, Dan. “Social Influence, Social Meaning, and Deterrence.” Virginia Law Review 83, (1997): 349–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahan, Dan. “The Logic of Reciprocity.” In Sentiments and Material Interests, edited by Gintis, Herbert, Bowles, Samuel, Boyd, Robert and Fehr, Ernst. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Kahn, Herman. On Thermonuclear War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Kahn, Herman. The Nature and Feasibility of War and Deterrence, a Study. 86th Cong., 2d Sess. Senate. Document. Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1960.Google Scholar

Kahn, Herman. Thinking about the Unthinkable. New York: Horizon Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Kahn, Herman. On Escalation: Metaphors and Scenarios. New York: Praeger, 1965.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, and What Is Enlightenment? Translated and introduced by Beck, Lewis White. The Library of Liberal Arts. New York: Liberal Arts Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. Edited and translated by Ladd, John. New York: Harper and Row, 1964.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel and Ladd, John. Metaphysical Elements of Justice: Part I of the Metaphysics of Morals. ed. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1999.Google Scholar

Kaplan, Fred M.The Wizards of Armageddon. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1983.Google Scholar

Kaplin, Morton A. “World Politics.” World Politics 11, no. 1 (1958): 20–43.Google Scholar

Kapstein, Ethan B. “Two Dismal Sciences Are Better Than One – Economics and the Study of National Security: A Review Essay.” International Security 27, no. 3 (2001): 158–187.Google Scholar

Kattenburg, Paul M. “MAD Is Still the Moral Position.” In After the Cold War: Questioning the Morality of Nuclear Deterrence, edited by Kegley, Charles W. Jr. and Schwab, Kenneth L., 111–120. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Kavka, Gregory S. “Deterrence, Utility, and Rational Choice.” Theory and Decision 12, no. 1 (1980): 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kavka, Gregory S. “Some Paradoxes of Deterrence.” The Journal of Philosophy 75, no. 6 (1978): 285–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kavka, Gregory S. “The Toxin Puzzle.” Analysis 43, no. 1 (1983): 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kavka, Gregory S.Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory. Studies in Moral, Political, and Legal Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Kavka, Gregory S. “Morality and Nuclear Politics: Lessons of the Missile Crisis.” In Nuclear Weapons and the Future of Humanity, edited by Cohen, Avner and Lee, Steven, 233–254. Totowa NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1986.Google Scholar

Kavka, Gregory S.Moral Paradoxes of Nuclear Deterrence. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Kegley, Charles W. and Schwab, Kenneth L.. After the Cold War: Questioning the Morality of Nuclear Deterrence. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Kenrick, D. T., Li, N. P., and Butner, J.. “Dynamical Evolutionary Psychology: Individual Decision Rules and Emergent Social Norms.” Psychological Review 110, no. 1 (2003): 3–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Keohane, Robert O.After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O.Neorealism and Its Critics. The Political Economy of International Change. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Ketelaar, T. and Ellis, B. J.. “Are Evolutionary Explanations Unfalsifiable? Evolutionary Psychology and the Lakatosian Philosophy of Science.” Psychological Inquiry 11, (2000), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ketelaar, T., and Ellis, B. J.. “On the Natural Selection of Alternative Models: Evaluation of Explanations in Evolutionary Psychology.” Psychological Inquiry, 11, (2000), 56–68.Google Scholar

King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Stanley. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Kloppenberg, James T.The Virtues of Liberalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Klosko, George. Political Obligations. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolbert, E. “The Calculator: How Kenneth Feinberg Determines the Value of Three Thousand Lives.” The New Yorker Magazine, November 25, 2002.

Kollock, Peter. “Social Dilemmas: The Anatomy of Cooperation.” Annual Review of Sociology 24, (1998): 183–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kornhauser, Lewis. “Economic Analysis of the Law.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, published November 26, 2001, revised August 12, 2011, available online, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-econanalysis/, accessed July 15, 2015.

Krasner, Stephen D.Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krause, Keith. “Rationality and Deterrence in Theory and Practice.” In Contemporary Security and Strategy, edited by Snyder, Craig A., 120–149. New York: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar

Krueger, Joachim I. and Acevedo, Mellisa. “A Game-Theoretic View of Voting.” Journal of Social Issues 64, no. 3 (2008): 467–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, Steven. “Prisoner's Dilemma.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2007, 2014). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/prisoner-dilemma/.

Kuklick, Bruce. Blind Oracles: Intellectuals and War from Kennan to Kissinger. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Kull, Steven. “Nuclear Nonsense.” Foreign Policy, no. 58 (1985): 28–52.Google Scholar

Kydd, Andrew. “Game Theory and the Spiral Model.” World Politics 49 (1997): 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kydd, Andrew H.Trust and Mistrust in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Lackey, Douglas. “Missiles and Morals: A Utilitarian Look at Nuclear Deterrence.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 11, no. 3 (1982): 189–231.Google Scholar

Lackey, Douglas. “Disarmament Revisited: A Reply to Kavka and Hardin.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12, no. 3 (1983): 261–256.Google Scholar

Lackey, Douglas. “The American Debate on Nuclear Weapons Policy: A Review of the Literature 1945–85.” Analyse and Kritik 9 (1987): 7–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langlois, Jean-Pierre P. “Modeling Deterrence and International Crises.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 33, no. 1 (1989): 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lasanga, Louis. “Oath of Lasanga.” Undated. in Box 10, Folder 3, D.302, University of Rochester Archive.

Lasker, Emanuel. Kampf. New York: Lasker's, 1907.Google Scholar

Lawler, Peter Augustine. “Fukuyama Versus the End of History.” In After History?: Francis Fukuyama and His Critics, edited by Burns, Timothy, 63–79. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 1994.Google Scholar

Lawrence, Philip K. “Strategy, Hegemony and Ideology: The Role of Intellectuals.” Political Studies XLIV (1996): 44–59.Google Scholar

Lebow, Richard Ned and Stein, Janice Gross. “Rational Deterrence Theory: I Think, Therefore I Deter.” World Politics 41, no. 2 (1989): 208–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lemann, Nicholas. “The Quiet Man; Dick Cheney's Discrete Rise to Unprecedented Power.” The New Yorker, May 7, 2001.

Leonard, Robert. Von Neumann, Morgenstern, and the Creation of Game Theory: From Chess to Social Science, 1900–1960. Historical Perspectives on Modern Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewin, Leonard C.Report from Iron Mountain: On the Possibility and Desirability of Peace. New York: The Free Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Lewis, David K.Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Lewis, David K. “Prisoners’ Dilemma Is a Newcomb Problem.” In Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation, edited by Campbell, Richmond and Sowden, Lanning, 251–255. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Lewis, David K. “Finite Counterforce.” In Nuclear Deterrence and Moral Restraint. Ed. by Shue, Henry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Lewis, David K.Papers in Ethics and Social Philosophy, vol. 3. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Lewis, David K.Convention: A Philosophical Study, reissue. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Licklider, Roy E.The Private Nuclear Strategists. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Locke, John. The Second Treatise of Government, edited by Macpherson, C. B.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1980.Google Scholar

Lohmann, Susanne. “The Poverty of Green and Shapiro.” Critical Review 9 (1995): 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luce, R. Duncan and Raiffa, Howard. Games and Decisions; Introduction and Critical Survey. New York: Wiley, 1957.Google Scholar

Lynn-Jones, Sean M. “Preface.” In Rational Choice and Security Studies: Stephen Walt and His Critics, edited by Brown, Michael E., Cote, Owen R. Jr., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Miller, Steven E., ix–xix. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2000.Google Scholar

MacGilvray, Eric. Market Freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Mack, Eric and Gaus, Gerald. “Classic Liberalism and Libertarianism.” In Handbook of Political Theory, edited by Gerald, F. and Gaus, Chandran Kukathas. London: Sage, 2004.Google Scholar

MacLean, Douglas. The Security Gamble: Deterrence Dilemmas in the Nuclear Age. Maryland Studies in Public Philosophy. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1984.Google Scholar

Majeski, Stephen J. “Technological Innovation and Cooperation in Arms Races.” International Studies Quarterly 30, no. 2 (1986): 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maloy, J. S.The Colonial American Origins of Modern Democratic Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malthus, T. R.An Essay on the Principle of Population. London: J. Johnson, 1798.Google Scholar

Mariotti, Marco. “Fair Bargains: Distributive Justice and Nash Bargaining Theory.” The Review of Economic Studies 66, no. 3 (1999): 733–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Lisa L. and Simmons, Beth A.. “Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions.” International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 729–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maslow, Abraham. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper, 1954.Google Scholar

Maynard Smith, John. “The Theory of Games and the Evolution of Animal Conflicts.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 47, no. 1 (1974): 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maynard Smith, John. “Evolution and the Theory of Games: In Situations Characterized by Conflict of Interest, the Best Strategy to Adopt Depends on What Others Are Doing.” American Scientist 64, no.1 (1976): 41–45.Google Scholar

Maynard Smith, John. “Optimization Theory in Evolution.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 9 (1978): 31–56.Google Scholar

Maynard Smith, John. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCabe, Donald, Butterfield, Kenneth, and Trevino, Linda Klebe. “Academic Dishonesty in Graduate Business Programs.” Academy of Management Learning and Education 5, no. 3 (2006): 294–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCabe, Donald and Trevino, Linda Klebe. “Academic Dishonesty.” Journal of Higher Education 64, no. 5 (1993): 522–538.Google Scholar

McCabe, Donald and Trevino, Linda Klebe. “Cheating among Business Students.” Journal of Management Education 19, no. 2 (1995): 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCay, Bonnie J. “Common and Private Concerns.” In Rights to Nature, edited by Hanna, Susan, Folke, Carl, and Mäler, Karl-Göran, 111–126. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1996.Google Scholar

McClennen, Edward F. “The Tragedy of National Sovereignty.” In Nuclear Weapons and the Future of Humanity, edited by Cohen, Avner and Lee, Steven, 391–405. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1986.Google Scholar

McCumber, John. Time in the Ditch: American Philosophy and the McCarthy Era. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

McCumber, John. Philosophical Excavations: Reason, Truth and Politics in the Early Cold War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, forthcoming.

McKean, Margaret A. “Common-Property Regimes as a Solution to Problems of Scale.” In Rights to Nature, edited by Hanna, Susan, Folke, Carl, and Mäler, Karl-Göran. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1996.Google Scholar

McMahon, Christopher. Collective Rationality and Collective Reasoning. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

McNamara, Robert S.Blundering into Disaster: Surviving the First Century of the Nuclear Age. New York: Pantheon Books, 1986.Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, John J.The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton, 2001.Google Scholar

Mensch, A. and NATO Science Committee. Theory of Games; Techniques and Applications. Proceedings of a Conference under the Aegis of the NATO Scientific Affairs Committee, Toulon, 29th June–3rd July 1964. New York: American Elsevier, 1966.Google Scholar

Mesquita, Bruce Bueno and Riker, William H. “An Assessment of the Merits of Selective Nuclear Proliferation.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 26, no. 2 (1982): 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty and Other Writings, edited by Collini, Stephan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Miller, Dale. “The Norm of Self-Interest.” American Psychologist 54, no. 12 (1999), 1053–1060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Milner, Helen. “Review: International Theories of Cooperation among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses.” World Politics 44, no. 3 (1992): 466–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mirowski, Philip. More Heat Than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature's Economics. Historical Perspectives on Modern Economics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mirowski, Philip. Economics and National Security: A History of Their Interaction. Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy, edited by Goodwin, Craufurd D. W.. Durham; London: Duke University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Mirowski, Philip. Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Mirowski, Philip and Plehwe, Dieter. The Road from Mont PèLerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moehler, Michael. “Why Hobbes’ State of Nature Is Best Modeled by an Assurance Game.” Utilitas 21, no. 3 (2009): 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moglewer, S. “A Resource Allocation Model for Tactical Air War.” In Theory of Games: Techniques and Applications, edited by Mensch, A., 219–235. New York: American Elsevier, 1966.Google Scholar

Montgomery, Evan Braden. “Breaking out of the Security Dilemma: Realism, Reassurance, and the Problem of Uncertainty.” International Security 31, no. 2 (2006): 151–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, Mary S. “The Curious Case of the Prisoner's Dilemma: Model Situation? Exemplary Narrative?” In Science without Laws, 157–188. Durham: Duke University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Morgan, Patrick M.Deterrence Now. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, Patrick M. “New Directions in Deterrence.” In Nuclear Weapons and the Future of Humanity, edited by Cohen, Avner and Lee, Steven, 169–189. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1986.Google Scholar

Morgenstern, Oskar. The Question of National Defense. New York: Random House, 1959.Google Scholar

Morris, Christopher W. “A Contractarian Defense of Nuclear Deterrence.” Ethics 95 (1985): 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moyn, Samuel. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Mueller, Dennis C.Public Choice III. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mueller, John E.Capitalism, Democracy, and Ralph's Pretty Good Grocery. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Mueller, John E.Atomic Obsession: Nuclear Alarmism from Hiroshima to Al Qaeda. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Myerson, Roger B.Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Nash, John F. “The Bargaining Problem.” Econometrica 18, no. 2 (1950): 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nash, John. “Non-Cooperative Games.” The Annals of Mathematics 54, no. 2 (1951): 54, 286–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nash, John F.Essays on Game Theory. Cheltenham, UK; Brookfield, VT: E. Elgar, 1996.Google Scholar

Neal, Fred Warner and Hamlett, Bruce D.. “The Never-Never Land of International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 13, no. 3 (1969): 281–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neal, Patrick. “Hobbes and Rational Choice Theory.” The Western Political Quarterly 41, no. 4 (1988): 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neblo, Michael A.Deliberative Democracy: Between Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Von Neumann, John and Morgenstern, Oskar. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. anniversary ed. Princeton, NJ; Woodstock: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Nitze, Paul H. “Atoms, Strategy and Policy.” Foreign Affairs 34, no. 2 (1956): 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nitze, Paul H. “The Strategic Balance between Hope and Skepticism.” Foreign Policy, no. 17 (1975): 136–156.Google Scholar

Nitze, Paul H. “Assuring Strategic Stability in an Era of Détente.” Foreign Affairs 54, no. 2 (1976): 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nitze, Paul H. “Deterring Our Deterrent.” Foreign Policy, no. 25 (1977): 195–210.Google Scholar

Nitze, Paul H. “Strategy in the Decade of the 1980s.” Foreign Affairs 59, no. 1 (1980): 82–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

North, Douglass Cecil. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. The Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nozick, Robert. “The Construction of the Good.” In Philosophy, Science, and Method, edited by Morgenbesser, Sidney, Suppes, Patrick, and White, Morton, 440–472. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Nozick, Robert. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell, 1975.Google Scholar

Nozick, Robert. Nature of Rationality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Nye, Joseph S. Jr.Nuclear Ethics. New York: Free Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Nye, Joseph S. Jr.Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs, 2005.Google Scholar

Nye, Joseph S. and Lynn-Jones, Sean M.. “International Security Studies: A Report of a Conference on the State of the Field.” International Security 12, no. 4 (1988): 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action; Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard Economic Studies, v. 124. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Ostrom, Elinor. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. The Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostrom, Elinor. “Policies That Crowd out Collective Action.” In Moral Sentiments and Material Interests, edited by Gintis, Herbert, Bowles, Samuel, Boyd, Robert, and Fehr, Ernst. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Ostrom, Elinor and Schlager, Edella. “The Formation of Property Rights.” In Rights to Nature, edited by Hanna, Susan, Folke, Carl, and Mäler, Karl-Göran, 127–156. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Oye, Kenneth A. “Explaining Cooperation under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies.” World Politics 38, no. 1 (1985): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parrington, Alan J. Col. “Mutually Assured Destruction Revisited. Strategic Doctrine in Question.” Airpower Journal (1997): 4–18.

Pettit, Philip. “The Prisoner's Dilemma and Social Theory: An Overview of Some Issues.” Australian Journal of Political Science 20, no. 1 (1985): 1–11.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip. “Free Riding and Foul Dealing.” Journal of Philosophy 83, no. 7 (1986), 361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pettit, Philip. “Preserving the Prisoner's Dilemma.” Synthese 68, no. 1 (1986): 181–184.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford Political Theory. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip. Rules, Reasons, and Norms: Selected Essays. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; Clarendon Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pettit, Philip. “Virtus Normativa: Rational Choice Perspectives.” In Rules, Reasons, and Norms, edited by Pettit, Philip. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pettit, Philip and Brennan, Geoffrey. “Restrictive Consequentialism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64, no. 4 (1986): 438–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pipes, Richard. Survival Is Not Enough: Soviet Realities and America's Future. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1984.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A.The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A.The Economics of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A. “Wealth Maximization and Judicial Decision-Making.” International Review of Law and Economics 4 (1984): 131–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, Richard A. “Wealth Maximization Revisited.” Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, and Public Policy 2 (1985): 85–106.Google Scholar

Poundstone, William. Prisoner's Dilemma. New York: Anchor Books, 1993.Google Scholar

Quackenbush, Stephen. “The Rationality of Rational Choice Theory.” International Interactions 30, no. 2 (2004): 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quester, George H. “Some Possible Surprises in Our Nuclear Future.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 11, no. 2 (2000): 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rand, David G., Greene, Joshua D., and Nowak, Martin A.. “Spontaneous Giving and Calculated Greed.” Nature 489, no. 11457 (2012), doi:10.1038/nature11467; www.nature.com/nature/journal/v489/n7416/abs/nature11467.html, accessed July 1, 2015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rapoport, Anatol. Fights, Games, and Debates. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Rapoport, Anatol. Strategy and Conscience. New York: Harper & Row, 1964.Google Scholar

Rapoport, Anatol. “The Role of Game Theory in Uncovering Non-Strategic Principles of Decision.” In Theory of Games: Techniques and Applications, edited by Mensch, A., 410–431. New York: American Elsevier Publishing Company, Inc., 1966.Google Scholar

Rapoport, Anatol. The Big Two; Soviet-American Perceptions of Foreign Policy. American Involvement in the World. New York: Pegasus, 1971.Google Scholar

Rapoport, Anatol and Chammah, Albert M.. Prisoner's Dilemma; a Study in Conflict and Cooperation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. “Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 14, no. 3 (1985): 223–251.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Original ed. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Riker, William H. and Ordeshook, Peter C.. An Introduction to Positive Political Theory. Prentice-Hall Contemporary Political Theory Series. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973.Google Scholar

Robbins, Lionel Robbins. An Essay on the Nature & Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan, 1932.Google Scholar

Robbins, Lionel Robbins. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. ed. New York: New York University Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodgers, Daniel T.Age of Fracture. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Roemer, John. “The Mismarriage of Bargaining Theory and Distributive Justice.” Ethics 97, no. 1 (1986): 88–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roese, Neal J. and Olson, James M.. What Might Have Been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1995.Google Scholar

Ross, Don. “Evolutionary Game Theory and the Normative Theory of Institutional Design: Binmore and Behavioral Economics.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 5, no. 1 (2006): 51–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, Don. “Game Theory.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2006, revised 2014. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/game-theory/.

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Social Contract. Translated and Introduced by Cranston, Maurice. New York: Penguin, [1762] 1968.Google Scholar

Ryan, Alan. The Making of Modern Liberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Ryan, Matthew J. “Mathematicians as Great Economists: John Forbes Nash Jr.” Agenda 9, no. 2 (2002): 121–134.Google Scholar

Saladoff, Susan. Hot Coffee. Docurama Films: New Video, 2011.

Sandel, Michael. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. ed. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandel, Michael. What Money Can't Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2013.Google Scholar

Savage, Leonard J.The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley, 1954.Google Scholar

Scarry, Elaine. Thermonuclear Monarchy: Choosing between Democracy and Doom. New York: W. W. Norton, 2014.Google Scholar

Schelling, Thomas C. “The Strategy of Conflict Prospectus for a Reorientation of Game Theory.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 2, no. 3 (1958): 203–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schelling, Thomas C. “The Retarded Science of International Strategy.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 4, no. 2 (1960): 107–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schelling, Thomas C.The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Schelling, Thomas C. “Review: War without Pain, and Other Models.” World Politics 15, no. 3 (1963): 465–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schelling, Thomas C. “Review: Strategy and Conscience by Anatol Rapoport..” The American Economic Review 54, no. 6 (1964): 1082–1088.Google Scholar

Schelling, Thomas C. “Strategy, Tactics, and Non-Zero-Sum Theory.” In Theory of Games: Techniques and Applications, edited by Mensch, A., 469–480. New York: American Elsevier, 1966.Google Scholar

Schelling, Thomas C. “Hockey Helmets, Concealed Weapons, and Daylight Saving: A Study of Binary Choices with Externalities.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 17, no. 3 (1973): 381–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schelling, Thomas. “A Framework for the Analysis of Arms-Control Proposals.” Daedalus 104, no. 3 (1975): 187–200.Google Scholar

Schelling, Thomas C. “The Role of War Games and Exercises.” In Managing Nuclear Operations, edited by Carter, Ashton B., Steinbruner, John D., and Zraket, Charles A., 426–444. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution 1987.Google Scholar

Schelling, Thomas C. “An Astonishing Sixty Years: The Legacy of Hiroshima.” In Nobel Prize Lecture, 2005. Available online at www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/2005/schelling-lecture.html.

Schelling, Thomas C. and Halperin, Morton H.. Strategy and Arms Control. New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1961.Google Scholar

Schelling, Thomas C. and University, Harvard. Center for International Affairs. Arms and Influence. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. The Last Commodity: Post-Human Ethics, Global (in)Justice, and the Traffic in Organs. Dissenting Knowledges Pamphlet Series. Penang: Multiversity & Citizens International, 2008.Google Scholar

Scherer, F. M. “Review: Analysis for Military Decisions by E. S. Quade.” The American Economic Review 55, no. 5 (1965): 1191–1192.Google Scholar

Schilling, Warner S. “US Strategic Nuclear Concepts in the 1970s: The Search for Sufficiently Equivalent Countervailing Parity.” International Security 6, no. 2 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schlesinger, James R. “European Security and the Nuclear Threat since 1945.” RAND Report P3574, April 1967.

Schlesinger, James R. “Systems Analysis and the Political Process” RAND Report P3464, June 1967.

Schlesinger, James R. “Uses and Abuses of Analysis.” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 10, no. 10 (1968): 334–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schlesinger, James R. Interview, Carter Presidency Project, Miller Center of Public Affairs, available at Jimmy Carter Presidential Library, 1984.

Schlosser, Eric. Command and Control: Nuclear Weapons, the Damascus Accident, and the Illusion of Safety. London: Penguin, 2014.Google Scholar

Schmidtz, David. “Pettit's Free Riding and Foul Dealing.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 66, no. 2 (1988): 230–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrecker, Ellen. Cold War Triumphalism: The Misuse of History after the Fall of Communism. New York: New Press, distributed by W. W. Norton, 2004.Google Scholar

Schweller, Randall L. “Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In.” International Security 19, no. 1 (1994): 72–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schweller, Randall L. “Neorealism's Status-Quo Bias: What Security Dilemma?” Security Studies 5, no. 3 (1996): 90–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schweller, Randall L.Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler's Strategy of World Conquest. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Schweller, Randall L. “Realism and the Present Great Power System: Growth and Positional Conflict over Scarce Resources.” In Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies after the Cold War, edited by Kapstein, Ethan B. and Mastanduno, Michael, 28–68. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Schweller, Randall L. “Unanswered Threats.” International Security 29, no. 2 (2004): 159–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schweller, Randall L. “Neoclassical Realism and State Mobilization: Expansionist Ideology in the Age of Mass Politics.” In Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy, edited by Lobell, Steven E., RIpsman, Norrin M., and Taliaferro, Jeffrey W., 227–250. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Schweller, Randall L.Maxwell's Demon and the Golden Apple: Global Discord and the New Millennium. Baltimore: JHUP, 2014.Google Scholar

Scodel, Alvin. “Induced Collaboration in Some Non-Zero-Sum Games.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 6, no. 4 (1962): 335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seabright, Paul. “Social Choice and Social Theories.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 18, no. 4 (1989): 365–387.Google Scholar

Seabright, Paul. “The Evolution of Fairness Norms: An Essay on Ken Binmore's Natural Justice.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 5, no. 1 (2006): 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, John R.The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya. Collective Choice and Social Welfare. Mathematical Economics Texts. San Francisco: Holden-Day, 1970.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya. “The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal.” The Journal of Political Economy 78, no. 1 (1970): 152–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sen, Amartya. “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 6, no. 4 (1977): 317–344.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya. “Social Choice Theory: A Re-Examination.” Econometrica 45, no. 1 (1977): 53–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sen, Amartya. Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya. “Liberty and Social Choice.” The Journal of Philosophy 80, no. 1 (1983): 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sen, Amartya. “Minimal Liberty.” Economica 59, no. 234 (1992): 139–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sen, Amartya. “The Possibility of Social Choice.” The American Economic Review 89, no. 3 (1999): 349–378.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya. Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya. “Elements of a Theory of Human Rights.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 32, no. 4 (2005): 315–356.Google Scholar

Sent, Esther-Mirjam. “Some Like It Cold: Thomas Schelling as a Cold Warrior.” The Journal of Economic Methodology 14, no. 4 (2007): 455–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, Ian and Hardin, Russell. Political Order Nomos XXXVIII. New York: New York University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Ian and Wendt, Alexander. “The Difference That Realism Makes: Social Science and the Politics of Consent.” Politics and Society 20, no. 2 (1992): 197–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapley, Deborah. Promise and Power: The Life and Times of Robert McNamara. Boston: Little, Brown, 1993.Google Scholar

Shimshoni, Jonathan. Israel and Conventional Deterrence: Border Warfare from 1953 to 1970. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Shubik, Martin. “On the Study of Disarmament and Escalation.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 12, no. 1 (1968): 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shue, Henry. Nuclear Deterrence and Moral Restraint: Critical Choices for American Strategy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sigal, Leon V. “Rethinking the Unthinkable.” Foreign Policy, no. 34 (1979): 35–51.Google Scholar

Simmel, Georg. The Philosophy of Money. London; Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978.Google Scholar

Simmel, Georg and Frisby, David. The Philosophy of Money. enl. ed. London; New York: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar

Simon, Herbert A.Models of Bounded Rationality: Economic Analysis and Public Policy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Singer, Peter. “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1, no. 1 (1972): 229–243.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. 2 vols. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Skyrms, Brian. “The Shadow of the Future.” In Rational Commitment and Social Justice, edited by Coleman, Jules L. and Morris, Christopher W., 12–21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Skyrms, Brian. “The Stag Hunt and the Evolution of Social Structure.” Economics and Philosophy 22 (2004): 441–468.Google Scholar

Skyrms, Brian. The Stag Hunt and the Evolution of Social Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Skyrms, Brian. “Trust, Risk, and the Social Contract.” Synthese 160 (2006): 21–25.Google Scholar

Slocombe, Walter. “The Countervailing Strategy.” International Security 5, no. 4 (1981): 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Adam. Wealth of Nations. vols. 1 and 2, edited by Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, [1776] 1976.Google Scholar

Smith, Adam. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, edited by Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, [1759] 1982.Google Scholar