Theology

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521250283.014

13 - Theology

from PART IV - PHYSICS AND METAPHYSICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Edited by

Jaap Mansfeld and

Keimpe Algra: Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Jonathan Barnes: Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Jaap Mansfeld: Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Malcolm Schofield: Affiliation:
University of Cambridge

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Philosophical theology

Though theology without some form of religion to prompt it would be an odd phenomenon, it is by no means the same thing as religion. Theology, or at least philosophical theology, is a rational enterprise or at any rate an attempt to rationalize the irrational. Rationalist forms of reflection concerning the gods, or the divine, are part of Greek philosophy from its very beginning. On the one hand, the primary principle or principles were often said to be divine or provided with divine attributes, while on the other traditional views of the gods were criticized and other proposals formulated. But the first philosopher to elevate theology (at least in principle) to the status of a part of philosophy was Aristotle, who at Metaph. E 1.1026a19 affirms that there are ‘three theoretical disciplines: mathematics, physics, theology’. Before Aristotle, Plato had argued that those who write about the gods should follow certain ‘models’ (Rep. 379a6). According to this prescription, a god is good and so not the cause of evil but only of what is good, and he does not change but always remains the same. The sharp contrast with the gods of traditional Greek religion, who assume different shapes at will and may not only favour human beings but also deceive and harm them, is very deliberate.

Divinities which conform to this ideal play a decisive part in Plato's and Aristotle's cosmologies. According to Plato's Timaeus we live in the best of all possible worlds because it has been constructed by a Divine Craftsman and his help-mates.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy , pp. 452 - 478

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521250283.014 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Babut, D. (1974) La Religion des Philosophes Grecs, de Thales aux Stoiciens (Paris).Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1989a) ‘The size of the sun in antiquity’, ACD 25.Google Scholar

Bett, R. (1994a) ‘What did Pyrrho think about “the nature of the divine and the good”?’, Phronesis 39.CrossRef Google Scholar

Boyancé, P. (1962) ‘Les preuves stoïciennes de l'existence des dieux d'après Cicéron’, Hermes 90.Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. (1994d) ‘Did Diogenes of Babylon invent the ontological argument?’, in Brunschwig, (1994a).Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. (1982b) ‘Gods and heaps’, in Schofield, & Nussbaum, (1982).CrossRef Google Scholar

Clay, D. (1986) ‘The cults of Epicurus’, CErc 16.Google Scholar

Couissin, P. (1941) ‘Les sorites de Carnéade contre le polythéisme’, REG 54.Google Scholar

Daiber, H. (1992) ‘The Meteorology of Theophrastus in Syriac and Arabic translation’, in Fortenbaugh, & Gutas, (1992).Google Scholar

Decleva Caizzi, F., ed. (1981a) Pirrone: Testimonianze, Elenchos, 5 (Naples).Google Scholar

Diels, H., ed. (1916/17) Philodemos über die Götter, Erstes und drittes Buch, Abh. der königlich Preussischen Akad. der Wiss. 1915.7/1916.4 and 6, philos.-hist. Klasse (Berlin).Google Scholar

Dionigi, I. (1976) ‘Lucr. 6, 1198–1203 e P. Oxy. 215 col. 17–24: L'epicureismo e la venerazione degli dei’, SIFC 48.Google Scholar

Döring, K. (1978) ‘Antike Theorien über die staatspolitische Notwendigkeit der Götterfurcht’, A & A 24.Google Scholar

Dragona-Monachou, M. (1976) The Stoic Arguments for the Existence and the Providence of the Gods (Athens).Google Scholar

Dumont, J.-P. (1982) ‘Diogène de Babylone et la preuve ontologique’, RPh 107.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (1992a) ‘Orthodoxie und Anpassung. Philodem, ein Panaitis des Kepos?’, MH 49.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (1993) ‘Philologia medicans. Wie die Epikureer die Texte ihres Meisters lasen’, in Kullmann, W. & Althoff, J., edd., Vermittlung und Tradierung von Wissen in der griechischen Kultur (Tübingen).Google Scholar

Fahr, W. (1969) “θEOYσ NOMIZEIN”, Zum Problem der Anfänge des Atheismus bei den Griechen, Spudasmata 26 (Hildesheim/New York).Google Scholar

Festugière, A.-J. (1949) La révélation d'Hermès Trismégiste, II: Le Dieu cosmique (Paris, later repr.).Google Scholar

Gercke, A., ed. (1885) Chrysippea (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1995) The Sceptics (London).Google Scholar

Henrichs, A. (1974) ‘Die Kritik der stoischen Theologie im PHerc. 1428’, CErc 4.Google Scholar

Henrichs, A. (1975) ‘Two doxographical notes: Democritus and Prodicus on religion’, HSPh 79.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (1985) Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism (Oxford).Google Scholar

Kattenbusch, F. (1930) ‘Die Entstehung einer christlichen Theologie. Zur Geschichte der Ausdrücke θ∊oλoγια, θ∊oλoγ∊ĩν, θ∊oλóγoς’, Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche N. F. 11.Google Scholar

Kleve, K. (1979) ‘The Epicurean isonomia and its sceptical refutation’, SO 54.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lange, F. A. (1974) Geschichte des Materialismus und Kritik seiner Bedeutung in der Gegenwart, Bd. 1: Geschichte des Materialismus bis auf Kant (Iserlohn 1866, 11 1921; repr. Frankfurt A. M. 1974 with introd. by Schmidt, A.).Google Scholar

Lemke, D. (1973) Die Theologie Epikurs: Versuch einer Rekonstruktion, Zetemata 57 (Munich).Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1975–6) ‘Heraclitus and Stoicism’, Philosophia 5/6 ; repr. in Long, (1996).Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1990) ‘Scepticism about Gods in Hellenistic philosophy’, in Griffith, M. & Mastronarde, D. J., edd., Cabinet of the Muses, Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer (Atlanta).Google Scholar

Long, A. A. & Sedley, D. N., edd. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols.: i. Translations of the principal sources with philosophical commentary; ii. Greek and Latin texts with notes and bibliography (Cambridge, various reprints).Google Scholar

Longo Auricchio, F., ed. (1988) Ermarco: Frammenti, La scuola di Epicuro 6 (Naples).Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1979) ‘Providence and the destruction of the universe in early Stoic thought’, in Vermaseren, M. J., ed., Studies in Hellenistic Religions, EPRO 78 (Leiden) ; repr. in Mansfeld, (1989b) study 1.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1981) ‘Protagoras on epistemological obstacles and persons’, in Kerferd, G. B., ed., The Sophists and their Legacy, Proceedings of the Fourth International Colloquium on Ancient Philosophy, Hermes Einzelschr. 44 (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1983b) ‘Techne: a new fragment of Chrysippus’, GRBS 24 ; repr. in Mansfeld, (1989b) study III.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1990a) ‘Doxography and dialectic: The Sitz im Leben of the “Placita”’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW 11 36.4 (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1992b) ‘A Theophrastean excursus on God and nature and its aftermath in Hellenistic thought’, Phronesis 37.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1992c) ‘Physikai doxai and problemata physika from Aristotle to Aëtius (and beyond)’, in Fortenbaugh, & Gutas, (1992).Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1993) ‘Aspects of Epicurean theology’, Mnemosyne 46.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1994a) ‘Epicurus peripateticus’, in Alberti, A., ed., Realtà e ragione, Studi di filosofia antica (Florence).Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (1984) ‘P.Oxy. 215 and Epicurean religious θ∊ωρια’, in Atti del XVII Congresso internazionale di papirologia, vol. II (Naples).Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (1989) ‘The atheism of Epicurus’, GRBS 30.Google Scholar

Obbink, D., ed. (1996) Philodemus On Piety, Part 1: Critical Text with Commentary (Oxford).Google Scholar

Pépin, J. (1976) Mythe et allégorie. Les origines grecques et les contestations judéo-chrétiennes, 2nd edn (Paris).Google Scholar

Romeo, C. (1979) ‘Demetrio Lacone sulla grandezza del sole (PHerc. 1013)’, CErc 9.Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. (1992) ‘The language of excellence in Plato's Timaeus and later Platonism’, in Gersh, S. & Kannengiesser, C., eds., Platonism in Late Antiquity (Notre Dame).Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. (1996b) ‘Atheists in Aëtius. Text, translation and comments on De placitis 1.7.1–10’, Mnemosyne IV.59.Google Scholar

Sandbach, F. H. (1985) Aristotle and the Stoics, PCPhS suppl. vol. 10 (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Schian, R. (1973) Untersuchungen über das ‘argumentum e consensu omnium’, Spudasmata 28 (Hildesheim).Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (1980b) ‘Preconception, argument and god’, in Schofield, et al. (1980a).Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (1983) ‘The syllogisms of Zeno of Citium’, Phronesis 28.CrossRef Google Scholar

Verbeke, G. (1949) Kleanthes van Assos (Brussels).Google Scholar

Winiarczyk, M., ed. (1981) Diagorae Melii et Theodori Cyrenaei reliquiae, Bibl. Teubneriana (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Winiarczyk, M. (1984) ‘Wer galt im Altertum als Atheist?’, Philologus 128.CrossRef Google Scholar

Winiarczyk, M. (1992) ‘Wer galt im Altertum als Atheist? 2. Teil’, Philologus 136.CrossRef Google Scholar

Woodward, P. G. (1989) ‘Star gods in Philodemus, PHerc. 152/157’, CErc 19.Google Scholar

Zanker, G. (1981) ‘Enargeia in the ancient criticism of poetry’, RhM 124.Google Scholar

Zeller, E. (& Wellmann, E., ed.) (1909) Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, III.1: Die nacharistotelische Philosophie, erste Hälfte (Leipzig; 5 1923 = Darmstadt 6 1963).Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.