Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T05:50:58.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - ENGLISH GRAMMAR AND USAGE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Edward Finegan
Edited by
Suzanne Romaine
Suzanne Romaine
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The codification of English usage, not by an official academy but by a disparate band of independent entrepreneurs, constitutes the story of this chapter. It is a story of increasing knowledge about language in general and English in particular, of competition between prescriptive and descriptive ideals of grammar and lexicography in the market-place and of a shifting role for the place of speech and writing in codifying the language. It is also a story of the influence of piety, morality, discipline and social politics on the evaluation of English usage as the language was codified and the codifications disseminated over the last two centuries. The focus throughout is on Britain, but the interactions between Britons and Americans and the intertwined scholarship and international markets for English-language grammars and dictionaries make a tidy separation of the British and American stories impracticable. Following section 6.1, the discussion is divided into three periods. Section 6.2 concentrates on the years roughly from the mid-eighteenth century to the introduction of comparative historical linguistics into Britain around 1830, section 6.3 the period from 1830 to 1930 so as to encompass the entire scope of planning and producing the Oxford English Dictionary, and section 6.4 the span from the completion of the OED to the close of the millennium. The chronological subdivisions are somewhat arbitrary in that the patterns examined do not start or end on particular dates, but the periods serve as convenient frames for focusing on notable trends. Section 6.5 offers some conclusions and prospects. (American views of grammar and usage are reported in volume VI.)

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of the English Language , pp. 536 - 588
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarsleff, H. (1983) [1967]. The Study of Language in England, 1780–1860. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Alford, H. (n.d.) [1864]. A Plea for the Queens English: Stray Notes on Speaking and Spelling. Repr. from 2nd London edn. New York: Dick & Fitzgerald.Google Scholar
Ash, J. (1763). Grammatical Institutes. 4th edn. London. [E. L. 9,1967]Google Scholar
Ayres, A. (1882) [1880]. The Orthoepist: a Pronouncing Manual. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Ayres, A. (1897) [1881]. The Verbalist: a Manual Devoted to Brief Discussions of the Right and the Wrong Use of Words. Rev. edn. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Bailey, R. W. (1991). Images of English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Baron, D. (1982). Grammar and Good Taste. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bolton, W. F. & Crystal, D. (eds.) (1969). The English Language: Essays by Linguists and Men of Letters, 1858–1964. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bolton, W. F. (ed.) (1966). The English Language: Essays by English and American Men of Letters, 1490–1839. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Breen, H. H. (1857). Modern English’ Literature: Its Blemishes and Defects. London: Longman, Brown, Green & Longmans.Google Scholar
Bromley, J. (1959). The Man of Ten Talents: a Portrait of Richard Chenevix Trench 1807–86. Philologist, Poet, Theologian, Archibishop. London: SPCK.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (1853) [1823]. The Institutes of English Grammar. New York: S. Wood.Google Scholar
Burchfield, R. W. (1987). The Supplement to the Oxford English Dictionary: the End of the Alphabet. In Bailey, R. W. (ed.), Dictionaries of English: Prospects for the Record of our Language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Burchfield, R. W. (ed.) (1972–86). A Supplement to the Oxford English Dictionary. 4 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (1995). Verbal Hygiene. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. (1776). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Ed. Bitzer, L. F. . Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press (1963).Google Scholar
Cobbett, W. (1818). A Grammar of the English Language. The 1818 New York first edition with passages added in 1819, 1820, and 1823. ed. Nickerson, C. C. & Osborne, J. W. (1983). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Cobbett, W. (1823). A Grammar of the English Language. With an introduction by Burchfield, Robert . (1984). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cobbett, W. (1832). A Grammar of the English Language. Facsimile reproduction with introductions by Downey, C. and Aarts, F. . (1986). Delmar, NY: Scholars’ Facsimiles and Reprints.Google Scholar
Coleridge, H. (1859). Proposal for the Publication of a New English Dictionary, by the Philological Society. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. (1685). Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae. [E. L. 86,1968]Google Scholar
Crowley, T. (1989). Standard English and the Politics of Language. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. [= The Politics of Discourse: the Standard Language Question in British Cultural Debates. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.]Google Scholar
Crowley, T. (1991). Proper English? Readings in Language, History and Cultural Identity. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dilworth, T. (1751) [1740]. A New Guide to the English Tongue. London: Kent. [E. L. 4,1967]Google Scholar
Fell, J. (1784). An Essay towards an English Grammar. London: Dilly. [E.L. 16,1967]Google Scholar
Finegan, E. (1980). Attitudes toward English Usage. New York and London: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Fisher, A. (1750). A New Grammar. Newcastle upon Tyne. [E. L. 130,1968]Google Scholar
Fowler, H. W. (1926). A Dictionary of Modern English Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [2nd edn. rev. by Gowers, E. . 1965]Google Scholar
Fowler, H. W. (1996). The New Fowler's Modern English Usage. Rev. by Burchfield, R. W. . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Francis, W. N. & Kucera, H. . (1982). Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Fries, C. C. (1940). American English Grammar (National Council of Teachers of English: Monograph No. 10). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Fries, C. C. (1952). The Structure of English. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Gilman, E. W. (ed.) (1989). Webster's Dictionary of English Usage. Springfield: Merriam-Webster.Google Scholar
Greaves, P. (1594). Grammatica Anglicana. [E. L. 169,1969]Google Scholar
Greenbaum, S. (ed.) (1996). Comparing English Worldmde: the International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hall, F. (1872). Recent Exemplifications of False Philology. New York: Scribner, Armstrong. (1873). Modern English. New York: Scribner, Armstrong.Google Scholar
Hall, R. A. Jr. (1950). Leave Your Language Alone!Ithaca, NY: Linguistica.Google Scholar
Hodgson, W. B. (1886). Errors in the Use of English. American rev. edn. New York: D. Appleton and Company. [First published Edinburgh, 1882]Google Scholar
Horne Tooke, J. (1798). EπEA TπTEPOENTA. Or, The Diversions of Purley, I. 2nd edn. London. [E. L. 127,1968] [1st edn. 1786]Google Scholar
Hudson, K. (1977). The Dictionary of Diseased English. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ihalainen, O. (1994). The Dialects of England since 1776. In Burchfield, R. (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. V. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1909–49). A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. 7 vols. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Johansson, S. & Hofland, K. (1989). Frequency Analysis of English Vocabulary and Grammar: Based on the LOB Corpus. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. (1755). A Dictionary of the English Language. 2 vols. London: W. Strahan.Google Scholar
Jones, R. F. (1953). The Triumph of the English Language: a Survey of Opinions concerning the Vernacular from the Introduction of Printing to the Restoration. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. E. (1987). Eloquence and Power: the Rise of Language Standards and Standard Languages. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Krapp, G. P. (1908). The Authority of ‘Lawin Language. (University Studies, University of Cincinnati, Series II, Vol. IV, No. 3.)Google Scholar
Krapp, G. P. (1909). Modern English: Its Growth and Present Use. New York: Scribner's. (1927). The Knowledge of English. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Kytö, M. , Rissanen, M. & Wright, S. (eds.) (1994). Corpora across the Centuries: Proceedings of the First International Colloquium on English Diachronic Corpora. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Landau, S. I. (1984). Dictionaries: the Art and Craft of Lexicography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Latham, R. G. (1848). The English Language. 2nd edn. London.Google Scholar
Leonard, S. A. (1929). The Doctrine of Correctness in English Usage, 1700–1800. Repr. New York: Russell & Russell, 1962.Google Scholar
Leonard, S. A. (1932). Current English Usage (National Council of Teachers of English: Monograph No. 1). Chicago: Inland.Google Scholar
Lowth, R. (1762). A Short Introduction to English Grammar. London. [E. L. 18, 1967]Google Scholar
Müller, M. (1862). Lectures on the Science of Language. From 2nd London edn., rev. New York: Scribner's.Google Scholar
Müller, M. (1874). Lectures on the Science of Language. Second series. New York: Scribner, Armstrong.Google Scholar
Marckwardt, A. H. & Walcott, F. G. . (1938). Facts About Current English Usage (National Council of Teachers of English: Monograph No. 7). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Marsh, G. P. (1860). Lectures on the English Language. New York: Scribner's.Google Scholar
Mathews, W. (1876). Words; Their Use and Abuse. Chicago.Google Scholar
Matthews, B. (1901). Parts of Speech: Essays on English. New York: Scribner's. (1921). Essays on English. New York: Scribner's.Google Scholar
McDavid, R. I. Jr. (1966). Usage, Dialects, and Functional Varieties. In Stein, J. (ed.), The Random House Dictionary of the English Language – The Unabridged Edition. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
McKnight, G. H. (1928). Modern English in the Making. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Meredith, L. P. (1877). Every-day Errors of Speech. Rev. by Leary, T. H. L. . London: William Tegg.Google Scholar
Michael, I. (1970). English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Michael, I. (1987). The Teaching of English from the Sixteenth Century to 1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, J. & Milroy, L. (1991). Authority in Language: Investigating Language Prescription and Standardisation. 2nd edn. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mittins, W. H. , Salu, M. , Edminson, M. & Coyne, S. (1970). Attitudes to English Usage. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moon, G. W. (1869). The Bad English of Lindley Murray and Other Writers on the English Language. 3rd edn. London.Google Scholar
Morris, W. (ed.) (1969). The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. Boston: American Heritage & Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Morton, H. C. (1994). The Story of Webster's Third: Philip Gove's Controversial Dictionary and Its Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mugglestone, L. (1995). ‘Talking Proper’: the Rise of Accent as Social Symbol. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Murray, K. M. E. (1977). Caught in the Web of Words. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, L. (1795). English Grammar, Adapted to the Different Classes of Learners. York. [E.L. 106,1968]Google Scholar
Padley, G. A. (1988). Grammatical Theory in Western Europe, 1500–1700: Trends in Vernacular Grammar IICambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Partridge, E. (1969). Shakespeare s Bawdy. Rev. edn. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Pedersen, H. (1959). The Discovery of Language; Linguistic Science in the Nineteenth Century. Trans. Spargo, J. W. . Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Originally published 1931.]Google Scholar
Peters, P. (1995). The Cambridge Australian English Style Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Priesdey, J. (1761). The Rudiments of English Grammar. London: Griffiths. [E. L. 210, 1969]Google Scholar
Quirk, R. (1968). From Descriptive to Prescriptive: an Example. In Quirk, R. , Essays on the English Language: Medieval and Modern. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Reddick, A. (1996). The Making of Johnson's Dictionary, 1746–1773. Rev. edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, C. (1836). A New Dictionary of the English Language. London: William Pickering.Google Scholar
Richardson, C. (1854). On the Study of Language: An Exposition of EπEA πTEPOENTA, or the Diversions of Purley, by John Home Tooke. ’London: George Bell.Google Scholar
Sheridan, T. (1762). A Course of Lectures on Elocution. London: W. Strahan. [E. L. 129,1968]Google Scholar
Sheridan, T. (1780). A General Dictionary of the English Language. London: J. Dodsley. [E. L. 50,1967]Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. M. (ed.) (1987). Looking Up. London: Collins ELT.Google Scholar
Sledd, J. H. & Kolb, G. J. . (1955). Dr. Johnsons Dictionary: Essays in the Biography of a Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sledd, J. H. & Ebbitt, W. R. (eds.) (1962). Dictionaries and That Dictionary. Chicago: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
Stein, G. (1985). The English Dictionary before Cawdrey. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, D. & Tieken-BoonOstade, I. (eds.) (1993). Towards a Standard English 1600–1800. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundby, B. , Bjørge, A. K. , & Haugland, K. E. (1991). A Dictionary of English Normative Grammar 1700–1800. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svartvik, J. & Quirk, R. (eds.) (1980). A Corpus of English Conversation. Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
Swift, J. (1712). A Proposalfor Correcting, Improving and Ascertaining the English Tongue. London. [E. L. 213, 1969]Google Scholar
Treble, H. A. & VaUins, G. H. (1936). An ABC of English Usage. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Trench, R. C. (1852) [1851]. On the Study of Words. [From 2nd London edn.] New York: Redfield.Google Scholar
Trench, R. C. (1855). English, Past and Present. London: Parker.Google Scholar
Trench, R. C. (1857). On Some Deficiencies in our English Dictionaries. Being the Substance of Two Papers Read before the Philological Society, Nov. 5, and Nov. 19, 1857.2nd edn. 1860. London: Parker.Google Scholar
Trench, R. C. (1877). Suplé’s Trench on Words. New York: Widdleton.Google Scholar
Tucker, S. I. (1961). English Examined. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallis, J. (1653). Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae. Oxonia: Excudebat. Leon. Lichfield. Veneunt apud Tho. Robinson. [E. L. 142,1969]Google Scholar
Ward, W. (1765). An Essay on Grammar. London: Horsfield. [E. L. 15, 1967]Google Scholar
Webster, N. (1784). A Grammatical Institute, of the English Language, Comprising, An Easy, Concise, and Systematic Method of Education, Designed for the Use of English Schools in America. Part II. Hartford: Hudson & Goodwin. [E. L. 90, 1968]Google Scholar
Webster, N. (1789). Dissertations on the English Language. Boston: Isaiah Thomas and Company. [Scolar Press Facsimile, 1967]Google Scholar
Webster, N. (1828). An American Dictionary of the English Language. New York: Converse.Google Scholar
Worcester, J. E. (1859). A Dictionary of the English Language. London: Sampson Low.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×