7 - LITERARY LANGUAGE
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
Edited by
Summary
Introduction
The two revolutions
(1) Every revolution in poetry is apt to be, and sometimes to announce itself as, a return to common speech. That is the revolution which Wordsworth announced in his prefaces and he was right… and the same revolution was due again something over a century later.
(Eliot 1942)T S. Eliot, like many other commentators, identifies two revolutions in the history of poetic language since 1776. The ‘revolution which Wordsworth announced in his prefaces’, conventionally known as the Romantic revolution, is commonly dated from the collaborative production of Lyrical Ballads by Wordsworth and Coleridge in 1798. The second revolution – Modernism – has its equivalent landmark publication in Eliot's own The Waste Land of 1922, though the movement began over a decade earlier, with the arrival in London of Eliot's mentor Ezra Pound in 1908 and the impact of the first exhibition of Post-Impressionist painting in 1910.
In the years between 1910 and 1922, Eliot, Pound, and other members of their circle were anxious to stress the stylistic gulf dividing them from their nineteenth-century predecessors and to represent Modernism as a counter-revolution against Romanticism. But in (1), reviewing events from the retroperspective of the 1940s, Eliot emphasises instead the common ground between the two movements and defines this as ‘a return to common speech'. It's a definition that may seem paradoxical to those who share the belief, voiced by Larkin in (2), that Modernism fosters élitist and difficult forms of writing which remove literature from common speech:
(2) It seems to me undeniable that up to this century literature used language in the way we all use it, painting represented what anyone with normal vision sees . . . The innovation of ‘modernism’ in the arts consisted of doing the opposite.
(Larkin 1983)- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of the English Language , pp. 589 - 692Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1999
References
(1994a). From empathetic deixis to empathetic narrative: stylisa-tion and (de)subjectivisation as processes of language-change. Transactions of the Philological Society 92A. Reprinted in
&
(eds.) (1995), Subjectivity andSubjectivisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1994b). Subjectivity in narration: empathy and echo. In
(ed.), Subjecthood and Subjectivity. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
(forthcoming). The code as context: language change and (mis)interpretation. In
&
(eds.), Context in Language Learning and Language Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1992). What would they know of English who only English know?: the contribution of Caribbean creoles to the expressive resources of the English language. In
(ed.), Old English and New: Studies in Language and Linguistics in Honor of Frederic G. Cassidy. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
(1912). Le style indirect libre en français moderne. Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift, 4.Google Scholar
1982. Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1986). A Bibliography of Stylistics and Related Criticism, 1967–83. New York: Modern Languages Association of America.Google Scholar
&
(1989). Drift and the evolution of English style: a history of three genres. Language 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988). Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1783). Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. 3 vols. Dublin: Whitestone, Colles et al.Google Scholar
(1984). A History of the Voice: the Development of Nation Language in Anglophone Caribbean Poetry. London: New Beacon.Google Scholar
(1948). The Triumph of Form: a Study of the Later Masters of the Heroic Couplet. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
(1986). Literary representation of dialect: a theoretical approach to the artistic problem. The USF Language Quarterly 14.Google Scholar
(1817). Biographia Literaria. In
&
(eds.) (1983), The Collected Works 7. i–ii. (Bollingen Series 75). Princeton: University Press.Google Scholar
(1980). Neglected grammatical factors in conversational English. In
,
&
(eds.), Studies in English Linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1984. What metaphors mean. In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1978). Language Processing and the Reading of Literature: Toward a Model of Comprehension. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
(1988). A First Dictionary and Grammar of Laadan. Ed.
. Madison, Wisconsin: Society for the Furtherance and Study of Fantasy and Science Fiction.Google Scholar
(1990). Tense and Narrativity: from Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1993). The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction: the Linguistic Representation of Speech and Consciousness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1983). Polyphony and problematic in Hard Times
. In
(ed.), The Changing World of Charles Dickens. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
(1954). Theory of Prosody in Eighteenth-Century England. (Connecticut College Monographs) New London, Connecticut: Connecticut College.Google Scholar
(1981). Linguistic function and literary style: an enquiry into the language of William Golding's The Inheritors
. In
(ed.) (1981).Google Scholar
(1973). The Logic of Literature (tr. by M.J. Rose). Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
(1771). Hermes, or A Philosophical Inquiry Concerning Universal Grammar. 3rd rev. edn. London: John Nourse.Google Scholar
(ed.) (1994). Repetition in Discourse: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
(1981). The Idea of Biblical Poetry: Parallelism and its History. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(1969). The logic of nonstandard English. In Georgetown Monographs on Language and Linguistics, 22. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. Reprinted as ch. 5 of W. Labov (1972), Language in the Inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
(1994). Philosophy of Nonsense: the Intuitions of Victorian Nonsense Literature. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991). But I Digress: the Exploitation of Parentheses in English Printed Verse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1997). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1992). Apposition in Contemporary English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980). Aliens and Linguistics: Language Study and Science Fiction. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
(1964). Eras and Modes in English Poetry. Revised edition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1967). Style and Proportion: The Language of Prose and Poetry. Boston: Litde, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
(1977). The Language of GerardManley Hopkins (The Language Library). London: André Deutsch.Google Scholar
(1982). Orality and Literacy: the Technologizing of the Word. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
&
(eds.) (1989). The Voice of the Narrator in Children's Literature: Insights from Writers and Critics. London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
(1977). The Dual Voice: free indirect style and its functioning in the nineteenth century European novelManchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
(1985). The Li'l Abner syndrome: written representations of speech. American Speech 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988). English poetry and emphatical language. Proceedings of the British Academy 74.Google Scholar
(1993). Beckett's Dying Words. (The Clarendon Lectures 1990.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1856). Modern Painters III. Volume 5 of
&
(eds.) (1904), The Works of John Ruskin. London: George Allen.Google Scholar
(1962). Lewis Carroll and T S. Eliot as nonsense poets. In
(ed.), T. S. Eliot. (Twentieth Century Views series.) New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
&
(eds.) (1991). Subjectivity and Literature from the Romantics to the Present Day. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
(1967). Making earnest of game: G. M. Hopkins and nonsense poetry. Modern Language Quarterly 28 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,
,
,
,
&
. A Literary History of the United States. 4th rev. edn. New York: Macmillan.
(1775). An Essay towards Establishing the Melody and Measure of Speech. London: J. Almon, 76.Google Scholar
(1990). Missing Measures: Modern Poetry and the Revolt against Meter. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press.Google Scholar
&
(1990). Literature, Language and Change: from Chaucer to the Present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1989). Talking voices: repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) (1982). Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
(1987). Meter and mode: English iambic pentameter, hexameter, and septame-ter and their period variations. Style 21.Google Scholar
&
(1980). Linguistics for Students of Literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
(1985). The search for a Scots narrative voice. In
(ed.) Focus On: Scotland. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
(1980). The Chances of Rhyme: Device and Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1985). The New Poetries: Poetic Form since Coleridge and Wordsworth. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
&
(eds.) (1971). A Various Language: Perspectives on American Dialects. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
(1970). One relation of rhyme to reason. In The Verbal Icon. London: Methuen. (First published 1954, Lexington: University of Kentucky.)Google Scholar
(1975). The New Journalism. London: Pan. (First published 1973, New York: Harper & Row.)Google Scholar
(1802). Preface and Appendix to 3rd edition of Lyrical Ballads (page references to the text as printed in Mason 1992).Google Scholar
(1991). The African Palimpsest: Indigenization of Language in the West African Europhone Novel. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
- 19
- Cited by