References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sign Language and Linguistic Universals , pp. 511 - 540Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
Aarons, Debra. 1994. Aspects of the syntax of American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Boston University.
, , , and . 1992. Clausal structure and a tier for grammatical marking in American Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 15: 103–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aarons, Debra, Bahan, Benjamin, Kegl, Judy, and Neidle, Carol.1994. Subjects and agreement in American Sign Language. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. , , and , 13–28. Durham: International Sign Language Association.Google Scholar
Aarons, Debra, Bahan, Benjamin, Kegl, Judy, and Neidle, Carol.1995. Lexical tense markers in American Sign Language. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. and , 225–253. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Abney, S. P. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Ahlgren, Inger. 1990. Deictic pronouns in Swedish and Swedish Sign Language. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Volume 1: Linguistics, eds. and , 167–174. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ahn, Sung-Ho. 1990. A structured-tiers model for ASL phonology. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. , 11–26. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1998. PAH! The acquisition of adverbials in ASL. Sign Language & Linguistics 1: 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1987. Principles of Dependency Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1992. Physiological constraints in Taiwan Sign Language handshape change. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 15: 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ann, Jean.1993. A linguistic investigation of the relationship between physiology and handshape. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.
. 1996. On the relation between ease of articulation and frequency of occurrence of handshapes in two sign languages. Lingua 98: 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 1995. Gesture and the Nature of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph Series 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Meir, Irit, Padden, Carol, and Sandler, Wendy. 2003. Classifier complexes and morphology in two sign languages. In Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages, ed. . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Meir, Irit, Padden, Carol, and Sandler, Wendy.2004. Morphological universals and the sign language type. In Yearbook of Morphology 2004, eds. and . Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer, 19–39.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Meir, Irit, and Sandler, Wendy. 2000. Universal and particular aspects of sign language morphology. In University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, eds. K. K. Grohmann and C. Struijke, 1–34.
, , and . 2005. The paradox of sign language morphology. Language 81.2: 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, and Sridhar, S. N. 1987. Morphological levels in English and Kannada: or Atarizing Reagan. In Phonomorphology, ed. . Lublin: Redakcja Wydawnictw Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Luelskiego.Google Scholar
Ausín, Adolfo. 1999. Chinese-type questions in English. In Proceedings of The Seventeenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, eds. , , and , 30–43. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bahan, Benjamin. 1996. Non-manual realization of agreement in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Boston University.
, , , , and . 2000. The licensing of null arguments in American Sign Language. Linguistic Inquiry 31:1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahan, Benjamin, and Petitto, Laura. 1980. Aspects of rules for character establishment and reference in ASL storytelling. Unpublished ms.; Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA.
1970. Notes on the description of English questions: the role of an abstract question morpheme. Foundations of Language 6: 197–219.Google Scholar
Baker, Charlotte. 1977. Regulators and turn-taking in American Sign Language discourse. In On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language, ed. , 215–236. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1980. American Sign Language: A Teacher's Resource Text on Grammar and Culture. Silver Spring, MD: TJ Publishers.Google Scholar
Baker, Charlotte, and Padden, Carol A. 1978. Focusing on the non-manual components of ASL. In Understanding Language through Sign Language Research, ed. , 27–57. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baker-Shenk, Charlotte. 1983. A micro-analysis of the non-manual components of questions in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California.
, and . 2001. The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1973. Narrative style and the grammar of direct and indirect speech. Foundations of Language 10:1–39.Google Scholar
, and eds. 1988. Agreement in Natural Language: Approaches, Theories, Descriptions. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Literature.Google Scholar
. 1974. Phonological deletion in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 5: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1986. Intonational structure in English and Japanese. Phonology Yearbook 3: 255–310.Google Scholar
, and . 1972. A comparison of signed and spoken language. Cognition 1: 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1981. Formal devices for creating new signs in ASL. Sign Language Studies 10: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2004. Where did all the arguments go? Argument-changing properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22.4: 743–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenz, Norine, and Ferreira-Brito, Lucinda. 1990. Pronouns in BCSL and ASL. In SLR '87: Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. and . Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Bergman, Brita. 1983. Verbs and adjectives: morphological processes in Swedish Sign Language. In Language in Sign: An International Perspective on Sign Language, eds. and , 3–9. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Bergvall, Victoria. 1987. The position and properties of in situ and right-moved questions in Kikuyu. In Current Approaches to African Linguistics, ed. , 37–54. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 1993. The nature of constraints on the non-dominant hand in ASL. In Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. , 43–62. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette.1995. The syllable in phonological theory. In A Handbook of Phonological Theory ed. , 206–244. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
, and . 2000. Rhythmic structures in French Sign Language (LSF) nursery rhymes. Sign Language & Linguistics 3: 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan. 1995. The syntax of verbal inflection. PhD dissertation, MIT.
. 1983. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Bos, Heleen. 1990. Person and location marking in SLN: some implications of a spatially expressed syntactic system. In Sign Language Research and Application: Proceedings of the International Congress on Sign Language Research and Application, March 23–25, 1990, Hamburg, eds. and , 231–246. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Bos, Heleen.1994. An auxiliary in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. , , and , 37–53. University of Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Bos, Heleen.1995. Pronoun copy in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Sign Language Research 1994: Proceedings of the Fourth European Congress on Sign Language Research, eds. and , 121–147. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko.1998. LF movement and the Minimalist Program. In NELS 28, eds. and , 43–57. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko.2000. Sometimes in [Spec, CP], sometimes in situ. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, eds. , , and , 53–87. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boster, Carole T. 1996. On the quantifier-NP split in American Sign Language and the structure of quantified noun phrases. In International Review of Sign Linguistics, eds. and , 159–208. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. 1996. Sign language and language universals: the status of order and position in grammar. Sign Language Studies 91: 101–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1995. Grammar, order and position of wh-signs in Quebec Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 87: 99–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyes-Braem, Penny. 1981. Distinctive features of the handshapes of American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California.
. 1999. Rhythmic temporal patterns in the signing of deaf early and late learners of Swiss German Sign Language. Language & Speech 42: 177–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , eds. 2001. The Hands are the Head of the Mouth: The Mouth as Articulator in Sign Languages. International Studies on Sign Language and Communication of the Deaf 39. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
. 2004. Aspectual inflection, verb raising, and object fronting in American Sign Language. Lingua 114.1: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Mary. 1981. Grammatical processes in British Sign Language. In Perspectives on British Sign Language, eds. , , and , 120–135. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Brennan, Mary.1983. Marking time in British Sign Language. In Language in Sign: An International Perspective on Sign Language, eds. and , 10–31. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
, and eds. 1994. Word-Order Issues in Sign Language: Working Papers (presented at a workshop held in Durham, 18–22 September 1991). Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane. 1990. Theoretical foundations of American Sign Language phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
. 1993. Establishing a sonority hierarchy in American Sign Language: the use of simultaneous structure in phonology. Phonology 10: 281–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane.1995. Sign language phonology: ASL. In A Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed. , 615–639. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane, and Goldsmith, John A. 1993. Secondary licensing and the non-dominant hand in ASL phonology. In Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. , 19–41. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane, Hulst, Harry van der, Kooij, Els van der, and Sandler, Wendy. 1996. [one] over [all]; [all] over [one]: a dependency phonology analysis of handshape in sign languages. Ms.
Brentari, Diane, and Padden, Carol A. 2001. Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language: a lexicon with multiple origins. In Foreign Vocabulary in Sign Languages: A Cross-Linguistic Investigation of Word Formation, ed. , 87–119. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
, and . 1994. A phonological analysis of a deaf Parkinsonian signer. Language and Cognitive Processes 9: 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and . 1995. Aphasic and Parkinsonian signing: differences in phonological disruption. Brain and Language 48: 69–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
. 1970. On complementizers: toward a syntactic theory of complement types. Foundations of Language 6: 197–260.Google Scholar
Bricker, Victoria. 1978. Antipassive constructions in Yucatec Maya. In Papers in Mayan Linguistics, ed. , 3–24: Columbia University of Missouri.Google Scholar
, and . 1989. Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6: 201–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1975. The declarative-interrogative opposition in Russian. Slavic and East European Journal 19: 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2001. Introduction: conceptions of grammaticalization and their problems. Language Sciences 23.2–3: 93–112.Google Scholar
, , , and 1999. Categorical perception of face actions: their role in sign language and in communicative facial displays. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 52A: 67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994. On the internal structure of pronominal DPs. The Linguistic Review 11: 195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, L. 1997. Wh-in-situ phenomena in French. Master's thesis, University of British Columbia.
Channon, Rachel. 2002a. Beads on a string? Representations of repetition in spoken and signed languages. In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Language, eds. , and , 65–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Channon, Rachel.2002b. Signs are single segments: phonological representations and temporal sequencing in ASL and other sign languages. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
Chen Pichler, Deborah. 2001. Word order variability and acquisition in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Chinchor, Nancy. 1978. The syllable in American Sign Language: sequential and simultaneous phonology. Ms.
Chomsky, Noam.1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, eds. and , 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam.1991. Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, ed. . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam.1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The View from Building 20, eds. and , 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Lasnik, Howard. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, ed. et al., 506–569. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G. 1994. On the evidence for partial N-Movement in the Romance DP. In Paths Towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, eds. , , , , and , 85–110. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
, and 1982. Sign recognition processes in American Sign Language: the effect of context. Language and Speech 25: 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1975. The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: its role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages 2: 141–177.Google Scholar
Clements, George N.1990. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology 1: Between the grammar and Physics of Speech, eds. and , 288–333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1983. CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coerts, Jane. 1992. Non-manual grammatical markers: an analysis of interrogatives, negations, and topicalizations in Sign Language of the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Coerts, Jane.1994. Constituent order in Sign Language of the Netherlands and the functions of orientations. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Volume 1, eds. , , and , 69–88. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Coerts, Jane, and Mills, Anne. 1992. Early sign combinations of deaf children in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Paper presented at The Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Salamanca, Spain.
. 2002a. Signed language classifier predicates: linguistic structures or schematic visual representation?Sign Language & Linguistics 3: 153–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2002b. A model of signed language “classifier predicates” as templated visual representation. Sign Language & Linguistics 3: 209–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins-Ahlgren, M. 1989. New Zealand Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Victoria University.
Corina, David. 1990a. Handshape assimilations in hierarchical phonological representations. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. , 27–49. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Press.Google Scholar
Corina, David.1990b. Reassessing the role of sonority in syllable structure: evidence from visual-gestural language. In Papers from the Chicago Linguistic Society, 33–44. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Corina, David.1993. To branch or not to branch: underspecification in ASL handshape contours. In Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. , 63–95. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
, , and . 1999. Neuropsychological studies of linguistic and affective facial expressions in deaf signers. Language and Speech 42: 307–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corina, David, and Hildebrandt, Ursula C. 2002. Psycholinguistic investigations of phonological structure in American Sign Language. In Modality and Structure in Signed Language and Spoken Language, eds. , , and , 88–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corina, David, and Sagey, Elizabeth. 1989. Are phonological hierarchies universal? Evidence from American Sign Language. Paper presented at ESCOL.
, and . 1993. On the nature of phonological structure in sign language. Phonology 10: 165–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy, Wechsler, Stephen, and Meier, Richard. 1998. Locus agreement in American Sign Language. In Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation, eds. , , and , 215–229. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Coulter, Geoffrey. 1979. American Sign Language typology. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Coulter, Geoffrey.1982. On the nature of ASL as a monosyllabic language. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Diego, CA.
Coulter, Geoffrey.1990. Emphatic stress in ASL. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Volume 1: Linguistics, eds. and , 109–126. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crasborn, Onno. 2001. Phonetic implementation of phonological categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
Crasborn, Onno, and Kooij, Els van der. 1997. Relative orientation in sign language phonology. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 1997, eds. and , 37–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Currie, Anne-Marie, Meier, Richard, and Walters, Keith. 2002. A crosslinguistic examination of the lexicons of four signed languages. In Modality and Structure in Signed Language and Spoken Language, eds. , , and , 224–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dachkovsky, Svetlana. 2004. Neutral and counterfactual conditionals in Israeli Sign Language. MA thesis, University of Haifa.
Davies, D. 1985. The tongue is quicker than the eye. In SLR '83: Proceedings of the III International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. , and , 185–193. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1995. The articulatory basis of babbling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38: 1199–1211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deguchi, Masanori, and Kitagawa, Yoshihisa. 2002. Prosody and wh-questions. In Proceedings of the Thirty-second Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, ed. Masako Hirotani, 73–92.
DeMateo, Asa. 1977. Visual imagery and visual analogues in American Sign Language. In On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language, ed. , 109–136. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Deuchar, Margaret. 1983. Is BSL an SVO language? In Language in Sign, eds. and , 69–76. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Diffloth, Gérard. 1972. Notes on expressive meaning. In Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, eds. , , and , 440–447. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Dively, V. 2001. Signs without hands: nonhanded signs in ASL. In Signed Languages: Discoveries from International Research, eds. , , , and , 62–73. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
1997. The morphosyntactic reality of phonological form. Yearbook of Morphology: 59–81.Google Scholar
, and . 1998. Head-dependent asymmetries in phonology: complexity and visibility. Phonology 15: 317–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edge, VickiLee, and Hermann, Leora. 1977. Verbs and the determination of subject. In On the Other Hand, ed. , 137–179. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
, and 1975. Unmasking the Face: A Guide to Recognizing Emotions from Facial Clues. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
, and 1978. Facial Action Coding System: A Technique for the Measurement of Facial Movement. Investigator's Guide. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen. 1995. Processing the dynamic visual-spatial morphology of signed languages. In Morphological Aspects of Language Processing: Crosslinguistic Perspectives, ed. , 29–54. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen.1996. The confluence of space and language in signed languages. In Language and Space, eds. , , , and , 171–209. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen.1999. Do signers gesture? In Gesture, Speech, and Sign, eds. and , 133–159. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Language, Cognition, and the Brain: Insights from Sign Language Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. ed. 2003. Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
, and . 1990. Lexical recognition in sign language: effects of phonetic structure and morphology. Perceptual and Motor Skills 71: 1227–1252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmorey, Karen, and Falgier, B. 1999. Processing continuous and simultaneous reference in ASL. Ms. Los Angeles, CA.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1990. Pragmatics of non-manual behaviour in Danish Sign Language. In SLR '87: Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. and , 121–128. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth.1994. Some simultaneous constructions in Danish Sign Language. In Word-order Issues in Sign Language: Working Papers (presented at a workshop held in Durham, 18–22 September 1991), eds. and , 73–87. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth.1995. Point of view expressed through shifters. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. and , 133–154. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. 1985. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan. 1974. Sign language and linguistic universals. Paper presented at Actes du Colloque Franco-Allemand de grammaire Transformationnelle, Tübingen.
Fischer, Susan.1975. Influences on word order change in American Sign Language. In Word Order and Word Order Change, ed. , 1–25. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan.1978. Sign language and creoles. In Understanding Language through Sign Language Research, ed. , 309–331. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan.1990. The head parameter in ASL. In SLR '87: Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. and , 75–85. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
. 1996. The role of agreement and auxiliaries in sign language. Lingua 98: 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 1999. Effects of rate of presentation on the reception of American Sign Language. Journal of Speech, Hearing and Language Research 42: 568–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and . 1978. Verbs in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 7: 17–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Susan, and Janis, Wynne. 1990. Verb sandwiches in American Sign Language. In Current Trends in European Sign Language Research: Proceedings of the Third European Congress on Sign Language Research, eds. and , 279–294. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
. 1982. The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, W., and Van Valin, R. 1985. Information packaging in the clause. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, ed. , 282–364. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1975. Space, time, and person reference in American Sign Language. Language 51: 940–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Lynn.1976. The manifestation of subject, object, and topic in American Sign Language. In Subject and Topic, ed. . New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lynn.1977. Formational properties of American Sign Language. In On the Other Hand, ed. , 13–56. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1975. Arbitrariness and iconicity: historical change in American Sign Language. Language 51: 696–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frishberg, Nancy.1985. Dominance relations and discourse structures. In SLR '83: Sign Language Research, eds. and , 79–90. Rome: Linstok Press and CNR.Google Scholar
Gallaudet Research Institute. 2001. Regional and National Summary Report of data from the 1999–2000 Annual Survey of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children and Youth. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Research Institute, Gallaudet University.
, and . 1985. Nativization, linguistic theory, and deaf language acquisition. Sign Language Studies 49: 291–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Canonical government and the specifier parameter: an ECP account of weak crossover. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gijn, Ingeborg Van, Kita, Sotaro, and Hulst, Harry van der. In press. How phonetic is the Symmetry Condition in sign language? In Phonetics and Phonology – Selected Papers of the Fourth HIL Phonology Conference, eds. , , and . Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Givón, Talmy. 1976. Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Subject and Topic, ed. , 149–188. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Glück, Susanne, and Pfau, Roland. 1998. On classifying classification as a class of inflection in German Sign Language. In ConSole VI Proceedings, eds. , , and , 59–74. Leiden: SOLE.Google Scholar
Glück, Susanne, and Pfau, Roland.1999. A distributed morphology account of verbal inflection in German Sign Language. In ConSole VII Proceedings, eds. , , and , 65–80. Leiden: SOLE.Google Scholar
. 2003. The Resilience of Language: What Gesture Creation in Deaf Children Can Tell Us about How All Children Learn Language. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Greftegreff, Irene. 1993. Anatomy and features in sign language handshapes. Ms. University of Trondheim.
Grinevald, Colette. 2000. A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. In Systems of Nominal Classification, ed. , 50–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1981. Sign and word recognition: a first comparison. Sign Language Studies 32: 195–219.Google Scholar
, ed. 1984. On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Discreteness and gradience in intonational contrasts. Language & Speech 42: 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
, and . 1991. Negative heads and the neg criterion. The Linguistic Review 8: 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1980. The iconicity of grammar: isomorphism and motivation. Language 56: 515–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Ken. 1980. Remarks on Japanese phrase structure: comments on the papers on Japanese syntax. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 2: Theoretical Issues in Japanese Linguistics, eds. and , 185–203. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
. 1983. Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1992. Phonological features. In International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Volume 3, ed. , 207–212. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, and Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, eds. and , 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, and Marantz, Alec. 1994. Some key features of Distributed Morphology. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 275–288. Cambridge, MA: MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosophy.
, and . 1971. A note on laryngeal features. In Research Laboratory of Electronics Quarterly Progress Report, 198–212. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Hamano, Shoko Saito. 1986. The sound-symbolic system of Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Florida.
Hanks, William F. 1992. The indexical ground of deictic reference. In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, eds. and , 43–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harder, R., and Schermer, T. 1986. A first phonological analysis of handshapes in SLN. In Signs of Life: Proceedings of the Second European Congress on Sign Language Research, ed. , 47–51: Institute of General Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1993. Against movement. In Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. , 213–226. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1999. Phonetically driven phonology: the role of optimality theory and inductive grounding. In Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, eds. , , , , and , 243–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
, and . 1991. Bengali intonational phonology. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 9: 47–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heggie, L. 1988. The syntax of copular structures. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
Heycock, C. 1991. Layers of predication: The non-lexical syntax of clauses. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Hoji, Hajime. 1985. Logical Form Constraints and Syntactic Configurations in Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.
Holmberg, A. 1986. Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English. PhD dissertation, University of Stockholm.
Horvath, Julia. 1980. Movement in “Logical Form”: evidence from Hungarian. Ms. UCLA.
. 1982. Move wh in a language without wh movement. The Linguistic Review 1: 369–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574.Google Scholar
. 1989. Atoms of segmental structure: components, gestures and dependency. Phonology 6: 253–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995. The composition of handshapes. University of Trondheim Working Papers in Linguistics 23: 1–17.Google Scholar
, and . 1994. Phonological theories meet sign language: two theories of the two hands. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 13: 43–73.Google Scholar
, and 1981. Logophoric reference in Gokana. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 3: 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1968 [1941]. Child Language, Aphasia, and Phonological Universals. The Hague: Mouton. (Original publication: Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janis, Wynne. 1992. Morphosyntax of the ASL Verb Phrase. PhD dissertation, SUNY Buffalo.
Janis, Wynne. 1995. A Crosslinguistic Perspective on ASL Verb Agreement. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. and , 195–223. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Janzen, Terry. 1998. Topicality in ASL: Information ordering, constituent structure, and the function of topic marking. PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico.
. 1999. The grammaticization of topics in American Sign Language. Studies in Language 23: 271–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, Terry, and Shaffer, Barbara. 2002. Gesture as the substrate in the process of ASL grammaticization. In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, eds. , , and , 199–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1999. On defining lexeme in a signed language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2: 115–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Daniel. 1976. Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.
, and . 1993. From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Model Theoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy. 1976. Relational grammar and American Sign Language. Ms.
Kegl, Judy. 1986. Clitics in American Sign Language. In Syntax and Semantics, Volume 19: The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, ed. . New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy. 1990. Predicate argument structure and verb-class organization in the ASL lexicon. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. , 149–175. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
. 2003 [1976]. Pronominalization in American Sign Language. Sign Language and Linguistics 6.2: 245–265. (Originally distributed as ms.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and . 1996. The case for grammar, order and position in ASL: a reply to Bouchard and Dubuisson. Sign Language Studies 90: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kegl, Judy, Senghas, Ann, and Coppola, Marie. 1999. Creation through contact: sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In Language Creation and Language Change: Creolization, Diachrony, and Development, ed. , 197–237. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy, and Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1976. When does structure stop and style begin? Syntax, morphology, and phonology vs. stylistic variation in ASL. Paper presented at the 12th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.
. 1985. The phonology and syntax of wh-expressions in Tangale. Studies in Linguistic Science 15: 79–91.Google Scholar
. 1999. Extrapolating from spoken to signed prosody. Language & Speech 7: 251–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical phonology and morphology. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. , 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul.2002. Paradigm effects and opacity. Ms. Stanford University.
Kisch, Shifra. 2000. Deaf Discourse: social construction of deafness in a Bedouin community in the Negev. MA thesis. Tel Aviv University.
. 1997. Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35: 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Edward S. 1964. Negation in English. In The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language, eds. and , 246–323. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kooij, Els van der. 1998. The position of unselected fingers. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 1998, ed. and , 149–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kooij, Els van der.2002. Phonological categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands: the role of phonetic implementation and iconicity. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
. 1984. The Syntax of Verbs: From Movement Rules in the Kru Languages to Universal Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
, and . 1989. Pronouns, logical variables, and logophoricity in Abe. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 555–588.Google Scholar
, and eds. 1991. Long Distance Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Twice as Meaningful: Reduplication in Pidgins, Creoles, and other Contact Languages. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
, and . 1985. Deaf signers and serial recall in the visual modality: memory for signs, fingerspelling and print. Memory and Cognition 13: 265–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuroda, S. -Y. 1983. What can Japanese say about government and binding? In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, eds. , and , 153–164. Stanford: Stanford Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S. -Y. 1988. Whether we agree or not: a comparative syntax of English and Japanese. In Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, ed. , 103–143. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
, and 1985. Sign Language: The Study of Deaf People and Their Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laka Mugarza, Miren Itziar. 1990. Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD Dissertation, MIT.
, and eds. 1984. The Deaf Experience: Classics in Language and Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1969. Pronominalization and the chain of command. In Modern Studies in English, eds. and , 160–186. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
1970. A Grammar of The Mesa Grande Dialect. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. 1995. Verbal morphology: syntactic structures meets the Minimalist Program. In Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Carlos Otero, eds. and , 251–275. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Robert G., Neidle, Carol, MacLaughlin, Dawn, Bahan, Benjamin, and Kegl, Judy. 1997. Role shift in ASL: A syntactic look at direct speech. In Syntactic Structure and Discourse Function: An Examination of Two Constructions in American Sign Language, eds. , and , 24–45. Boston, MA: American Sign Language Linguistic Research Project, Boston University.Google Scholar
Legate, Julie Anne. 2003. Arguments and adjuncts in Warlpiri. Paper presented at the University of Connecticut, February 2003.
Lehmann, Christian. 1988. On the function of agreement. In Agreement in Natural Language, eds. and , 55–66. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Lentz, Ella Mae. 1986. Teaching role shifting. In Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching, ed. . Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.Google Scholar
Levy, Doron. 2001. Weak drop in Israeli Sign Language. Ms. Tel Aviv.
Li, Charles, and Thompson, Sandra. 1976. Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In Subject and Topic, ed. , 457–489. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 1978. Non-manual signs and relative clauses in American Sign Language. In Understanding Language through Sign Language Research, ed. , 59–90. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1984a. Unrealized-inceptive aspect in American Sign Language: feature insertion in syllabic frames. Papers from the Chicago Linguistic Society, 257–270.Google Scholar
1984b. think and believe: sequentiality in American Sign Language. Language 60: 372–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 1990a. Four functions of a locus: reexamining the structure of Space in ASL. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. , 176–198. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 1990b. Structures for representing handshape and local movement at the phonemic level. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, eds. and , 37–65. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 1994. Tokens and surrogates. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. , , and , 105–119. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 1995. Real, surrogate, and token space: grammatical consequences in ASL. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. and , 19–41. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 2000. Indicating verbs and pronouns: pointing away from agreement. In The Signs of Language Revisited: An Anthology to Honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, eds. and , 303–320. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 2003. Sources of meaning in ASL classifier predicates. In Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Language, ed. . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
, and 1986. American Sign Language compound formation processes, lexicalization, and phonological remnants. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 445–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1989 [1985]. American Sign Language: the phonological base. Sign Language Studies 64: 197–277. (Originally distributed as ms.).Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1985. Null pronouns and verb agreement in American Sign Language. In Proceedings of NELS 15, eds. , , and , 302–318. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
1986a. Two kinds of null arguments in American Sign Language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4: 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane.1986b. Parameter setting: evidence from use, acquisition, and breakdown in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1990. Parameters for questions: evidence from WH-movement in American Sign Language. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. , 211–222. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1991. Universal Grammar and American Sign Language: Setting the Null Argument Parameters. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1992. Sentences as islands: on the boundedness of A′-movement in American Sign Language. In Island Constraints, eds. and , 259–274. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1995. The point of view predicate in American Sign Language. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. and , 155–170. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1997. The modular effects of sign language acquisition. In Relations of Language and Thought: The View from Sign Language and Deaf Children, eds. , , , , and , 62–109. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1999a. Modality effects and modularity in language acquisition: the acquisition of American Sign Language. In Handbook of Language Acquisition, eds. and , 531–567. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane.1999b. Syntactic aspects of intonation. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting.
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 2002. Where are all the modality effects? In Modality and Structure in Signed Language and Spoken Language, eds. , , and , 241–262. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane, and Fischer, Susan. 1992. Overt and covert wh-questions in American Sign Language. Paper presented at the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Salamanca, Spain.
Lillo-Martin, Diane, and Klima, Edward S. 1990. Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Volume 1: Linguistics, eds. and , 191–210. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lobeck, Anne.1990. Functional heads as proper governors. Paper presented at NELS 20.
Loew, Ruth. 1984. Roles and reference in American Sign Language: a developmental perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Lucas, Ceil. 1995. Sociolinguistic variation in ASL: the case of DEAF. In Sign Language Research 1994, eds. and , 189–210. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
, and . 1992. Linguistics of American Sign Language: A Resource Text for ASL Users. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
MacLaughlin, Dawn. 1997. The structure of determiner phrases: evidence from American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Boston University.
MacNeilage, Peter. 1998. Evolution of the mechanism of language output: comparative neurobiology of vocal and manual communication. In Approaches to the Evolution of Language: Social and Cognitive Bases, eds. , , and , 222–241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mandel, Mark. 1977. Iconic devices in American Sign Language. In On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language, ed. . New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mandel, Mark.1981. Phonotactics and morphophonology in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California.
Mathur, Gaurav. 2000. Verb agreement as alignment in signed languages. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Mathur, Gaurav, and Rathmann, Christian. 2001. Why not GIVE-US: an articulatory constraint in signed languages. In Signed Languages: Discoveries from International Research, eds. , , , and , 1–25. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Matsuoka, Kazumi.2000. The lexical verb sandwich in American Sign Language and the hybrid feature. Ms.
(Peter Hugoe). 1974. Morphology: An Introduction to the Theory of Word Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McBurney, Susan. 2002. Pronominal reference in signed and spoken language: are grammatical categories modality-dependent? In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, eds. , , and , 329–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1979. Formal Problems in Semitic Phonology and Morphology. PhD dissertation, MIT.
. 1981. A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 373–418.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John, and Prince, Alan. 1986. Prosodic morphology. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Brandeis University.
McCarthy, John, and Prince, Alan.1993. Prosodic morphology I: constraint interaction and satisfaction. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Rutgers University.
McCarthy, John, and Prince, Alan.1994. The emergence of the unmarked: optimality in prosodic morphology. In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 24, ed. M. González, 333–379.
McCarthy, John, and Prince, Alan. 1995. Prosodic morphology. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed. , 318–366. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
, and . 1984. The syntax of person-number inflection in Modern Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 487–533.Google Scholar
McDonald, B. 1982. Aspects of the American Sign Language predicate system. PhD dissertation, University of Buffalo.
. 1977. The acquisition of ASL hand configurations. Sign Language Studies 16: 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, David, and Kennedy, Graeme. 2000. Lexical comparison of signs from American, Australian, British, and New Zealand Sign Languages. In The Signs of Language Revisited: An Anthology in Honor of Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, eds. and , 49–76. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
McLemore, Cynthia. 1991. The pragmatic interpretation of English intonation: sorority speech. PhD dissertation, University of Texas.
. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gesture Reveals about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1998. Identifying the creole prototype: vindicating a typological class. Language 74: 788–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , and 1988. A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition 29.2: 143–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1981. Icons and morphemes: models of the acquisition of verb agreement in ASL. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 20: 92–99.Google Scholar
Meier, Richard P.1982. Icons, analogues, and morphemes: the acquisition of verb agreement in ASL. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
1987. Elicited imitation of verb agreement in American Sign Language: iconically or morphologically determined?Journal of Memory and Language 26: 362–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Richard P. 1990. Person deixis in American Sign Language. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, eds. and , 175–190. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meier, Richard P. 1993. A psychologinguistic perspective on phonological segmentation in sign and speech. In Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. , 169–188. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Meier, Richard P. 2002a. The acquisition of verb agreement: pointing out arguments for the linguistic status of agreement in signed languages. In Current Developments in the Study of Signed Language Acquisition, eds. and , 115–141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Meier, Richard P. 2002b. Why different, why the same? Explaining effects and non-effects of modality upon linguistic structure in sign and speech. In Modality and Structure in Signed Language and Spoken Language, eds. , , and , 1–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Richard P., and Willerman, Raquel. 1995. Prelinguistic gesture in deaf and hearing infants. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. and , 391–410. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Meir, Irit. 1998a. Thematic structure and verb agreement in Israeli Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
. 1998b. Syntactic-semantic interaction of Israeli Sign Language verbs: the case of backwards verbs. Sign Language & Linguistics 1: 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Verb classifiers as noun incorporation in Israeli Sign Language. Yearbook of Morphology 1999: 299–319.Google Scholar
. 2002. A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20.2: 413–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Grammaticalization and modality: the emergence of a case marked pronoun in Israeli Sign Language. Journal of Linguistics 39.1: 109–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2004. Language in Space: A Window on Israeli Sign Language (Hebrew). Haifa: University of Haifa Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. Une théorie prosodique de la phonologie des langues des signes. Revue Québecoise de Linguistique Théoretique et Appliquée 10: 21–55.Google Scholar
Miller, Christopher. 1994. Simultaneous constructions in Quebec Sign Language. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Volume 1, eds. , , and , 131–147. Durham: ISLA.Google Scholar
Miller, Christopher.1996. Phonologie de la langue des signes Québequois: structure simultanée et axe temporal. PhD dissertation, Université du Québec à Montréal.
Mithun, Marianne. 1986a. The convergence of noun classification systems. In Noun Classes and Categorization (Typological Studies in Language 7), ed. , 379–397. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith. 1988. Agreement and markedness. In Agreement in Natural Language, eds. and , 89–106. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Murasugi, Keiko. 1991. Noun Phrases in Japanese and English: A Study in Syntax, Learnability, and Acquisition. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Nadeau, Marie, and Desouvrey, Louis. 1994. Word order in sentences with directional verbs in Quebec Sign Language. In Perspectives on sign language structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Volume 1, eds. , , and , 149–158. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Nagahara, Hiroyki. 1988. Towards an explicit phonological representation for American Sign Language. MA thesis, University of California.
. 2002. Language across modalities: ASL focus and question constructions. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2: 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and . 1998a. Realizations of syntactic agreement in American Sign Language: similarities between the clause and the noun phrase. Studia Linguistica 52: 191–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neidle, Carol, Kegl, Judy, Bahan, Ben, Aarons, Debra, and MacLaughlin, Dawn. 1997. Rightward WH-movement in American Sign Language. In Rightward Movement, eds. , , and , 247–278. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and 2000. The Syntax of American Sign Language: Functional Categories and Hierarchical Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
, , , , and . 1998b. The right(ward) analysis of wh-movement in ASL. Language 74: 819–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1999. Prosody in Israeli Sign Language. Language and Speech 42: 143–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Segmental inventory size, word length, and communicative efficiency. Linguistics 33: 359–367.Google Scholar
Newkirk, Don. 1978. The form of multiples and exhaustives in ASL. Ms.
Newkirk, Don.1979. The form of continuative aspect inflection on ASL verbs. Ms.
Newkirk, Don.1981. Rhythmic features of inflections in American Sign Language. Ms.
. 1998 [1981]. On the temporal segmentation of movement in American Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 1: 173–212. (Originally distributed as ms.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newkirk, Don, Klima, Ed, Pedersen, Carlene Canady, and Bellugi, Ursula. 1980. Linguistic evidence from slips of the hand. In Errors in Linguistic Performance: Slips of the Tongue and Hand, ed. . New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Newport, Elissa L. 1981. Constraints on structure: evidence from American Sign Language and language learning. In Aspects of the Development of Competence. Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, ed. . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Newport, Elissa L., and Meier, Richard P. 1985. The acquisition of American Sign Language. In The Cross-Linguistic Study of Language Acquisition, ed. , 881–938. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Newport, Elissa L., and Supalla, Ted. 2000. Sign language research at the millennium. In The Signs of Language Revisited: An Anthology to Honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, eds. and , 103–114. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Nunes, Jairo. 1999. Linearization of chains and phonetic realization of chain links. In Working Minimalism, eds. and , 217–249. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nunes, Jairo and Quadros, Ronice. 2004. Phonetic realization of multiple copies in Brazilian Sign Language. Presented at Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR VIII), Barcelona.
. 1984. An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica 41: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osugi, Yutaka. 1997. In search of the phonological representation of ASL. PhD dissertation, University of Rochester.
1990. Sentential negation, Relativized Minimality, and the aspectual status of auxiliaries. The Linguistic Review 7: 183–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padden, Carol A. 1986. Verbs and role-shifting in American Sign Language. In Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching, ed. . , MD: National Association of the Deaf.Google Scholar
Padden, Carol A. 1988 [1983]. Interaction of Morphology and Syntax in American Sign Language: Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York: Garland. (Originally distributed as: PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.)
Padden, Carol A. 1990. The relation between space and grammar in ASL verb morphology. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. , 118–132. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1988. Deaf in America: Voices from a Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1987. American Sign Language and the architecture of phonological theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 335–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parisot, Anne-Marie. 2000. Do plain verbs agree in Quebec Sign Language? Ms. Amsterdam.
Perlmutter, David.1991. Feature geometry in a language with two active articulators. Ms. Santa Cruz.
Perlmutter, David. 1992. Sonority and syllable structure in American Sign Language. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 407–442. Reprinted as: Sonority and syllable structure in American Sign Language. In Phonetics and Phonology, Volume 3: Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. . San Diego, CA: Academic Press (1993).Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David. 1996. Compounds and lexemes in American Sign Language. Ms.
Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in situ: movement and unselective binding. In The Representation of (in)Definiteness, eds. and , 98–129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Petronio, Karen. 1991. A focus position in ASL. In Papers from the Third Student Conference in Linguistics, 1991, eds. and , 211–225. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Petronio, Karen.1993. Clause structure in American Sign Language. PhD Dissertation, University of Washington.
, and . 1997. Wh-Movement and the position of Spec CP: evidence from American Sign Language. Language 73: 18–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland. 2002. Applying morphosyntactic and phonological readjustment rules in natural language negation. In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, eds. , , and , 263–295. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland, and Quer, Josep. 2003. V-to-Neg raising and negative concord in three sign languages. Paper presented at the XXIX Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Urbino, February 2003.
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Pierrehumbert, Janet, and Hirschberg, Julia. 1990. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Intentions in communication, eds. , , and . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pizzuto, Elena, Giuranna, Enza, and Gambino, Giuseppe. 1990. Manual and non-manual morphology in Italian Sign Language: grammatical constraints and discourse processes. In Sign Language Research. Theoretical Issues, ed. , 83–102. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Poulin, Christine, and Miller, Christopher. 1995. On narrative discourse and point of view in Quebec Sign Language. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. and , 117–131. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. 1989. HamNoSys: Version 2.0; Hamburg Notational System for Sign Languages. An Introductory Guide. International Studies on Sign Language and Communication of the deaf 5. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms. New Brunswick and Boulder.
1986. On the syntactic marking of presupposed open propositions. Chicago Linguistic Society 22: 208–222.Google Scholar
Quadros, Ronice Müller de. 1995. As categorias vazias pronominais: uma análise alternativa com base na língua de sinais brasileira e reflexos no processo de aquisição. MA thesis, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.
Quadros, Ronice Müller de.1999. Phrase structure of Brazilian Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.
, and 2004. Língua de sinais brasileira: estudos lingüísticos. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.Google Scholar
Quadros, Ronice Müller de, Lillo-Martin, Diane, and Chen Pichler, Deborah. 2000. A little change goes a long way: capturing structural differences between Brazilian Sign Language and American Sign Language. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Amsterdam.
Quadros, Ronice Müller de, Lillo-Martin, Diane, and Chen Pichler, Deborah.2004. Clause structure in LSB and ASL. Paper presented at the 26. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft, Mainz, Germany.
Quer, Josep. 2003. Operadores negativos en Lengua de Signos Catalana (LSC) (Negative operators in LSC): Presented at the Jornadas del Comahue de Lingüística de Lenguas de Señas, San Martin de los Andes, Argentina, March 2003.
Rathmann, Christian. 2000. The optionality of agreement phrase: evidence from signed languages. MA report, University of Texas.
Rathmann, Christian, and Mathur, Gaurav. 1999. The linguistic status of joint-based constraints in signed languages. Paper presented at The 35th Annual Chicago Linguistics Society Meeting.
Rathmann, Christian, and Mathur, Gaurav. 2002. Is verb agreement the same cross-modally? In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, eds. , , and , 370–404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1996. Competition on the face: affect and language in ASL motherese. Journal of Child Language 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1991. where shoe: the acquisition of wh-questions in American Sign Language. Papers and Reports in Child Language Development 30: 104–111.Google Scholar
, , and . 1990a. The acquisition of conditionals in American Sign Language: grammaticized facial expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics 11: 369–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, Judy S., McIntire, Marina L., and Bellugi, Ursula. 1990b. Faces: the relationship between language and affect. In From Gesture to Language in Hearing and Deaf Children, eds. and , 128–141. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1976. The syntactic domain of anaphora. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Reuland, Eric J., and Everaert, Martin. 2001. Deconstructing binding. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, eds. and , 634–669. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Norvin. 1997. What moves where when in which language? PhD dissertation, MIT.
. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi.1991. Residual verb second and the WH-criterion. Ms., Technical Reports in Formal and Computational Linguistics. Faculté des Lettres, University of Geneva.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, ed. , 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, Christine. 1991. Mixed headedness in American Sign Language: evidence from functional categories. In Papers from the Third Student Conference in Linguistics, 1991, eds. and , 241–254. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 1989. Two types of noun incorporation: a lexical analysis. Language 65: 294–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstein, Ofra. 2001. ISL as a topic prominent language. MA thesis, University of Haifa.
Ross, J. R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
. 1988. On multiple questions and multiple WH fronting. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 445–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagey, Elizabeth. 1986. The representation of features and relations in non-linear phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Saito, Mamoru. 1985. Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. PhD dissertation, MIT.
. 1986. The spreading hand autosegment of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 50: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1987a. Assimilation and feature hierarchy in American Sign Language. In Papers from the Chicago Linguistic Society, Parasession on Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology, 266–278. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy.1987b. Sequentiality and simultaneity in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of Texas.
. 1989. Phonological Representation of the Sign: Linearity and Non-linearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 1990. Temporal aspect and American Sign Language. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, eds. and , 103–129. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1993a. Hand in hand: the roles of the non-dominant hand in sign language phonology. The Linguistic Review 10: 337–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 1993b. Linearization of phonological tiers in American Sign Language. In Phonetics and Phonology, Volume 3: Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. . San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 1995a. One phonology or two? Sign language and phonological theory. GLOT International 1. Reprinted in The GLOT International State-of-the-Article Book, eds. L. Cheng and R. Sybesma, 349–384. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter (2000).
. 1995b. Phonological characteristics of sign languages: Similarities and differences. Trondheim Working Papers in Linguistics 23: 18–37.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 1995c. Markedness in the handshapes of signs: a componential analysis. In Leiden in Last: Holland Institute of Linguistics Phonology Papers, eds. and , 369–399. The Hague: Holland Academie Graphics.Google Scholar
. 1996a. Representing handshapes. International Review of Sign Linguistics 1: 115–158.Google Scholar
. 1996b. Phonological features and feature classes: the case of movements in sign language. Lingua 98: 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy.1996c. A negative suffix in ASL. Ms.
. 1999a. Prosody in two natural language modalities. Language and Speech 42: 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 1999b. Cliticization and prosodic words in a sign language. In Studies on the Phonological Word, eds. and , 223–254. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1999c. The medium and the message: prosodic interpretation of linguistic content in Israeli Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2: 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 2003. On the complementarity of signed and spoken languages. In Language Competence across Populations, eds. and , 383–409. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. In press. Phonology, phonetics, and the non-dominant hand. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Varieties of Phonological Competence, eds. , , and . Berlin: Mouton-deGruyter.
Sandler, Wendy, and Dachkovsky, Svetlana. 2004. Superarticulation in Israeli Sign Language: the grammar of the face. Ms.
Sandler, Wendy, and Lillo-Martin, Diane. 2001. Natural sign languages. In The Handbook of Linguistics, eds. and , 533–562. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
, , , and . 2005. The emergence of grammar: systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102.7: 2661–2665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1967. Note sur la classification nominale en Bainouk. In La classification nominales dans les langues Négro-Africaines, 225–236. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam. 2003. Rethinking “classifiers” in signed languages. In Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages, ed. , 3–34. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schick, Brenda S. 1987. The acquisition of classifier predicates in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Purdue University.
1990. Classifier predicates in American Sign Language. International Journal of Sign Linguistics 1: 15–40.Google Scholar
. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation Between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
, ed. 2000a. Systems of Nominal Classification: Language, Culture, and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Senft, Gunter, 2000b. What do we really know about nominal classification systems? In Systems of Nominal Classification, ed. . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Senghas, Ann. 1995. Children's contribution to the birth of Nicaraguan Sign Language. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Senghas, Ann. 2000. The development of early spatial morphology in Nicaraguan Sign Language. In Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development, eds. , and , 696–707. Boston: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Shepard-Kegl, Judy. 1985. Locative relations in ASL word formation, syntax and discourse. PhD dissertation, MIT.
. 2000. Topic and topic-comment constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Language 76: 383–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1993. Phonological deletion revisited: errors in young children's two-handed signs. Sign Language Studies 80: 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1997. Young children's acquisition of the handshape aspect of American Sign Language signs: parental report findings. Applied Psycholinguistics 18: 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1978. Visual constraints for sign language communication. Sign Language Studies 7: 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1977. Grammatike Cukotskogo Jazyka. Tom 2 [A Grammar of Chukchee Volume 2, Russian]. Moscow: Izdatel'stro Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan, Hoiting, Nini, Kuntze, Marlon, Lindert, Reyna B., Weinberg, Amy M., Pyers, Jennie E., Thumann, Helen, and Biederman, Yael. 2003. A cognitive/functional perspective on the acquisition of “classifiers.” In Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Language, ed. , 271–296. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Smith, Wayne. 1990. Evidence for auxiliaries in Taiwan Sign Language. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Volume 1: Linguistics, eds. and , 211–228. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. On the nature of syntactic variation: evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation. Language 77: 324–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Morphological Theory: An Introduction to Word Structure in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stack, Kelly. 1988. Tiers and syllable structure: evidence from phonotactics. MA thesis, University of California.
, and . 1989. Primary features and their enhancement in consonants. Language 65: 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stjepanović, Sandra. 1999. What do second position cliticization, scrambling, and multiple wh-fronting have in common? PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
1960. Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. In Studies in Linguistics: Occasional Papers. Buffalo: University of Buffalo.Google Scholar
, , and . 1965. A Dictionary of American Sign Language on Linguistic Principles. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press. [Reprinted in 1976 by Linstok Press.]Google Scholar
Stowell, Timothy. 1991. Determiners in NP and DP. In Views on Phrase Structure, eds. and , 37–56. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supalla, Ted. 1982. Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion and location in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Supalla, Ted. 1986. The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Noun Classes and Categorization, ed. , 181–214. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supalla, Ted.1998. Reconstructing early ASL grammar through historic films. Ms.
Supalla, Ted, and Newport, Elissa. 1978. How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language. In Understanding Language Through Sign Language Research, ed. , 91–132. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Supalla, Ted, and Webb, Rebecca. 1995. The grammar of international sign: a new look at pidgin languages. In Language, Gesture, and Space (International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research), eds. and , 333–352. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 2000. Aspects of BSL poetry: a social and linguistic analysis of the poetry of Dorothy Miles. Sign Language & Linguistics 3: 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1999. The Linguistics of British Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swart, Henriette de. 1995. Topic and focus. Glot International 1. Reprinted in The First Glot International State-of-the-Article Book, eds. L. Cheng and R. Sybesma, 105–130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 2000.
Szabolcsi, A. 1994. The noun phrase. In Syntax and Semantics, Volume 27: The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian, eds. and , 179–274. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1993. Movement of wh-phrase in Japanese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 11: 655–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2003. The representation of spatial structure in spoken and signed language: a neural model. Language & Linguistics 4.2: 207–250.Google Scholar
2001. Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Henry. 1977. The lack of subordination in American Sign Language. In On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language, ed. , 181–195. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1965. A Vietnamese Reference Grammar. Previously published as Mon-Khymer studies XIII–XIV [1965]. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Robin, and Emmorey, Karen. 2003. The relationship between eye gaze and verb agreement in American Sign Language: an eye-tracking study. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1994. On the (non-)universality of functional categories. Ms. Harvard University / University of Iceland.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2001. Object shift and scrambling. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, eds. and , 148–202. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torigoe, Takashi. 1994. Resumptive X structures in Japanese Sign Language. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Volume 1, eds. , , and , 187–198. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
. 1999. Syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 219–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1992. The syntax of postverbal focus constructions in Chadic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 10: 303–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1996 [1994]. The Geometry of Visual Phonology. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. (Originally distributed as PhD dissertation, Stanford University.)Google Scholar
, and . 1996. The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics 34: 459–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1992. Linguistics of American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
. 1992. Conceptual spaces and pronominal reference in American Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 15: 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1990. A linguistic analysis of the negative headshake in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 68: 217–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallin, Lars. 1983. Compounds in Swedish Sign Language in historical perspective. In Language in Sign: An International Perspective on Sign Language. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium of Sign Language Research in Bristol, UK in July 1981, eds. and , 56–68. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Wallin, Lars.1994. Polysyntetiska tecken i svenska teckenspråket. [Polysynthetic signs in Swedish Sign Language]. Doctoral dissertation, Stockholms Universitet.
Wallin, Lars. 1996. Polysynthetic signs in Swedish Sign Language (English edition). Stockholm: University of Stockholm.
Watanabe, Akira. 2001. Wh-in-situ languages. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, eds. and , 203–225. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program: Principles and Parameters in Syntactic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Whittemore, Greg. 1986. The production of ASL signs. PhD dissertation, the University of Texas at Austin.
1979. American Sign Language and Sign Systems: Research and Application. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B.1982. A multi-tiered theory of syllable structure for American Sign language. Ms.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1987. American Sign Language: Linguistic and Applied Dimensions. Boston, MA: College-Hill Press.
Wilbur, Ronnie B.1991. Intonation and focus in American Sign Language. Paper presented at ESCOL ‘90: the Seventh Eastern States Conference on Linguistics.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1993. Syllables and segments: hold the movement and move the holds! In Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. , 135–168. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1994a. Foregrounding structures in American Sign Language. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 647–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1995a. What the morphology of operators looks like: a formal analysis of ASL brow-raise. In FLSM VI: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America, Volume 2: Syntax II and Semantics/Pragmatics, eds. , and . Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1995b. Why so-called “rhetorical questions” (RHQs) are neither rhetorical nor questions. In Sign Language Research 1994: Proceedings of the Fourth European Congress on Sign Language Research, eds. and , 149–169. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1996. Evidence for the function and structure of wh-clefts in American Sign Language. In International Review of Sign Linguistics, eds. and , 209–256. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1997. A prosodic/pragmatic explanation for word order variation in ASL with typological implications. In Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Constructions of Meaning, eds. , , and , 89–104. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999a. Stress in ASL: empirical evidence and linguistic issues. Language and Speech 42: 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1999b. A functional journey with a formal ending: what do brow raises do in American Sign Language? In Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, Volume 2: Case Studies, eds. , , , and , 295–313. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 2000. Phonological and prosodic layering of non-manuals in American Sign Language. In The Signs of Language Revisited, eds. and , 215–244. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 2002. Phrase structure in ASL and ÖGS. In Progress In Sign Language Research: in Honor of Sigmund Prillwitz, eds. and , 235–247 Signum.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B., Klima, Ed, and Bellugi, Ursula. 1983. Roots: on the search for the origins of signs in ASL. In Proceedings of CLS 19: The Chicago Linguistic Society Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax, eds. , , and , 314–336: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
and . 1998. Body leans and marking contrast in ASL. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 275–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 1999. Syntactic correlates of brow raise in ASL. Sign Language & Linguistics 2: 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1987. The effects of linguistic stress on sign movement in ASL. Language and Speech 30: 301–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilbur, Ronnie B., and Zelaznik, H. N. 1997. Kinematic correlates of stress and position in ASL. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Chicago, IL.
. 2000. Metaphor in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1997. A visual-spatial “phonological loop” in working memory: evidence from American Sign Language. Memory and Cognition 25: 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1990. International perspectives on sign language communication. International Journal of Sign Linguistics 1.2: 107–120.Google Scholar
Woll, Bencie. 2002. The sign that dares to speak its name: echo phonology in British Sign Language (BSL). In The Hands Are the Head of the Mouth: The Mouth as Articulator in Sign Languages, eds. and , 87–98. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Wood, Sandra K. 1999. Semantic and syntactic aspects of negation in ASL. MA thesis, Purdue University.
. 1974. Implicational variation in American Sign Language: negative incorporation. Sign Language Studies 3: 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1978. All in the family: kinship lexicalization across sign languages. Sign Language Studies 7: 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 1975. Synchronic variation and historical change in American Sign Language. Language Sciences 37: 9–12.Google Scholar
Zec, Draga, and Inkelas, Sharon. 1990. Prosodically constrained syntax. In Phonology-Syntax Connection, eds. and , 365–378. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Interrogative constructions in signed languages: crosslinguistic perspectives. Language 80: 7–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, June, and Patschke, Cynthia. 1990. A class of determiners in ASL. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. , 201–210. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, Inge. 2003. Classifying hand configurations in Nederlandse Gebarentaal (Sign Language of the Netherlands). PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Aarons, Debra. 1994. Aspects of the syntax of American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Boston University.
, , , and . 1992. Clausal structure and a tier for grammatical marking in American Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 15: 103–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aarons, Debra, Bahan, Benjamin, Kegl, Judy, and Neidle, Carol.1994. Subjects and agreement in American Sign Language. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. , , and , 13–28. Durham: International Sign Language Association.Google Scholar
Aarons, Debra, Bahan, Benjamin, Kegl, Judy, and Neidle, Carol.1995. Lexical tense markers in American Sign Language. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. and , 225–253. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Abney, S. P. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Ahlgren, Inger. 1990. Deictic pronouns in Swedish and Swedish Sign Language. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Volume 1: Linguistics, eds. and , 167–174. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ahn, Sung-Ho. 1990. A structured-tiers model for ASL phonology. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. , 11–26. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1998. PAH! The acquisition of adverbials in ASL. Sign Language & Linguistics 1: 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1987. Principles of Dependency Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1992. Physiological constraints in Taiwan Sign Language handshape change. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 15: 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ann, Jean.1993. A linguistic investigation of the relationship between physiology and handshape. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.
. 1996. On the relation between ease of articulation and frequency of occurrence of handshapes in two sign languages. Lingua 98: 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 1995. Gesture and the Nature of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph Series 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Meir, Irit, Padden, Carol, and Sandler, Wendy. 2003. Classifier complexes and morphology in two sign languages. In Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages, ed. . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Meir, Irit, Padden, Carol, and Sandler, Wendy.2004. Morphological universals and the sign language type. In Yearbook of Morphology 2004, eds. and . Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer, 19–39.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Meir, Irit, and Sandler, Wendy. 2000. Universal and particular aspects of sign language morphology. In University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, eds. K. K. Grohmann and C. Struijke, 1–34.
, , and . 2005. The paradox of sign language morphology. Language 81.2: 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, and Sridhar, S. N. 1987. Morphological levels in English and Kannada: or Atarizing Reagan. In Phonomorphology, ed. . Lublin: Redakcja Wydawnictw Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Luelskiego.Google Scholar
Ausín, Adolfo. 1999. Chinese-type questions in English. In Proceedings of The Seventeenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, eds. , , and , 30–43. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bahan, Benjamin. 1996. Non-manual realization of agreement in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Boston University.
, , , , and . 2000. The licensing of null arguments in American Sign Language. Linguistic Inquiry 31:1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahan, Benjamin, and Petitto, Laura. 1980. Aspects of rules for character establishment and reference in ASL storytelling. Unpublished ms.; Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA.
1970. Notes on the description of English questions: the role of an abstract question morpheme. Foundations of Language 6: 197–219.Google Scholar
Baker, Charlotte. 1977. Regulators and turn-taking in American Sign Language discourse. In On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language, ed. , 215–236. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1980. American Sign Language: A Teacher's Resource Text on Grammar and Culture. Silver Spring, MD: TJ Publishers.Google Scholar
Baker, Charlotte, and Padden, Carol A. 1978. Focusing on the non-manual components of ASL. In Understanding Language through Sign Language Research, ed. , 27–57. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baker-Shenk, Charlotte. 1983. A micro-analysis of the non-manual components of questions in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California.
, and . 2001. The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1973. Narrative style and the grammar of direct and indirect speech. Foundations of Language 10:1–39.Google Scholar
, and eds. 1988. Agreement in Natural Language: Approaches, Theories, Descriptions. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Literature.Google Scholar
. 1974. Phonological deletion in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 5: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1986. Intonational structure in English and Japanese. Phonology Yearbook 3: 255–310.Google Scholar
, and . 1972. A comparison of signed and spoken language. Cognition 1: 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1981. Formal devices for creating new signs in ASL. Sign Language Studies 10: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2004. Where did all the arguments go? Argument-changing properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22.4: 743–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenz, Norine, and Ferreira-Brito, Lucinda. 1990. Pronouns in BCSL and ASL. In SLR '87: Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. and . Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Bergman, Brita. 1983. Verbs and adjectives: morphological processes in Swedish Sign Language. In Language in Sign: An International Perspective on Sign Language, eds. and , 3–9. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Bergvall, Victoria. 1987. The position and properties of in situ and right-moved questions in Kikuyu. In Current Approaches to African Linguistics, ed. , 37–54. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 1993. The nature of constraints on the non-dominant hand in ASL. In Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. , 43–62. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette.1995. The syllable in phonological theory. In A Handbook of Phonological Theory ed. , 206–244. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
, and . 2000. Rhythmic structures in French Sign Language (LSF) nursery rhymes. Sign Language & Linguistics 3: 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan. 1995. The syntax of verbal inflection. PhD dissertation, MIT.
. 1983. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Bos, Heleen. 1990. Person and location marking in SLN: some implications of a spatially expressed syntactic system. In Sign Language Research and Application: Proceedings of the International Congress on Sign Language Research and Application, March 23–25, 1990, Hamburg, eds. and , 231–246. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Bos, Heleen.1994. An auxiliary in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. , , and , 37–53. University of Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Bos, Heleen.1995. Pronoun copy in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Sign Language Research 1994: Proceedings of the Fourth European Congress on Sign Language Research, eds. and , 121–147. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko.1998. LF movement and the Minimalist Program. In NELS 28, eds. and , 43–57. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko.2000. Sometimes in [Spec, CP], sometimes in situ. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, eds. , , and , 53–87. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boster, Carole T. 1996. On the quantifier-NP split in American Sign Language and the structure of quantified noun phrases. In International Review of Sign Linguistics, eds. and , 159–208. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. 1996. Sign language and language universals: the status of order and position in grammar. Sign Language Studies 91: 101–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1995. Grammar, order and position of wh-signs in Quebec Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 87: 99–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyes-Braem, Penny. 1981. Distinctive features of the handshapes of American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California.
. 1999. Rhythmic temporal patterns in the signing of deaf early and late learners of Swiss German Sign Language. Language & Speech 42: 177–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , eds. 2001. The Hands are the Head of the Mouth: The Mouth as Articulator in Sign Languages. International Studies on Sign Language and Communication of the Deaf 39. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
. 2004. Aspectual inflection, verb raising, and object fronting in American Sign Language. Lingua 114.1: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Mary. 1981. Grammatical processes in British Sign Language. In Perspectives on British Sign Language, eds. , , and , 120–135. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Brennan, Mary.1983. Marking time in British Sign Language. In Language in Sign: An International Perspective on Sign Language, eds. and , 10–31. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
, and eds. 1994. Word-Order Issues in Sign Language: Working Papers (presented at a workshop held in Durham, 18–22 September 1991). Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane. 1990. Theoretical foundations of American Sign Language phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
. 1993. Establishing a sonority hierarchy in American Sign Language: the use of simultaneous structure in phonology. Phonology 10: 281–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane.1995. Sign language phonology: ASL. In A Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed. , 615–639. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane, and Goldsmith, John A. 1993. Secondary licensing and the non-dominant hand in ASL phonology. In Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. , 19–41. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane, Hulst, Harry van der, Kooij, Els van der, and Sandler, Wendy. 1996. [one] over [all]; [all] over [one]: a dependency phonology analysis of handshape in sign languages. Ms.
Brentari, Diane, and Padden, Carol A. 2001. Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language: a lexicon with multiple origins. In Foreign Vocabulary in Sign Languages: A Cross-Linguistic Investigation of Word Formation, ed. , 87–119. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
, and . 1994. A phonological analysis of a deaf Parkinsonian signer. Language and Cognitive Processes 9: 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and . 1995. Aphasic and Parkinsonian signing: differences in phonological disruption. Brain and Language 48: 69–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
. 1970. On complementizers: toward a syntactic theory of complement types. Foundations of Language 6: 197–260.Google Scholar
Bricker, Victoria. 1978. Antipassive constructions in Yucatec Maya. In Papers in Mayan Linguistics, ed. , 3–24: Columbia University of Missouri.Google Scholar
, and . 1989. Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6: 201–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1975. The declarative-interrogative opposition in Russian. Slavic and East European Journal 19: 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2001. Introduction: conceptions of grammaticalization and their problems. Language Sciences 23.2–3: 93–112.Google Scholar
, , , and 1999. Categorical perception of face actions: their role in sign language and in communicative facial displays. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 52A: 67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994. On the internal structure of pronominal DPs. The Linguistic Review 11: 195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, L. 1997. Wh-in-situ phenomena in French. Master's thesis, University of British Columbia.
Channon, Rachel. 2002a. Beads on a string? Representations of repetition in spoken and signed languages. In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Language, eds. , and , 65–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Channon, Rachel.2002b. Signs are single segments: phonological representations and temporal sequencing in ASL and other sign languages. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
Chen Pichler, Deborah. 2001. Word order variability and acquisition in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Chinchor, Nancy. 1978. The syllable in American Sign Language: sequential and simultaneous phonology. Ms.
Chomsky, Noam.1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, eds. and , 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam.1991. Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, ed. . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam.1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The View from Building 20, eds. and , 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Lasnik, Howard. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, ed. et al., 506–569. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G. 1994. On the evidence for partial N-Movement in the Romance DP. In Paths Towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, eds. , , , , and , 85–110. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
, and 1982. Sign recognition processes in American Sign Language: the effect of context. Language and Speech 25: 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1975. The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: its role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages 2: 141–177.Google Scholar
Clements, George N.1990. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology 1: Between the grammar and Physics of Speech, eds. and , 288–333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1983. CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coerts, Jane. 1992. Non-manual grammatical markers: an analysis of interrogatives, negations, and topicalizations in Sign Language of the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Coerts, Jane.1994. Constituent order in Sign Language of the Netherlands and the functions of orientations. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Volume 1, eds. , , and , 69–88. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Coerts, Jane, and Mills, Anne. 1992. Early sign combinations of deaf children in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Paper presented at The Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Salamanca, Spain.
. 2002a. Signed language classifier predicates: linguistic structures or schematic visual representation?Sign Language & Linguistics 3: 153–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2002b. A model of signed language “classifier predicates” as templated visual representation. Sign Language & Linguistics 3: 209–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins-Ahlgren, M. 1989. New Zealand Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Victoria University.
Corina, David. 1990a. Handshape assimilations in hierarchical phonological representations. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. , 27–49. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Press.Google Scholar
Corina, David.1990b. Reassessing the role of sonority in syllable structure: evidence from visual-gestural language. In Papers from the Chicago Linguistic Society, 33–44. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Corina, David.1993. To branch or not to branch: underspecification in ASL handshape contours. In Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. , 63–95. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
, , and . 1999. Neuropsychological studies of linguistic and affective facial expressions in deaf signers. Language and Speech 42: 307–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corina, David, and Hildebrandt, Ursula C. 2002. Psycholinguistic investigations of phonological structure in American Sign Language. In Modality and Structure in Signed Language and Spoken Language, eds. , , and , 88–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corina, David, and Sagey, Elizabeth. 1989. Are phonological hierarchies universal? Evidence from American Sign Language. Paper presented at ESCOL.
, and . 1993. On the nature of phonological structure in sign language. Phonology 10: 165–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy, Wechsler, Stephen, and Meier, Richard. 1998. Locus agreement in American Sign Language. In Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation, eds. , , and , 215–229. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Coulter, Geoffrey. 1979. American Sign Language typology. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Coulter, Geoffrey.1982. On the nature of ASL as a monosyllabic language. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Diego, CA.
Coulter, Geoffrey.1990. Emphatic stress in ASL. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Volume 1: Linguistics, eds. and , 109–126. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crasborn, Onno. 2001. Phonetic implementation of phonological categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
Crasborn, Onno, and Kooij, Els van der. 1997. Relative orientation in sign language phonology. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 1997, eds. and , 37–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Currie, Anne-Marie, Meier, Richard, and Walters, Keith. 2002. A crosslinguistic examination of the lexicons of four signed languages. In Modality and Structure in Signed Language and Spoken Language, eds. , , and , 224–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dachkovsky, Svetlana. 2004. Neutral and counterfactual conditionals in Israeli Sign Language. MA thesis, University of Haifa.
Davies, D. 1985. The tongue is quicker than the eye. In SLR '83: Proceedings of the III International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. , and , 185–193. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1995. The articulatory basis of babbling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38: 1199–1211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deguchi, Masanori, and Kitagawa, Yoshihisa. 2002. Prosody and wh-questions. In Proceedings of the Thirty-second Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, ed. Masako Hirotani, 73–92.
DeMateo, Asa. 1977. Visual imagery and visual analogues in American Sign Language. In On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language, ed. , 109–136. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Deuchar, Margaret. 1983. Is BSL an SVO language? In Language in Sign, eds. and , 69–76. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Diffloth, Gérard. 1972. Notes on expressive meaning. In Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, eds. , , and , 440–447. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Dively, V. 2001. Signs without hands: nonhanded signs in ASL. In Signed Languages: Discoveries from International Research, eds. , , , and , 62–73. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
1997. The morphosyntactic reality of phonological form. Yearbook of Morphology: 59–81.Google Scholar
, and . 1998. Head-dependent asymmetries in phonology: complexity and visibility. Phonology 15: 317–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edge, VickiLee, and Hermann, Leora. 1977. Verbs and the determination of subject. In On the Other Hand, ed. , 137–179. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
, and 1975. Unmasking the Face: A Guide to Recognizing Emotions from Facial Clues. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
, and 1978. Facial Action Coding System: A Technique for the Measurement of Facial Movement. Investigator's Guide. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen. 1995. Processing the dynamic visual-spatial morphology of signed languages. In Morphological Aspects of Language Processing: Crosslinguistic Perspectives, ed. , 29–54. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen.1996. The confluence of space and language in signed languages. In Language and Space, eds. , , , and , 171–209. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen.1999. Do signers gesture? In Gesture, Speech, and Sign, eds. and , 133–159. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Language, Cognition, and the Brain: Insights from Sign Language Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. ed. 2003. Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
, and . 1990. Lexical recognition in sign language: effects of phonetic structure and morphology. Perceptual and Motor Skills 71: 1227–1252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmorey, Karen, and Falgier, B. 1999. Processing continuous and simultaneous reference in ASL. Ms. Los Angeles, CA.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1990. Pragmatics of non-manual behaviour in Danish Sign Language. In SLR '87: Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. and , 121–128. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth.1994. Some simultaneous constructions in Danish Sign Language. In Word-order Issues in Sign Language: Working Papers (presented at a workshop held in Durham, 18–22 September 1991), eds. and , 73–87. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth.1995. Point of view expressed through shifters. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. and , 133–154. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. 1985. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan. 1974. Sign language and linguistic universals. Paper presented at Actes du Colloque Franco-Allemand de grammaire Transformationnelle, Tübingen.
Fischer, Susan.1975. Influences on word order change in American Sign Language. In Word Order and Word Order Change, ed. , 1–25. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan.1978. Sign language and creoles. In Understanding Language through Sign Language Research, ed. , 309–331. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan.1990. The head parameter in ASL. In SLR '87: Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. and , 75–85. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
. 1996. The role of agreement and auxiliaries in sign language. Lingua 98: 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 1999. Effects of rate of presentation on the reception of American Sign Language. Journal of Speech, Hearing and Language Research 42: 568–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and . 1978. Verbs in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 7: 17–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Susan, and Janis, Wynne. 1990. Verb sandwiches in American Sign Language. In Current Trends in European Sign Language Research: Proceedings of the Third European Congress on Sign Language Research, eds. and , 279–294. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
. 1982. The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, W., and Van Valin, R. 1985. Information packaging in the clause. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, ed. , 282–364. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1975. Space, time, and person reference in American Sign Language. Language 51: 940–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Lynn.1976. The manifestation of subject, object, and topic in American Sign Language. In Subject and Topic, ed. . New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lynn.1977. Formational properties of American Sign Language. In On the Other Hand, ed. , 13–56. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1975. Arbitrariness and iconicity: historical change in American Sign Language. Language 51: 696–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frishberg, Nancy.1985. Dominance relations and discourse structures. In SLR '83: Sign Language Research, eds. and , 79–90. Rome: Linstok Press and CNR.Google Scholar
Gallaudet Research Institute. 2001. Regional and National Summary Report of data from the 1999–2000 Annual Survey of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children and Youth. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Research Institute, Gallaudet University.
, and . 1985. Nativization, linguistic theory, and deaf language acquisition. Sign Language Studies 49: 291–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Canonical government and the specifier parameter: an ECP account of weak crossover. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gijn, Ingeborg Van, Kita, Sotaro, and Hulst, Harry van der. In press. How phonetic is the Symmetry Condition in sign language? In Phonetics and Phonology – Selected Papers of the Fourth HIL Phonology Conference, eds. , , and . Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Givón, Talmy. 1976. Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Subject and Topic, ed. , 149–188. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Glück, Susanne, and Pfau, Roland. 1998. On classifying classification as a class of inflection in German Sign Language. In ConSole VI Proceedings, eds. , , and , 59–74. Leiden: SOLE.Google Scholar
Glück, Susanne, and Pfau, Roland.1999. A distributed morphology account of verbal inflection in German Sign Language. In ConSole VII Proceedings, eds. , , and , 65–80. Leiden: SOLE.Google Scholar
. 2003. The Resilience of Language: What Gesture Creation in Deaf Children Can Tell Us about How All Children Learn Language. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Greftegreff, Irene. 1993. Anatomy and features in sign language handshapes. Ms. University of Trondheim.
Grinevald, Colette. 2000. A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. In Systems of Nominal Classification, ed. , 50–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1981. Sign and word recognition: a first comparison. Sign Language Studies 32: 195–219.Google Scholar
, ed. 1984. On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Discreteness and gradience in intonational contrasts. Language & Speech 42: 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
, and . 1991. Negative heads and the neg criterion. The Linguistic Review 8: 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1980. The iconicity of grammar: isomorphism and motivation. Language 56: 515–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Ken. 1980. Remarks on Japanese phrase structure: comments on the papers on Japanese syntax. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 2: Theoretical Issues in Japanese Linguistics, eds. and , 185–203. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
. 1983. Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1992. Phonological features. In International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Volume 3, ed. , 207–212. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, and Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, eds. and , 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, and Marantz, Alec. 1994. Some key features of Distributed Morphology. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 275–288. Cambridge, MA: MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosophy.
, and . 1971. A note on laryngeal features. In Research Laboratory of Electronics Quarterly Progress Report, 198–212. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Hamano, Shoko Saito. 1986. The sound-symbolic system of Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Florida.
Hanks, William F. 1992. The indexical ground of deictic reference. In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, eds. and , 43–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harder, R., and Schermer, T. 1986. A first phonological analysis of handshapes in SLN. In Signs of Life: Proceedings of the Second European Congress on Sign Language Research, ed. , 47–51: Institute of General Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1993. Against movement. In Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. , 213–226. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1999. Phonetically driven phonology: the role of optimality theory and inductive grounding. In Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, eds. , , , , and , 243–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
, and . 1991. Bengali intonational phonology. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 9: 47–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heggie, L. 1988. The syntax of copular structures. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
Heycock, C. 1991. Layers of predication: The non-lexical syntax of clauses. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Hoji, Hajime. 1985. Logical Form Constraints and Syntactic Configurations in Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.
Holmberg, A. 1986. Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English. PhD dissertation, University of Stockholm.
Horvath, Julia. 1980. Movement in “Logical Form”: evidence from Hungarian. Ms. UCLA.
. 1982. Move wh in a language without wh movement. The Linguistic Review 1: 369–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574.Google Scholar
. 1989. Atoms of segmental structure: components, gestures and dependency. Phonology 6: 253–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995. The composition of handshapes. University of Trondheim Working Papers in Linguistics 23: 1–17.Google Scholar
, and . 1994. Phonological theories meet sign language: two theories of the two hands. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 13: 43–73.Google Scholar
, and 1981. Logophoric reference in Gokana. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 3: 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1968 [1941]. Child Language, Aphasia, and Phonological Universals. The Hague: Mouton. (Original publication: Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janis, Wynne. 1992. Morphosyntax of the ASL Verb Phrase. PhD dissertation, SUNY Buffalo.
Janis, Wynne. 1995. A Crosslinguistic Perspective on ASL Verb Agreement. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. and , 195–223. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Janzen, Terry. 1998. Topicality in ASL: Information ordering, constituent structure, and the function of topic marking. PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico.
. 1999. The grammaticization of topics in American Sign Language. Studies in Language 23: 271–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, Terry, and Shaffer, Barbara. 2002. Gesture as the substrate in the process of ASL grammaticization. In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, eds. , , and , 199–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1999. On defining lexeme in a signed language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2: 115–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Daniel. 1976. Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.
, and . 1993. From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Model Theoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy. 1976. Relational grammar and American Sign Language. Ms.
Kegl, Judy. 1986. Clitics in American Sign Language. In Syntax and Semantics, Volume 19: The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, ed. . New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy. 1990. Predicate argument structure and verb-class organization in the ASL lexicon. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. , 149–175. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
. 2003 [1976]. Pronominalization in American Sign Language. Sign Language and Linguistics 6.2: 245–265. (Originally distributed as ms.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and . 1996. The case for grammar, order and position in ASL: a reply to Bouchard and Dubuisson. Sign Language Studies 90: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kegl, Judy, Senghas, Ann, and Coppola, Marie. 1999. Creation through contact: sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In Language Creation and Language Change: Creolization, Diachrony, and Development, ed. , 197–237. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy, and Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1976. When does structure stop and style begin? Syntax, morphology, and phonology vs. stylistic variation in ASL. Paper presented at the 12th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.
. 1985. The phonology and syntax of wh-expressions in Tangale. Studies in Linguistic Science 15: 79–91.Google Scholar
. 1999. Extrapolating from spoken to signed prosody. Language & Speech 7: 251–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical phonology and morphology. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. , 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul.2002. Paradigm effects and opacity. Ms. Stanford University.
Kisch, Shifra. 2000. Deaf Discourse: social construction of deafness in a Bedouin community in the Negev. MA thesis. Tel Aviv University.
. 1997. Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35: 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Edward S. 1964. Negation in English. In The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language, eds. and , 246–323. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kooij, Els van der. 1998. The position of unselected fingers. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 1998, ed. and , 149–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kooij, Els van der.2002. Phonological categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands: the role of phonetic implementation and iconicity. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
. 1984. The Syntax of Verbs: From Movement Rules in the Kru Languages to Universal Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
, and . 1989. Pronouns, logical variables, and logophoricity in Abe. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 555–588.Google Scholar
, and eds. 1991. Long Distance Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Twice as Meaningful: Reduplication in Pidgins, Creoles, and other Contact Languages. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
, and . 1985. Deaf signers and serial recall in the visual modality: memory for signs, fingerspelling and print. Memory and Cognition 13: 265–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuroda, S. -Y. 1983. What can Japanese say about government and binding? In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, eds. , and , 153–164. Stanford: Stanford Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S. -Y. 1988. Whether we agree or not: a comparative syntax of English and Japanese. In Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, ed. , 103–143. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
, and 1985. Sign Language: The Study of Deaf People and Their Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laka Mugarza, Miren Itziar. 1990. Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD Dissertation, MIT.
, and eds. 1984. The Deaf Experience: Classics in Language and Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1969. Pronominalization and the chain of command. In Modern Studies in English, eds. and , 160–186. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
1970. A Grammar of The Mesa Grande Dialect. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. 1995. Verbal morphology: syntactic structures meets the Minimalist Program. In Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Carlos Otero, eds. and , 251–275. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Robert G., Neidle, Carol, MacLaughlin, Dawn, Bahan, Benjamin, and Kegl, Judy. 1997. Role shift in ASL: A syntactic look at direct speech. In Syntactic Structure and Discourse Function: An Examination of Two Constructions in American Sign Language, eds. , and , 24–45. Boston, MA: American Sign Language Linguistic Research Project, Boston University.Google Scholar
Legate, Julie Anne. 2003. Arguments and adjuncts in Warlpiri. Paper presented at the University of Connecticut, February 2003.
Lehmann, Christian. 1988. On the function of agreement. In Agreement in Natural Language, eds. and , 55–66. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Lentz, Ella Mae. 1986. Teaching role shifting. In Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching, ed. . Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.Google Scholar
Levy, Doron. 2001. Weak drop in Israeli Sign Language. Ms. Tel Aviv.
Li, Charles, and Thompson, Sandra. 1976. Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In Subject and Topic, ed. , 457–489. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 1978. Non-manual signs and relative clauses in American Sign Language. In Understanding Language through Sign Language Research, ed. , 59–90. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1984a. Unrealized-inceptive aspect in American Sign Language: feature insertion in syllabic frames. Papers from the Chicago Linguistic Society, 257–270.Google Scholar
1984b. think and believe: sequentiality in American Sign Language. Language 60: 372–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 1990a. Four functions of a locus: reexamining the structure of Space in ASL. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. , 176–198. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 1990b. Structures for representing handshape and local movement at the phonemic level. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, eds. and , 37–65. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 1994. Tokens and surrogates. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. , , and , 105–119. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 1995. Real, surrogate, and token space: grammatical consequences in ASL. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. and , 19–41. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 2000. Indicating verbs and pronouns: pointing away from agreement. In The Signs of Language Revisited: An Anthology to Honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, eds. and , 303–320. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 2003. Sources of meaning in ASL classifier predicates. In Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Language, ed. . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
, and 1986. American Sign Language compound formation processes, lexicalization, and phonological remnants. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 445–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1989 [1985]. American Sign Language: the phonological base. Sign Language Studies 64: 197–277. (Originally distributed as ms.).Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1985. Null pronouns and verb agreement in American Sign Language. In Proceedings of NELS 15, eds. , , and , 302–318. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
1986a. Two kinds of null arguments in American Sign Language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4: 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane.1986b. Parameter setting: evidence from use, acquisition, and breakdown in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1990. Parameters for questions: evidence from WH-movement in American Sign Language. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. , 211–222. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1991. Universal Grammar and American Sign Language: Setting the Null Argument Parameters. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1992. Sentences as islands: on the boundedness of A′-movement in American Sign Language. In Island Constraints, eds. and , 259–274. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1995. The point of view predicate in American Sign Language. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. and , 155–170. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1997. The modular effects of sign language acquisition. In Relations of Language and Thought: The View from Sign Language and Deaf Children, eds. , , , , and , 62–109. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1999a. Modality effects and modularity in language acquisition: the acquisition of American Sign Language. In Handbook of Language Acquisition, eds. and , 531–567. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane.1999b. Syntactic aspects of intonation. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting.
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 2002. Where are all the modality effects? In Modality and Structure in Signed Language and Spoken Language, eds. , , and , 241–262. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane, and Fischer, Susan. 1992. Overt and covert wh-questions in American Sign Language. Paper presented at the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Salamanca, Spain.
Lillo-Martin, Diane, and Klima, Edward S. 1990. Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Volume 1: Linguistics, eds. and , 191–210. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lobeck, Anne.1990. Functional heads as proper governors. Paper presented at NELS 20.
Loew, Ruth. 1984. Roles and reference in American Sign Language: a developmental perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Lucas, Ceil. 1995. Sociolinguistic variation in ASL: the case of DEAF. In Sign Language Research 1994, eds. and , 189–210. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
, and . 1992. Linguistics of American Sign Language: A Resource Text for ASL Users. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
MacLaughlin, Dawn. 1997. The structure of determiner phrases: evidence from American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Boston University.
MacNeilage, Peter. 1998. Evolution of the mechanism of language output: comparative neurobiology of vocal and manual communication. In Approaches to the Evolution of Language: Social and Cognitive Bases, eds. , , and , 222–241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mandel, Mark. 1977. Iconic devices in American Sign Language. In On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language, ed. . New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mandel, Mark.1981. Phonotactics and morphophonology in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California.
Mathur, Gaurav. 2000. Verb agreement as alignment in signed languages. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Mathur, Gaurav, and Rathmann, Christian. 2001. Why not GIVE-US: an articulatory constraint in signed languages. In Signed Languages: Discoveries from International Research, eds. , , , and , 1–25. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Matsuoka, Kazumi.2000. The lexical verb sandwich in American Sign Language and the hybrid feature. Ms.
(Peter Hugoe). 1974. Morphology: An Introduction to the Theory of Word Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McBurney, Susan. 2002. Pronominal reference in signed and spoken language: are grammatical categories modality-dependent? In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, eds. , , and , 329–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1979. Formal Problems in Semitic Phonology and Morphology. PhD dissertation, MIT.
. 1981. A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 373–418.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John, and Prince, Alan. 1986. Prosodic morphology. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Brandeis University.
McCarthy, John, and Prince, Alan.1993. Prosodic morphology I: constraint interaction and satisfaction. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Rutgers University.
McCarthy, John, and Prince, Alan.1994. The emergence of the unmarked: optimality in prosodic morphology. In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 24, ed. M. González, 333–379.
McCarthy, John, and Prince, Alan. 1995. Prosodic morphology. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed. , 318–366. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
, and . 1984. The syntax of person-number inflection in Modern Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 487–533.Google Scholar
McDonald, B. 1982. Aspects of the American Sign Language predicate system. PhD dissertation, University of Buffalo.
. 1977. The acquisition of ASL hand configurations. Sign Language Studies 16: 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, David, and Kennedy, Graeme. 2000. Lexical comparison of signs from American, Australian, British, and New Zealand Sign Languages. In The Signs of Language Revisited: An Anthology in Honor of Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, eds. and , 49–76. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
McLemore, Cynthia. 1991. The pragmatic interpretation of English intonation: sorority speech. PhD dissertation, University of Texas.
. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gesture Reveals about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1998. Identifying the creole prototype: vindicating a typological class. Language 74: 788–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , and 1988. A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition 29.2: 143–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1981. Icons and morphemes: models of the acquisition of verb agreement in ASL. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 20: 92–99.Google Scholar
Meier, Richard P.1982. Icons, analogues, and morphemes: the acquisition of verb agreement in ASL. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
1987. Elicited imitation of verb agreement in American Sign Language: iconically or morphologically determined?Journal of Memory and Language 26: 362–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Richard P. 1990. Person deixis in American Sign Language. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, eds. and , 175–190. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meier, Richard P. 1993. A psychologinguistic perspective on phonological segmentation in sign and speech. In Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. , 169–188. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Meier, Richard P. 2002a. The acquisition of verb agreement: pointing out arguments for the linguistic status of agreement in signed languages. In Current Developments in the Study of Signed Language Acquisition, eds. and , 115–141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Meier, Richard P. 2002b. Why different, why the same? Explaining effects and non-effects of modality upon linguistic structure in sign and speech. In Modality and Structure in Signed Language and Spoken Language, eds. , , and , 1–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Richard P., and Willerman, Raquel. 1995. Prelinguistic gesture in deaf and hearing infants. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. and , 391–410. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Meir, Irit. 1998a. Thematic structure and verb agreement in Israeli Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
. 1998b. Syntactic-semantic interaction of Israeli Sign Language verbs: the case of backwards verbs. Sign Language & Linguistics 1: 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Verb classifiers as noun incorporation in Israeli Sign Language. Yearbook of Morphology 1999: 299–319.Google Scholar
. 2002. A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20.2: 413–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Grammaticalization and modality: the emergence of a case marked pronoun in Israeli Sign Language. Journal of Linguistics 39.1: 109–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2004. Language in Space: A Window on Israeli Sign Language (Hebrew). Haifa: University of Haifa Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. Une théorie prosodique de la phonologie des langues des signes. Revue Québecoise de Linguistique Théoretique et Appliquée 10: 21–55.Google Scholar
Miller, Christopher. 1994. Simultaneous constructions in Quebec Sign Language. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Volume 1, eds. , , and , 131–147. Durham: ISLA.Google Scholar
Miller, Christopher.1996. Phonologie de la langue des signes Québequois: structure simultanée et axe temporal. PhD dissertation, Université du Québec à Montréal.
Mithun, Marianne. 1986a. The convergence of noun classification systems. In Noun Classes and Categorization (Typological Studies in Language 7), ed. , 379–397. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith. 1988. Agreement and markedness. In Agreement in Natural Language, eds. and , 89–106. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Murasugi, Keiko. 1991. Noun Phrases in Japanese and English: A Study in Syntax, Learnability, and Acquisition. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Nadeau, Marie, and Desouvrey, Louis. 1994. Word order in sentences with directional verbs in Quebec Sign Language. In Perspectives on sign language structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Volume 1, eds. , , and , 149–158. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Nagahara, Hiroyki. 1988. Towards an explicit phonological representation for American Sign Language. MA thesis, University of California.
. 2002. Language across modalities: ASL focus and question constructions. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2: 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and . 1998a. Realizations of syntactic agreement in American Sign Language: similarities between the clause and the noun phrase. Studia Linguistica 52: 191–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neidle, Carol, Kegl, Judy, Bahan, Ben, Aarons, Debra, and MacLaughlin, Dawn. 1997. Rightward WH-movement in American Sign Language. In Rightward Movement, eds. , , and , 247–278. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and 2000. The Syntax of American Sign Language: Functional Categories and Hierarchical Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
, , , , and . 1998b. The right(ward) analysis of wh-movement in ASL. Language 74: 819–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1999. Prosody in Israeli Sign Language. Language and Speech 42: 143–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Segmental inventory size, word length, and communicative efficiency. Linguistics 33: 359–367.Google Scholar
Newkirk, Don. 1978. The form of multiples and exhaustives in ASL. Ms.
Newkirk, Don.1979. The form of continuative aspect inflection on ASL verbs. Ms.
Newkirk, Don.1981. Rhythmic features of inflections in American Sign Language. Ms.
. 1998 [1981]. On the temporal segmentation of movement in American Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 1: 173–212. (Originally distributed as ms.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newkirk, Don, Klima, Ed, Pedersen, Carlene Canady, and Bellugi, Ursula. 1980. Linguistic evidence from slips of the hand. In Errors in Linguistic Performance: Slips of the Tongue and Hand, ed. . New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Newport, Elissa L. 1981. Constraints on structure: evidence from American Sign Language and language learning. In Aspects of the Development of Competence. Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, ed. . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Newport, Elissa L., and Meier, Richard P. 1985. The acquisition of American Sign Language. In The Cross-Linguistic Study of Language Acquisition, ed. , 881–938. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Newport, Elissa L., and Supalla, Ted. 2000. Sign language research at the millennium. In The Signs of Language Revisited: An Anthology to Honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, eds. and , 103–114. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Nunes, Jairo. 1999. Linearization of chains and phonetic realization of chain links. In Working Minimalism, eds. and , 217–249. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nunes, Jairo and Quadros, Ronice. 2004. Phonetic realization of multiple copies in Brazilian Sign Language. Presented at Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR VIII), Barcelona.
. 1984. An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica 41: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osugi, Yutaka. 1997. In search of the phonological representation of ASL. PhD dissertation, University of Rochester.
1990. Sentential negation, Relativized Minimality, and the aspectual status of auxiliaries. The Linguistic Review 7: 183–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padden, Carol A. 1986. Verbs and role-shifting in American Sign Language. In Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching, ed. . , MD: National Association of the Deaf.Google Scholar
Padden, Carol A. 1988 [1983]. Interaction of Morphology and Syntax in American Sign Language: Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York: Garland. (Originally distributed as: PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.)
Padden, Carol A. 1990. The relation between space and grammar in ASL verb morphology. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. , 118–132. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1988. Deaf in America: Voices from a Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1987. American Sign Language and the architecture of phonological theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 335–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parisot, Anne-Marie. 2000. Do plain verbs agree in Quebec Sign Language? Ms. Amsterdam.
Perlmutter, David.1991. Feature geometry in a language with two active articulators. Ms. Santa Cruz.
Perlmutter, David. 1992. Sonority and syllable structure in American Sign Language. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 407–442. Reprinted as: Sonority and syllable structure in American Sign Language. In Phonetics and Phonology, Volume 3: Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. . San Diego, CA: Academic Press (1993).Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David. 1996. Compounds and lexemes in American Sign Language. Ms.
Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in situ: movement and unselective binding. In The Representation of (in)Definiteness, eds. and , 98–129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Petronio, Karen. 1991. A focus position in ASL. In Papers from the Third Student Conference in Linguistics, 1991, eds. and , 211–225. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Petronio, Karen.1993. Clause structure in American Sign Language. PhD Dissertation, University of Washington.
, and . 1997. Wh-Movement and the position of Spec CP: evidence from American Sign Language. Language 73: 18–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland. 2002. Applying morphosyntactic and phonological readjustment rules in natural language negation. In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, eds. , , and , 263–295. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland, and Quer, Josep. 2003. V-to-Neg raising and negative concord in three sign languages. Paper presented at the XXIX Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Urbino, February 2003.
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Pierrehumbert, Janet, and Hirschberg, Julia. 1990. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Intentions in communication, eds. , , and . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pizzuto, Elena, Giuranna, Enza, and Gambino, Giuseppe. 1990. Manual and non-manual morphology in Italian Sign Language: grammatical constraints and discourse processes. In Sign Language Research. Theoretical Issues, ed. , 83–102. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Poulin, Christine, and Miller, Christopher. 1995. On narrative discourse and point of view in Quebec Sign Language. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. and , 117–131. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. 1989. HamNoSys: Version 2.0; Hamburg Notational System for Sign Languages. An Introductory Guide. International Studies on Sign Language and Communication of the deaf 5. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms. New Brunswick and Boulder.
1986. On the syntactic marking of presupposed open propositions. Chicago Linguistic Society 22: 208–222.Google Scholar
Quadros, Ronice Müller de. 1995. As categorias vazias pronominais: uma análise alternativa com base na língua de sinais brasileira e reflexos no processo de aquisição. MA thesis, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.
Quadros, Ronice Müller de.1999. Phrase structure of Brazilian Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.
, and 2004. Língua de sinais brasileira: estudos lingüísticos. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.Google Scholar
Quadros, Ronice Müller de, Lillo-Martin, Diane, and Chen Pichler, Deborah. 2000. A little change goes a long way: capturing structural differences between Brazilian Sign Language and American Sign Language. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Amsterdam.
Quadros, Ronice Müller de, Lillo-Martin, Diane, and Chen Pichler, Deborah.2004. Clause structure in LSB and ASL. Paper presented at the 26. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft, Mainz, Germany.
Quer, Josep. 2003. Operadores negativos en Lengua de Signos Catalana (LSC) (Negative operators in LSC): Presented at the Jornadas del Comahue de Lingüística de Lenguas de Señas, San Martin de los Andes, Argentina, March 2003.
Rathmann, Christian. 2000. The optionality of agreement phrase: evidence from signed languages. MA report, University of Texas.
Rathmann, Christian, and Mathur, Gaurav. 1999. The linguistic status of joint-based constraints in signed languages. Paper presented at The 35th Annual Chicago Linguistics Society Meeting.
Rathmann, Christian, and Mathur, Gaurav. 2002. Is verb agreement the same cross-modally? In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, eds. , , and , 370–404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1996. Competition on the face: affect and language in ASL motherese. Journal of Child Language 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1991. where shoe: the acquisition of wh-questions in American Sign Language. Papers and Reports in Child Language Development 30: 104–111.Google Scholar
, , and . 1990a. The acquisition of conditionals in American Sign Language: grammaticized facial expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics 11: 369–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, Judy S., McIntire, Marina L., and Bellugi, Ursula. 1990b. Faces: the relationship between language and affect. In From Gesture to Language in Hearing and Deaf Children, eds. and , 128–141. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1976. The syntactic domain of anaphora. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Reuland, Eric J., and Everaert, Martin. 2001. Deconstructing binding. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, eds. and , 634–669. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Norvin. 1997. What moves where when in which language? PhD dissertation, MIT.
. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi.1991. Residual verb second and the WH-criterion. Ms., Technical Reports in Formal and Computational Linguistics. Faculté des Lettres, University of Geneva.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, ed. , 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, Christine. 1991. Mixed headedness in American Sign Language: evidence from functional categories. In Papers from the Third Student Conference in Linguistics, 1991, eds. and , 241–254. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 1989. Two types of noun incorporation: a lexical analysis. Language 65: 294–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstein, Ofra. 2001. ISL as a topic prominent language. MA thesis, University of Haifa.
Ross, J. R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
. 1988. On multiple questions and multiple WH fronting. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 445–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagey, Elizabeth. 1986. The representation of features and relations in non-linear phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Saito, Mamoru. 1985. Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. PhD dissertation, MIT.
. 1986. The spreading hand autosegment of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 50: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1987a. Assimilation and feature hierarchy in American Sign Language. In Papers from the Chicago Linguistic Society, Parasession on Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology, 266–278. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy.1987b. Sequentiality and simultaneity in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of Texas.
. 1989. Phonological Representation of the Sign: Linearity and Non-linearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 1990. Temporal aspect and American Sign Language. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, eds. and , 103–129. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1993a. Hand in hand: the roles of the non-dominant hand in sign language phonology. The Linguistic Review 10: 337–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 1993b. Linearization of phonological tiers in American Sign Language. In Phonetics and Phonology, Volume 3: Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. . San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 1995a. One phonology or two? Sign language and phonological theory. GLOT International 1. Reprinted in The GLOT International State-of-the-Article Book, eds. L. Cheng and R. Sybesma, 349–384. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter (2000).
. 1995b. Phonological characteristics of sign languages: Similarities and differences. Trondheim Working Papers in Linguistics 23: 18–37.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 1995c. Markedness in the handshapes of signs: a componential analysis. In Leiden in Last: Holland Institute of Linguistics Phonology Papers, eds. and , 369–399. The Hague: Holland Academie Graphics.Google Scholar
. 1996a. Representing handshapes. International Review of Sign Linguistics 1: 115–158.Google Scholar
. 1996b. Phonological features and feature classes: the case of movements in sign language. Lingua 98: 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy.1996c. A negative suffix in ASL. Ms.
. 1999a. Prosody in two natural language modalities. Language and Speech 42: 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 1999b. Cliticization and prosodic words in a sign language. In Studies on the Phonological Word, eds. and , 223–254. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1999c. The medium and the message: prosodic interpretation of linguistic content in Israeli Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2: 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 2003. On the complementarity of signed and spoken languages. In Language Competence across Populations, eds. and , 383–409. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. In press. Phonology, phonetics, and the non-dominant hand. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Varieties of Phonological Competence, eds. , , and . Berlin: Mouton-deGruyter.
Sandler, Wendy, and Dachkovsky, Svetlana. 2004. Superarticulation in Israeli Sign Language: the grammar of the face. Ms.
Sandler, Wendy, and Lillo-Martin, Diane. 2001. Natural sign languages. In The Handbook of Linguistics, eds. and , 533–562. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
, , , and . 2005. The emergence of grammar: systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102.7: 2661–2665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1967. Note sur la classification nominale en Bainouk. In La classification nominales dans les langues Négro-Africaines, 225–236. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam. 2003. Rethinking “classifiers” in signed languages. In Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages, ed. , 3–34. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schick, Brenda S. 1987. The acquisition of classifier predicates in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Purdue University.
1990. Classifier predicates in American Sign Language. International Journal of Sign Linguistics 1: 15–40.Google Scholar
. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation Between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
, ed. 2000a. Systems of Nominal Classification: Language, Culture, and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Senft, Gunter, 2000b. What do we really know about nominal classification systems? In Systems of Nominal Classification, ed. . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Senghas, Ann. 1995. Children's contribution to the birth of Nicaraguan Sign Language. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Senghas, Ann. 2000. The development of early spatial morphology in Nicaraguan Sign Language. In Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development, eds. , and , 696–707. Boston: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Shepard-Kegl, Judy. 1985. Locative relations in ASL word formation, syntax and discourse. PhD dissertation, MIT.
. 2000. Topic and topic-comment constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Language 76: 383–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1993. Phonological deletion revisited: errors in young children's two-handed signs. Sign Language Studies 80: 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1997. Young children's acquisition of the handshape aspect of American Sign Language signs: parental report findings. Applied Psycholinguistics 18: 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1978. Visual constraints for sign language communication. Sign Language Studies 7: 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1977. Grammatike Cukotskogo Jazyka. Tom 2 [A Grammar of Chukchee Volume 2, Russian]. Moscow: Izdatel'stro Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan, Hoiting, Nini, Kuntze, Marlon, Lindert, Reyna B., Weinberg, Amy M., Pyers, Jennie E., Thumann, Helen, and Biederman, Yael. 2003. A cognitive/functional perspective on the acquisition of “classifiers.” In Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Language, ed. , 271–296. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Smith, Wayne. 1990. Evidence for auxiliaries in Taiwan Sign Language. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Volume 1: Linguistics, eds. and , 211–228. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. On the nature of syntactic variation: evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation. Language 77: 324–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Morphological Theory: An Introduction to Word Structure in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stack, Kelly. 1988. Tiers and syllable structure: evidence from phonotactics. MA thesis, University of California.
, and . 1989. Primary features and their enhancement in consonants. Language 65: 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stjepanović, Sandra. 1999. What do second position cliticization, scrambling, and multiple wh-fronting have in common? PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
1960. Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. In Studies in Linguistics: Occasional Papers. Buffalo: University of Buffalo.Google Scholar
, , and . 1965. A Dictionary of American Sign Language on Linguistic Principles. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press. [Reprinted in 1976 by Linstok Press.]Google Scholar
Stowell, Timothy. 1991. Determiners in NP and DP. In Views on Phrase Structure, eds. and , 37–56. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supalla, Ted. 1982. Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion and location in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Supalla, Ted. 1986. The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Noun Classes and Categorization, ed. , 181–214. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supalla, Ted.1998. Reconstructing early ASL grammar through historic films. Ms.
Supalla, Ted, and Newport, Elissa. 1978. How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language. In Understanding Language Through Sign Language Research, ed. , 91–132. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Supalla, Ted, and Webb, Rebecca. 1995. The grammar of international sign: a new look at pidgin languages. In Language, Gesture, and Space (International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research), eds. and , 333–352. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 2000. Aspects of BSL poetry: a social and linguistic analysis of the poetry of Dorothy Miles. Sign Language & Linguistics 3: 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1999. The Linguistics of British Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swart, Henriette de. 1995. Topic and focus. Glot International 1. Reprinted in The First Glot International State-of-the-Article Book, eds. L. Cheng and R. Sybesma, 105–130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 2000.
Szabolcsi, A. 1994. The noun phrase. In Syntax and Semantics, Volume 27: The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian, eds. and , 179–274. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1993. Movement of wh-phrase in Japanese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 11: 655–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2003. The representation of spatial structure in spoken and signed language: a neural model. Language & Linguistics 4.2: 207–250.Google Scholar
2001. Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Henry. 1977. The lack of subordination in American Sign Language. In On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language, ed. , 181–195. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1965. A Vietnamese Reference Grammar. Previously published as Mon-Khymer studies XIII–XIV [1965]. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Robin, and Emmorey, Karen. 2003. The relationship between eye gaze and verb agreement in American Sign Language: an eye-tracking study. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1994. On the (non-)universality of functional categories. Ms. Harvard University / University of Iceland.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2001. Object shift and scrambling. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, eds. and , 148–202. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torigoe, Takashi. 1994. Resumptive X structures in Japanese Sign Language. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Volume 1, eds. , , and , 187–198. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
. 1999. Syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 219–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1992. The syntax of postverbal focus constructions in Chadic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 10: 303–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1996 [1994]. The Geometry of Visual Phonology. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. (Originally distributed as PhD dissertation, Stanford University.)Google Scholar
, and . 1996. The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics 34: 459–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1992. Linguistics of American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
. 1992. Conceptual spaces and pronominal reference in American Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 15: 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1990. A linguistic analysis of the negative headshake in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 68: 217–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallin, Lars. 1983. Compounds in Swedish Sign Language in historical perspective. In Language in Sign: An International Perspective on Sign Language. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium of Sign Language Research in Bristol, UK in July 1981, eds. and , 56–68. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Wallin, Lars.1994. Polysyntetiska tecken i svenska teckenspråket. [Polysynthetic signs in Swedish Sign Language]. Doctoral dissertation, Stockholms Universitet.
Wallin, Lars. 1996. Polysynthetic signs in Swedish Sign Language (English edition). Stockholm: University of Stockholm.
Watanabe, Akira. 2001. Wh-in-situ languages. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, eds. and , 203–225. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program: Principles and Parameters in Syntactic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Whittemore, Greg. 1986. The production of ASL signs. PhD dissertation, the University of Texas at Austin.
1979. American Sign Language and Sign Systems: Research and Application. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B.1982. A multi-tiered theory of syllable structure for American Sign language. Ms.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1987. American Sign Language: Linguistic and Applied Dimensions. Boston, MA: College-Hill Press.
Wilbur, Ronnie B.1991. Intonation and focus in American Sign Language. Paper presented at ESCOL ‘90: the Seventh Eastern States Conference on Linguistics.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1993. Syllables and segments: hold the movement and move the holds! In Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. , 135–168. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1994a. Foregrounding structures in American Sign Language. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 647–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1995a. What the morphology of operators looks like: a formal analysis of ASL brow-raise. In FLSM VI: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America, Volume 2: Syntax II and Semantics/Pragmatics, eds. , and . Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1995b. Why so-called “rhetorical questions” (RHQs) are neither rhetorical nor questions. In Sign Language Research 1994: Proceedings of the Fourth European Congress on Sign Language Research, eds. and , 149–169. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1996. Evidence for the function and structure of wh-clefts in American Sign Language. In International Review of Sign Linguistics, eds. and , 209–256. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1997. A prosodic/pragmatic explanation for word order variation in ASL with typological implications. In Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Constructions of Meaning, eds. , , and , 89–104. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999a. Stress in ASL: empirical evidence and linguistic issues. Language and Speech 42: 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1999b. A functional journey with a formal ending: what do brow raises do in American Sign Language? In Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, Volume 2: Case Studies, eds. , , , and , 295–313. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 2000. Phonological and prosodic layering of non-manuals in American Sign Language. In The Signs of Language Revisited, eds. and , 215–244. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 2002. Phrase structure in ASL and ÖGS. In Progress In Sign Language Research: in Honor of Sigmund Prillwitz, eds. and , 235–247 Signum.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B., Klima, Ed, and Bellugi, Ursula. 1983. Roots: on the search for the origins of signs in ASL. In Proceedings of CLS 19: The Chicago Linguistic Society Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax, eds. , , and , 314–336: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
and . 1998. Body leans and marking contrast in ASL. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 275–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 1999. Syntactic correlates of brow raise in ASL. Sign Language & Linguistics 2: 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1987. The effects of linguistic stress on sign movement in ASL. Language and Speech 30: 301–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilbur, Ronnie B., and Zelaznik, H. N. 1997. Kinematic correlates of stress and position in ASL. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Chicago, IL.
. 2000. Metaphor in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1997. A visual-spatial “phonological loop” in working memory: evidence from American Sign Language. Memory and Cognition 25: 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1990. International perspectives on sign language communication. International Journal of Sign Linguistics 1.2: 107–120.Google Scholar
Woll, Bencie. 2002. The sign that dares to speak its name: echo phonology in British Sign Language (BSL). In The Hands Are the Head of the Mouth: The Mouth as Articulator in Sign Languages, eds. and , 87–98. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Wood, Sandra K. 1999. Semantic and syntactic aspects of negation in ASL. MA thesis, Purdue University.
. 1974. Implicational variation in American Sign Language: negative incorporation. Sign Language Studies 3: 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1978. All in the family: kinship lexicalization across sign languages. Sign Language Studies 7: 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 1975. Synchronic variation and historical change in American Sign Language. Language Sciences 37: 9–12.Google Scholar
Zec, Draga, and Inkelas, Sharon. 1990. Prosodically constrained syntax. In Phonology-Syntax Connection, eds. and , 365–378. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Interrogative constructions in signed languages: crosslinguistic perspectives. Language 80: 7–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, June, and Patschke, Cynthia. 1990. A class of determiners in ASL. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. , 201–210. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, Inge. 2003. Classifying hand configurations in Nederlandse Gebarentaal (Sign Language of the Netherlands). PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.