Political Parties in Africa
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014
THE EMERGENCE OF NONETHNIC POLITICS
African independence did not produce viable democratic states. From the early to mid-1960s, African nations underwent a rapid transformation to various forms of autocratic rule. Then, against the economic odds, multiparty democracy made a stunning and unpredicted comeback. Since the early 1990s, multiparty democracy has become the norm in many African countries. Nevertheless, there has been little conceptual and no comparative work on African parties or, indeed, parties in nonindustrialized democracies. Due to the silence on African parties, the scholarly community has missed the entry point to research how nonindustrialized countries democratize. The neglect of the study of individual African parties served as the point of departure for this study. The findings of this book shatter dominant assumptions about party politics in ethnically segmented societies. Ethnic parties are neither inevitable nor ubiquitous. The African landscape is more diverse than conventionally assumed.
After a concise review of the major argument, the present chapter elaborates on the democratization potential of African parties. Parties are the inevitable byproduct of democratization, yet the reverse relationship is rarely, if ever, analyzed. Only a few works exist. All highlight the deficiencies of African parties amid democratic consolidation. These studies frame their evaluations in terms of the European mass party of the 1960s. The European mass party, however, has outlived itself both in Europe and elsewhere. Comparative politics scholars have failed to propose alternative normative criteria by which the democratization potential of parties can be evaluated. Due to the lack of alternative criteria, I deliberately highlight the positive effects of African parties on democratization. A systematic analysis of parties is labor-intensive, and accordingly, the scope of this study is confined to a few cases. Accordingly, the findings of this book call for more comparisons between African parties, but also for future comparisons with parties elsewhere. Scholars interested in other regions of the globe can take the operationalization of the Diamond and Gunther (2001) typology as a starting point for the comparisons of parties in their region of interest.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.