Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-5jtmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-07T20:46:38.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Social Exchange and Social Order: An Affect Theory Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

By
Edward J. Lawler ,
Shane R. Thye  and
Jeongkoo Yoon
Edited by
Edward J. Lawler ,
Shane R. Thye  and
Jeongkoo Yoon
Edward J. Lawler
Affiliation:
Cornell University USA
Shane R. Thye
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina USA
Jeongkoo Yoon
Affiliation:
Ewha Womans University South Korea
Edward J. Lawler
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Shane R. Thye
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina
Jeongkoo Yoon
Affiliation:
EWHA Women's University, Seoul
Get access

Summary

Abstract

We theorize how social exchanges at the micro level generate social order at higher or macro levels of analysis. There are two themes in the argument. The first extrapolates an implicit theory of social order found in exchange theorizing, highlighting both its strengths and limitations. A key strength is that it is a relational theory. A key limitation is that it adopts a purely instrumental conception of people and their relations. The second theme is that this strength can be built upon and the limitation mitigated if one considers the emotional byproducts of social exchange. Social exchanges generate emotions; and when people attribute their feelings to social units, they have an impact on their affective sentiments about group ties. Such social unit attributions link social exchange at the micro level to social ties at the macro level. Exchange-based interpersonal ties are transformed into affective person-to-group ties that promote group-oriented behaviors and sacrifices for the collective welfare.

The Hobbesian problem of social order can be recast in terms of two fundamental social ties: person-to-person and person-to-group. The Hobbesian framing posits that problems with forming and sustaining productive person-to-person ties – humans’ avarice and aggression toward one another – make necessary strong person-to-group social ties, designed to control an inherent tendency of person-to-person social interactions to descend into a “war of all against all.” To understand modern manifestations of this Hobbesian problem, both dimensions clearly are important.

The relational ties of people to each other (person-to-person) and their ties to social units (person-to-group) represent distinct types of social bonds (see Prentice, Miller, and Lightdale 1994 for evidence). Person-to-person ties entail micro level social interactions in which people develop bonds with other people; whereas person-to-group ties entail a direct link between people and an encompassing social unit, which could be a small local unit or large more distant organization, community, or even nation state (see Lawler, Thye, and Yoon 2009, 2014). This paper reviews theory and research that specifies how and when person-to-group ties emerge from person-to-person ties, and in particular, the implications this has for the Hobbesian problem of social order.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Order on the Edge of Chaos
Social Psychology and the Problem of Social Order
 , pp. 105 - 124
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, Benedict. 2006. Imagined communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter, and Luckmann, Thomas. 1966. Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor Book.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter J., and Stets, Jan E.. 2009. Identity Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Karen S., Emerson, Richard M., Gillmore, Mary R., and Yamagishi, Toshio. 1983. “The Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks: Theory and Experimental Results.” American Journal of Sociology 89: 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. 1988. “Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory.” Pp. 3–22 in Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, edited by Zucker, L.G.. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1895. The Rules of the Sociological Method.New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile 1915. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life.New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ekeh, Peter. 1974. Social Exchange Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, Richard M. 1972. “Exchange Theory Part II: Exchange Relations and Networks.” Pp. 58–87 in Sociological Theories in Progress, edited by Berger, J., Zelditch, M. Jr., and Anderson, B.. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Emerson, Richard M. 1976. “Social Exchange Theory.” Annual Review of Sociology 2: 335–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Gary A. 2012. Tiny Publics: A Theory of Group Action and Culture. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity.New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hechter, Michael. 1987. Principles of Group Solidarity.Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hitlin, Steven, and Vaisey, Stephen. 2010. “Back to the Future.” Pp. 3–16 in Handbook of the Sociology of Morality, edited by Hitlin, and Vaisey, S.. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitlin, Steven, and Vaisey, Stephen 2013. “The New Sociology of Morality.” Annual Review of Sociology 39: 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homans, George Caspar. 1950. The Human Group. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth M. 1968. “Commitment and Social Organization: A Study of Commitment Mechanisms in Utopian Communities.” American Sociological Review 33: 499–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollock, Peter. 1994. “The Emergence of Exchange Structures: An Experimental Study of Uncertainty, Commitment, and Trust.” American Journal of Sociology 100: 315–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuwabara, Ko. 2011. “Cohesion, Cooperation, and the Value of Doing Things Together How Economic Exchange Creates Relational Bonds.” American Sociological Review 76: 560–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, Edward J. 1992. “Affective Attachments to Nested Groups: A Choice-Process Theory.” American Sociological Review 57: 327–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, Edward J. 2001. “An Affect Theory of Social Exchange.” American Journal of Sociology 107: 321–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, Edward J., and Yoon, Jeongkoo. 1996. “Commitment in Exchange Relations: Test of a Theory of Relational Cohesion.” American Sociological Review 61: 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, Edward J., and Yoon, Jeongkoo 1998. “Network Structure and Emotion in Exchange Relations.” American Sociological Review 58: 465–81.Google Scholar
Lawler, Edward J., Thye, Shane R., and Yoon, Jeongkoo. 2000. “Emotion and Group Cohesion in Productive Exchange.” American Journal of Sociology 106: 616–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, Edward J., Thye, Shane R., and Yoon, Jeongkoo 2008. “Social Exchange and Micro Social Order.” American Sociological Review 73: 519–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, Edward J., Thye, Shane R., and Yoon, Jeongkoo 2009. Social Commitments in a Depersonalized World. New York: The Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Lawler, Edward J., Thye, Shane R., and Yoon, Jeongkoo 2014. “Emotions and Group Ties in Social Exchange.” In Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions II, edited Stets, J. and Turner, J.. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Markovsky, Barry, Willer, David, and Patton, Travis. 1988. “Power Relations in Exchange Networks.” American Sociological Review 53: 220–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, George Herbert. 1934. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., and Allen, Natalie J.. 1997. Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research and Application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Molm, Linda D., and Cook, Karen S.. 1995. “Social Exchange and Exchange Networks.” Pp. 209–35 in Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology, edited by Cook, K. S., Fine, G. A., and House, J. S.. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Molm, Linda D., Collett, Jessica L., and Schaefer, David R.. 2007. “Building Solidarity through Generalized Exchange: A Theory of Reciprocity.” American Journal of Sociology 113: 205–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Charles W., and Lawler, Edward J.. 1999. “Commitment to Nested Organizational Units: Some Basic Principles and Preliminary Findings.” Social Psychology Quarterly 62: 325–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, T. 1950. The Social System.New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Prentice, Deborah A., Miller, Dale T., and Lightdale, Jenifer R.. 1994. “Asymmetries in Attachments to Groups and to Their Members: Distinguishing Between Common-Identity and Common-Bond Groups.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20: 484–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2011. Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World.Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skvoretz, John and Lovaglia, Michael J.. 1995. “Who Exchanges with Whom: Structural Determinants of Exchange Frequency in Negotiated Exchange Networks.”Social Psychology Quarterly 58: 163–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stryker, Sheldon. 1980. Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings Publishers.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henry. 1982. “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.” Annual Review of Psychology 33: 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Catherine, and Pillemer, Karl. 2009. “Using Affect to Understand Employee Turnover: A Context-Specific Application of a Theory of Social Exchange.” Sociological Perspectives 52: 481–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thye, Shane R., Lawler, Edward J., and Yoon, Jeongkoo. 2011. “The Emergence of Embedded Relations and Group Formation in Networks of Competition.” Social Psychology Quarterly 74: 387–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thye, Shane R., Lawler, Edward J., and Yoon, Jeongkoo 2014. “Affective Bases of Order in Task Groups: Testing a New Theory of Social Commitments.” Unpublished Manuscript.
Thye, Shane R., Vincent, Aaron, Lawler, Edward J, and Yoon, Jeongkoo. 2014. “Relational Cohesion, Social Commitments and Person to Group Ties: Twenty Five Years of a Theoretical Research Program.” Pp. 99–138 in Advances in Group Processes 31, edited by Thye, Shane R. and Lawler, Edward J.. London: Emerald Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thye, Shane R., Yoon, Jeongkoo, and Lawler, Edward J.. 2002. “The Theory of Relational Cohesion: Review of a Research Program.” Pp. 89–102 in Advances in Group Process, Vol. 19, edited by Thye, S. R. and Lawler, E. J.. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Turner, Jonathan. 2007. Human Emotions: A Sociological Theory. New York: Routedge.Google Scholar
Turner, Jonathan 2010. “The Stratification of Emotions: Some Preliminary Generalizations.” Sociological Inquiry 80: 168–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willer, David. 1999. Network Exchange Theory.Westport, CT: Praeger Publisher.Google Scholar
Willer, Robb, Flynn, Francis J., and Zak, Sonya. 2012. “Structure, Identity, and Solidarity: A Comparative Field Study of Generalized and Direct Exchange.” Administrative Science Quarterly 57: 119–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, E. Williamson 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wrong, Dennis. 1995. Power: Its forms, Bases, and Uses. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Yoon, Jeongkoo, and Thye, Shane R.. 2000. “Supervisor Support in the Work Place: Legitimacy and Positive Affectivity.” Journal of Social Psychology 140: 295–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoon, Jeongkoo, and Thye, Shane R. 2002. “A Dual Process Model of Organizational Commitment.” Work and Occupations 29: 97–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×