Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Social Psychology of Social Order: An Introduction
- 2 The Evolutionary Biology and Sociology of Social Order
- 3 Social Rationality and Weak Solidarity: A Coevolutionary Approach to Social Order
- 4 An Integrative Theory of Action: The Model of Frame Selection
- 5 The Center Cannot Hold: Networks, Echo Chambers, and Polarization
- 6 Social Exchange and Social Order: An Affect Theory Approach
- 7 Institutions, Trust, and Social Order
- 8 Identity Verifi cation and the Social Order
- 9 Identities, Roles, and Social Institutions: An Affect Control Account of Social Order
- 10 The Gender Frame and Social Order
- 11 Status, Power, and Social Order
- 12 Interaction Order: The Making of Social Facts
- 13 The Arts of Together: Social Coordination as Dyadic Achievement
- 14 Dignity as Moral Motivation: The Problem of Social Order Writ Small
- 15 The Legitimacy of Groups and the Mobilization of Resources
- Commentary: Contrasts and Complementarities
- Index
- References
7 - Institutions, Trust, and Social Order
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2015
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Social Psychology of Social Order: An Introduction
- 2 The Evolutionary Biology and Sociology of Social Order
- 3 Social Rationality and Weak Solidarity: A Coevolutionary Approach to Social Order
- 4 An Integrative Theory of Action: The Model of Frame Selection
- 5 The Center Cannot Hold: Networks, Echo Chambers, and Polarization
- 6 Social Exchange and Social Order: An Affect Theory Approach
- 7 Institutions, Trust, and Social Order
- 8 Identity Verifi cation and the Social Order
- 9 Identities, Roles, and Social Institutions: An Affect Control Account of Social Order
- 10 The Gender Frame and Social Order
- 11 Status, Power, and Social Order
- 12 Interaction Order: The Making of Social Facts
- 13 The Arts of Together: Social Coordination as Dyadic Achievement
- 14 Dignity as Moral Motivation: The Problem of Social Order Writ Small
- 15 The Legitimacy of Groups and the Mobilization of Resources
- Commentary: Contrasts and Complementarities
- Index
- References
Summary
Abstract
Trust theories suggest that the human capacity to trust and to be trustworthy is an important element in the production of micro social order. Trust can take the form of generalized beliefs (attitudes) about the trustworthiness of people in the abstract or be based on information about behaviors indicative of the trustworthiness of specific others in particular situations. In either case, trust involves an expectation that one or more others will cooperate or collaborate, despite the opportunity to exploit or act out of pure self-interest. We explore the general role of trust in the production of collective efforts and its limits as the basis for large-scale cooperation and macro-social order.
INTRODUCTION
Trust is important not only because it increases the regularity and predictability of social interaction, but also because it leads people to collaborate and generate joint goods that otherwise would not be produced (Yamagishi and Yamagishi 1994; Fukuyama 1995; Yamagishi, Cook, and Watabe, 1998; Zak and Knack 2001; Knack and Zak 2003; Cook, Hardin, and Levi 2005). It also extends the reach of social control mechanisms especially when monitoring and sanctioning are not possible. In addition, in many circumstances it reduces transaction costs since if the parties to an exchange are generally trustworthy with respect to one another and have some interest in maintaining the relationship and/or their reputations as trustworthy actors they will behave in a reliable manner, making for more beneficial transactions.
Despite the generally recognized benefits of trust, Cook, Hardin, and Levi (2005) argue that while trust may generate order at the micro level it is typically ineffective as a source of macro-level social order. Information requirements are simply too great to know whom to trust in a large complex organization or community and the risks involved are often too substantial to leave to the vagaries of individual behavior. In this chapter I explore the conditions under which trust does operate to produce micro social order and the conditions under which we rely on institutional mechanisms instead to undergird and create the conditions for macro social order.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Order on the Edge of ChaosSocial Psychology and the Problem of Social Order, pp. 125 - 144Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
, and . 2001. “Trust in Signs.” Pp. 146–84 in Trust in Society, edited by . New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
(2012). “How Does Social Trust Affect Economic Growth?” Southern Economic Journal 78(4): 1346–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1989. “Price, Authority and Trust: From Ideal Types to Plural Forms.” Annual Review of Sociology 15: 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. “Institutionalizing Distrust, Enculturating Trust.” In Trust and Governance, edited by and . New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
, and . 1997. Working, Shirking and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94: 250–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2001. “Norms of Cooperativeness and Networks of Trust.” Pp. 327–47 in Social Norms, edited by and . New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
, , and . 2005. Cooperation without Trust?New York City, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
, , and . 2004. “The Emergence of Trust Networks Under Uncertainty: The Case of Transitional Economies.” In Building a Trustworthy State in Post-Socialist Transition, edited by and . New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
, and . 2003. “The Fragility of Organizational Trust: Lessons from the Rise and Fall of Enron.” Organizational Dynamics 32: 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2002. “Trust in Leadership: Meta-Analytic Findings and Implications for Research and Practice.” Journal of Applied Psychology 87(4): 611–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and . 2003. “The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance: Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea.” Organization Science Special Issue: Trust in an Organizational Context 14: 57–68.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Reputations, Trust, and the Principal Agent Problem.” Pp. 185–201 in Trust in Society, edited by . New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
1993. “Does Monitoring Increase Work Effort – the Rivalry with Trust and Loyalty.” Economic Inquiry 31(4): 663–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity.New York: Simon and Schuster, Free Press Paperbacks.Google Scholar
. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1989. “Reputation and Coalitions in Medieval Trade: Evidence on the Maghribi Traders.” Journal of Economic History XLIX(4): 857–82.Google Scholar
1993. “Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade: The Maghribi Traders’ Coalition.” American Economic Review 83: 525–48.Google Scholar
. 1993. “The Street-Level Epistemology of Trust.” Politics and Society 21(4): 505–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1988. “Kinship, Contract, and Trust: The Economic Organization of Migrants in an African City Slum.” Pp. 176–93 in Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, edited by . New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
, and . 2003. “Building Trust: Public Policy, Interpersonal Trust, and Economic Development.” Supreme Court Economic Review 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1999. “The Production of Trust in Online Markets.” Pp. 99–123 in Advances in Group Processes, edited by . Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
, , and . 2008. “Social Exchange and Micro-Social Order.”American Sociological Review 73: 519–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1973. “Undermining Children's Intrinsic Interest with Extrinsic Reward: A Test of the ‘Overjustification’ Hypothesis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28: 129–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997. Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. “A State of Trust.” In Trust and Governance, edited by and . New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
. 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995. “Social Interaction: Continuities and Complexities in the Study of Non-intimate Sociality.” Pp. 176–201 in Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology edited by , , and . Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
. 1980. “Trust: A Mechanism for the Reduction of Social Complexity.” In Trust and Power, edited by . New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
1995. “Affect and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 38: 24–59.Google Scholar
, and . 2000. “Private Order under Dysfunctional Public Order.” Michigan Law Review 98(8): 2421–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2002. “The Effects of Contracts on Interpersonal Trust.” Administrative Science Quarterly 47: 534–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and . 1995. “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust.” Academy of Management Review 20(3): 709–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. Trust in Modern Societies: The Search for the Bases of Social Order. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
, , , and . 2006. “Undermining Trust and Cooperation: The Paradox of Sanctioning Systems in Social Dilemmas.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42: 147–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995. “Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28(4): 664–83.Google Scholar
2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community.New York: Simon and Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2004a. “Coping with Distrust in the Emerging Russian Markets.” In Distrust, edited by . New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
2004b. “How Trust Is Established in Economic Relationships When Institutions and Individuals Are Not Trustworthy: The Case of Russia.” In Building a Trustworthy State in Post-Socialist Transitions, edited by and . New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
1967. “A New Scale for the Measurement of Interpersonal Trust.” Journal of Personality 35(4): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1971. “Generalized Expectancies for Interpersonal Trust.” American Psychologist 26(5): 443–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1980. “Interpersonal Trust, Trustworthiness, and Gullibility.” American Psychologist 35(1): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and . 1998. “Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust.” Academy of Management Review 23: 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1993. “Explaining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic ‘Remedies’ for Trust/Distrust.” Organization Science. 4(3): 367–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. “Trust and Democratic Government.” In Trust and Governance, edited by and . New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Trust, Democracy, and Governance: Can Government Policies Influence Generalized Trust?” In Generating Social Capital: The Role of Voluntary Associations, Institutions and Government Policy, edited by . New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Trust as a Form of Social Intelligence.” Pp. 121–74 in Trust in Society, edited by . New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
, and , 1998. “Uncertainty, Trust and Commitment Formation in the United States and Japan.” American Journal of Sociology 104(1): 165–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and . 2003. “Solving Lemons Problem with Reputation: An Experimental Study of Online Trading.” In Working Paper, CEFOM/21, Hokkaido University. Sapporo, Japan.
, and . 1994. “Trust and Commitment in the United States and Japan,” Motivation and Emotion 18(1994): 129–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999. Banker to the Poor: Micro-Lending and the Battle against World Poverty. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 27
- Cited by