Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T10:51:26.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Teacher Unions in India: Diverse and Powerful

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2016

Tara Béteille
Affiliation:
World Bank
Geeta Gandhi Kingdon
Affiliation:
UCL Institute of Education
Mohammad Muzammil
Affiliation:
Agra University
Terry M. Moe
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Susanne Wiborg
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter describes the political power of school teachers in India, and the role played by teachers’ unions in influencing education reform efforts in the country. India has done well in terms of rapidly expanding access to elementary education over the past 15–20 years. Today, 236 million students are enrolled in primary and secondary schools (grade 1–10), and are taught by 8.3 million teachers. The success in improving access to elementary schools is associated with two center-state programs: the District Primary Education Program and Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA). The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act 2009 (RTE) has also aimed to make schooling available to every child aged 6–14 years.

Unfortunately, India's tremendous success in expanding elementary-level schooling since the 1990s has not been accompanied by commensurate gains in student learning (Dundar et al., 2014). This is not surprising. Access-oriented reforms tend to be politically popular and relatively easier to implement, with few opponents. They provide more jobs for teachers, administrators, service personnel, construction workers, and textbook and school equipment manufacturers – tangible resources that politicians are happy to distribute to their constituencies. In contrast, quality-enhancing reforms focus on accountability and cost-effectiveness. These reforms threaten many of the entities benefiting from expansionary policies, and are therefore frequently blocked by them (Grindle, 2004).

Improving quality in government schools in India is, of course, no easy task, given that the country has the largest number of school-age children relative to any other country, many of whom are first generation school-goers. Further, there is considerable variation in the linguistic and socio-economic background of students (and their teachers), all of which combine to make teaching in government schools in India a particularly challenging task.

These challenges in improving education quality and student learning in India are compounded by low teacher accountability: schools in large parts of India suffer from high rates of teacher absenteeism, with a national absenteeism rate of 25 percent – a problem similar to Mexico, also discussed in this book (Kremer et al., 2005; Muralidharan et al., 2014). This rate has not changed much over the past ten years, despite this being the era of major school reform in India.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Comparative Politics of Education
Teachers Unions and Education Systems around the World
, pp. 239 - 268
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aslam, Monazza, Kingdon, Geeta, and Rawal, Shenila (2011). Teacher Quality in South Asia. Background paper for Dundar et al. (2014), Student Learning in South Asia (see separate reference).
Béteille, Tara (2009). Absenteeism, Transfers and Patronage: The Political Economy of Teacher Labour Markets in India. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
CABE (1992). Teachers’ representation in the legislative councils, Report of the CABE Committee. New Delhi: Central Advisory Board of Education.
Chakravarty, Devkanya (2010). Teacher Unions: Who, Where and What They Think. Center for Civil Society. Working Paper No. 236.
Dundar, Halil, Béteille, Tara, Riboud, Michel, and Deolalikar, Anil (2014). Student Learning in South Asia: Challenges, Opportunities and Policy Priorities. Directions in Development. The World Bank.
Frederiksson, Ulf (1999). Education for All Assessment 2000: The Teachers’ Perspective.
Government of India (2009). The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act.
Grant, Laura (2010). “The Second Freedom Struggle”: Transnational Advocacy for EFA Case Study. National Coalition for Education in India.
Grindle, M.S. (2004). Despite the Odds: The Contentious Politics of Education Reform. Princeton University Press.
Gupta, Saumya (2013). Perspectives of Teachers’ Union on Challenges to Education in India. Center for Civil Society. Working Paper No. 304.
Kingdon, Geeta (1994). An Economic Evaluation of School Management-Types in Urban India: A Case Study of Uttar Pradesh. Dissertation. University of Oxford.
Kingdon, Geeta (2010). The Impact of the Sixth Pay Commission on Teacher Salaries: Assessing Equity and Efficiency Effects. RECOUP Working Paper No. 29, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge. May.
Kingdon, Geeta, and Banerji, Rukmini (2009). Addressing School Quality: Some Policy Pointers From Rural North India. Briefing. Department for International Development.
Kingdon, Geeta, and Muzammil, Mohd (2003). The Political Economy of Education in India: Teacher Politics in Uttar Pradesh. Delhi:Oxford University Press.
Kingdon, Geeta, and Muzammil, Mohd (2013). The school governance environment in Uttar Pradesh: Implications for teacher accountability and effort. Journal of Development Studies 49(2), February: 251–69. Also, see its fuller version, RECOUP Working Paper No. 31, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, May 2010.Google Scholar
Kingdon, Geeta, and Teal, Francis (2010). Teacher unions, teacher pay and student performance in India: A pupil fixed effects approach. Journal of Development Economics 91(2), March: 278–88.Google Scholar
Kremer, Michael, Muralidharan, Karthik, Chaudhury, Nazmul, Hammer, Jeffrey, and Rogers, F. Hasley (2005). Teacher absence in India: A snapshot. Journal of the European Economic Association 3(2–3): 658–67.Google Scholar
Madras Presidency (1893). Manual of Standing Information for the Madras Presidency.
Muralidharan, Karthik, Das, Jishnu, Holla, Alaka, and Mohpal, Aakash (2014). The Fiscal Cost of Weak Governance: Evidence From Teacher Absence in India. No. w20299. National Bureau of Economic Research.
NCT (1986) The Teacher and Society: Volume I. In Report of the National Commission on Teachers, 1983–85. New Delhi: Government of India Press.
Ramachandran, Vimala, Linden, Toby, Beteille, Tara, Dey, Sangeeta, Goyal, Sangeeta, and Goel, Prerna (2015). Teachers in the Indian Education System: A Nine State Study. Draft. Government of India.
Sen, Amartya (2002) The Pratichi Report. Pratichi India Trust.
Sharma, Rashmi (1999). What manner of teacher? Economic and Political Weekly, June.Google Scholar
Shrimali, K.L. (1951). Shikshak aur Bhartiya Loktantra [The Teacher and Indian Democracy]. Udaipur: Vidya Bhawan Society.
Singh, Shailendra, and Sridhar, Kala Seetharam (2002). Government and private schools: Trends in enrolment and retention. Economic and Political Weekly (2002): 4229–38.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×