Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-6bnxx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-12T08:57:04.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Urinary calculi in ruminants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2017

A. C. Field
A. C. Field*
Affiliation:
Moredun Research Institute, Edinburgh
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Urolithiasis is not at present an important problem for the livestockindustry in the United Kingdom, but the probable introduction of moreintensive systems of management may change this position. The rapidfattening of male animals with high-energy diets predisposes to formation ofphosphatic calculi and obstructive urolithiasis in the feed lot system ofthe USA and it is a form of this type of management which is most likely tobe introduced to this country. For this reason, this review will be limitedto the problem of phosphatic calculus formation, although other calculi,especially siliceous forms cause economic loss in extensive areas of theworld.

Information

Type
Symposium Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , September 1969 , pp. 198 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 1969

References

Bell, D. S. & Kirk, K.F. (1935). Bull. Ohio agric. Exp. Stn no. 561.Google Scholar
Boyce, W. H., Garvey, F.K. & Norfleet, C. M. (1954). J- clin. Invest. 33, 1287.10.1172/JCI103004Google Scholar
Boyce, W. H. & Swanson, M. (1955). J. clin. Invest. 34, 1581.10.1172/JCI103211Google Scholar
Bushman, D. H., Embry, L. B. & Emerick, R. J. (1967). J. Anim. Sci. 26, 1199.10.2527/jas1967.2651199xGoogle Scholar
Bushman, D. H., Emerick, R. J. & Embry, L. B. (1965). J. Nutr. 87, 499.Google Scholar
Bushman, D. H., Emerick, R. J. & Embry, L. B. (1968). J. Anim. Sci. 27, 490.10.2527/jas1968.272490xGoogle Scholar
Cornelius, C. E. (1963). Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 104, 638.Google Scholar
Cornelius, C. E., Moulten, J. E. & McGowan, B. (1959). Am. J. vet. Res. 20, 863.Google Scholar
Crookshank, H. R. (1966). J. Anim. Sci. 25, 1005.10.2527/jas1966.2541005xGoogle Scholar
Crookshank, H. R., Keating, F. E., Burnett, E., Jones, J. H. & Davis, R. E. (1960). J. Anim. Sci, 19, 863.Google Scholar
Crookshank, H. R. & Robbins, J. D. (1962). Nature, Lond. 196, 1343.Google Scholar
Elam, C. J., Ham, W. E. & Dyer, I. A. (1959) J- Anim. Sci. 18, 383.10.2527/jas1959.181383xGoogle Scholar
Elam, C. J., Ham, W. E. & Schneider, B. H. (1957). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 95, 769.10.3181/00379727-95-23359Google Scholar
Elliot, J. S., Quaide, W. L., Sharp, R. F. & Lewis, L. (1958). J. Urol. 80, 269.10.1016/S0022-5347(17)66177-9Google Scholar
Emerick, R. J. & Embry, L. B. (1963). J. Anim. Sci. 22, 510.10.2527/jas1963.222510xGoogle Scholar
Emerick, R. J. & Embry, L. B. (1964). J. Anim. Sci. 23, 1079.10.2527/jas1964.2341079xGoogle Scholar
Fleisch, H. & Bisaz, S. (1962). Am. J. Physiol. 203, 671.Google Scholar
Gili, W. B., Finlayson, B. & Vermeulen, C. W. (1959). J. Urol. 82, 256.10.1016/S0022-5347(17)65872-5Google Scholar
Howard, J. E. (1962). Can. med. Ass. J. 86, 1001.Google Scholar
Howard, J. E., Thomas, W.C. Barker, L. M., Smith, L. M. & Wadkins, C. L. (1967). Johns Hopkins med. J. 120, 119.Google Scholar
Joly, J. W. (1939). Seventh Congr. int. Soc. Urol. p. 77.Google Scholar
Jordan, R. M. (1953). J. Anim. Sci. 12, 670.10.2527/jas1953.124670xGoogle Scholar
Lindley, C. E., Taysom, E. D., Ham, W. E. & Schneider, B. Н. (1953) J- Anim. Sci. 12, 704.10.2527/jas1953.124704xGoogle Scholar
Marsh, H. (1961). J. Am. vet. med. Ass. 139, 1019.Google Scholar
McGregor, J., Robertson, W. G. & Nordin, E. C. (1965). Br. J. Urol. 37, 518.10.1111/j.1464-410X.1965.tb09640.xGoogle Scholar
Nordin, B. E. C. & Robertson, W. G. (1966). Br. med. J. 1, 450.10.1136/bmj.1.5485.450Google Scholar
Packett, L. V. & Coburn, S. P. (1965). Am. J. vet. Res. 26, 112.Google Scholar
Packett, L. V. & Hauschild, J. P. (1964). J. Nutr. 84, 185.Google Scholar
Puntriano, G. O. (1954). J. Am. vet. med. Ass. 124, 55.Google Scholar
Robbins, J. D., Kunkel, H. O. & Crookshank, H. R. (1965). J. Anim. Sci. 24, 76.10.2527/jas1965.24176xGoogle Scholar
Robertson, W. G., Peacock, M. & Nordin, B. E. C. (1968). Clin. Sci. 34, 579.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. C. & Howard, J. E. (1959). Trans. Ass. Am. Physns 72, 181.Google Scholar
Udall, R. H. (1959). Am. J. vet. Res. 20, 423.Google Scholar
Udall, R. H. (1962). Am. J. vet. Res. 23, 1241.Google Scholar
Udall, R. H. & Chen Chow, F. H. (1963). Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 104, 612.Google Scholar
Udall, R. H. & Chen Chow, F. H. (1965). Cornell Vet. 55, 538.Google Scholar
Vermeulen, C. W., Lyon, E. S. & Fried, F. A. (1965). J. Urol. 94, 176.10.1016/S0022-5347(17)63596-1Google Scholar