Stahl Online is a one-stop shop, covering everything a mental health professional or teacher will ever need to know about neuropsychopharmacology. Comprehensive and regularly updated, Stahl Online provides full access to the entire current portfolio of books by Dr Stephen M. Stahl.
Stahl Online is a one-stop shop, covering everything a mental health professional or teacher will ever need to know about neuropsychopharmacology. Comprehensive and regularly updated, Stahl Online provides full access to the entire current portfolio of books by Dr Stephen M. Stahl.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Despite recent downward trends in lithium use for bipolar disorder (BD) [1], nearly every treatment guideline, meta-analysis or review published in the last decade has reinforced the notion that lithium remains the mood stabilizer of choice for acute or maintenance therapy in those with a history of mania (BD-1, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type [SAD-BT]), and an important treatment option for other mood disorder spectrum patients (BD-2, unipolar major depressive disorder [MDD]) [2–4].
Medical journals from the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries contained descriptions of lithium toxicity derived from animal experiments, some of which resulted in fatal outcomes; however, a 1903 paper reviewed this animal and human literature extensively and noted that, when lithium carbonate was used in daily doses of 975 mg – 1300 mg as a putative gout treatment, the adverse effects were quite modest and gastrointestinal in nature [2]. Perhaps emboldened by this finding, a Michigan physician, Dr. Clarence Cleaveland, decided in 1913 to experiment on himself by ingesting 14 grams (g) of lithium chloride (equivalent to 12,380 mg of lithium carbonate) in divided doses over a period of 28 h (2 g at 1 pm, 9 pm and 7 am, then 8 g at 7 pm) and document the outcome [3].
In a 1989 review entitled “Long-term treatment with lithium and renal function: A review and reappraisal,” the pioneering Danish psychopharmacologist Mogens Schou concluded: “The fear of eventual kidney insufficiency as a result of long-term lithium treatment can be set at rest” [1]. Despite the certainty advanced by the preeminent authority on lithium at that time – the man responsible for all of the early data on lithium’s efficacy and the first double-blind placebo-controlled trials – fear of lithium’s long-term renal adverse effects remains a significant concern to clinicians, a concern that is often disproportionate to the emerging data in this area.
There are numerous reasons for lithium discontinuation, some patient driven and others motivated by clinician concerns [1]. Focused and early attention to common adverse effects may forestall a certain proportion of somatic complaints leading to lithium refusal, but patients may also stop lithium due to the inconvenience of daily medication; diminished perceived need for lithium during periods of euthymia; a desire to remain in a hypomanic or even manic state (e.g. because they feel more creative or productive, or miss the elevated mood); comparative lack of efficacy for depressive episodes compared with the significant impact on mania; a wish not to be reminded of the illness itself; and not wanting their mood to be regulated by medication [2–4].
As reflected in the number of citations per year, the initial golden age of lithium discovery was indeed 1965–1990. Yet interest in lithium has not waned, and a renaissance in lithium related publications has occurred over the past 20 years (Figure 0.1). This literature is fueled by ongoing exploration of lithium’s unique mood stabilizing, anti-suicide and neuroprotective properties, a constellation of activities not seen in any single molecule [1–10]. Delving into how a simple ion conveys such benefits has opened important avenues of research into the neurobiology of both mood and degenerative brain disorders, and the molecular neuropharmacology of intracellular G-protein dependent and G-protein independent 2nd messenger systems [11, 12].
Which of the following represents the best and most evidence-based intervention for an adolescent with MDD who failed to respond to escitalopram (Lexapro) 20 mg daily for 4 months, and in whom escitalopram was discontinued 2 months ago?