We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Research on mortality and admissions for physical health problems across eating disorder diagnoses in representative settings is scarce. Inequalities in these outcomes across a range of sociodemographic characteristics have rarely been investigated.
Aims
We investigated whether people with eating disorders had greater all-cause mortality and physical health-related in-patient admissions compared with those without eating disorders, and whether associations varied by sex, ethnicity, deprivation, age and calendar year at diagnosis.
Method
Using primary care Clinical Research Practice Datalink linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, we matched people with an incident eating disorder diagnosis (any, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, eating disorders not otherwise specified, generic eating disorder or a referral code) from primary care Read codes to four people without eating disorders (1:4 matching) on year of birth, sex, primary care practice, year of registration and index date. We used univariable and multivariable Cox (mortality) and Poisson (admissions) models, and fitted interactions to investigate whether associations varied by sociodemographic characteristics.
Results
We included 58 735 people (90.1% female, 91.6% White). People with any eating disorders had higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.73–2.67). Anorexia nervosa had the highest mortality (hazard ratio: 3.49, 95% CI: 2.43–5.01). People with any eating disorders had higher rates of planned (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.80, 95% CI: 1.4–1.87) and emergency admissions for physical health problems (IRR: 2.35. 95% CI: 2.35–2.46) and emergency admissions for injuries, accidents and substance misuse (IRR: 5.26, 95% CI: 5.24–5.29). Mortality and admission rate ratios were greater in males.
Conclusions
People with eating disorders have high rates of mortality and physical health-related admissions. Observed inequalities call for an understanding of why such inequalities exist. These findings highlight the need for prompt and effective treatment for eating disorders, and for improved guidance on primary care management of people with eating disorders.
Heat exposure can negatively impact mental health. Evidence for the effect of temperature on mood disorders is inconsistent. Current studies exploring the link between temperature and mood disorders are limited by poor temporal and geographical resolution. We aimed to use ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to investigate the effect of real-time temperature on depressive and manic symptoms. We hypothesised higher temperatures would be associated with increased depressive and manic symptoms.
Methods
We used EMA data from the digital platform and smartphone app juli to investigate the effect of real-time mean and maximum ambient temperature on depressive and manic symptoms in adults with depression and bipolar disorder. Depressive and manic symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 and the Altman Self Rating Mania score, respectively. Time- and location-specific temperature data were collected from participants’ smartphone geolocation on a 5-by-5 km resolution grid. We analysed data using negative binomial mixed-effects regression models, controlled for demographic and weather variables, and stratified by season.
Results
We analysed data from 4,000 participants with depressive symptoms and 2,132 with manic symptoms, between July 2021 and March 2023. We found that each 1°C increase in mean daily temperature in the preceding two weeks was associated with a 0.2% reduction in depressive symptom scores (IRR 0.998, 95%CI 0.997–0.999). This association was most pronounced in the spring (IRR 0.995, 95%CI 0.992–0.999). For manic symptoms, we found that each 1°C increase in mean temperature in the preceding two weeks was associated with a 0.4% increase in manic symptom scores (IRR 1.004, 95%CI 1.001–1.007), with the strongest association observed in the autumn (IRR 1.011, 95%CI 1.002–1.020). Associations between maximum temperature and depressive and manic symptoms followed a similar pattern.
Conclusion
We found evidence that higher temperatures were associated with decreased depressive symptoms and increased manic symptoms, indicating a complex relationship between temperature and mood disorder symptoms. With globally rising temperatures due to climate change, there is a need to understand the impact of heat on mental health symptoms to provide targeted support. This study demonstrates the potential for using novel data sources and EMA methods to inform our understanding of the link between climate and mental health, although there is a need for improved data collection to realise the potential of these methods. Clinically, our findings highlight opportunities for risk stratification and targeted interventions based on local temperature patterns.
Edited by
David Kingdon, University of Southampton,Paul Rowlands, Derbyshire Healthcare NHS foundation Trust,George Stein, Emeritus of the Princess Royal University Hospital
This chapter gives an introduction to key concepts in epidemiology for the clinician, student, trainee or early career researcher interested in psychiatry and mental health. Following a brief introduction to the history of epidemiology, we provide a comprehensive, yet accessible introduction to key epidemiological concepts and how these apply to psychiatry and mental health. We introduce the major observational (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional, ecological) and experimental (randomised controlled trial) designs used in epidemiology, their strengths and limitations and specific issues for their use in psychiatry. We also cover measures of disease frequency (incidence, prevalence), measures of effect (risk, rate and odds ratios) and measures of impact (population attributable risk). Our chapter then provides a comprehensive introduction to traditional and contemporary approaches to understanding the critical issue of causation, illustrated via the use of causal diagrams known as Directed Acyclic Graphs. Throughout, we use accessible examples from published research and hypothetical worked examples to consolidate the reader’s knowledge about key methods in psychiatric epidemiology.
Depression is associated with higher rates of premature mortality in people with physical comorbidities, such as type 2 diabetes. Conceptually, the successful treatment of depression in people with type 2 diabetes could prevent premature mortality.
Aims
To investigate the association between antidepressant prescribing and the rates of all-cause and cause-specific (endocrine, cardiovascular, respiratory, cancer, unnatural) mortality in individuals with comorbid depression and type 2 diabetes.
Method
Using UK primary care records between years 2000 and 2018, we completed a nested case–control study in a cohort of people with comorbid depression and type 2 diabetes who were starting oral antidiabetic treatment for the first time. We used incident density sampling to identify cases who died and matched controls who remained alive after the same number of days observation. We estimated incidence rate ratios for the association between antidepressant prescribing and mortality, adjusting for demographic characteristics, comorbidities, medication use and health behaviours.
Results
We included 5222 cases with a recorded date of death, and 18 675 controls, observed for a median of 7 years. Increased rates of all-cause mortality were associated with any antidepressant prescribing during the observation period (incidence rate ratio 2.77, 95% CI 2.48–3.10). These results were consistent across all causes of mortality that we investigated.
Conclusions
Antidepressant prescribing was highly associated with higher rates of mortality. However, we suspect that this is not a direct causal effect, but that antidepressant treatment is a marker of more severe and unsuccessfully treated depression.
Individuals with physical comorbidities and polypharmacy may be at higher risk of depression relapse, however, they are not included in the ‘high risk of relapse’ group for whom longer antidepressant treatment durations are recommended.
Aims
In individuals with comorbid depression and type 2 diabetes (T2DM), we aimed to investigate the association and interaction between depression relapse and (a) polypharmacy, (b) previous duration of antidepressant treatment.
Method
This was a cohort study using primary care data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) from years 2000 to 2018. We used Cox regression models with penalised B-splines to describe the association between restarting antidepressants and our two exposures.
Results
We identified 48 001 individuals with comorbid depression and T2DM, who started and discontinued antidepressant treatment during follow-up. Within 1 year of antidepressant discontinuation, 35% of participants restarted treatment indicating depression relapse. As polypharmacy increased, the rate of restarting antidepressants increased until a maximum of 18 concurrent medications, where individuals were more than twice as likely to restart antidepressants (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.15, 95% CI 1.32–3.51). As the duration of previous antidepressant treatment increased, the rate of restarting antidepressants increased – individuals with a previous duration of ≥25 months were more than twice as likely to restart antidepressants than those who previously discontinued in <7 months (HR = 2.36, 95% CI 2.25–2.48). We found no interaction between polypharmacy and previous antidepressant duration.
Conclusions
Polypharmacy and longer durations of previous antidepressant treatment may be associated with depression relapse following the discontinuation of antidepressant treatment.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.