Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

7 results

  • SCHUMPETER VS. KEYNES: “IN THE LONG RUN NOT ALL OF US ARE DEAD”

  • ARTHUR M. DIAMOND, JR.
  • Journal:
    Journal of the History of Economic Thought / Volume 31 / Issue 4 / December 2009
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    01 December 2009, pp. 531-541
    Print publication:
    December 2009

  • Keynes was viewed by himself, Schumpeter, and most others as the most highly esteemed economist of the twentieth century. However, Schumpeter is receiving increasing attention from mainstream economists. A few specific examples are discussed, and the citation time series for Keynes and Schumpeter are compared for the period 1956 through 2006. Generally, Keynes receives more citations than Schumpeter from 1956 through roughly the mid-1990s. But subsequently until 2006, Schumpeter received more citations than Keynes.

  • Age and the Acceptance of Cliometrics

  • Arthur M. Diamond, Jr.
  • Journal:
    The Journal of Economic History / Volume 40 / Issue 4 / December 1980
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 May 2010, pp. 838-841
    Print publication:
    December 1980

  • Popular wisdom asserts, and life-cycle theories of human capital investment seem to imply, that older scientists are slower to accept new theories than are younger scientists. When this view is tested with evidence on the acceptance of cliometrics, however, the year-of-birth variable, although statistically significant, explains less than 10 percent of the variance in acceptance.