This article presents a new method that can compare lexical priming (word–word) andsentential priming (sentence–word) directly within a single paradigm. We show that it canbe used to address modular theories of word comprehension, which propose that the effects ofsentence context occur after lexical access has taken place. Although lexical priming andsentential priming each occur very quickly in time, there should be a brief time window in whichthe former is present but the latter is absent. Lexical and sentential priming of unambiguous wordswere evaluated together, in competing and converging combinations, using time windowsdesigned to detect an early stage where lexical priming is observed but sentential priming is not.Related and unrelated word pairs were presented visually, in rapid succession, within auditorysentence contexts that were either compatible or incompatible with the target (the second word ineach pair). In lexical decision, the additive effects of lexical priming and sentential priming werepresent under all temporal conditions, although the latter was always substantially larger. Incross-modal naming, sentential priming was present in all temporal conditions; lexical priming wasmore fragile, interacting with timing and sentential congruence. No evidence was found for astage in which lexical priming is present but sentential priming is absent – a finding that isdifficult to reconcile with two-stage models of lexical versus sentential priming. We conclude thatsentential context operates very early in the process of word recognition, and that it can interactwith lexical priming at the earliest time window.