We partner with a secure submission system to handle manuscript submissions.
Please note:
You will need an account for the submission system, which is separate to your Cambridge Core account. For login and submission support, please visit the
submission and support pages.
Please review this journal's author instructions, particularly the
preparing your materials
page, before submitting your manuscript.
Click Proceed to submission system to continue to our partner's website.
To save this undefined to your undefined account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your undefined account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Reading ability is commonly used as a proxy for educational quality but may be unsuitable for cross-cultural comparisons. This study aimed to evaluate a novel Brief Mathematics Achievement Test (BMAT) as a proxy measure of quality of education (QoE) in culturally and linguistically diverse populations.
Methods:
Data on demographic variables, socioeconomic status (SES), country-level QoE, and performance on the BMAT and brief cognitive tests, were collected from 157 cognitively healthy participants (18–89 years) including native-born and immigrant populations in five European countries.
Results:
No significant differences were found between females and males or between participants with native-born and immigrant backgrounds in BMAT scores. In correlation analyses, BMAT scores were strongly correlated with SES, level of education, and performance on a brief cognitive composite, moderately with student–teacher ratio, country income classification, and a quality of education index, and weakly with age. In regression models controlling for key demographic variables and socioeconomic status, BMAT scores were significantly associated with level of education and the QoE index, while showing no significant relationship with immigrant status. Also, after controlling for demographic variables, SES, and the quality of education index, BMAT scores were the only significant predictor of performance on the brief cognitive composite.
Conclusions:
These findings provide preliminary evidence supporting the potential utility of the BMAT as an objective proxy measure of QoE in culturally and linguistically diverse populations.
Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) may represent the earliest observable stage of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), yet identifying individuals at risk of progressing remains challenging. Cognitive dispersion, or intra-individual variability (IIV-D), may serve as a sensitive early marker. This study examined IIV-D across diagnostic groups, focusing on SCD and amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) progressors (SCD-p, aMCI-p; progressing to a more advanced disease stage) versus non-progressors (SCD-np, aMCI-np; not progressing to a more advanced stage). We expected greater IIV-D across groups (AD > aMCI > SCD > controls) and in progressors.
Methods:
A total of 308 participants aged 65–94 (67 healthy controls [HC], 126 SCD, 79 aMCI, 36 AD) from the Consortium for the Early Identification of Alzheimer’s Disease – Quebec (CIMA-Q) were included. SCD and aMCI participants were followed for up to eight years (34 SCD-p, 92 SCD-np; 29 aMCI-p, 50 aMCI-np). Analyses of covariance assessed baseline across- and verbal memory within-domain IIV-D, maximum discrepancy (MD), and domain-specific deviation.
Results:
IIV-D increased with disease severity (HC = SCD < aMCI < AD). Among SCD participants, progressors showed greater episodic memory deviation than non-progressors, primarily driven by poorer Logical Memory delayed recall. In aMCI, progressors showed higher IIV-D across all indices (across- and within-domain, IIV-D and MD), with domain-specific differences limited to episodic memory.
Conclusions:
These findings indicate that IIV-D measures distinguish aMCI progressors from non-progressors, although they do not appear to enhance predictive accuracy for progression to AD and may not yet be a reliable marker at the SCD stage.
Few studies have examined how differing diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) relate to neuroimaging markers of cerebrovascular disease and neurodegeneration in Veterans. We compared three MCI diagnostic schemes on their associations with white matter hyperintensity (WMH) burden, hippocampal volume, and cortical thickness in nondemented Vietnam-era Veterans.
Methods:
228 Veterans (mean age = 69.65) were classified using: (1) Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) criteria (subjective memory concerns, impaired Logical Memory, global Clinical Dementia Rating = 0.5); (2) neuropsychological criteria (>1 standard deviation [SD] below norms on two tests within a domain or one test across three domains); and (3) typical criteria (subjective memory concerns and >1.5 SD below norms on one test). Regression models predicting WMH burden adjusted for age and intracranial volume and included MCI status and hippocampal volume; ADNI-based models also included posttraumatic stress disorder symptom severity.
Results:
Neuropsychological criteria were associated with greater WMH burden (β = 0.45, p = .024), whereas typical and ADNI criteria were not. Sensitivity analyses found that meeting neuropsychological criteria for amnestic MCI interacted with lower hippocampal volume to predict greater WMH burden (β = −0.001, p = .028). No criteria were associated with cortical thickness.
Conclusions:
Neuropsychological criteria more sensitively identified Veterans with greater WMH burden and demonstrated a small, hippocampal volume-dependent effect in amnestic MCI. These findings support the clinical utility of multi-test neuropsychological approaches for detecting complex brain changes in high-comorbidity populations, with implications for risk stratification and targeted intervention in aging Veterans.
Poor social function in people with psychosis has been linked to impairments in social cognition and neurocognition, which in turn have been identified as promising treatment targets. We developed a novel social cognitive intervention, Understanding Social Situations (USS), that minimizes cognitive load by leveraging delivery methods common to cognitive rehabilitation. USS focuses on making good judgments about what others may be feeling and thinking, and how they might respond in various social scenarios. In the current trial, we evaluated the efficacy of USS versus an active control.
Methods:
103 Veterans with psychotic spectrum disorders were randomized to two months of USS training or a problem-solving training matched for nonspecific treatment factors. Comprehensive assessments included clinician-aided self-report social functioning, social skills performance, and pre/post/follow-up ecological momentary assessments about the extent and quality of social interactions.
Results:
Participants in USS had significant within but not between group improvements on a clinician-aided self-report measure of social function. Social skills performance did not change for either condition. Momentary assessments revealed no change in frequency of social contacts, but those in the USS condition showed within-group improvements on comfort level during current social interactions and anticipated positive appraisals of future interactions. Those randomized to problem-solving training had significantly greater improvements in depression at post-training.
Conclusions:
More rigorous trials are needed evaluating the impact of social cognitive interventions on real-world social functioning. It may be particularly important to link interventions to lived social experience and to assess the quality of social interactions.
This study examined age-specific associations between parent-reported executive function (EF) difficulties and internalizing/externalizing symptoms in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), a genetic condition underrepresented in psychiatric research.
Methods:
Cross-sectional data of 1,049 observations from 803 children with NF1 (Mage = 10.58 years, SD = 3.84, range = 3–18; 47.5% female; 67.5% from higher-education households; 36.6% with familial NF1) across nine U.S. and Australian institutions were integrated. Parents rated EF difficulties using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function and internalizing/externalizing symptoms using the Child Behavior Checklist and the Behavior Assessment System for Children. Time-varying effect modeling estimated age-specific associations between EF and internalizing/externalizing symptoms and tested moderation by sex and parental education.
Results:
Poorer functioning in all EF domains was associated with greater internalizing and externalizing symptoms from ages 3 to 18. The associations were largely consistent across ages as well as sex and parental education subgroups with a few differences: (1) emotional control and cognitive flexibility problems were more strongly associated with internalizing symptoms during middle and late adolescence; (2) inhibitory control was more strongly linked to externalizing symptoms in childhood; (3) stronger associations between EF and internalizing symptoms were observed among males in early adolescence.
Conclusions:
Parental complaints of EF difficulties are robustly linked to internalizing and externalizing problems from early childhood to late adolescence in children with NF1. Further longitudinal and experimental studies are needed to determine the directionality of these associations and whether EF represents a viable target for intervention.
Concussion, a common injury in contact sports, often leads to oculomotor symptoms. The King-Devick (K-D) is a rapid number naming test that evaluates saccadic eye movements, visual tracking, and processing speed. We studied the effects of age and dyslexia status on K-D outcome. The aim was to determine the threshold for a clinically meaningful change in K-D test outcome in adolescent athletes.
Methods:
A total of 1506 Finnish athletes (mean age = 16.3, SD = 1.6) were assessed with K-D before the season. Twenty-eight percent (n = 416) participated in two consecutive baseline assessments one year apart, enabling reliable change analysis. Furthermore, results from 28 concussed athletes, assessed using the K-D test 3 days post injury, were compared to their own baseline data.
Results:
We found that older athletes were faster in the K-D test, and dyslexic athletes (n = 95) were significantly slower than healthy controls. When evaluated 3 days post-concussion, 54% of the studied athletes were slower in the K-D test as compared to individual baseline. The clinically significant increase in the K-D test time, performed in Finnish, was 4.4 sec. The odds ratio for significantly decreased performance post-concussion was 3.3-fold, as compared to healthy controls.
Conclusions:
Age, dyslexia, and spoken language affect K-D test performance, so they should be addressed when clinically using the K-D test. Taking this into account and by using specific thresholds, the K-D test could be a cost-effective method in assessing the athletes’ functional vision both at baseline and after concussion.
Psychologists are increasingly asked to assess intellectual functions in adults from diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds. This study investigated the impact of acculturation and bilingualism on Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS)-IV performance among Arabic-Danish bilingual university students.
Methods:
Forty-eight academically high-achieving participants (69% female), fluent in Danish and educated entirely in Denmark, were recruited in Greater Copenhagen and completed a demographic questionnaire, the Danish version of the WAIS-IV, and self-report measures of acculturation and bilingualism.
Results:
Several WAIS-IV indexes and subtests were significantly associated with degree of bilingualism and acculturation, even after controlling for educational variables. Despite being academically high-achieving university students, participants scored below the national mean on most indexes and subtests. In fact, only performances on the Processing Speed Index, and the Coding and Symbol Search subtests were at the expected level. Notably, the lowest scores were observed on Block Design, which showed a strong correlation with Arabic acculturation scores. Finally, participants had index profiles that were more uneven than predicted based on the norms.
Conclusions:
These findings underscore the influence of cultural and linguistic factors on WAIS-IV performance and suggest that WAIS-IV may not fully capture the intellectual abilities of bilingual individuals, even when they are fluent in the test language and have the same educational experience as the norm population.
Mathematical computation skills are a common vulnerability in those born very preterm (VP), but the underlying cognitive mechanisms have not been established. Using causal mediation methods, we aimed to investigate whether working memory, processing speed, and selective attention at 7 years of age could mediate the relationship between VP birth and mathematics computation performance at 13 and 20 years of age.
Methods:
Participants completed standardized measures of working memory, processing speed, and selective attention at 7 years. At 13 and 20 years, participants completed a standardized measure of mathematical computation. Using an interventional effects approach, we estimated the extent to which differences in mathematic performance could be reduced by hypothetically intervening on working memory, processing speed, and selective attention in childhood.
Results:
The VP group performed lower than the FT group on mathematic computation at 13 and 20 years. Improving working memory, processing speed, and selective attention separately in the VP group to the level of the FT group reduced the difference in mathematics performance at both 13 and 20 years. If all cognitive domains were to be simultaneously intervened on so that the VP group matched the FT group, there would be a reduction in difference in mathematic performance by 68.7% at 13 years and 44.1% reduction at 20 years.
Conclusions:
Findings from our causal mediation analyses suggest that interventions targeting working memory, processing speed, and selective attention in childhood for those born VP have potential for improving mathematical outcomes in adolescence born VP, especially if implemented concurrently.
Clinical neuropsychology historically emphasized the assessment of “cold” cognitive functions, whereas emotional and motivational processes remain rarely evaluated. This point-of-view article argues for the inclusion of affective–motivational assessment into neuropsychological practice and outlines the key domains that should be routinely considered.
Methods:
Drawing on neuroscience and clinical research, we review four core affective–motivational domains: emotional reactivity, emotion regulation, emotion recognition, and social cognition. For each domain, we summarize self-report instruments and performance-based tasks. Beyond these domains, we discuss emotional-cognitive interference as a cross-cutting modulatory mechanism that may influence overall neuropsychological performance.
Results:
Evidence indicates that emotional and motivational processes shape cognitive functioning, predict functional outcomes, and contribute uniquely to diagnosis, rehabilitation adherence, and quality of life. Validated tools are available for assessing each domain, and many clinical conditions present affective and social disturbances that may be more disabling than cognitive deficits. Despite this, surveys consistently show that affective–motivational domains are rarely assessed in practice.
Conclusions:
Integrating emotional–motivational assessment is essential for achieving a comprehensive characterization of clinically relevant dimensions of everyday functioning. We propose a modular framework guided by referral questions and emphasize the need to develop a brief affective–motivational screener analogous to cognitive screeners such as the Mini-Mental State Examination or Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Systematic assessment of these domains can enhance diagnostic accuracy, strengthen rehabilitation planning, and more accurately reflect the complexity of everyday functioning.
Few studies have examined the relationship between racial identity and baseline assessment performance in collegiate athletes, and even fewer have contextualized results using structural factors linked to test performance. This study examined racial differences in baseline assessment performance before and after controlling for performance on a word-reading task as a proxy for education quality. We hypothesized that there would be racial differences in baseline performance but that controlling for education quality would reduce these differences.
Methods:
For this observational cross-sectional study, 875 collegiate athletes were grouped based on racial identity (White = 661, Black = 165, Another Race = 49) and underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. Cognitive composite scores and intraindividual variability (IIV) were calculated for two neurocognitive domains: attention/processing speed and memory. Education quality was assessed with the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR). ANCOVAs were used to examine racial differences in these cognitive domains before and after controlling for WTAR scores.
Results:
There were significant racial differences in both composite scores and in attention/processing speed IIV, p’s < .001, f = 0.13–0.21. However, there were no significant racial differences in memory IIV, p = .97. After controlling for WTAR scores, there were no significant racial differences in the attention/processing (p = .530, f = 0.03) or memory (p = .183, f = 0.06) composite scores, and the relationship between racial identity and attention/processing speed IIV was less prominent (p = .014, f = 0.10).
Conclusions:
Results suggest that racial differences at baseline assessment can be largely accounted for by education quality as assessed by the WTAR, which underscores the importance of considering sociocultural context when assessing racially diverse athletes.
Pulse pressure (PP) calculated as systolic minus diastolic blood pressure is a surrogate measure of arterial stiffness that may affect executive function; however, this relationship could be moderated by age and genetic risk for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). We therefore examined relationships among PP, age, AD risk (i.e., APOE genotype) and executive function measured by the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) in older adults.
Methods:
PP was determined in 216 older adults without dementia (mean age: 77.5 ± 7.9 years, education: 16.8 ± 2.4 years, 55% women, 34.8% APOE ϵ4+) who were tested with the NIHTB-CB as part of the Advancing Reliable Measurement of Alzheimer’s Disease and Cognitive Aging (ARMADA) study.
Results:
Multiple linear regression revealed PP × Age × APOE genotype interaction effects for List Sorting Working Memory (β = 0.04; p = .007) and Picture Sequence Memory (β = 0.04; p = .006); higher PP was associated with worse scores in younger APOE ϵ4+ older adults (same pattern for fluid and total cognition composite scores). Higher PP was associated with lower Picture Vocabulary scores in ApoE ϵ4+ (PP X APOE interaction: β = −0.19; p = .022). Higher PP was associated with lower Flanker Inhibitory Control scores (β = −0.13; p = .005) across all participants.
Conclusions:
Arterial stiffness measured by PP in older adults is associated with worse performance on NIHTB-CB tests of executive function, working memory, and episodic sequence memory, particularly in younger APOE ϵ4 carriers. Arterial stiffness and AD risk may work synergistically in an age dependent manner to adversely affect cognition.
To develop regression-based normative data for a set of widely used neuropsychological tests and to provide a freely accessible normative data calculator for use in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Methods:
Participants were drawn from a large clinical dataset and selected to reflect preserved global cognition, intact memory performance, and functional independence. Regression-based norms were developed for the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Verbal Fluency, Trail Making Test, and Digit Span tasks. For each model, predictors included age, sex, and years of education, as well as polynomial terms and interaction effects; final models were obtained via stepwise backward elimination procedures. Model assumptions were evaluated, and predictive performance was estimated using 10-fold cross-validation.
Results:
393 participants met inclusion criteria. Age was negatively associated with verbal memory, fluency, and executive function, whereas higher educational attainment was associated with better performance. Women outperformed men in verbal memory and phonological fluency. Demographic variables explained between 2% and 23% of variance across tests. An open-access calculator was developed to facilitate individualized normative estimation in clinical settings.
Conclusions:
This study provides locally developed, regression-based norms for neuropsychological assessment in Buenos Aires – Argentina, addressing the lack of culturally relevant norms and limitations of traditional methods.
Despite its clinical relevance, emotion recognition is difficult to assess in culturally, linguistically, and educationally diverse populations due to a lack of adapted tools.
Objectives:
In Part I, we adapted the Test d’Identification des Émotions Faciales (TIE-93), an emotion recognition test, from French into Dutch, Moroccan-Arabic, and Turkish. In Part II, the translated versions were piloted.
Methods:
The procedures and challenges encountered during the translation and adaptation process are reported qualitatively. The translated versions were piloted, with performance on the TIE-93 compared across Dutch (n = 13), Surinamese (n = 15), Moroccan (n = 14), and Turkish (n = 16) healthy control groups. Second, we compared Surinamese, Moroccan, and Turkish healthy controls to matched patients (n = 20) with subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, or dementia. Third, we compared Moroccan healthy controls from the Netherlands and France (n = 20).
Results:
The challenges encountered during the translation process highlighted the difficulty of translating tests of social cognition, as emotional concepts are intricately linked to culture. As a result, literal translations often failed to maintain meaning equivalence; therefore, adaptations were necessary. Seventy-eight participants were included for piloting, and exploratory analyses were conducted. Healthy controls significantly outperformed patients, and Moroccan healthy controls from the Netherlands, who tested in their native language, significantly performed better than those from France.
Conclusions:
Results highlight challenges in cross-cultural test adaptation in social cognition, as achieving conceptual equivalence was complicated by cultural and linguistic nuances in emotion-related terms. Nevertheless, the TIE-93 shows clinical potential; this should be examined in larger samples.
The goal of the present study is to understand whether youth with Noonan Syndrome Spectrum Disorder (NSSD) are at increased risk of neurocognitive difficulties when living in resource depleted communities.
Method:
Youth (5–17 years; Mage = 9.48 years) with NSSD (n = 140) and unaffected youth (4–15 years; Mage = 9.63 years; n = 85) were included. We ascertained the Child Opportunity Index Health and Environment Index (COI H/E) national-level Z-scores and assessed academic achievement and executive function. Multiple regressions were run to analyze the effects of diagnosis (whether the child had NSSD), COI H/E Z-scores, and diagnosis × COI H/E Z-score interaction on academic achievement (i.e., word reading, math, spelling, and sentence comprehension) and executive skills (i.e., performance-based working memory and processing speed and parent-rated measure of daily executive skills).
Results:
Diagnosis was a significant predictor in each model. COI H/E Z-score was a significant predictor of spelling and a marginally significant predictor of sentence comprehension scores. There was a significant diagnosis × COI H/E Z-score interaction for working memory, and marginally significant interactions for spelling and sentence comprehension scores. Higher H/E Z-scores were associated with better working memory in the NSSD group and better academic achievement in the unaffected group.
Conclusions:
While the effects of NSSD are large on all assessed domains, there is an additional burden of resource depletion on working memory abilities of youth with NSSD. Academic achievement in the NSSD group was lower than the unaffected group across resource-depleted/enriched environments, demonstrating the profound effects of NSSD on academic functioning.
The cognitive-behavioral model of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) implicates impaired cognition; yet existing evidence of cognitive impairment in the disorder is often inconsistent. To date, cognitive performance in BDD has not been measured utilizing the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV), a gold standard cognitive assessment in clinical settings. Accordingly, this study compared WAIS-IV performance between individuals with BDD and healthy controls.
Methods:
Participants included 59 BDD patients and 56 controls. Cognitive performance was evaluated via the WAIS-IV, and clinical characteristics of the BDD group were examined via multiple clinician and self-report questionnaires.
Results:
The BDD group demonstrated significantly poorer performance compared to the control group in the WAIS-IV index and subtests that reflect processing speed abilities (Processing Speed Index: d = −0.55, 95% CI [−0.92, −0.18], Symbol Search: d = −0.70, 95% CI [−1.07, −0.32], Coding: d = −0.79, 95% CI [−1.17, −0.41]), yet other indices were not significantly different. These impairments were not correlated with anxiety or BDD-YBOCS symptom severity. Reduced overall cognitive performance was primarily driven by impairments in processing speed.
Conclusions:
The study suggests that in BDD, processing speed is notably lower than other index scores, falling in the low average range. This may reflect difficulties with rapid visual processing, attention to detail, or motor speed. Performance in domains reflective of reasoning and verbal functioning were unimpaired relative to controls. This selective cognitive pattern in BDD may be driven by increased cognitive load associated with perfectionistic traits. This has clinical implications for cognitive-behavioral treatment.