Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a fatal condition affecting older people. This study aims to identify specific risk factors for VTE in older psychiatric in-patients within mental hospital settings. Using predefined search terms, we searched five databases to capture studies evaluating risk factors associated with the occurrence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in older psychiatric in-patients.

Thirteen studies were identified, and a narrative synthesis performed. Increasing age was a consistent risk factor for VTE. Diagnosis and psychotropic medication use were inconsistent. Depression, catatonia and use of restraint in people with dementia were associated with higher risks.

Older psychiatric in-patients differ from medical and surgical in-patients in their risk profiles. Screening tools used in general hospital patients are of limited use among older adults in psychiatric hospital settings. An exclusive screening tool to identify VTE risk factors in older psychiatric in-patients is needed.

Helplines and crisis lines are a standard component of a public health approach which appear to be intuitively supportive and useful to a population in acute distress and prevent severely adverse outcomes i.e., suicide. These services exist in different formats throughout the world. They have the advantage of being widely accessible, approachable, and bypass the waiting times and bureaucracies of referral systems for accessing secondary mental health services. The authors set out to study the range of outcomes used to evaluate mental health helplines and crisis lines. The focus was not simply to explore whether mental health helplines were effective or not. Rather the authors wanted to investigate what outcomes were being considered as evidence.

The authors aimed to conduct a systematic review of evidence for mental health outcomes of service users of helplines and crisis lines.

The research question was, ‘What outcomes are evidenced in published literature for mental health helplines and/or crisis lines in terms of efficacy, effectiveness or efficiency?’

This was a systematic review of literature using the PRISMA-2020 statement. Literature searches of Web of Science, Ovid (PsycINFO, Medline, EMBASE), PubMed and Scopus were conducted in December 2022. Relevant information from eligible studies was extracted by using a structured data extraction form. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess quality of the included studies. While the heterogeneity of studies prevented a meta-analysis, it provided a rich landscape for exploring the topic through a thematic analysis.

Eighteen studies finally met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The projects studied used both trained professionals and volunteers trained to offer crisis intervention. Both qualitative and quantitative outcomes were evaluated across the studies. Outcomes were frequently subjective assessments of service users and/or the personnel delivering the intervention. Studies evaluated outcomes in various ways. Anonymity of the callers made long-term follow-up difficult in most cases, though it is understandable that anonymity might have contributed to the helpline being more accessible and less intimidating to the callers. MMAT scores showed the papers have a range of methodological soundness.

There is lack of consensus and uniformity regarding what outcomes can evidence the efficacy, efficiency, and effectiveness of mental health helplines. Before more investment in helplines, there needs to be discussion, planning and understanding among policy makers and service developers in deciding what they want to achieve from a mental health helpline. This will help researchers focus on relevant outcomes to evaluate mental health helplines. Services need clarity regarding what difference they are trying to make when such helplines are set up.

Measure compliance with standards requiring baseline work up before Lithium therapy is commenced and subsequent Lithium level monitoring during the initiation phase

All inpatients and outpatients who were started on Lithium between 2018 and 2019 within the Leicestershire Partnership NHS trust. Case notes were of patients 128 were retrieved from the electronic system and an audit proforma was completed to ascertain adherence to auditing standards as per BNF and trust guidelines. Parameters monitored were full blood count (FBC), renal functions test including serum electrolytes, thyroid function test, and BMI before commencing Lithium, and serum Lithium periodically after. ECG was needed for those patients with cardiovascular illness. Data were systematically compiled and analyzed descriptively using Microsoft Excel

A total of 128 patients were included in the study. 111 (86.71%) had FBC, 118 (92.19%) had renal function test and electrolytes, 114 (89.06%) had thyroid function test while 99 (77.34%) had their BMI/weight recorded before initiating Lithium. 26 out of 36 patients with cardiovascular disorder had their ECG recorded. After Lithium was commenced, 108 (84.37%) had serum Lithium tested a week later, while only 89 (69.53%) had lithium monitored weekly. Trust guidelines recommend weekly monitoring for up to 4 weeks after a stable dose was reached. This was monitored in only 16 out of 128 patients.

Most of the patients had blood test done before being commenced on Lithium. However it was observed that serum Lithium was not adequately monitored at regular intervals after dose escalations. These finding indicate that there has to be greater awareness of the trust and BNF guidelines with regards to Lithium monitoring.