Objectives: Since 1988, four government-funded health technologyassessment (HTA) agencies have been established in Canada. This paperis a descriptive review of reports issued by these organizationsduring the period from 1988 to 1998.
Methods: Publications from the national and three provincial HTAagencies in Canada were obtained and reviewed. Only the 117assessment reports that were reported to have undergone externalreview were included in this analysis. Each report was classified ona standard abstraction form according to criteria such as technologytype(s), assessment focus, whether a specific policy question wasclearly stated and relevant decision maker(s) identified, descriptionof search strategy and selection criteria, sources of data andassessment methods used, whether recommendations or conclusions weremade, and duplication or overlap of reports. The trends in thesequalities over the 10-year period were also examined.
Results: Therapeutic technologies have received the most attentionfrom all four agencies, although the focus on devices, drugs, andprocedures varied between agencies. The policy question underinvestigation was clearly identified in 82% of reports, and 71% clearly identified the decision maker toward whom the assessment wastargeted. Efficacy or effectiveness was examined in 81% of reports,and costs were assessed in 65% of studies. These were the two mostfrequently examined aspects. Almost all assessments were descriptiveliterature reviews; 9% included meta-analyses and 32% had costanalyses or economic evaluations. Forty-four percent of reports had aclear description of the literature search strategy, and selectioncriteria were clearly specified in 38% of studies, but there wasconsiderable variation among agencies in the level of descriptionof these methods. Conclusions were clearly stated in 83% of the assessments' conclusions, and 13% had recommendations. When analyzedlongitudinally, it is apparent that the quality of reports hasimproved markedly during the past decade. This was determined byexamining the clarity of specifying the policy question(s) underinvestigation, the identification of the target audience of decisionmakers for the information, and by evaluating the thoroughness of thedescription of the methods used in the assessment.
Conclusions: Canadian government agencies have contributed aconsiderable quantity of health technology assessments. There hasbeen very little duplication of technologies evaluated, and thequality of the assessment reports has markedly improved during thepast decade.