We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Plugging of a hydraulic fracture because of particle bridging in the fracture channel is ubiquitous in drilling operations and reservoir stimulations. The particles transported in the fluid and fracture can aggregate under certain conditions and finally form a plug. The plug reduces the permeability of the flow channel and blocks the fluid pressure from reaching the fracture front, leading to fracture arrest. In this paper, a numerical model is developed to describe the plugging process of a hydraulic fracture driven by a slurry of solid particles in a viscous fluid while accounting for the rock deformation, slurry flow in the fracture channel, fracture propagation, particle transport and bridging. Three dimensionless numbers are derived from the governing equations, which reveal two length scales that control the fracture propagation and particle transport behaviour, respectively. The difference in magnitude between the two length scales implies three limiting regimes for fracture propagation, i.e. static regime, fluid-driven regime and slurry-driven regime, which correspond to fracture arrest, fracture driven by clean fluid, and fracture driven by slurry, respectively. Numerical results show that the fracture will sequentially transition through the static regime, fluid-driven regime and slurry-driven regime as the fracture length increases. The transition between regimes is controlled by the ratio between the two length scales. Simulation results also reveal two plugging modes, with the plug located near the fracture tip region and at the fracture inlet. The transition between the two plugging modes is controlled by the ratio of the length scales and the injected particle concentration.
Large datasets, combined with modeling techniques, provide a quantitative way to estimate when known archaeological sites will be impacted by climatological changes. With over 4,000 archaeological sites recorded on the coast of Georgia, USA, the state provides an ideal opportunity to compare methods. Here, we compare the popular passive “bathtub” modeling with the dynamic Sea Level Affecting Marshes Model (SLAMM) combined with the Marshes Equilibrium Model (MEM). The goal of this effort is to evaluate prior modeling and test the benefits of more detailed ecological modeling in assessing site loss. Our findings indicate that although rough counts of archaeological sites destroyed by sea-level rise (SLR) are similar in all approaches, using the latter two methods provides critical information needed in prioritizing site studies and documentation before irrevocable damages occur. Our results indicate that within the next 80 years, approximately 40% of Georgia's coastal sites will undergo a loss of archaeological context due to wetlands shifting from dry ecological zones to transitional marshlands or submerged estuaries and swamps.
Includes 'The Will of Roger Benetheton, 1438/9', edited by the late Rev. R. M. Serjeantson (A Latin transcription with English translation of a will entered on the court rolls of Higham Ferrers, Northamptonshire.).
'Ancient Bedfordshire Deeds II: Deeds relating to Elstow,' by F. A, Page-Turner (Sixty-six deeds made between 1553 and 1665, transcribed, translated, abstracted or listed.).
'Ancient Indictments, 1341-2,' by G. Herbert Fowler (Latin transcriptions with English translations of Indictments in the court of King's Bench, with an introduction.).
'Selections from Jury Lists,' by the Rev. J. E. Brown (Jurors are listed by parish for 1780, 1785, 1791, 1798, 1800, 1810, 1820 and 1830. Most parishes are included but a notable exception is Bedford itself. The introduction summarises the qualifications for serving on a jury.)
Includes 'The Assessment of Knight Service in Bedfordshire, no. 2', by John E. Morris. 'St. John of SouthilI', by F. A. Page-Turner. 'Some Saxon Charters', by G. Herbert Fowler. 'A Late Example of a Deodand', by William Austin. 'Domesday Notes II: Kenemondwick', by G. Herbert Fowler. 'The Hillersdens of Elstow', by F. A. Page-Turner. 'Grant of Free Warren to Newnham Priory', by J. Hamson. 'Cutenho, Farley Hospital, and Kurigge', by William Austin. 'Munitions in 1224', by G. Herbert Fowler. 'The Becher Family of Howbury', by F. A. Page-Turner. 'Yttingaford and the Tenth-Century Bounds of Chalgrave and Linslade,’ by Frederick G. Gurney. 'The Paper Register of St. Mary's Church in Bedford, 1539-1558', by the Rev. A. G. Kealey. 'Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem No. I,’ by G. Herbert Fowler. 'Notes and queries: Information requested on some Anglo-Saxon charters; ancient parish maps; Simon Fitz; and healing wells.'.
In memoriam C. G. C. (Clifford Gore Chambers, d. 1913). 'The Bedfordshire Wills and Administrations Proved at Lambeth Palace and in the Archdeaconry of Huntingdon', by F. A. Page Turner. 'The Beauchamps, Barons of Eaton', by G. Herbert Fowler. 'Ancient Bedfordshire Deeds, No. 1', by F. A. Page Turner. 'Records of Northill College, No. 2', by C. Gore Chambers. 'Bedfordshire Charters in the Missenden Cartulary', by G. Herbert Fowler. 'The Browne Family of Arlesey', by F. A. Page Turner. 'Markets and Fairs of Luton', by William Austin. 'The Assessment of Knight Service in Bedfordshire, No. 1', by John E. Morris. 'Materies Genealogica, No. 1', by F. A. Page Turner. 'An early Bedfordshire taxation', by Mrs. Hilary Jenkinson. 'A Commutation of Villan (sic) services', by William Austin. 'Records of Knight Service in Bedfordshire’, by G. Herbert Fowler. 'Notes and replies – Ravensden and Chainhalle; Toddington place names 1453; Luton names in the xiith century; duties on bricks'.
Includes 'The Beauchamps, Barons of Bedford', by C. Gore Chambers and G. Herbert Fowler. 'Clerical Subsidies in the Archdeaconry of Bedford, 1390-2, 1400-1', by J. E. Brown. 'Domesday Notes', by G. Herbert Fowler. 'A Lease of Caddington Manor in 1299', by C. Gore Chambers. 'Sir William Harper, Knt.', by F. A. Page-Turner. 'Early Charters of the Priory of Chicksand', by G. Herbert Fowler. 'Notes on Two Trades: (i) Strawplaiting, (ii) Brickmaking', by William Austin. 'The Bedford Eyre, 1202', by G. Herbert Fowler. 'Records of Northill College, No. I', by C. Gore Chambers.
In a very interesting note on Eels and Eel-catching in Bedfordshire, Mr. Steele Elliott has criticised my suggested identification of these two manors, on the ground that the mill at Chainhalle paid as part rent in Domesday Book thirty shillings and a hundred eels:
“judging from its comparatively high rental [this mill] must have been one of the most important in the county. Therefore we can reasonably presume the position of this Manor was adjoining the Ouse, and not remote from any important stream.” The actual money rent is no doubt high, but we cannot now gauge the factors which produced that (accessibility, water-power, population, area under grain, etc.). As regards the eels, I venture to think that the criticism is not destructive. In the first place, a hundred eels was not an exceptional number, but about the average paid by eel-rented mills in Beds. (2610 eels ÷ 25 mills); nine out of the twenty-five mills paid less, six paid more. Again, Mr. Elliott does not seem to have made sufficient allowance for the general lowering of the water level all over the county due to the ‘ drayning and imbanking ‘ of the fens. What is now the inconsiderable stream on which presumably the Ravensden Mill stood, would be larger, and the area of which it can be said today “the ground is swampy and often covered by water from the overflow of the streams,” would then offer harbourage enough for eels.
That there was a mill at Ravensden in early times is shown by the inquisition post mortem of William de Beauchamp (II B) in 1262. To clinch the matter, the manor of Putenehou (Putnoe in Goldington), the position of which is not disputed, lay just on the other side of the stream from Ravensden, and similarly paid a rent of a hundred eels. The probable position of these mills is less than three miles from the Ouse.