We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The evidence-based psychological therapy for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) delivered by mental health professionals who are trained and regulated by a professional standards authority. In recent years, people with OCD have reported consulting unqualified and unregulated coaches. We aimed to explore the experience of people who sought unregulated coaching for OCD. Using semi-structured interviews, we explored the lived experiences of 13 people with OCD who have undertaken sessions with an unqualified individual (referred to as a ‘coach’). Thematic analysis was conducted. There were four coaches rated negatively and one rated positively. Four over-arching themes were identified in the coaches who were rated negatively: (1) Appealing content, (2) Vulnerability, (3) Cult-like experience, and (4) Complex peer relationships. There were some positive experiences of coaching described, such as positive peer support from others receiving coaching in group chats. Many of the experiences documented by people who received OCD coaching were negative. It was highlighted that unqualified coaches may increase vulnerability of people seeking OCD treatment, due to unprofessional conduct. We suggest that this unprofessional conduct may be investigated by a regulator. We suggest that people seeking OCD treatment seek help from qualified professionals and that clinicians are aware of the potential negative effects such coaches can have on people.
Key learning aims
(1) To understand the potential risks, vulnerabilities and potential positive aspects associated with unregulated coaching for individuals seeking OCD treatment.
(2) To discuss our findings to promote informed decision-making by encouraging individuals with OCD to seek treatment from regulated and qualified mental health professionals.
(3) Increase clinician awareness of the potential harms associated with unqualified coaching and equip them to guide patients towards evidence-based treatment options.
Zuranolone is an investigational positive allosteric modulator of synaptic and extrasynaptic GABAA receptors and a neuroactive steroid in clinical development as a once-daily, oral, 14-day treatment course for adults with major depressive disorder or postpartum depression (PPD). The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled SKYLARK Study (NCT04442503) demonstrated that zuranolone 50 mg significantly improved depressive symptoms (as assessed by 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression total score) at Day 15 (primary endpoint; p<0.001) and was generally well tolerated in adults with PPD.
Methods
In the SKYLARK Study, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive zuranolone 50 mg or placebo for 14 days. Safety and tolerability were assessed by the incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), rates of dose reduction and treatment discontinuation, as well as weight gain and sexual dysfunction.
Results
The SKYLARK Study assessed safety data from 98 patients treated with zuranolone 50 mg and 98 patients treated with placebo. TEAEs were reported in 66.3% of zuranolone-treated patients and 53.1% of placebo-treated patients. In patients that experienced TEAEs, most reported mild (zuranolone, 50.8%; placebo, 75%) or moderate (zuranolone, 44.6%; placebo, 23.1%) events. The most common (≥5%) TEAEs were somnolence (26.5%), dizziness (13.3%), sedation (11.2%), headache (9.2%), diarrhea (6.1%), nausea (5.1%), urinary tract infection (5.1%), and COVID-19 (5.1%) with zuranolone, and headache (13.3%), dizziness (10.2%), nausea (6.1%), and somnolence (5.1%) with placebo. Dose reduction due to TEAEs was 16.3% in patients receiving zuranolone vs 1.0% in patients receiving placebo; the most common TEAEs (>1 patient) leading to zuranolone dose reduction were somnolence (7.1%), dizziness (6.1%), and sedation (3.1%). Treatment discontinuation due to TEAEs was 4.1% in patients receiving zuranolone vs 2.0% in patients receiving placebo; TEAEs leading to zuranolone discontinuation in >1 patient included somnolence (2.0%). Serious TEAEs were reported in 2.0% of zuranolone-treated and 0% of placebo-treated patients; these included upper abdominal pain (1.0%, [1/98]), peripheral edema (1.0%, [1/98]), perinatal depression (1.0%, [1/98]), and hypertension (1.0%, [1/98]). Per investigators, serious TEAEs were not related to zuranolone. No signals for weight gain or sexual dysfunction were identified.
Conclusions
In adults with PPD, zuranolone 50 mg was generally well tolerated. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. Dose reduction due to TEAEs mainly resulted from somnolence, dizziness, and sedation, while treatment discontinuation due to TEAEs was low. No signals for weight gain or sexual dysfunction were identified.
Background: Infection Prevention (IP) practices in ambulatory care are often reactive and many communicable diseases in the community often do not fall onto IP’s radar until the patient becomes ill enough to seek inpatient services. The gap between ambulatory and inpatient care can lead to increased transmission and illness severity. Early identification has substantial impacts on timely implementation of IP mitigation strategies, appropriate handoff upon entry into other care settings, and timely reporting to public health organizations. Current IP processes underutilize electronic health record (EHR) capabilities by relying upon lab driven notifications. This project sought to redesign the IP’s workflows, advancing the health system beyond the acute care setting and into the ambulatory care setting by adding the power of diagnosis codes to close a practice gap. Method: Infection Prevention and Information Technology collaborated to build silent best practice advisories (BPAs) in the EHR that utilized diagnosis codes related to Varicella zoster (VZV) infection charted by ambulatory care providers. These BPAs function by triggering infection statuses that populate the patient chart and include instructions to front line staff on personal protective equipment (PPE) requirements. These BPAs also trigger real-time notifications to the IP team to determine the validity of the infection status and exposure work-up necessity. Chart reviews of diagnosis codes utilized in pre and post intervention timeframes were completed to understand the impact of the silent BPAs. Percentages of patients captured, and Healthcare Worker (HCW) exposure reviews reported were evaluated to demonstrate effectiveness. Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) was utilized to respond to gaps, increase efficiency, and limit erroneous infection statuses. Result: The one-year pre-intervention period revealed 36 total diagnosis codes used for Varicella zoster (VZV) infection; 3% of these infection cases were captured and 4% of eligible cases were reported for HCW exposure review. The one-year post intervention period revealed 40 total diagnosis codes used for VZV infection; 80% of these infection cases were captured and 70% of eligible cases were reported for HCW exposure review. PDSA quality improvement cycles allowed for refinement of the BPA logic that further increased infection cases captured to 100% with 100% of eligible cases reported for HCW exposure review. Conclusion: Utilizing the EHR, the organization appreciated enhanced identification of patients in real-time with VZV infection that allowed for appropriate mitigation strategies to be implemented. This proactive workflow design helps minimize the risk of transmission between ambulatory and acute settings and facilitated HCW exposure reviews.
Neurological involvement associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection is increasingly recognized. However, the specific characteristics and prevalence in pediatric patients remain unclear. The objective of this study was to describe the neurological involvement in a multinational cohort of hospitalized pediatric patients with SARS-CoV-2.
Methods:
This was a multicenter observational study of children <18 years of age with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection or multisystemic inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C) and laboratory evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children, admitted to 15 tertiary hospitals/healthcare centers in Canada, Costa Rica, and Iran February 2020–May 2021. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed and logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with neurological involvement.
Results:
One-hundred forty-seven (21%) of 697 hospitalized children with SARS-CoV-2 infection had neurological signs/symptoms. Headache (n = 103), encephalopathy (n = 28), and seizures (n = 30) were the most reported. Neurological signs/symptoms were significantly associated with ICU admission (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.15–2.55; p = 0.008), satisfaction of MIS-C criteria (OR: 3.71, 95% CI: 2.46–5.59; p < 0.001), fever during hospitalization (OR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.46–3.15; p < 0.001), and gastrointestinal involvement (OR: 2.31, 95% CI: 1.58–3.40; p < 0.001). Non-headache neurological manifestations were significantly associated with ICU admission (OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.08–3.42; p = 0.026), underlying neurological disorders (OR: 2.98, 95% CI: 1.49–5.97, p = 0.002), and a history of fever prior to hospital admission (OR: 2.76, 95% CI: 1.58–4.82; p < 0.001).
Discussion:
In this study, approximately 21% of hospitalized children with SARS-CoV-2 infection had neurological signs/symptoms. Future studies should focus on pathogenesis and long-term outcomes in these children.
Cognitive developmental research continues to shift from a mechanistic paradigm toward a more contextualized approach, especially in the search to uncover contextual factors that may play a role in cognitive development (see Rogoff, Dahl, & Callahan, 2018). This is certainly the case in the memory literature, where there exists rich documentation of children’s memory skills, but less research on the origins of mnemonic strategies and how they are supported by contextual aspects of children’s everyday lives. This chapter builds on the existing literature on children’s deliberate memory and strategy use and highlights one exemplar of this shift, namely the evolution of a program of research by Ornstein, Coffman and colleagues, the Classroom Memory Study. This collaborative work began as an effort to characterize children’s changing skills over time while simultaneously working to identify mechanisms in the elementary classroom context that may underlie children’s developing strategies for remembering – and has now evolved to include an examination of other cognitive outcomes as well as the development of experimental manipulations that can lead to teacher interventions that may facilitate children’s cognitive growth.
To develop an international template to support patient submissions in Health Technology Assessments (HTAs). This was to be based on the experience and feedback from the implementation and use of the Scottish Medicines Consortium's (SMC) Summary Information for Patient Groups (SIP).
Methods
To gather feedback on the SMC experience, web-based surveys were conducted with pharmaceutical companies and patient groups familiar with the SMC SIP. Semistructured interviews with representatives from HTA bodies were undertaken, along with patient group discussions with those less familiar with the SIP, to explore issues around the approach. These qualitative data informed the development of an international SIP template.
Results
Survey data indicated that 82 percent (18 of 22 respondents) of pharmaceutical company representatives felt that the SIP was worthwhile; 88 percent (15/17) of patient group respondents found the SIP helpful. Both groups highlighted the need for additional support and guidance around plain language summaries. Further suggestions included provision of a glossary of terms and cost-effectiveness information. Patient group interviews supported the survey findings and led to the development of a new template. HTA bodies raised potential challenges around buy-in, timing, and bias connected to the SIP approach.
Conclusions
The international SIP template is another approach to support deliberative processes in HTA. Although challenges remain around writing summaries for lay audiences, along with feasibility considerations for HTA bodies, the SIP approach should support more meaningful patient involvement in HTAs.
The introduction situates the book amid the dangers and opportunities for feminism in the twenty-first century and argues for its importance in addressing a gap in contemporary feminist literary studies. It also offers summaries of the chapters, explains the sectioning of the book into the sections ‘Frontiers’, ‘Fields’, and‘Forms’, and offers reflections on the process of feminist commissioning.
Guides on being a feminist by writers such as Caitlin Moran are increasingly popular. This chapter contrasts these new feminist manuals with the recent resurgence of feminist manifestos. It examines common features in manuals by Moran, Laurie Penny, Roxanne Gay, Chamananda Ngozi Adichie, and Emer O’Toole, including their narrative tone and their reluctance to engage with the rich legacy feminist work that precedes them. Feminism, in these works, is an individual realisation rather than an encounter with history or a political change induced by reading or activism. In contrast, Sara Ahmed’s ‘Killjoy Manifesto’, the document ‘Xenofeminism: A Politics for Alienation’ by the collective Laboria Cuboniks, and the Trans Heath Manifesto by activists from Edinburgh Action for Trans Health, provide exciting points from which to think about collective action, showing solidarity, and the importance of feminist knowledge-sharing. The chapter concludes that feminist manuals fail to move feminist thinking forward, whereas the manifestos speak directly to the problems, challenges, and political opportunities of collective feminist action in the twenty-first century.
The New Feminist Literary Studies presents sixteen essays by leading and emerging scholars that examine contemporary feminism and the most pressing issues of today. The book is divided into three sections. This first section , 'Frontiers', contains essays on issues and phenomena that may be considered, if not new, then newly and sometimes uneasily prominent in the public eye: transfeminism, the sexual violence highlighted by #MeToo, Black motherhood, migration, sex worker rights, and celebrity feminism. Essays in the second section, 'Fields', specifically intervene into long-constituted or relatively new academic fields and areas of theory: disability studies, eco-theory, queer studies, and Marxist feminism. Finally, the third section, 'Forms', is dedicated to literary genres and tackles novels of domesticity, feminist dystopias, young adult fiction, feminist manuals and manifestos, memoir, and poetry. Together these essays provide new interventions into the thinking and theorising of contemporary feminism.
Chapter 1 examines autobiographical accounts of rape in Tracey Emin’s Strangeland (2005), Jana Leo’s Rape New York (2009), and Virginie Despentes’s King Kong Theory (2006). Starting with Emin’s naming and shaming of her rapist as feminist praxis, the chapter continues by focusing upon the powerfully political messages about rape and its social significance delivered by Leo and Despentes. The close readings I offer in this chapter demonstrate that what may initially be recognised as factual descriptions of violence are accounts skilfully crafted to deliver maximum intensity, or what I term ‘affective audacity’. This is channelled to persuade the reader to agree with the wider societal arguments they make. The chapter pays considerable attention to the formal and rhetorical structure of what I describe as ‘body-essays’ to argue that Leo and Despentes repurpose their sexual traumas to argue against social inequality, and that all three authors exhibit new audacity in their resistance of victimhood and refusal of silence.
A short afterward suggests the new audacity archive can be expanded through the inclusion of other writers not tackled in this text and that we will need feminism’s new audacity in these troubled times.