Patients with hematological malignancies are at high risk of infections due to both the disease and the associated treatments. The use of immunoglobulin (Ig) to prevent infections is increasing in this population, but its cost effectiveness is unknown. This trial-based economic evaluation aimed to compare the cost effectiveness of prophylactic Ig with prophylactic antibiotics in patients with hematological malignancies.

The economic evaluation used individual patient data from the RATIONAL feasibility trial, which randomly assigned 63 adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, multiple myeloma, or lymphoma to prophylactic Ig or prophylactic antibiotics. The following two analyses were conducted to estimate the cost effectiveness of the two treatments over the 12-month trial period from the perspective of the Australian health system:

(i) a cost-utility analysis (CUA) to assess the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained using data collected with the EuroQol 5D-5L questionnaire; and

(ii) a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) to assess the incremental cost per serious infection prevented (grade ≥3) and per infection prevented (any grade).

The total cost per patient was significantly higher in the Ig arm than in the antibiotic arm (difference AUD29,140 [USD19,000]). There were non-significant differences in health outcomes between the treatment arms: patients treated with Ig had fewer QALYs (difference −0.072) and serious infections (difference −0.26) than those given antibiotics, but more overall infections (difference 0.76). The incremental cost-effectiveness from the CUA indicated that Ig was more costly than antibiotics and associated with fewer QALYs. In the CEA, Ig costed an additional AUD111,262 (USD73,000) per serious infection prevented, but it was more costly than antibiotics and associated with more infections when all infections were included.

These results indicate that, on average, Ig prophylactic treatment may not be cost effective compared with prophylactic antibiotics for the group of patients with hematological malignancies recruited to the RATIONAL feasibility trial. Further research is needed to confirm these findings in a larger population and over the longer term.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 (HIV-1), cardiovascular disease, and HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) disproportionately affect Black/African American individuals compared to other racial and ethnic groups. Understanding the mechanisms of cognitive health disparities is essential for developing policy and health interventions to combat such disparities. Cardiovascular risk factors/diseases are common comorbidities that likely contribute to cognitive health disparities among Black/African American people living with HIV (PWH), but their impacts on cognition longitudinally in this population are unclear. The current study examines the relationship between cardiovascular risk and cognitive functioning over time in Black/African American adults living with HIV.

A sample of 122 Black/African American adults with HIV (ages 25-68, M=51.8, SD=7.7; 98% on antiretroviral therapy; 91% with undetectable viral load) were selected from the Drexel/Temple Comprehensive NeuroHIV Center, Clinical and Translational Research Support Core (CTRSC; based at Drexel University College of Medicine) Cohort. They completed longitudinal visits (300 total visits, average follow-up time=4.9 years) that included clinical interviews, medical record review, biometric measurements, and comprehensive neuropsychological assessments. Cardiovascular risk factors of interest were body mass index (BMI), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), and a total vascular risk burden score (VBS) representing five risk factors: obesity, central obesity, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Based on a prior principal component analysis, three cognitive domains were examined: (1) verbal fluency, (2) visual memory/visuoconstruction, and (3) motor speed/executive functions. Mixed models were used to examine domain-specific cognitive trajectories in relation to baseline cardiovascular risk factors and changes in cardiovascular risk factors.

Overall, cognitive test performance improved over time (p<.003). Baseline VBS was marginally associated with longitudinal change in verbal fluency (p=.06). Participants with low baseline VBS (0-1 risk factors) demonstrated improvement in verbal fluency (p=.002), while those with higher VBS (2-5 risk factors) demonstrated stability in verbal fluency. In contrast, greater increases in BMI and in WHtR predicted more favorable trajectories in motor speed/executive function (both p<.001). Patients with increasing BMI over time improved in this domain (p=.02), while patients with stable or decreasing BMI did not. A similar pattern was observed for WHtR change. No vascular risk factors were associated with trajectories of visual memory/visuoconstruction.

Higher total vascular risk burden was associated with less favorable verbal fluency trajectories, reflecting the negative cognitive consequences of disorders such as diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Unexpectedly, greater increases in BMI and WHtR were associated with more favorable trajectories in motor speed and executive functioning. In this population, weight gain may be a proxy for other positive health factors, such as immune reconstitution, which will be examined in future analyses. Taken together, cardiovascular risk factors have heterogeneous associations with cognitive trajectories, emphasizing the importance of examining the mechanisms of these varying relationships. Future research will examine how social determinants of health, such as racial/ethnic discrimination, contribute to disparities in cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive outcomes.