We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This article illustrates how contemporary Durkheim studies offer a corrective to previous misinterpretations. They stress the significance of his work for subsequent developments in cultural sociology and his contribution to our understanding of solidarity, which has informed recent developments in civil society theorizing.
Peter Kivisto is the Richard A. Swanson Professor of Social Thought at Augustana College and International Reader at the University of Helsinki’s Center for Research on Ethnic Relations and Nationalism (CEREN). He is the author or editor of 37 books and over 180 articles and book chapters.
This ambitious two-volume handbook of social theory consists of forty original contributions. The researchers take stock of the state of social theory and its relationship to the canon, exploring such topics as the nature, purpose, and meaning of social theory; the significance of the classics; the impact of specific individual and theory schools; and more. Both volumes reflect a mixture of what intellectual historian Morton White distinguished as the 'annalist of ideas' and the 'analyst of ideas,' locating theoretical thought within the larger socio-historical context that shaped it - within the terrain of the sociology of knowledge. Exploring the contemporary relevance of theories in a manner that is historically situated and sensitive, this impressive and comprehensive set will likely stand the test of time.
This ambitious two-volume handbook of social theory consists of forty original contributions. The researchers take stock of the state of social theory and its relationship to the canon, exploring such topics as the nature, purpose, and meaning of social theory; the significance of the classics; the impact of specific individual and theory schools; and more. Both volumes reflect a mixture of what intellectual historian Morton White distinguished as the 'annalist of ideas' and the 'analyst of ideas,' locating theoretical thought within the larger socio-historical context that shaped it - within the terrain of the sociology of knowledge. Exploring the contemporary relevance of theories in a manner that is historically situated and sensitive, this impressive and comprehensive set will likely stand the test of time.
The development of a civil sphere implies the existence of a specific form of solidarity, broader than those created by physical co-presence, emotional attachment, repeated interaction, resource exchange, and political or religious homophily. Such a solidary sphere, sustained by a distinctive set of symbolic codes and embedded in specialized institutions, is a key element in the working of any complex, modern society and is a requisite for democratic governance in pluralist societies (Alexander 2006:38). It is, however, far from being the overarching, or even dominant, form of social organization. On the contrary, it is constantly encroached by the functional imperatives of other social spheres. It is often torn apart by the diverse (more particularistic) logics that other spheres nurture and advance. In any of its actually existing forms, moreover, the civil sphere is also highly fragmented and imperfect. Conceived, in principle, as an imagined community of equals, its actual practices are always defined by the particularistic understanding of its most established core groups.