What is the “standing decision” rule that guides the French voter? Party or ideology? Converse and Pierce (1993), commenting on their 1986 volume, say that “the tilt of our diverse tests actually favored party.” Our tests point in the opposite direction, favoring ideology (Fleury and Lewis-Beck 1993). This disagreement is but a part of a larger debate in the literature on explanations of French electoral behavior. We hope, by reviewing key aspects of the disagreement, light will be cast on broader concerns. We begin with the modeling issue, then take up the matter of data and measures. We conclude with analysis of a newer, and perhaps better, data set from the 1988 elections. In that analysis, we offer a straightforward examination of the basic question: Are there more ideological identifiers or party identifiers in the French electorate? As shall be seen, there are many more ideological identifiers.