To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This study aims to assess the perspectives of patients with chronic conditions on the use of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC) tool during consultations with their healthcare providers in primary care.
Background:
The increasing prevalence of chronic conditions, including multimorbidity, poses major challenges to healthcare systems today, particularly in primary care where most chronic care takes place. Effective management strategies are crucial for improving quality of life (QoL). The ABCC tool offers a unique approach to chronic disease management by facilitating shared decision-making and self-management.
Methods:
This qualitative phenomenological study involved semi-structured interviews. Fourteen patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and/or chronic heart failure (CHF) were recruited from a previously conducted quasi-experimental study on the effectiveness of the ABCC tool.
Findings:
Participants generally expressed satisfaction with the comprehensive questionnaire, user-friendly design and clear visualisation. They appreciated the opportunity to facilitate discussions with healthcare providers and help with monitoring. However, some confusion around the grey balloons in the tool highlighted the need for clearer explanations. Participants had limited awareness of advanced treatment recommendation functions.
Conclusions:
This study provides valuable insights into patients’ experiences with the ABCC tool. Despite challenges such as recall bias and limited awareness of certain features, participants generally expressed satisfaction with using the tool. Based on these findings, the tool can be further improved and its use should be further supported. However, the ABCC tool shows promise as a valuable instrument for improving consultations in clinical practice.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.