Head and neck cancer (HNC), characterised by malignant neoplasms originating in the oral cavity, upper aerodigestive tract, the sinuses, salivary glands, bone, and soft tissues of the head and neck, is diagnosed in approximately 600 people annually in New Zealand. Although HNC is a less common cancer, it has a profound effect on almost all aspects of the lives of those affected, particularly the nutritional and social domains. This is due to the common treatment modality being surgery and/or radiotherapy, which can result in major structural and physiological changes in the affected areas, which in turn affects chewing, swallowing, and speaking(1). Specific nutrition impact symptoms (NIS) of HNC have been identified and are significant predictors of reduced dietary intake and malnutrition risk(2). We aimed to identify and describe the malnutrition risk, prevalence of NIS, and protein and energy intake of community living adult HNC survivors 6 months–3 years post treatment in New Zealand. Participants were recruited through virtual HNC support groups in New Zealand. A descriptive observational case series design was used. Malnutrition risk was determined using the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA SF). Malnutrition was defined as a PG-SGA SF score between 2 - 8 (mild/suspected - moderate malnutrition) or ≥9 (severely malnourished). NIS were obtained via a validated symptom checklist specific for HNC patients(3), and dietary data was collected using a four-day food record. Participants (N=7) are referred to as PTP1 – PTP7. PTP1 was well-nourished. PTP3 through PTP7 were categorised as mildly/suspected to moderately malnourished (scores ranged from 2-7), and PTP2 was severely malnourished (score of 16). NIS were experienced by all seven participants, with “difficulty chewing” and “difficulty swallowing” being the most selected and highest scored NIS that interfered with oral intake. PTP2 (severely malnourished) scored loss of appetite, difficulty chewing, and difficulty swallowing highly (interfering “a lot”), indicating a high degree of prevalence and impact. Despite being well-nourished, PTP1 had inadequate energy intake (85.5% of their estimated energy requirement (EER)). PTP2, 3, 6, and 7 also had inadequate energy intake (79.3%, 79.3%, 73.9%, and 99.3%, respectively, of their EER). All participants had adequate protein intake based on a range of 1.2-1.5 g/kg body weight per day. The prevalence of malnutrition and NIS in this case series indicates an urgent need for research to identify the true extent of malnutrition in community living HNC survivors post treatment.